Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
Before everyone freaks just think about it. If we put down our emotions I think that this is an idea worth considering given the current trade market and the likelihood of a decreased price.

From MLBTR
Barry Bonds' agent, Jeff Borris, said this evening that his client still wants to play in 2008 despite his legal troubles. It seems that his trial is unlikely to begin until after the season ends, so he'll be available.
A team willing to take on the baggage should be given a huge discount. Maybe a half price deal - $8MM or so. Signing Barry might be unpopular with the fanbase, but winning would probably overrule it.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2007/12/bonds-wants-to.html#comments
Assuming we could get a discount and assuming the trial begins after the season, I don't see why we wouldn't put in a flyer on bonds. I don't think he's going to sign for 8 million but 12 million for a one year deal. I'd totally do it. The LF market is quickly evaporating. Taking a chance on an aging veteran is very Shap-esque (Juan Gonzales)
The only thing I'd worry about is losing draft picks for signing him. However, if we signed Bonds then we could use our trading chips, Lee, Shoppach,etc to trade for minor leaguers prospects instead of looking for a LF bat.
In fact it seems preferable to trade for an established prospect who either has a high upside or is closer to the majors, or both, as compared "to buying a lottery ticket" in the draft. If we were smart we could even parlay our trading chips into a near ML ready OF who could possibly take over for Bonds in LF next year.
I know some people won't like this idea just because of who Bonds is/you think he cheated/etc. Thats fine, but from a non emotion based standpoint I think its worth reconsidering.
0 recs |
42
comments
Comments
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by Kid Cleveland on Dec 5, 2007 11:46 PM EST 0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by Joe on Dec 5, 2007 11:57 PM EST 0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by TheVanillaGorilla on Dec 6, 2007 12:12 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
He could play some DH with the tribe to. Maybe play Blake in LF and Marte at third on those days. (just a rough sketch off the top of my head)
by world dictator on
Dec 6, 2007 12:17 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
In any case i just don't see Barry fitting in on this team very well. The injury risk is high (he wasn't even playing in day games after night games last year)and I am not convinced the return and possible disturbance of clubhouse continuity would be worth the investment. I could also see Wedge sending him out on crutches while mumbling something about veterans and loyalty. Just a bad dream i'm sure.
by TheVanillaGorilla on
Dec 6, 2007 12:26 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
First (and the most minor), Juan opened the season on the team in 2005. He did not get hurt in Spring Training.
Second, your original line, Taking a chance on an aging veteran is very Shap-esque (Juan Gonzales), had to be referring to his second signing, because
A) the first signing was not "taking a chance," it was for $10 million for a star player, and
B) the first signing wasn't made by Shapiro, if I remember correctly. Juan Gone was signed in 2001, and Shapiro took over in the offseason between 01 and 02.
Also! He was an All Star in 2001. God I'm nitpicky.
by nickjs21 on
Dec 6, 2007 12:27 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
He did pull his hammy grounding out in his first regular season AB right? I'm not dreaming this up am I? I hope not, that's a fond memory for me.
by TheVanillaGorilla on
Dec 6, 2007 12:31 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
We should write him a thank you or something.
by nickjs21 on
Dec 6, 2007 12:37 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
Shapiro is the brother-in-law of New York Jets coach Eric Mangini.
Hm.
by nickjs21 on
Dec 6, 2007 12:48 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by TheVanillaGorilla on
Dec 6, 2007 12:56 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by jefftribe on
Dec 6, 2007 1:07 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by Jay on
Dec 6, 2007 1:10 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by nickjs21 on
Dec 6, 2007 1:47 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by TheVanillaGorilla on
Dec 6, 2007 3:32 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
For the record, Gonzalez was signed to a minor league contract. That's much more low risk.
Man, would someone get f*cking traded or something? Today was just slow.
by nickjs21 on Dec 6, 2007 12:19 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by TheVanillaGorilla on
Dec 6, 2007 12:28 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by nickjs21 on
Dec 6, 2007 12:36 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by nickjs21 on
Dec 6, 2007 12:36 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by bodiaz74 on Dec 6, 2007 12:27 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by fwembt on Dec 6, 2007 12:45 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
The Dodgers just signed Andruw Jones to a 2 year deal. Jones will play CF, with Pierre supposedly in LF. This leaves Matt Kemp and Andre Ethier in either a platoon situation next season (again) or one of them could be trade bait (I'm purely guessing at the situation here).
