BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
for those without a baseball prospectus subscription ...
BP's PECOTA player projection system ranks the tribe as having:
#17 farm system in baseball (taking into account rookie-eligible players only). d-rays are ranked #1.
#6 in 25-and under talent (regardless of rookie eligibility). d-rays rank #1 here as well.
#2 in 'total talent stock' (looking at all players in the organization ... but not sure how far into the future they're trying to look here). twins are ranked #1.
all in all, bodes well for the next few years, but with a middle-to-low budget, the organization needs a couple of good drafts to get some impact talent back into the system.
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by plato on Apr 27, 2007 2:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
The other really interesting thing to me is that they've got Kouzmanoff at #11 (whose performance this year must've been ignored, as he's currently hitting .125 for the Padres).
by zempf on Apr 27, 2007 2:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by zempf on Apr 27, 2007 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by cheech99 on Apr 27, 2007 4:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
Mind you, if I was to pick one player to build around, I would choose Grady over Gordon. Although time will tell on that, and Grady will need to adjust his approach against lefty pitchers.
by Brandini on Apr 27, 2007 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
I don't understand what you mean.
by Jay on Apr 27, 2007 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by fleerdon on Apr 27, 2007 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by Jay on Apr 28, 2007 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
Just ask a Red Sox fan about how Coco is in center. He's got very good closing speed, but his jumps and routes aren't very good at all. It's the same reason why Choo is never going to be a center fielder.
by Ryan on Apr 28, 2007 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by fleerdon on Apr 28, 2007 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by Jay on Apr 28, 2007 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by Brick. on Apr 28, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by Jay on Apr 28, 2007 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by drerikbrady on Apr 28, 2007 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
Also, from a HBT story I linked to a while back...
One thing to note right away: aside from Taveras, nobody really stood out in center field in 2006. In fact, there isn't really much difference between number three, Chone Figgins, and number 15, Juan Pierre. The bottom two, though, Joey Gathright and Johnny Damon are genuinely atrocious throwers, at least they were in 2006.
by fleerdon on Apr 28, 2007 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by Jay on Apr 28, 2007 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by Ryan on Apr 27, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: BP's PECOTA prospect / organization rankings
by Brick. on Apr 27, 2007 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure I trust the system!
No offense, but rating Scott Lewis #53 and Adam Miller #82, complaining about Miller's injury history, when Scott Lewis' history is more checkered?!
Also, Miller has done no worse at AAA than Lewis has at AA, thanks to Lewis' poor start in his last outing. Besides that, they complain about Miller's poor performance so far, but did they stop to realize that Miller has made, I believe, one start on normal rest? The other times, he's had 5-6 days rest, and on another, 8 days rest. Today, he'll be going on 6 days rest, so you really can't read too much into his performance at this point. Once he starts pitching every fifth day like he's supposed to a few times, then you can get a better idea of how well he can do at AAA.
Like zempf mentioned, they complain about Miller's performance, but they essentially give Kouz a pass, even though he's doing poorly by most standards. Essentially, I don't even know why they're taking this year's performance into account when they did these rankings - most players haven't even had 100 ABs yet or 5 starts, not even a month of baseball, yet they're going to incorporate these early-season stats into their analysis to try to justify their rankings? That right there would give me pause in believing the validity of these rankings.
Like I said, they're one of the few, if not the only one, that would rank Lewis higher than Miller, and trying to say or imply that Miller's injury history is more significant or more worrisome than Lewis'.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
by indiansfan on Apr 27, 2007 4:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: I'm not sure I trust the system!
by Jay on Apr 27, 2007 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see why they are rated like that now - thanks!
by indiansfan on Apr 28, 2007 11:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















