Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 Africa Cup Of Nations Final

Marte's Role In '08

Entering the holidays and hot stove doldrums, I figured this deserved a diary thread, seeing as how its likely the roster will not undergo much upheaval going into spring training.

Assuming the roster stays pat, to me one of the biggest questions for next year is what role Andy Marte plays. He was our starting 3B at the beginning of last year, and even though his avg sucked, he handled himself pretty well at the hot corner throughout the cold weather and his ISO was decent. If he hadn't pulled a hammy, he probably would have made it into the warm weather as our 3B and gotten the sustained ML at bats most have figured he needs to give some indication of what kind of player he'll be.

A year later and much is the same - nobody knows. With the crucial distinction that he's out of options. Assuming health and a decent spring training, is he our starter at third once again? A backup at third and first? DFA? Minor part of a trade package? A very unusual range of options for someone who was an uber-prospect 2 years ago, and caused ShapCo to go through a very extended and public trade negotiation to acquire him as the third baseman of the future.

I'm of the opinion that he more than others needs consistent playing time to show anything, but given last season and the pressure to win in '08, it's hard to see him handed the starting job. Which means he's in a tough spot. And there are only 25.

Any thoughts?

Comment 85 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I go back and forth on this.  On one hand, Marte is way too talented to let go and it seems that it would be impossible for him to improve by playing some sort of backup 3B role. On the other, Blake is coming off a pretty solid season and we know what we would get from him and it is probably better than Marte right now- in fact, Blake's major league numbers have been just a tad better than Marte's AAA numbers the last two seasons.  

The ideal, of course, is to have Marte take off and produce like we thought he would when we acquired him.  That would allow us to maximize Blake's value as someone with a bunch of versatility as a OF, 1B, 3B guy.  The question is, what does Marte have to do to get the job.  Our recent report of his (lack of) progress in winter ball does not excite anyone.  What if he hits .135 with 4 Ks in every 10 ABs in spring training?  Further, what if he is given the job, but has those type of terrible numbers through April? May? June?  

While Blake has a lot of versatility, Marte does not.  Blake can log some ABs at a position of weakness in my opinion (OF) as well as 3rd.  However, Marte could only play 3rd and maybe 1st, but that doesn't seem to help much since we already have Garko, Victor, and Hafner splitting time there.  

With a 25 man roster, you can't afford to waste a roster spot on a guy that can basically play 1 position and doesn't hit.  Especially with the value that the Indians put on versatility and flexibility.  Now, you could argue that if Michaels is essentially our 4th OF, and Carroll can back up every other position, we have a spot to waste on either Marte or Barfield.  If that is the decision, its Marte, because Barfield can be sent to Buffalo.  But, it really seems like Marte is holding on to that last roster spot and once we need it for an extra pitcher, depth, etc., he would be the first to go unless he starts to hit.

by Ryan Kelsey on Dec 17, 2007 10:25 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
envisions marte being waived--still doesnt understand people believing this guy can play or has any trade value--he doesnt.  just a wash out--no big deal, it happens.  you cant win em all when you trade for "prospects."

by rustyparts on Dec 20, 2007 8:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
He has more trade value then Paul Byrd but thats not saying much.  I will agree he is a wash out but we could get a BP deal at least.
Patience is a virtue but Champions don't need it. LGT resident kinesiologist 774

by E5 on Dec 20, 2007 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
You'll pass on someone with obvious talent after 278 AB's? After 401 AB's Mike Schmidt was a .198 hitter. In Dale Murphy's first season he hit .226 and struck out 145 times. I am assuming you didn't understand why anyone thought they could play either.
I swear, next year is it.

by Brad D on Dec 20, 2007 9:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
i really wish they'd give him the starting job, but i'm of the opinion that it would take an injury to blake to get him the kind of consistent ABs he needs to develop at this level.

this, from wedge's press conference at the end of the season:

Casey Blake's our third baseman.  I mean, he earned that role this year.  It doesn't mean that Andy Marte won't be on our ballclub.  He's a good athlete, and he did what we asked him to do in triple-A this year.  Right now, the ballclub I have in my mind is the ballclub that was on the field at the end of this year.  We'll have a better view of Andy's situation after we talk next week.

for discussion, see here

his trade value is at a low presently, but i think shapiro should try to get what he can now, because it's only going to get worse after half a season of inconsistent ABs when we find ourselves facing a roster crunch.  

by emil minty on Dec 17, 2007 11:23 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Had forgotten that quote, but nevertheless tend to agree - Blake has the job at this point, even tho I'd rather give Marte the shot.

