Let's Go Tribe!: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez

Nate Silver at BP Unfiltered has a post  about Max Ramirez.  He is basically unimpressed by Ramirez, noting that much of his value is inflated by a high walk rate, which may have more to do with the fact that he is old for his minor league levels than with any great pitch selection ability.  Also, Ramirez's defense is apparently not good.  It's an interesting read.

0 recs  |  Comment 35 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
Good link. I do assume they weren't going to give us that J. Salty character for half a season of the "retiring" Bob Wickman. That said, Shapiro had them over a barrel at the time of the trade -- Atlanta's bullpen was nearly as bad as ours but they were still in the hunt. I guess that means Max was the best Shapiro could do.

Now, I'm gonna go come up with a better word for the 2006 NL wild card race than "hunt."

by fleerdon on Feb 4, 2007 9:21 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
Yeah, this one, I recall Shapiro saying there were players they could have selected that were closer to major-league ready but they preferred the projectability of Ramirez.  

Hard to tell how much sweeter of a deal we might have got if Wickman wasn't throwing out the potential retiring angle.  

by cheech99 on Feb 4, 2007 10:30 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
No better deal at all.  We traded away a few months of Bob Wickman, the rest was between them and not us.

by Jay on Feb 4, 2007 10:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
Max Ramirez has had an inflated value for some time and I am sure he will struggle to be consistent defensively but I do not think it is a stretch to say he could be a decent hitter.  I doubt he will end up being a catcher if he makes the majors given his arm problems but who know Shapiro likes offense over defense with his catchers.  Maybe by 2010 he will take over for Victor.  Victor will be moved to first base by then because his arm will be almost worthless if his current trend continues.
Swing and a big miss

by 5tribetipies on Feb 4, 2007 2:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
He does seem destined to end up at 1B or DH at this point -- he's getting a little old to learn new skill positions.  Is it just me, or does it seem like the Indians never want to try anyone at 3B?  It seems like plenty of mediocre catchers and shortstops could play 3B, but outside of Peralta playing it part-time in 2004, I can't think of when we've ever done it.

I mean, whatever Garko's athletic deficiencies, he did make it to Buffalo as a catcher.  Would he have been that ridiculous at third base?  Would Victor have been?  Or have the Indians decided that above-average defense at 3B is a huge advantage and undervalued in the market?

by Jay on Feb 4, 2007 3:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
Third base has always been my favorite position; and I think part of that is the near even balance of defense and offense.  

I think the fewest members of the Hall of Fame played third base, right?  Part of that is no one really moves along the defensive spectrum to third base.  SS's become 2B's.  Outfielders all gravitate to LF, then to 1B.

I also think part of it is, no one can agree on defensive metrics in general, and that goes double for third-basemen, as left-handed starting pitching can skew the results.  I'll say this, if the FO was ready to sign Mark Mulder and consider having four left-handed starters, they must really believe in Mr. Marte's defensive prowess.

by cheech99 on Feb 4, 2007 5:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
I was a little surprised at Wedge's recent dismissive comment of Garko as a catcher (don't have the link handy). I recall them insuring that he worked hard to improve behind the plate while in the minors, but never read any really disparaging reports on his catching ability of the kind we've already seen about Ramirez.

To my mind, they switched Garko because Martinez was blocking him and they needed another position for him. When I read Wedge's comment, I thought to myself: "Well, you know Ryan's probably still a better catcher than he is a first baseman."

by mcrose on Feb 5, 2007 12:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
never read any really disparaging reports on his catching ability of the kind we've already seen about Ramirez

Well, any comments you read tend to be in the context of a guy as a total prospect.  With Garko, the defense was suspect, but people loved everything else about him, and he fairly leapt up the ladder to Triple-A in basically one season.  With MaxRam, if he's not a catcher, then who cares about a guy who looks like he might rake -- at age 22 in low-A?  If he clobbers pitching at two levels this year and makes it to Triple-A, as Garko did at that age, the rap on him will change in a hurry, regardless of his position.

by Jay on Feb 5, 2007 1:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
Can't help but think that in many other orgs Garko would have seen ML action at catcher last year.

