The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
Still no official word on the make-up games with Seattle, but it looks as though at least one game will be played while they are visiting in September. I kind of expected that, but still: bleh. Link.
Though no firm details have been announced, Casey Blake, the Tribe's players' union representative, confirmed Tuesday that at least one of the four snowed-out games against the Mariners from early April will have to be played when the Indians visit Seattle during the last week of the regular season.
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
Re: The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
by dgcambridge on May 1, 2007 10:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
by mplswahoo on May 1, 2007 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
by mjmarble on May 1, 2007 11:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
by Ryan on May 2, 2007 12:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
by RockChalkTribe on May 2, 2007 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
The Milwaukee White Sox?
In an effort to return Major League Baseball to Milwaukee after the departure of the Braves, local businessman and minority Braves owner Bud Selig brought other teams to play at County Stadium, beginning with a 1967 exhibition game between the Chicago White Sox and Minnesota Twins. The exhibition game attracted more than 51,000 spectators, so Selig's group contracted with Sox owner Arthur Allyn to host nine Chicago White Sox home games at County Stadium in 1968.
Selig's experiment was staggeringly successful - those nine games drew 264,297 fans. In Chicago that season, the Sox drew 539,478 fans to their remaining 58 home games. In just a handful of games, the Milwaukee crowds accounted for nearly one-third of the total attendance at White Sox games. In light of this success, Selig and Allyn agreed that County Stadium would host Sox home games again the next season.
In 1969, the Sox schedule in Milwaukee was expanded to include 11 home games (one against every other franchise in the American League at the time). Although those games were attended by slightly fewer fans (198,211 fans, for an average of 18,019) they represented a greater percentage of the total White Sox attendance than the previous year - over one-third of the fans who went to Sox home games in 1969 did so at County Stadium (in the remaining 59 home dates in Chicago, the Sox drew 391,335 for an average of 6,632 per game).
Selig was unable to gain a major league franchise for Milwaukee through expansion, so he purchased the Pale Hose from Allyn with the intention of moving them north to County Stadium. But unwilling to concede Chicago to the National League, the American League vetoed the sale. Not discouraged, Selig instead bought the struggling Seattle Pilots instead. In the spring of 1970 Milwaukee had baseball again, and County Stadium had a new tenant.
by FranklinScott on May 2, 2007 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
by Jackdaw on May 2, 2007 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
by palcal on May 2, 2007 12:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Really bizarre rules!
Regarding that snowed out home opener, we have to replay that whole game, yet, on Tuesday, the Cubs-Pirates game was suspended in the bottom of the 7th inning because the Cubs scored in the top of the 7th to take the lead 6-5 and the Pirates hadn't come to bat yet in the bottom of the 7th inning. If they had followed the old rules, the Pirates would have won 5-2 because the old rules stated that they go by the score of the last completed inning.
Wouldn't it just make more sense to resume every suspended game, regardless of whether it's official or not? Why replay 4.4999999 perfectly good, valid innings when we don't have to? Really bizarre rules in my opinion.
Maybe one day, MLB will figure it all out, but I'm not holding my breath. :-)
Just my 2 cents.
by indiansfan on May 2, 2007 4:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
by rog on May 2, 2007 9:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Cleveland Indians of Seattle?
He's right, they're going to have to wear it and hang with 'em. Possibly at the same time.
by dgcambridge on May 3, 2007 11:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















