Let's Go Tribe!: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Once A Metro covering Red Bull New York!

Johnson designated for assignment

According to MLB.com

6/20/06  Cleveland Indians
Designated RHP Jason Johnson for assignment; Purchased the contract of INF Joe Inglett from Triple-A Buffalo.  

It feels good, doesn't it?  Hopefully Shapiro can work out a trade in the next 10 (?) days so we don't have to eat the entire contract.

UPDATE: We're waiting for official word, but apparently ...

  • Jeremy Guthrie was optioned back down to Buffalo, where presumably he will rejoin the rotation.
  • RHP Ed Mujica gets his first big-league callup, taking Guthrie's spot in the pen.
  • ... and the big one ...
  • Jeremy Sowers is expected to be promoted from Buffalo to take Johnson's spot in the rotation on Sunday.
  • It would be fair to say that both Sowers and Mujica have terrorized Triple-A hitters this season. Sowers lacks imposing K rates but has allowed only 13 ER in 14 starts, averaging 6.5 innings, five hits and two walks per outing -- and he has allowed only one home run all season. Mujica has allowed zero runs -- yes, zero -- over 39 innings, a span of 24 appearances split equally between Akron and Buffalo -- with a healthy 35 K's along the way. [Jay]

    0 recs  |  Comment 46 comments

    Story-email Email Printer Print

    Comments

    Display:

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Great but how does the saying "a day late and a dollar short". Eating the contract is probably what they deserve for such a stupid signing. I hope Inglett gets a little playing time. Wedge doesn't seem to use his bench much unless somebody is hurt.

    by exileincincy on Jun 20, 2006 3:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    "What they deserve?"

    Whose side are you on?

    That's our money that's getting eaten there!

    by Jay on Jun 21, 2006 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    wow.  do you feel that momentum?  

    by thetravishalffull on Jun 20, 2006 4:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    When I first read this, I thought "Could it be, or am I dreaming?" The truly ironic part is that the "straw that broke the camel's back" wasn't actually that horrible. 3 ER, 5 IP. Yes, I know he still gave up six runs, but you have to admit, the standards are kind of low. The important thing is that he's gone.
    Tribe fan trapped in Illinois

    by Avindian on Jun 20, 2006 4:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Guthrie also got sent back down for Mujica.  Yummy.

    by Thommy on Jun 20, 2006 4:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Would've been better if they'd kept Guthrie and designated Mota for assignment...
    -Erik "Come on Dorn, get in front of the damn ball"

    by drerikbrady on Jun 20, 2006 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Guthrie was bad last night, Mota was decent.

    It comes down to "what have you done for me lately' and "do you have any options?"

    by emd2k3 on Jun 20, 2006 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    As we are probably thinking .... this should have happened a few weeks ago .... patience is a virtue, but we seem to be hanging ourselves with that long leash we like to use ....

    by talonk on Jun 20, 2006 4:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    It took me forever to find the story.  Here's the ESPN link.

    I can't imagine we'd have Inglett and Vazquez both on the club for too long.  Unless another infielder is moved?

    by dgcambridge on Jun 20, 2006 4:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    It's probably for next week's Interleague games.

    Unless Belliard is going to be traded soon.

    by Ryan on Jun 20, 2006 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    On the other diary, someone mentioned that there was a statement about Sowers also coming up.  Any more info on that?

    by dgcambridge on Jun 20, 2006 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Inglett has been playing the OF a lot the last week at Buffalo.  I'd think of him as our superutility guy, not just a backup infielder.

    by Thommy on Jun 20, 2006 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Is Carmona taking Johnson's spot?  Please say yes...

    by APV on Jun 20, 2006 4:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    I'm thrilled, but actually a little surprised.  I sort of figured he'd get a couple more starts, although Wedge's comments after the game yesterday were a pretty obvious clue.  

    I've got to believe that Sowers will be called up to replace one of Inglett or Vazquez (barring a Belliard trade).

    by jdudas on Jun 20, 2006 5:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    I missed Wedge's comments.  What did he say?
    -Erik "Come on Dorn, get in front of the damn ball"

    by drerikbrady on Jun 20, 2006 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    He was talking about how the team needed to have starting pitchers who could keep them in the game.  

    Usually, Wedge is very upbeat and optimistic, looking for the silver lining.  From him, this was clearly a vote of no confidence.

    by jdudas on Jun 20, 2006 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Of course, if Michaels and Blake are on the DL at the same time,  Inglett can be the 5th OF too.  I assume that Hollandsworth and Guiterrez would start, with a little Perez sprinkled in.  