by mcrose on Feb 5, 2007 10:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
It depends on the organization and how desperate they were for a catcher. With Victor Martinez and Kelly Shoppach, the decision has been made for you, but if the choice was between Garko and a guy like Toby Hall, it would be a much more interesting decision.

by Ryan on Feb 5, 2007 11:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
Yep. I just thought that was a better reason to explain why he'll spend time at first. To say that Garko would never cut it as a ML catcher strikes me as a little disingenuous, since at this point he's probably a better catcher than 1B, where he will actually play.

by mcrose on Feb 5, 2007 5:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
We've discussed this before, but if you really believe that Garko was anything other than a defensive liability behind the plate, then you have to say that moving him to 1b was a tremendous mistake.  Right?

by dgcambridge on Feb 6, 2007 2:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
I think Garko can be both a defensive liability behind the plate and better than he is at first.

I'm not kidding.

by afh4 on Feb 6, 2007 2:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
At this point, at least. Same could probably be said of Victor to some degree - neither upgrades the defense when they put on a 1B mitt.

by mcrose on Feb 6, 2007 4:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
There is no reasonable basis for thinking that Victor wouldn't be a very good first baseman, if he played it full-time for over a year, as Garko has.

by Jay on Feb 6, 2007 10:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
I did say "at this point". I actually almost wrote "at the end of last year", because I don't know if the work Ryan put in fielding grounders in the Caribbean sun has paid off to any extent.

But it was clear watching either of them at 1B last year that they were learning on the job. It will be interesting to see how much time each of them ends up getting over there. It's the logical place to keep Vic in the lineup when he needs a break from catching, and its the only place for Garko, period.

by mcrose on Feb 7, 2007 9:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
I'm pretty tired of having to correct people who carelessly state (or imply) that Victor is an all-around bad defender.  There's just no truth to it.  Catching base-stealers is not related to other defensive skills at all, and Victor has a long reputation as an excellent all-around defender, reaching deep into his minor league career.  The guy started as a shortstop and is very intelligent, he can damned sure learn to play a fine first base if that's what he needs to do.

by Jay on Feb 6, 2007 10:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
If Garko was a serviceable catcher, then the right thing to do would be to trade him.  But either way, you can't trade him for anything good until he establishes himself as a big-league hitter.

by Jay on Feb 6, 2007 10:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Look at Brandon Inge, for instance!
Hello everyone,

Jay - Brandon Inge comes to mind - from what I recall, I think Inge was solid or okay defensively behind the plate, but wasn't Ivan Rodriguez either.  Yet, he goes to 3B and seemed to excel there (I don't know about GC-caliber,) but he seemed to get a lot of praise over there for his defensive ability.

I too am surprised that we haven't tried more guys over there - after all, the farm system hasn't had many quality 3B in the last several years - the likes of Corey Smith, Pat Osborn, probably one or two others I don't recall at the moment, before Kevin Kouzmanoff and Andy Marte came along, and Kouzmanoff wasn't considered good defensively at 3B.  Only Marte was, and he still needs some more reps to make sure he is a solid defensive 3B at the ML level.  

In other words - there haven't been many options over the years, so you'd think that the Indians would have been willing to try almost anyone who couldn't stick at SS/2B/CF/C and see if they could adapt to 3B.  It certainly wouldn't have hurt.

Just my 2 cents.  :-)

Go Tribe! :-)

by indiansfan on Feb 4, 2007 6:32 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Re: Look at Brandon Inge, for instance!
Inge may be such a good athlete that he's not a fair comparison for anybody. The WS commentators last year said he dunk a basketball on a few steps and do a backflip from a standstill. No offense to the guys we're talking about here, but I don't see Victor hanging from the rim. Not while I'm sober, anyway.

by fleerdon on Feb 5, 2007 5:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Look at Brandon Inge, for instance!
Side note. I wonder who has the best vertical on the Indians? Actually, I wonder which of 25-man Indians I would take if I were drafting a team for a five-on-five basketball league. I'm thinking Sabathia underneath, Barfield running point, and Sizemore at 2-guard. Maybe Blake as swing man, but I'm struggling for a power forward. Westbrook? Davis? It's tempting to use Hafner, but I just can't see that ending well.

by fleerdon on Feb 5, 2007 7:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Look at Brandon Inge, for instance!
Jason Davis was a basketball player in high school.

