Shaprio's Chat on MLB
Howdy -
Just a head's up that Shaprio had a chat posted on indians.com yesterday, here. It's not a brillant read, as most of it is standard ShapiroSpeak (TM), but the first question in particular should be worth 30-40 posts alone.
Assuming the Dellucci signing happens, Shaprio is thinking that either Choo or Garko will make the team, but apparently not both. In one scenario, I suppose, Garko plays 1B while Blake plays RF, and in the other Blake plays 1B and Choo plays RF.
I suppose this means that one or the other may be traded, though either could be sent back to AAA. I somehow doubt this, though, as we need thier talent level on the ML team - if not directly, then through a trade. Of the two, I think Garko would bring home more, and would likely be the one traded.
As always, I'm open to opinions and interpretations.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
My guess from that comment that the odds of us signing a high profile guy is close to nil. I sure don't see any high profile guys out there with the exception of Zito and Schmidt and it sounded like they weren't going to pursue SPs.
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
I would feel kind of bad if we don't go out and try and sign (overpay) for one of the good SP out there. Our rotation is good, but you can never have too much pitching, and we have all this money to spend.
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
I'm not sure what the players' perception of Cleveland is as far as the clubhouse or their potential to win, but we seem to have a hard time snagging big free agents. I hope I'm wrong about that and it's just all about money, because we can up the payroll to fix that problem. Has any one else gotten that impression?
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
by Kos @ Let's Go Tribe! on Dec 1, 2006 2:13 PM EST reply actions
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
by GermanysTribeFan on Dec 1, 2006 5:25 PM EST reply actions
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
GermanysTribeFan, you're not off to a great start, whining pointlessly about a lineup that will almost certainly be in the top five in run production, possibly leading the majors.
by Jay on Dec 1, 2006 6:13 PM EST up reply actions
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
2-3 guys who were capable of handeling a bullpen job were all it took....trade garko if its a win-win deal like for barfield
by GermanysTribeFan on Dec 1, 2006 6:28 PM EST reply actions
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
Also, the '95 Indians featured the first-base stylings of Paul Sorrento for 323 at-bats and, because of injury, 263 at-bats from Tony Pena. So even in the glory days the Indians didn't field a good 9-person attack.
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
We have seven of them. Platoons are a good thing: they get you solid production from two cheap players. They also (usually) leave you with superior players on your bench every day. I think everyone's favorite site, MLB Trade Rumors, was the one who said it best: "Platoons are the new OBP."
by Kos @ Let's Go Tribe! on Dec 1, 2006 8:15 PM EST up reply actions
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
by GermanysTribeFan on Dec 1, 2006 7:49 PM EST reply actions
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
by chodson28 on Dec 1, 2006 8:22 PM EST up reply actions
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
I know ... I think I'll just invent my own random roster problem -- the catchers don't steal enough bases! -- and then write 20 comments about how the front office is incompetent for not addressing it.
Re: Shaprio's Chat on MLB
by GermanysTribeFan on Dec 2, 2006 8:24 PM EST up reply actions

by 
