FYI - Andy's been playing some 1B in winterball, and by all accounts looks trimmer and has been playing excellent defense on either corner. I took it as the  only reason he spends any time down there at 1B is because of FO dictates, prepping him for a backup role.

by mcrose on Dec 18, 2007 12:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Again, it's the definition of "is."

Casey Blake is our third baseman.

He did earn that role last season.

Doesn't mean he will be our third baseman on Opening Day.  There could be a trade, an injury, an observable difference in Spring Training that can't be ignored.

I take the quote to mean that they respect that he earned the job, up to this point, but mostly that they aren't the kind of organization that's going to tell an established starter that he has to re-apply for his own job.

But a lot of things can happen.  Blake is marginal, they know that.  And now that Marte is out of options, well, it shouldn't take a rocket scientist to know which player you put your chips on:  the one who just turned 24, or the one who just turned 34.

by Jay on Dec 18, 2007 2:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Just like with Bobby Cox, Wedge doesn't want to play Marte. He's always pinch hit for him even when he does get a start. This gives off the "I'm only starting him because the FO wants me to" vibe.

All this said, I can't say I blame Wedge. Wedge's responsibility is to get the team to the playoffs, and he doesn't think that Marte gives them the best chance. In all likelihood, Marte gets traded, but not at the end of spring training like Phillips. Since I don't know who you leave off the team to keep a non-starting, non-defensive replacement, non-pinch hitter player, he will probably be traded soon.

by oxforddave on Dec 18, 2007 9:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I agree that Wedge does seem to have that posture.  It was an uncomfortable feeling every time he would pinch-hit for Marte, though I know he was telling himself it was just to get a better contact hitter in the box.

As for who "gives them the best chance," where are all your posts running down Gutierrez as you do for Marte?  Gutierrez's Triple-A stats, while better recently (when he was oler), do not overall match up with Marte's, and Garko's are hardly any better.

If you're just sour on the guy, that's one thing.  But a year ago the Tribe thought they were best off with Marte at 3B, and I don't know what has happened to change that.  Marte and Blake are both a year older, but that's a good thing for Marte and a bad thing for Blake.

by Jay on Dec 18, 2007 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
What has changed is that Marte had another sub-replacement level year. As I posted before, any consistent play would allow him to claim the 3B job in the majors. He has not done that.

As for Garko and Gutz. Garko had sub-par AAA stats, but has produced in the majors. If Marte produces close to Garko, he gets the nod, but he hasn't done so.

Gutz has been on and off with the bat, but brings speed and defense. I'm not sold on Gutz, but even if he really starts to struggle hitting, he still has value as a 4th outfielder. If Marte doesn't hit, he has no other value, and he has yet to hit.  The only way to get this other value from Marte is to borrow it from Blake (make Blake a super-utility guy). I could understand why Wedge would be reluctant to do that.

Brandon Phillips (sorry, but the parallels are evident) could have come north with the big club, as he could provide value without starting with his defense. I doubt Phillips would have broken out with the tribe, so I do not mourn the loss. The only way Marte stays with the big club is if he starts. To do that he has to win the 3B job over Blake. That seems like an awful tall order right now. I guess an injury to Blake or Garko to give him an opportunity (ala Carmona). Maybe a small injury would not be the best thing.

You know I've always been suspect of Marte. But the above logic has nothing to do with my unbelief. Just the reality of the situation.  

by oxforddave on Dec 18, 2007 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I know this is the same argument over and over but I feel compelled to say it again:

We consistently fault Marte for things out of his control. The Garko situation is the clearest example; by all measures, heading into 2006, Marte was the better prospect. But, Marte never gets a chance in 2006, never gets a chance in 2007, and Garko lucks into consistent ABs, a hot streak of RISP hitting, and then puts together a great 2007.

You can't take anything away from Garko. He had his opportunity and seized it. Marte, on the other hand, has never had an opportunity to seize.

And, if we want to fault Marte for being less than great in AAA, well, Garko is just one of many examples of players who get frustrated and stall in AAA when they think they've earned their way out. We only start to hate the guys when the organization continues to hold the players there.

I don't know what to make of Marte anymore. I want to play him, I know that much.

I'm losing a grip on my identity as a prospect lover. I'm actually finding myself coming around on Jordan Brown and his back to back MVPs and feeling less than bullish on Marte.

by afh4 on Dec 18, 2007 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Garko and Marte had the same chance in 06 (see below). Even after outhitting Marte (only BA driven, but this is worth something), Garko was the odd man out coming into 07.