Aaron Boone and Matt Whitney have also had plenty of experience playing basketball, to the detriment of their baseball career.

by Ryan on Feb 5, 2007 11:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Look at Brandon Inge, for instance!
Blake is sort of famously the Indians best athlete right? I would think he's your Inge-type character on the Tribe and, thusly, maybe your basketball MVP.

Still, I've always suspected Blake is qualified as a great athlete b/c he's positionless and just an ok MLB player. It seems ridiculous that he's actually a better athlete than, say, Sizemore. It's just that with Sizemore there are way better things to talk about, like how he plays baseball really well.

by afh4 on Feb 6, 2007 11:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Look at Brandon Inge, for instance!
I don't think anyone's claimed Blake is a better athlete than Sizemore, who turned down a full scholarship as a quarterback when he signed with the Expos.

by Jay on Feb 6, 2007 10:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Look at Brandon Inge, for instance!
It's not that anyone directly would compare the two, just that an average viewer might, over the course of a season, get the impression Blake is the official "athlete" of the Cleveland Indians. Maybe my perception is skewed but it seems like we got some mention of Blake as athlete every few games last year.

It's the same with Inge-all of that stuff about him dunking a basketball and kicking a field goal and whatever else, it's only in the discussion because there's not a ton to say about Brandon Inge the baseball player.

by afh4 on Feb 7, 2007 11:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
If you go back a couple of years, the FO thought they had a couple of high-potential 3B prospects in Corey Smith and Matt Whitney, so why move anyone to 3B?

Similarly, a year ago, we seemed to have a nice selection of 1B prospects at all minor-league levels: Garko, Aubrey, Head, Mulhern (who is also an outfielder).

It just shows how quickly a prospect's flame can burn out due to injury or lack of development - and how quickly a perceived overstock at one position can a drought.

A few years back, we had nobody for CF, hence the aquisition of Milton Bradley. Now, just about all of our best OF prospects have CF potential.

by kov on Feb 5, 2007 10:27 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
If you go back a couple of years, the FO thought they had a couple of high-potential 3B prospects in Corey Smith and Matt Whitney, so why move anyone to 3B?

You would have to go back more than a couple years to find a time when those guys were considered really good prospects.  Outside of Whitney's short-season debut -- five years ago -- neither one of them ever had a good season after high school.  Smith had a couple of okay seasons as a kind-of young Double-A guy, but he also committed 45 errors in a season -- twice.  That was about as good as either one ever got.

Yeah, I said 45, twice, not a typo.

I think it is fair to say that the Marte trade happened because the Indians had been desperate for even a good 3B prospect in the upper minors, and had been for a couple of years already.

by Jay on Feb 5, 2007 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That was the guy I forgot about - Whitney!
Hello kov and Jay,

I knew I forgot another 3B prospect - Matt Whitney.  And Jay, I agree with you in the sense that those two hadn't been considered good to great prospects really since Whitney broke his foot and Smith's first full season at AA - and that was quite some time ago.  By the time Kouzmanoff was drafted in 2003, Smith was already a prospect who lost his luster and Whitney was out with the knee injury, which definitely put a hit on his prospect status.  

So, yes, the Indians hadn't had a good 3B prospect for several years - Kouzmanoff showed signs before the fall on the steps in the AFL, then Marte was traded for.  

Yes, it's amazing how quickly a position of strength at a position in a farm system can quickly turn into a weakness.

Go Tribe! :-)

by indiansfan on Feb 6, 2007 12:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
Not to quibble with Jay (a dangerous thing to do!), but:

Matt Whitney was a hot prospect until he hurt his leg and missed the 2003 season. He came back in 2004 at the age of 20 to play at Lake County and hit .256/.347/.390 (195 ABs). So, two years ago, at the beginning of the 2005 season, he still appeared to have the potential to recover from the injury. I believe the FO considered him to be a good prospect at that point, but not like they did in 2002.