    Dubois really can't blame anyone but himself.  He hasn't put up the numbers.

    by dgcambridge on Jun 20, 2006 5:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    InifiniteMonkeyTypists ... hope you don't mind, I hijacked your Diary for the main story and expanded.  This is headline news, you officially get the scoop.

    by Jay on Jun 20, 2006 5:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    All kinds of news popping today:

    RP Kazuhito Tadano was designated for assignment by the A's on Tuesday.
    Tadano, who came over from the Indians in a trade earlier this season, was 0-2 with a 9.62 ERA in nine games, three starts, at Triple-A Sacramento. Perhaps he should give his former career another shot. Jun. 20 - 4:49 pm et

    by exileincincy on Jun 20, 2006 5:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    The front office is basically announcing to savvy fans that the race is over.

    I'm happy for Inglett.  A player in his career situation is unlikely to get much of a shot except in an emergency -- not during a playoff race.

    by Jay on Jun 20, 2006 5:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    This still doesn't alter the motivational makeup of this team.

    If they continue to play such uninspired ball, I would think Wedge would consider his job in jeopardy. But of course I lack the patented Shapiro patience.

    by emd2k3 on Jun 20, 2006 6:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Maybe the Indians FO reads our posts and waits a few days before following our advice so it's not obvious :-)

    Next, Marte will replace Boone and Kouzmanoff will move up to AAA.

    by kov on Jun 20, 2006 8:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Well, if the statistic cited in Jay's recent Our Starters Don't Suck entry is an accurate reflection of reality, and JJ was actually a league-average pitcher being let down by lousy defense, he is kind of getting the shaft here by being DFA.  I think basically the front office needed a scapegoat of some kind just to make changes, and a fifth starter whose signing was unpopular with a lot of folks to begin with was the easy choice.  Hopefully it works out for the best.

    by Jackdaw on Jun 20, 2006 10:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    I've been thinking about this.  The answer, I think, is that it just isn't that simple.

    I think the fact that Johnson was tradeable -- and to a division-leading team no less -- is an indication that savvy teams know that what I wrote is true.  That is, that Johnson has not been quite as bad as his ERA makes it look.

    The Indians thus get the best of both worlds.  They appear to be making a stand on accountability and improving the team ... but what they are really doing is starting over with a few rookies, and with a clear sense of having little if anything left to lose.

    They may feel that Sowers is being rushed a tad, but on the other hand, he should be under minimal pressure to succeed right out of the gate, as Johnson's successor on a team 15 games out.

    The other thing, which I didn't address in that article, was that Johnson was on a downward trend.    Johnson leaves with a 6.43 RA, 5.96 ERA and 4.93 FIP -- compare with 5.11::4.71::4.91 for Cliff Lee.  So the case that Johnson was getting screwed was clear-cut.

    Take away Johnson's first three starts, however, and it looks a lot worse -- the ERA jumps to 7.93, which even corrected as FIP is still going to be over 6.50.  That's a two-month snapshot.

    The most recent one-month snapshot looks better for ERA, 6.68, and there was even a stretch of 2-of-3 quality starts in there, 3.50 ERA -- that's when I started writing my article.  But that masks the fact that he'd started to give up home runs in bunches -- eight out of his last six starts at this point, after giving up only one in the previous five.

    One wonders if he had started to change his game, having given up on his defense.  It is interesting that Boston, proud new owners of baseball's best infield defense, is not afraid to start him, and is willing to pay some $2.5 million to do it.

    So it's true that he was better than he appeared -- or more to the point of my article, that he had not hurt the team anywhere near to the level being discussed by Indians fans everywhere.  And in that sense, he has been scapegoated.  But it is also true that he seemed to be getting more and more lost as the weeks went by.

    by Jay on Jun 21, 2006 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    I'm very surprised that Boston (a division leader) took him. The thing that stands out in my mind is that in 77 innings he gave up 108 hits. It will be interesting to see if that improves significantly with a better infield.

    I would bet that Johnson isn't going to be any more effective in Boston than he was with us (though he may start out well like he did with us).  Here is what the Plain Dealer wrote today:

    "Clubhouse confidential: There were no departing hugs when Jason Johnson, designated for assignment on Tuesday, left Jacobs Field.

    Johnson marched past everyone without saying a word en route to the players parking lot. "One of the most aloof guys I've ever met," a Tribe official said."

    Doesn't sound like a fun guy to have around the clubhouse.

    by LeftyCatcher on Jun 21, 2006 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    There was a whiff of that in the press conference, a few remarks that seemed to suggest that people didn't feel Johnson was taking responsibility for his results.

    by Jay on Jun 21, 2006 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    It feels similar to the way the Tribe picked up Elarton off the Rockies scrap heap a couple of years ago.  Johnson could turn it around and be respectable the rest of the season for the Red Sox.  