Name Year Ag Tm  Lg  G    AB    R     H   2B 3B HR  RBI  SB CS BB  SO  BA   OBP   SLG
Garko 2006 25 CLE AL  50  185   28   54  12  0   7   45   0  0  14  37  .292  .359  .470
Marte 2006 22 CLE AL  50  164   20   37  15  1   5   23   0  0  13  38  .226  .287  .421

Marte has had many chances without success, and despite this and my personal doubts, even I would like to give Marte another chance because of his age. But can someone please explain how?

Would you like telling Blake or Garko, "Sorry you have hit better than this guy ever has, but he is younger, and hit real well in AAA 2 1/2 years ago, so you will need to play a spot role." How much leeway do you give Marte in the starting role? Would you trade Blake or Garko, giving you little back up if Marte is less than replacement level?

Again, how does this work? The same thing goes for (my boy) Cliff Lee. For Lee, you can give him the 5th starter and put Sowers and Laffey in AAA, and even being a supporter of Lee, I don't know if I'd do that. But you can't send Garko and Blake to AAA.  

 

by oxforddave on Dec 18, 2007 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I say that to Blake every day of the week. Well, maybe not that exactly, but I say, "Blake, you're more valuable as a super utility player. Your versatility is your specialness." If he doesn't believe it, I show him his hitting stats.

Garko's 2006 was absolutely blah but you know as well as I do that everybody was in love with all those RBIs.

My point was one we've been over lots of times; Garko has gotten lucky in his breaks, and he's taken advantage. Garko got lucky with all those RBIs in 2006, which raised his profile enough to make the team out of ST in 2007, and he got lucky when Marte got hurt. Marte hasn't gotten a single break.

Marte defeatists love to throw out terms like "many chances without success" but the bottom line is 278 major league ABs. He's had no chance at the MLB level and, frankly, I think that's all that matters for a player of his pedigree.

I'm tired of looking at his AAA stats, his ST stats, his winterball stats. They don't make any damn sense in relation to Marte or to each other. I just want to see him play; not until June, not as a platoon player for a whole season. I want him to be the Indians 3B until it's absolutely unsustainable.

by afh4 on Dec 18, 2007 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
  1. Marte is three years younger

  2. They have the same BB-rate, K-rate and XBH%

  3. In 6 weeks of play, Garko had 17 more hits (with 21 more ABs). Since their XBH% numbers are identical, we're talking about Marte beating a couple of grounders for base hits each week.

  4. I would love telling Blake that

How is keeping Marte on the roster a hard thing to do?

13 hitters

9 position starters (Martinez, Garko, Cabrera, Peralta, Marte, Dellucci, Sizemore, Gutierrez)
1 back up catcher (Shoppach)
1 utility middle infielder (Carrol)
1 utility 3B/1B (Blake)
1 utility OF (Michaels)

Who am I forgetting? Frosty the Snowman?

by crazymoloh on Dec 18, 2007 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
You've forgotten Travis and Generalissimo.

How depressing is it that we can forget Travis?

by afh4 on Dec 18, 2007 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Wow, you guys would just push Blake aside after 07? Casey Blake drives me crazy (I don't even want to talk about game 7), but you wouldn't be a manager long doing things like this.

I find it weird to be on the Wedge side in a Wedge vs LGT debate, but that is where I am on this issue.

by oxforddave on Dec 18, 2007 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I'm grumpy because of finals week, so excuse me if I come off harsh.

Casey Blake will be 34 entering the 2009 season. His OPS+, as a regular:

  1. 93
  2. 122
  3. 99
  4. 114
  5. 101

So, what we have here is an aging player, who is a league average hitter. He'll likely command a multi-year deal after 2008 from some stupid team, which would be absolutely moronic for the Indians to match (especially if Marte and/or Gutz prove themselves as regulars). His defense, which is a tick above average right now, will be declining by the end of 2008 due to age (it's only natural).

His value is in his versatility. If he signs a cheap, 1 year deal with a club option after 08, sure, why not. He posted a .697 OPS after the break in 2007. Using 07 as a reason to keep him is absolutely stupid.

Sizemore-Shapiro 2008. The Official Red Bull of Let's Go Tribe Game Threads.

by Gradyforpresident on Dec 18, 2007 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Wouldn't be a manager long, eh?

Look, there's a case to be made for stability and known quantities. But at some point, as a small market team, you have to be willing to deal with a 'trial by fire' for at least one position on a yearly basis. Not everyone is going to pull a Ryan Braun or an Albert Pujols in their first stint.

Who did these hitters become?