The Dodgers seem pretty solid in starting pitching and have Martin at catcher, but third base has been a concern for them with the always injury-prone Nomar and a shaky Andy LaRoche. LaRoche is still young and doesn't have many ABs, but I heard LA was kinda down on him so far.
Would it be a good idea to approach them about one of their extra outfielders? Will they ask for more than we can afford to trade? I'm not sure how appealing Marte would be to them, but that's who I had in mind to start with.
by Pronk33 on Dec 6, 2007 2:28 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
It's the first thing I thought as well, but I don't really see a fit unless you want to trade Sabathia.
by nickjs21 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:40 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by gte619n on
Dec 6, 2007 10:11 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
I'm not one to get all "moral" about sports, but Bonds is a cancer I just don't want having anything to do with my team.
by Turkmenbashi on Dec 6, 2007 8:51 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
by Thommy on Dec 6, 2007 8:56 AM EST 0 recs
Please?
2008 is our best chance to win it all in a long time. There is no guarantee we have CC in 2009.
Let's take a big gamble for once. We have an established team with known veteran leaders. The team would not be all about him like SF was. I think they can balance him out.
We need a big stick. We need a LF. Barry can be had cheap. Isn't he a classic "damaged goods" type player?
Maybe he can even give Pronk some hints on how to adjust his swing to compensate for wearing plate mail on his arm.
by KevinV on Dec 6, 2007 9:32 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Please?
So why not eff it up with a one-year rental, criminal clubhouse cancer?!
by Turkmenbashi on
Dec 6, 2007 10:24 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
If its March 1st and we know we can not sign CC and Bonds is still available and in game shape, wouldn't you want to take a shot at him for 1 year just to try to push us over top?
I realize his chemistry awful and his fieldign is poor, but the guy can still mash.
To me it seems like a worthwhile risk if 2008 is our last year with CC.
by KevinV on
Dec 6, 2007 11:29 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
by Turkmenbashi on
Dec 6, 2007 11:54 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
How is signing a FA is an insult to the team? In a way spending the $ on him shows that you believe in this team this year and you think think they can win it all, so you are giving them all they help you can get.
The biggest downside of Bonds to me is that he is a Type A FA. I don't like the idea of losing the draft picks.
by KevinV on
Dec 6, 2007 12:20 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
by Turkmenbashi on
Dec 6, 2007 1:42 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
Are you saying the media circus would be an insult to our core? I am not tryin to be flippant. I really do not understand the insult.
by KevinV on
Dec 6, 2007 1:48 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
Effect of talent Bonds brings < effect ridiculous Bonds issues have on the clubhouse
While I agree with your point that players almost universally appreciate when management brings in better players, I just feel like some guys might think "hey, we're good enough as is, why do we need to bring in this clown?"
Of course I think I might be overestimating players' perceptions of Bonds. I guess a lot of people really respect him and feel some sympathy for him.
by Turkmenbashi on
Dec 6, 2007 1:59 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
by Jay on
Dec 6, 2007 2:09 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
by Turkmenbashi on
Dec 6, 2007 2:37 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
That was the problem with Bonds' Giants. Not enough veterans. They weren't a veteran team at all.
by nickjs21 on
Dec 6, 2007 11:28 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
He brings a media circus, no doubt. But he wouldn't be the centerpiece of this team like he was in SF. He would be a 1 year mercenary and that's all.
I think we could find a way to mitigate the media circus. It should be less this year any way. He can't talk about the case due to his pending trial and he has already taken the HR title.
by KevinV on
Dec 6, 2007 11:34 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
by nickjs21 on
Dec 6, 2007 11:36 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
by KevinV on
Dec 6, 2007 11:39 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Please?
by nickjs21 on
Dec 6, 2007 11:41 AM EST
up
0 recs
Hah
by KevinV on
Dec 6, 2007 11:46 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Just a thought...Bonds in LF?
We have a DH that can play a barely average position, we don't need two. Barry in the outfield is pretty sad.
Also, after all the team has done to build chemistry and togetherness, bringing the constant biggest story and baseball along with all the fan reaction that entails would seem to derail the entire process.
No... Stop it.
by painaxl on Dec 6, 2007 10:10 AM EST 0 recs