    This is nothing more than "we made and egregious error in judgment signing this guy so please take this salary off our hands" deal.

    Shapiro cutting his losses.  

    by SpringTrainingFun on Jun 21, 2006 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    It'll be interesting to see how Johnson fares in Boston.  Across all of his starts in Cleveland, he was consistently getting ground balls about 60% of the time (a pretty amazing rate).  Jay is right about his home runs, though.  He has started giving up more fly balls over the last month, and more of those have started to go for home runs.  This year 14.7% of the flyballs he allowed went for home runs (courtesy of http://www.fangraphs.com).  That's the highest number of his career and I have to believe not a good number relative to the league.

    by APV on Jun 21, 2006 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Yes, but the current thinking is that that's a random fluctuation, like BABIP, not controllable by the pitcher.

    THT sez:  "Research has shown that about 11% to 12% of outfield flies are hit for home runs. For pitchers, significant variations from 11% are probably the result of "luck," but for hitters this stat is more indicative of a true skill (hitting the ball hard!)."

    by Jay on Jun 21, 2006 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Intuitively that just doens't make a lot of sense to me.  It seems it would be more an indicator of hitters making solid contact, especially on a pitcher whose success is dependent on hitters not making solid contact.  I suppose for any pitcher, regardless of how many home runs they give up, the problem of small sample sizes will always be present...hmmm...

    by APV on Jun 21, 2006 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Yeah, I know.  Stats are a bitch, aren't they?

    by Jay on Jun 21, 2006 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Ok...here are a few numbers, although the small sample size warning holds true for all of this.

    Arbitrarily dividing Johnson's season between April (when Johnson was ok) and post-April (when he was terrible), it's pretty clear his control has suffered.

    His HR/9IP went from 0.28 to 1.79
    His GB/9IP rate remained the same, 20.2-20.1, although, he was allowing more men on base per game and these men seemed to be the result from increased walks (from 2.0/9IP to 3.0/9IP) and more batters making solid contact (LD+FB/9IP 11.5 pre-May, LD+FB/9IP 14.5 post-April).

    The numbers are too small to say anything for sure, but he seemed to lose control and effectiveness.

    by APV on Jun 21, 2006 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Again, it's not quite as simple as saying that pitchers have no control of ball is play.  See my reply to Jay's post on our starters.

    by dgcambridge on Jun 22, 2006 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    You're right, it isn't quite that simple.  But the presumption has always been that the pitcher had most of the control -- hence avg-against has always been considered a revealing stat.  The presumption should lie on the opposite side -- the batter has little control over it, so avg-against is mostly about luck.  Not entirely, but mostly.

    by Jay on Jun 22, 2006 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Wow, everybody reads this blog.  

    Thanks for the link.

    by dgcambridge on Jun 23, 2006 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    i hope the infield D is better for sowers.  

    by thetravishalffull on Jun 20, 2006 10:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Sowers only threw 83 pitches over 5 today before getting the hook. The light workload seems to indicate that he's about to be moved. He struck out 4, walked none, and gave up 2 earned. Obviously I, and everyone else, is rooting hard for Sowers but I'm not optimistic about his smoke and mirrors act translating well. We'll see soon.

    by afh4 on Jun 21, 2006 2:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Two questions for the AAA-informed:

    (1) What does Mujica's arsenal contain? Serious heat or moderate heat with good control? Off-speed pitches? Slider or sinker (I think I recently read that he just acquired a splitter this year)?

    (2) Does anyone know what Sowers' ERA would be AFTER the 1st inning? It seems like nearly all the runs he gives up are in the first, but he doesn't get rattled and just shuts 'em down once he gets into a comfort zone.
    Also--the legit. concerns about his low K/9 rates should be mitigated by his apparent ability to keep the ball in the park...I hope.

    by DocNo on Jun 21, 2006 6:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Semi-related to all of this, Kouz is going to start playing left field a bit - see the last few paragraphs of this nice article.

    http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/sports/baseball/14858932.htm

    It's also odd that people have stopped complaining about the Coco trade the past few weeks...or is it?

    by Thommy on Jun 21, 2006 8:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Good points, DocNo!
    Hello DocNo,

    1. I'm not sure about Mujica's arsenal, but I think he can reach the mid-90s when necessary.  The addition of the splitter has enabled him to handle lefties a little better (they're batting .267 against him, better than the over .300 they were batting last year, while keeping righties to an .086 average in 2006.)