  • 22 year old Dodger's first baseman hit .215/.272/.306 through his first 150 ABs

  • 21 year old Cleveland third baseman hit .227/.282/.327 through his first 215 ABs

  • 21 year old Milwaukee shortstop hit .243/.300/.371 through his first 450 ABs

The first guy goes by the name Paul Konerko, the second as Jim Thome and the third as Gary Sheffield.

Look, there are going to be many more guys who have stat lines similar to the ones above, but didn't turn into anything. My point is that through 270 odd ABs its hard to know what kind of player someone is going to turn into. Marte's track record suggests that he deserves a chance.

by crazymoloh on Dec 18, 2007 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Oh, as for actual mechanics:

I'm fine with flipping Michaels. I'm also fine with flipping Francisco or with sending him back down (though I don't know his options status).

I don't think it's all that complicated.

4 IFs, 2 C's, 5 SP's, Grady, Gutz, 3 LF's, Travis, 8 man BP.

You just have to ditch a LFielder, right? I'm fine with that, especially with Choo hanging around.  

by afh4 on Dec 18, 2007 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
While we're doing the stats thing, though, have a gander at these:

284 PA, .264/.313/.384, 4 HR, 17BB:52K (.312 BA/bip)

That's Casey Blake's post-break 2007 line, and it's actually fairly in step with Casey's second half fall-off every year. Moreover, Casey's 2007 roughly equaled his 2006 in counting stats . . . but of course, it took him an extra 190 ABs to reach those numbers.

Casey saved our collective heine by holding the fort at third last season, and he deserves our gratitude. That doesn't make him any kind of answer for the Indians at third.

by fleerdon on Dec 18, 2007 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Here's the bottom line....

At age 21, in 2004, Marte proved everything he needed to prove at the minor league level. He 'graduated' every level without showing any decline in performance as he moved up. I've seen players get progressively worse as they moved up through the minors and eventually stink it up in the minors. I've seen players repeat levels, post improved numbers on repeat stints and then proceed to suck at the ML level. I've NEVER seen anyone consistently improve at at each stop through the minors, without having to repeat a level, and then all of sudden disappear at the ML-level when given a fair chance.

The Indians are sooooo tragically risk averse that they manage to completely screw up at least one young prospect a year. Brandon Phillps was ready after 2005 by posting a .303/.363/.430 line with a good K/BB ratio in AAA. Ryan Garko was ready after 2005 by posting a .303/.384/.498 line in AAA. Andy Marte (at age 21) was ready after 2005 by posting a .269/.354/.525 line in AAA with great K/BB numbers. Jeremy Guthrie finally puts up good numbers in AAA in 2006 and only gets 19 innings in his ML call up that year! The 2006 season was toast! Why didn't they give Guthrie a few starts?

by crazymoloh on Dec 18, 2007 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
That's just not true with regards to Guthrie.

For one, his numbers in Buffalo were ok, but not really eye-popping in terms of peripherals.

More importantly, Guthrie was up in April and May, when it mattered, and was absolutely horrid. While I can't find his AAA game log, my recollection is that he spent a while trying to figure it out in AAA, put up his "meh" numbers, got to come back and make a couple of more appearances and continue to suck.

There was no clamor to play Guthrie in 2006 and there shouldn't have been. He wasn't ruined or blocked or anything by anyone in Clevelad; he was fixed by somebody in Baltimore.

On top of that, it was his stupid contract.

by afh4 on Dec 18, 2007 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Look the numbers weren't eye popping, but its hard to say that they weren't worthy of consideration.

Buffalo, 2006:

WHIP - 1.23
H/9 - 7.59
BB/9 - 3.50 (ok, this sucks)
K/9 - 6.42

Jeremy Guthrie was groomed to be a starting pitcher. How many starts did he make for the Cleveland Indians? One. As I recall, Fausto Carmona also had issues with pitching in a relief role.

Honestly, I agree its a little much to fault the Tribe here. They have amazing starting pitching depth in the system and Guthrie was 27 years old in 2006. At some point the Indians had to just let him go. Plus, he was a Boras client, so I'm not exactly disappointed. I just wish they'd given him 4-5 starts in 2006 when there was really nothing to play for.

by crazymoloh on Dec 18, 2007 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
That's awfully revisionist. Who's starts do you want to take? CC, Byrd's, Lee's, and Westbrook's are non-negotiable. They cut loose Jason Johnson and got starts for Sowers and Carmona.

