Our C/1B Situation
There's been a lot of talk regarding Victor Martinez and his offensive value as a catcher as opposed to his value as a first baseman.
For what it's worth, I think the team is currently on the right track, what with Martinez getting some games in at 1B. Shoppach has enough potential with the bat to platoon at catcher, rather than being just a backup. Allowing VMart to get 2-4 games a week at 1B would save him from the wear and tear that would affect his bat, while Garko would play the rest of the games at first and possibly also serve as an emergency third catcher.
As far as Martinez' value as a 1B is concerned, he's already an above average (if just barely) bat at that position, going by OPS (just a quick and dirty reference there). Yes, I would like our first baseman to be one of the top performers in the majors, but Albert Pujols doesn't play for the Tribe. Until we have a .950 to 1.000 OPS bat to plug in at first, I think that a VMart/Shoppach/Garko rotation between C and 1B would be the best use of our players.
What do you all think?
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think that is a realistic solution!
I think that is a realistic solution to being able to incorporate Martinez, Shoppach, and Garko into the future Indians' lineup. Otherwise, it looks like you either have to keep playing Victor at catcher most of the time, which exploits his lack of arm strength and bad throwing mechanics, plus keeps Shoppach from developing any consistent groove at the plate, as well as preventing his better throwing abilities from keeping the fast teams from stealing a ton of bases.
Granted, Garko's playing time will get cut down, but he'd probably still be playing 4-5 times a week, which might not be bad for a rookie player so that he can ease more into playing every day at the ML level.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
Re: I think that is a realistic solution!
Hopefully these questions will be answered by the end of the season, would hate to enter 2007 with the same issues remaining unresolved. Sort it out over the next 3 months and lets focus on solving other areas of weakness during the off season.
Today's lineup looked much deeper with VMart, Shoppach and Blake in the lineup.
by new zealand tribe fan on Jul 14, 2006 6:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I sleep on occasion! :-)
Yes, I sleep occasionally, LOL! :-) Seriously, I get about 6-7 hours a night. Thanks for asking. :-)
I agree with you on resolving the issues now - we need to know what we can get in the offseason, so it's better if Victor starts getting more time at 1B and Shoppach gets more playing time to see if that combination can be effective in the future.
Plus, that may encourage the Indians to trade Broussard, as I would think he would be a decent to good trading chip, besides the fact that he probably won't be back with the Indians in 2007.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
Re: Our C/1B Situation
Its unfortunate that Hafner can't play 1B and Martinez can't throw out a runner though.
Either way, this is the 3rd best scoring team in the majors.
by Brandini on Jul 14, 2006 9:54 AM EDT reply actions
Re: Our C/1B Situation
by exileincincy on Jul 14, 2006 10:14 AM EDT reply actions
Re: Our C/1B Situation
Re: Our C/1B Situation
Re: Our C/1B Situation
I'm not too fond of the 1B experiment. You have a player who is having defensive problems, so you give him a new position to learn?
Re: Our C/1B Situation
It's not an elegant solution, but right now it's the best of the available options.
Re: Our C/1B Situation
As an aside, I don't know that Vic's defense is necessarily as much of a problem as we think it is. Given all the uncertainties surrounding defensive evaluation (e.g. the value of throwing out a higher percentage of baserunners) and other factors (is it the fault of the pitchers?), perhaps his plus offense as a catcher outweighs another catcher's plus defense/average bat.
I'm mostly concerned with keeping Martinez' bat in the lineup while maintaining his potency as a hitter.
Heh heh, heh heh, I just talked about "his potency." Heh heh.
Sorry. Little bit of a lapse there. I'll grow back up now.
by ManchildinBeantown on Jul 14, 2006 12:30 PM EDT reply actions

by 