    2. I've noticed that about Sowers as well; it usually takes time for him to get settled in.  Many of his walks are usually in the first inning as well, which may quell the higher than ideal BB/9 IP rate concerns, as it's understandable for a pitcher to get into a groove before he can dominate, which Sowers usually has done in most of his starts this year.  

    Like you also said, he does do a very good job of keeping the ball in the park, which I believe should help; most AAA hitters did not make good contact against him, probably because of his good command and late movement on his pitches.  Hopefully, that will translate at the ML level as well.

    We will find out beginning Sunday! :-)

    Go Tribe! :-)

    by indiansfan on Jun 21, 2006 8:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    What a relief. Finally, the FO is acknowledging that the some serious changes are in order.  As a fan I'd much rather watch some youngsters struggle than some of our "proven veterans"® struggle.

    Johnson may have been the victim of bad play behind him and given last year's defense might have been a marginally acceptable 5th starter, but why keep him when it appears we have youngsters who can pitch as well, maybe better (maybe a LOT better).

    You do have to give Johnson props for battling diabetes, for a couple of good starts, and for telling whiny Posada to get a life after he inadvertantly hit him with a pitch and Posada went juvenile about it (I can't read lips, but that's what I would have said).

    I'm surprised Guthrie was sent back down.  I don't think this bodes well for his future with the Tribe.

    I hope there will be more moves in the near future.  If we're lucky a few of the new guys will play well and will finally add some excitement to this dreary season...

    by LeftyCatcher on Jun 21, 2006 8:50 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    I understand your reservation about Guthrie's future, but something I read today quoted Shaprio saying that Guthrie was our 6th starter now.  So it's not necessarily a bad thing.

    by Thommy on Jun 21, 2006 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Re: Johnson designated for assignment
    Yeah, I got the impression from what I read that they want him to get back into the routine of starting instead of sitting in the pen for days on end. That inactivity might explain his last appearance.

    by Luis (Tribe Fan in London) on Jun 21, 2006 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Comments For This Post Are Closed


    User Tools

    Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.
    Start posting about the Indians »

    Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

    Connect_with_facebook

    Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

    FanPosts

    Community blog posts and discussion.

    Recent FanPosts

    Ketchup_small
    Spring Training Photos: 3/12, 3/13, 3/14
    Small
    SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
    Small
    LGT Fantasy Basseball Roto League - openings remain
    Cleveland_indians_select_manny_acta_as_new_manager_small
    LGT Yahoo H2H Fantasy Baseball League
    Hans_small
    Old Timey Baseball Photographs
    Small
    Bullpen Banter's Indians Preview and our Top 25 Prospects
    Dscn0271_small
    The Pitchers 2004 vs. 2010
    Scared_of_santa_small
    top 30 prospects
    Small
    DYE
    39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
    Predictions Group

    + New FanPost All FanPosts >

    Featured Poll

    Poll
    Who would you most like to see in the rotation to start the season?

      173 votes | Results

    FanShots

    Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

    Recent FanShots

    Mauer Signs 8-Year, $184M Extension
    Gutz's 40-time Would Make Him an UDFA
    March 20: Talbot Vs Athletes
    Kerry Wood Out 6-8 Weeks
    Acta's sabermetrics sermon paying off
    Carlos Santana had one at bat and smoked a line-drive double. I know...
    "We're excited, we potentially could have a rotation at Triple-A full of...
    Tribe signs RHP Justin Germano to Minor League Deal
    Five Questions: Cleveland Indians
    Ron Washington Tested Positive For Cocaine?!!

    + New FanShot All FanShots >

    SBNation.com Recent Stories

    Chicago Cubs pitcher Angel Guzman, center, rubs the head of teammate Carlos Marmol, left, while chatting with Marmol and manager Lou Piniella, right, on the first day of baseball spring training Thursday, Feb. 18, 2010, in Mesa, Ariz. (AP Photo/Paul Connors)

    SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Chicago Cubs, Seeking Redemption

    New York Mets starting pitchers Mike Pelfrey, left, Johan Santana, center, and Oliver Perez watch as teammates take part in drills during spring training baseball Saturday, Feb. 27, 2010, in Port St. Lucie, Fla. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)

    SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: New York Mets, The High Cost Of Low Expectations

    Washington Nationals pitcher Stephen Strasburg throws during the second inning of  a spring training baseball game against the Detroit Tigers Tuesday, March 9, 2010 in Viera, Fla. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)

    Nationals Send Stephen Strasburg To Double-A Despite Impressive Spring

    More from SBNation.com >


    Managers

    427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

    Dosequisman_small Jay

    Authors

    3444ant_black_small APV

    47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4