And they found one for Guthrie and Slocum two. So what? Neither guy had earned them, at all. Guthrie sucked in Cleveland and was whatever in Buffalo. Sowers and Carmona both deserved the looks and got them.

by afh4 on Dec 18, 2007 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
but with Guthrie they had to decide what they were going to do with him, not the same  with Sowere and Carmona.
Fan in Texas

by fanintexas on Dec 18, 2007 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Meh. I'd rather the two better prospects get the starts, preparing them for a pennant run the next year. It worked, didn't it?

by afh4 on Dec 18, 2007 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
My only criticism with not giving Guthrie due process was not calling him up late in '06 when nothing was on the line to do what he had just made a lot of progress at: starting games. He's a horse (unfortunately one with a brain that overthinks), and the relief disaster was not surprising.

I was pretty surprised, though, when they didn't give him a few late August/Sept starts to better make the '07 decision. When they didn't, there was pretty much no way he was going to make last year's club.

I've always (still do) feel that Shap's Achilles heel, and the unstructured part of The Plan, is having a real system in place for integrating the talent he's so good at acquiring into the ML club. A majority of the moves promoting from depth in the last two years have been forced - injury or bad performance necessitating a call up. Perhaps that's what he feels is the true function of depth, but it tends towards sink or swim scenarios, and we've been really lucky that many of them have panned out. Marte is in that situation now - the safe bet is stay with Casey and have Marte be a sub, but you'd think the smart money has to be on Marte getting a solid few months as a starter.

Hypothetical: say Marte has one option left. What are the odds he's looking at a 4th year in AAA?

by mcrose on Dec 18, 2007 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Ok, now I see what you meant by "is"! Another "is" is that Blake's the poster boy for the Tribe's profile for player attitude. It's hard to see them taking away all his at bats going into the season.

If Marte looks ok in ST, I kind of like the idea floated here of trading Michaels and letting Casey get some starts in the OF as well. Just judging from his '06 season, he's already a better OF than Michaels anyway. Blake can exemplify once again his team first attitude and still keep a significant role.

by mcrose on Dec 18, 2007 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Yes, I see no reason why we shouldn't start Blake in the OF as we did last season.  By doing that, we essentially convert our OF depth into 3B depth.

by Jay on Dec 18, 2007 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I think this is more the F.O.'s take, except for the spring training part, where I doubt they'll care.

by fleerdon on Dec 18, 2007 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
We're getting darn close to a Marte-based, off-season Irrational Over-reactions Thread here. DFA? Trade him while you can? I've got some other suggestions:

  • Make him a catcher.
  • Teach him better situational hitting.
  • Give him Skinner's job -- we KNOW Marte can wave his arms at nothing.
  • Can he switch hit?
  • Get CoCo back.
  • Trade him to the Reds, where he'll blossom, in exchange for a reliever with two first names who'll be awesome in 2011.
  • Screw it: Jason Michaels for Tribe 3B '08.

by fleerdon on Dec 17, 2007 11:38 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Wait wait wait. Forget the Reds relief prospect. Trade him for Coutlangus. But, you know, take your time making the exchange, drop some rumors first -- that transaction's all about anticipation.

by fleerdon on Dec 17, 2007 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Colonel, I was trying for a joke about Marte playing  2B which would make it 4 play, but that he's actually more accustomed to 3rd, and I realized its already been done:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0ns8t9iQck

Should be a reggaeton version of this on the PA every time Marte came up to bat.

by mcrose on Dec 18, 2007 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I am 100% pro-Meatloaf. Didn't mean to make light of your diary. It's just, if Keith Ginter, at 27 or whatever, had put up the line in AAA last year that Marte put up in AAA as a 21 year old, I guarantee you we'd have had some people clamoring to give Ginter a shot when Casey was struggling in the second half. And Casey REALLY struggled in the second half. I appreciate Casey Blake, but if Andy Marte can OPS .780 BOTH halves of the season, that makes Marte an improvement. The bar's not stratospheric here.

by fleerdon on Dec 18, 2007 10:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
coutlangus comes awfully close to be a sexual term--i would hate to be an announcer with that one.

by rustyparts on Dec 21, 2007 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
  1. Has Marte shown the commitment to training necessary to grinding out a season on a championship caliber team?

  2. Is his glove ready for prime time?

Those are the only questions he needs to answer for me. Given the Tribe's track record of sticking promising youngsters (Phillips, Garko, Francisco and even Gutierrez to some extent) in the minors longer than necessary, they should just unclench and let him get his bearings at ML level if meets the above thresholds.