Cory Smith was a hot prospect at the beginning of 2004, after hitting .271/.340/.397 at Akron at the age of 21. His offense slipped in 2004 and his defense never did improve. So, I would say he was still a hot prospect three years ago.

In my defense, I'm getting older and three years ago seems like two years ago :-)

by kov on Feb 6, 2007 12:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Smith was still decent, but probably not a hot...
prospect.

Hello kov,

First, regarding Whitney, like I said, his injury caused a hit in his prospect status, which you agree with with your last statement - even when the injury occurred in 2003, there had to be doubt on whether Whitney would ever be able to regain his old prospect status, and as it turned out, he didn't.

Regarding Smith, I did not look up Smith's numbers from my last post, so I was a bit surprised to see that Smith had hit .271 at AA Akron at age 21.  That itself was decent, but I would still argue he didn't have the hot prospect status when you take into account that his power dropped in 2003 (9 HRs compared to 18 in 2001 and 13 in 2002 in almost the same number of ABs at Low-A and High-A respectively,) plus the fact that Smith's BB/K ratio really had declined from 2000 to 2001, then rebounded a bit in 2002, but still well over a 2 K/1 BB ratio at High-A, further dropping his prospect status from its highest point when he was drafted.  His 50 BB/99 K ratio at AA was a nice improvement, but at a sacrifice of his power, so I would say that Smith was still a decent prospect at the end of 2003, probably better than I gave him credit for in my last post, but still not a hot prospect, and arguably, Kouzmanoff was probably the hotter prospect than Smith (and Whitney also) when he was drafted in the 2003 Draft.

Just my 2 cents.  :-)

Go Tribe! :-)

by indiansfan on Feb 6, 2007 10:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
http://www.letsgotribe.com/?op=search&offset=0&old_count=30&type=story&section=& string=max+ramirez&search=Search&count=30
Interesting stuff on how we felt about Max Ramirez at the time of the trade as opposed to now.  I don't know if he has lost something as we had more time to evaluate him but none the less it is fun to look back.
Swing and a big miss

by 5tribetipies on Feb 5, 2007 4:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
http://www.letsgotribe.com/story/2006/8/5/201444/9636
Sorry this is the link i should have posted. My bad.
Swing and a big miss

by 5tribetipies on Feb 5, 2007 4:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
He hasn't lost anything, this new thread is just reacting to a post from Nate Silver -- who, by the way, no matter how smart he may be, is just a guy looking at the stats.  He doesn't know anything more about this player than we do.

That said, we do have more reports on the player since the trade, and of course that is a factor.  But it was clear from the outset that this was one of those players that the Indians like for reasons that are not, shall we say, projectably obvious.

by Jay on Feb 5, 2007 5:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Baseball Prospectus on Max Ramirez
Small addendum ... one small thing that has changed his value is the new CBA, which allowed the Indians to leave Max off the 40-man without exposing him to the Rule 5 draft.  One suspects, in this and in other moves, that the Indians saw that CBA change coming.  Dolan was one of the lead negotiators after all.

by Jay on Feb 5, 2007 5:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.
Start posting about the Indians »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Bullpen Banter's Indians Preview and our Top 25 Prospects
Dscn0271_small
The Pitchers 2004 vs. 2010
Scared_of_santa_small
top 30 prospects
Small
DYE
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Small
I think we found our utility infielder
Small
Baseball in Japan
3444ant_black_small
Spring Training Trips
Hans_small
Trade Peralta?
3444ant_black_small
Beware the year of the Ox

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who would you most like to see in the rotation to start the season?

  60 votes | Results

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Casey Blake's Grit has passed.
Talbot's Mind is Blown / Sowers Out of the Race
Brian Giles Retires
NYT weighs in on the Indians' woes
I came away from that game with a hatred of the Yankees and was absolute...
LL Responds to ESPN-Bradley Interview
Pitch Face!
Lebron suspended for PEDs
NJ Institute of Technology math professor projects Tribe for 67 wins
Realignment Committee with Interesting Ideas

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Authors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4