I have hunch that Andy Marte will be our Andruw Jones. Spectacular defense, low BA, modest plate discipline and good power. Give him a freakin' chance.

by crazymoloh on Dec 18, 2007 4:11 AM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Hmmm.... Jones looks like an apt comparison in more ways than I thought. Jones reached the majors younger by a couple of years, but was just as putrid in his first couple of auditions in the bigs. His minor league numbers resemble Jones' in a lot of facets (walk rates, K-rates, HRs). Well, until he reached our farm system.

by crazymoloh on Dec 18, 2007 4:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I think those couple of years are important, though.  As Jay would attest, reaching the ML at a young age is the best predictor of future "stardom".  By 23, Jones had already had his first 30hr season.  Even considering the injuries, I don't think anyone would argue Marte was ready for anything close to that in his age 23 season.

That said, I'm all about starting him at 3B on opening day.  

by tribemountain on Dec 18, 2007 9:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
He hit over 30 HR in the Majors as a 21 year old. (unless he was secretly 23 at the time??)

Andruw was a freak.

Marte has a similar game I think, but his developmental arc isn't anywhere close to Andruw's.

formerly 'tourist

by jhon on Dec 18, 2007 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Damn, Andruw's age 19 year was truly unbelievable.

by mcrose on Dec 18, 2007 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
My thoughts on what I think they should do echo what Paul Cousineau wrote a few weeks ago on his DiaTribe blog:
"I'd like to see the Indians flip Michaels for a reliever (probably from the NL) allowing them to open the season with a platoon of Blake/Marte/Dellucci at 3B/LF (Blake at 3B, Dellucci in LF against RHP, Marte at 3B, Blake in LF against LHP). That arrangement, I think, would allow Andy Marte to ease into the MLB against mainly LHP, whom he has consistently hit throughout his career. If, and when, Marte is ready to take the reins at 3B, Blake moves to his super-utility role and out of the everyday lineup."

Whether they actually will do this is an entirely different question. But I think it would be a mistake to have Michaels stand in the way of Marte's future with Cleveland. If Marte can't even handle it then, we can still plug Blake into 3rd full time, let BenFran replace Michaels and release Marte.

by DocNo on Dec 18, 2007 8:45 AM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I'd love this to take place. It would give the Indians better defense at both positions, not to mention allow Marte a real shot at becoming the long-term third baseman.

The more probable scenario, though, would be Blake starting out as the third baseman, and Marte playing his way into the full-team third baseman, moving Blake to the outfield if Dellucci struggles. It worked out with Blake/Garko last year, hopefully it will work the same way this season.

by Ryan on Dec 18, 2007 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Warning: Armchair GM rant impending

Give Marte the 3B job from opening day - we'll only know what he can do with consistent ABs for at least half the season.  Sign Bonds, and move the Platucci over to right.  Gutz et al become trade fodder for a reliever.

pros: improved lineup depth to balance out a possible Marte bomb, value signing of Bonds

cons: not exactly the 3 CFs in the outfield we've grown to love

by tribemountain on Dec 18, 2007 9:35 AM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Give Marte the 3B job from opening day - we'll only know what he can do with consistent ABs for at least half the season.  Sign Bonds, and move the Platucci over to right.  Gutz et al become trade fodder for a reliever.

Prediction #1 might happen, Predictions #2 and #3 wouldn't happen in a million years. The Indians are not going to sign Bonds, and they aren't going to choose Dellucci/Michaels over Gutierrez.

by Ryan on Dec 18, 2007 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
As far as Bonds, that's not really meant as a prediction, just my little fantasy.  Yeah, they won't sign him due to the circus that would ensue.  But, as has been discussed before, it sure makes sense from a lot of other angles - short contract, near certain production, improving the area of greatest need on the team (per Shapiro), etc.

My concern is that, without moving an outfielder, there is little room for Blake, Marte, Carrol, and four outfielders, potentially causing the FO to give up on Marte sooner than I'd like.

Maybe moving one of the Platucci makes more sense from a standpoint of retaining youth and contract control, but also garners less in a trade.  Gutz could be more valuable to others as a CF.  

by tribemountain on Dec 18, 2007 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
if we have an extra $20 million to spend for bonds i'm guessing the tribe would rahther spend that on sabathia dont you think?

by rustyparts on Dec 21, 2007 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Marte will make the team, unless he's absolutely hopeless.  The Carroll trade sends Barfield to Buffalo and opens a spot for Marte, I would guess.  They're going to be afraid of the Brandon Phillips scenario, so they won't dump him for nothing.

I would like to see them give him a shot.  Blake is what he is -- a .270 hitter with a little pop (and poor numbers w/RISP over his career); he's an adequate third baseman with no range who makes Peralta's lack of range even more of a problem.  I hope everyone remembers watching a certain Boston 3rd baseman cutting off balls to his left at least once a game. When's the last time you saw Blake do that?

I like the scenario involving trading Michaels  and creating a 3-way platoon for 2 positions.  That would make use of Blake, who is still a useful player, and give Marte a chance to earn Wedge's trust, something that's apparently hard to do (and hard to lose once you've earned it).

by peter m on Dec 18, 2007 10:24 AM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I would also like to see Marte get an extended (half-season) look at 3B.  But I think the likelihood of that happening depends in part on the success guys around Marte are having.  If he gets off to a slow start, it's a lot easier to keep him in the lineup if others are doing well.  Consider last season.  

When Marte went down at the end of April last season he was putting up a .179/.220/.333 line.  Terrible.  But look at what some other regulars were doing at that point. (roughly April 23)

Jhonny Peralta: .196/.303/.357
Casey Blake: .196/.288/.314
Josh Barfield: .132/.164/.226 (!)
Trot Nixon: .243/.317/.351

That meant we had 3-5 holes in the lineup everyday in April.  A huge proportion of our offense those first few weeks came about solely because of Grady, Vic and Hafner.  Marte, especially with the injury, was probably the easiest way to shake up the lineup and get some different options.  If I were Marte, I'd be rooting hard for everyone (aside from probably Casey Blake) to get off to hot starts at the plate in April so that the FO and coaching staff feel less pressure to shake things up.

by APV on Dec 18, 2007 11:33 AM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
i really do apologize for being so negative on marte---i've seen the guy play and it does not inspire confidence in me. i hope i am wrong and the guy becomes a solid player--i just don't see it---but then again i didnt see carmona either so i do have a tendency to be wrong---just ask my ex-wives....

by rustyparts on Dec 21, 2007 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I say play the kid using Blake as a super-utility.  I've always thought that Blake gets worn down over the course of the season.  This would keep him fresher, even if Marte eventually bombs.

I think you give Marte the nod 5 times per week at least through the end of June.  If he doesn't pan out and we'll know it, but otherwise I fear another Phillips debacle.  I have hope that he pans out well for us.  Nothing to necessarily back that up, just irrational gut instinct.  (Note: I had the same gut instinct last year with Garko, that Guthrie would eventually pan out, and that Phillips would be fine.  Then again, the same gut instinct always said players like Schilling are overrated).

Officially starting up and driving the trade for Bedard bandwagon. Also, local "Barfield Bounces Back Believer."

by mjmarble on Dec 18, 2007 11:33 AM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I don't think your gut's wrong about Schilling, for what it's worth.
Burn on, big river, burn on...

by Turkmenbashi on Dec 18, 2007 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Oh good lord. Would you two just show each other your BBWA cards and get it over with?

by afh4 on Dec 18, 2007 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Jealous?

Just for fun, howsabout we make a little bet on Marte?

Burn on, big river, burn on...

by Turkmenbashi on Dec 18, 2007 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I'll take you on, Phil.  Six (6) pack of Nosferatu or IPA that Marte's 2008 is equal to or better than Blake's 2007.

Do you accept?

formerly 'tourist

by jhon on Dec 18, 2007 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Take it Turk.
Sizemore-Shapiro 2008. The Official Red Bull of Let's Go Tribe Game Threads.

by Gradyforpresident on Dec 18, 2007 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Agreed, though I think we should set a minimum number of ABs for Marte to make it fair. Say 450?
Burn on, big river, burn on...

by Turkmenbashi on Dec 18, 2007 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
This is great.  You gonna share those Phil?
Officially starting up and driving the trade for Bedard bandwagon. Also, local "Barfield Bounces Back Believer."

by mjmarble on Dec 18, 2007 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
No doubt. The only thing better than Naosferatu is free Nosferatu!
Burn on, big river, burn on...

by Turkmenbashi on Dec 18, 2007 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Don't count your beers just yet.  It's not like Blake is Jesus on a dinosaur.
formerly 'tourist

by jhon on Dec 18, 2007 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
This is a trick bet.  Nosferatu only comes in 4 packs.

by Brick. on Dec 18, 2007 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Both fun and germane.

by fleerdon on Dec 18, 2007 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I should have known that...

I'm ashamed...

Burn on, big river, burn on...

by Turkmenbashi on Dec 18, 2007 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I found a 4-pack of Nosferatu last night at the Wine Room in Avon.  I will not be gambling it away.

by jds16 on Dec 20, 2007 6:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
What are we giving up for Marte's potential upside though?

Worst-case Marte bats for a low average, but still probably has a pretty good slugging percentage.

I would call Marte's upside significant. We know exactly what we are getting with Blake at best and given his age, it could be much worse. Play the kid

by Roger Dorn on Dec 18, 2007 7:41 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I agree for the most part.  I see the worst case scenario for Marte is something like a .230/.290/.400 line.  Bad, yes.  But not Barfield bad (.243/.270./324).  But I agree the upside is still high.

by APV on Dec 18, 2007 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Does anyone else think that if Marte would have stayed healthy that he (not Barfield) would have been the player to stay in Cleveland to try to "figure it out"?

I see the rationale that the team could stick with one, but not two, of them in the lineup for an extended period of time.

Unfortunately for Marte, he got hurt and the decision was made...exacerbated by the fact that Blake ably stepped in.  

by The DiaTriber on Dec 19, 2007 9:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
You might be right.  But the think Barfield had going for him is that he already had a full season of big league "success" and therefore a more proven track-record.  I think his rope was longer than Marte's...but the injury definitely decided the situation.

by APV on Dec 19, 2007 9:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Would the team have been ready to bring up Asdrubal early in the season? He began the year in Double A, I think.

by Jeffrey R on Dec 19, 2007 10:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
No...but we had Luis Rivas, Joe Inglett, Hector Luna and Keith Ginter all sitting in Buffalo.

by APV on Dec 19, 2007 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Yeah, because every single one of those names inspires such confidence.
Officially starting up and driving the trade for Bedard bandwagon. Also, local "Barfield Bounces Back Believer."

by mjmarble on Dec 19, 2007 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
In the long-run, no...but all four of those guys were in Buffalo to be short-term insurance.  And I've got pretty good confidence they all could have posted an OPS above .400 at the major league level, something Barfield wasn't doing at the end of the April.

by APV on Dec 19, 2007 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
I don't know about all, but my main point is that if you're switching Barfield out in April or May you're probably looking at a season long switch.  And I honestly don't think we win 96 games with any one of those guys spending quality time at 2B.

Injury insurance, yes.  But longer than a couple weeks - we're in trouble.

Officially starting up and driving the trade for Bedard bandwagon. Also, local "Barfield Bounces Back Believer."

by mjmarble on Dec 19, 2007 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
loves marbles disclaimer on bedard and barfield--i agree completely---and thats a miracle

by rustyparts on Dec 21, 2007 6:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Also - Barfield had an OPS of .425 in April.  Interestingly enough, that was followed by a .723 in May.  I know it's fashionable to bash Barfield relentlessly lately, but it doesn't need exaggeration.  
Officially starting up and driving the trade for Bedard bandwagon. Also, local "Barfield Bounces Back Believer."

by mjmarble on Dec 19, 2007 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Didn't mean to exagerate.  I was going off of April 23rd when Marte went down at which point Barfield was sub .400.

by APV on Dec 19, 2007 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Sounds like most here favor giving Marte extended at bats at 3rd base. The obvious problem with that is getting Casey Blake at bats as well.

Does this make Jason Michaels completely redundant? Trading him allows Casey to get regular time in the OF, which is probably an upgrade, and also gives Ben Francisco a roster spot as the 5th OF.

Marte gets his shot, with Casey in reserve should he not pan out, Ben Fran providing depth for that move.

I like it. Not sure Wedge would go for it, but I like it.

by mcrose on Dec 19, 2007 7:23 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Honestly, I don't recall Michaels getting much to any playing time once the Lofton trade went down. I think he should get traded.

by Roger Dorn on Dec 19, 2007 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Traded

For spare parts and a few dusty air fresheners.

Patience is a virtue but Champions don't need it. LGT resident kinesiologist 774

by E5 on Dec 20, 2007 6:14 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Marte's Role In '08
Approaching the troll threshold here.  You've made your point.

by Jay on Dec 21, 2007 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01731_small
Some quick questions for the locals
Etat_small
Eric's 2012 Cleveland Indians Projections...
Its_alive-fstn_small
Oswalt > Carmona/Heredia
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #24
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian — "Country Peach Passion"
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "Fridge Magnet"
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #23
Small
Seriously Go Get Carlos Peña Now
Avatard_small
Indians by the Numbers — #22
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian: "Fridge Magnet"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

A look back at the last Tribe arbitration hearing
MLB.COM Tribe Top 20
Jared Goedert is Puddin Head Jones
Chisenhall v.  Hannahan
After watching Lindor in the Fall Instructional League, I have very little...
Coming off of an optimistic 80-82 season, is this the Indians window to win?  

See full post on Beyond the Box Score
Praising the Indians offseason
Brooks Baseball Stats
Hello my friends! I hope you guys are ready for Super Bowl Weekend? Make...
Heyman reporting Indians will sign Kotchman

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4