Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Cleveland at Boston, 7:05 PM (STO)
Memorial Day
Starting Pitchers:
Boston: Curt Schilling (3.94 ERA, 30 PRC)
Cleveland: Sleepy Kitten (5.93 ERA, 7 PRC)
The Indians had favorable matchups for each game of the Detroit series; this series, not so much. Josh Beckett will be coming off the DL tomorrow, and Dice-K will pitch on Wednesday.
The Indians optioned Andy Marte to Buffalo today, calling up Rafael Perez in his place. My first impression: makes sense short-term, but this might bite the Indians come next season. More after the game.
581 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by mkwng @ Let's Go Tribe! on May 28, 2007 7:04 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Cleveland:
- Sizemore - CF
- Blake - 3B
- Hafner - DH
- Martinez - C
- Nixon - RF
- Peralta - SS
- Dellucci - LF
- Garko - 1B
- Barfield - 2B
- Lugo - SS
- Crisp - CF
- Youkillis - 1B
- Ramirez - DH
- Drew - RF
- Lowell - 3B
- Varitek - C
- Pena - LF
- Pedroia - 2B
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by TribeLoverInNewYork on May 28, 2007 7:16 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by TribeLoverInNewYork on May 28, 2007 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
NESN said its actually possible he might not play a game in the series. Feeling ill.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by FranklinScott on May 28, 2007 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by TribeLoverInNewYork on May 28, 2007 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Regardless, pretty incredible.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by TribeLoverInNewYork on May 28, 2007 7:27 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
.404/.402/.627 1.029
Some kind of mistake with that BA/OBP but otherwise should be accurate: http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=martivi01&year=00
You'll have to go elsewhere for a reason to rip on the best hitting catcher in baseball.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
I absolutely love how we see a lot of pitches. But I will also forever be the site's apologist for the right of players to go to the plate looking for their perfect pitch to drive right away.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
I'm respecting BoSox fans a bit more now. Shiver
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by TribeLoverInNewYork on May 28, 2007 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by one size more on May 28, 2007 7:28 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by TribeLoverInNewYork on May 28, 2007 7:32 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by TribeLoverInNewYork on May 28, 2007 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by TribeLoverInNewYork on May 28, 2007 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Would tomorrow be a good night for it?
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by one size more on May 28, 2007 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Fenway
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Calling BS. Grady was 11 when Jackson played his final game. This is like oden saying he liked watching the Lakers-Celtics growing up. I guess Oden loved Dee Brown and Eddie Jones.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by one size more on May 28, 2007 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by TribeLoverInNewYork on May 28, 2007 7:49 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by one size more on May 28, 2007 7:51 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Ok, we had our two basestealing threats on.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by one size more on May 28, 2007 7:52 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
cliff looked like he needed a nap.
my friend: oh! he's like a sleepy kitten!
it kind of stuck. and then suddenly became incredibly apt recently when clifton didn't cover first.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Rayman @ Let's Go Tribe! on May 28, 2007 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
That's about as bad a mischaracterization of Victor's situation as I can imagine a commentator making.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by one size more on May 28, 2007 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Terrible inning by everyone there.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Our guys look tired.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
He should do comedy with Rick Dempsey.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Remy makes me laugh sometimes. Like with his pizza throw commentary.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
I long ago released any expectation of winning tonight.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
No wonder Boston has such a good record.
by one size more on May 28, 2007 8:15 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
yeah, i got nothin'.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Thank you.
From,
Cliff
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
All things considered, could have been much worse. Though of course Cliff won't make it past 6 throwing that many pitches.
by one size more on May 28, 2007 8:29 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Maybe Schilling will have cooled off after that long break.
Maybe.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
I'd like to see Wedge get thrown out.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
That said, they're both trying to live low in the zone and Schilling's being allowed to and Cliff's not. That's how it looks to me anyways.
Plus, Cliff isn't a rookie. He deserves whatever Schill's getting.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
That comment wasn't me questioning y'all. That was me, like, seriously, having no spatial intelligence to speak of. :D
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
whispers: White Squall
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by portlandtribefan on May 28, 2007 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Still, as of now, it's the kind of trade nobody has clearly won. We have more time to win it.
I guess my point, which I've meandered to, is that I can't imagine any Indians fans sitting around in a bar in 10 years kvetching about how absolutely horrible this trade was. It's either going to be forgettable or a win.
If it had to be someone, might as well be Manny.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
... Because that is not celebratory for me, that's why. >:O
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
No matter what happens, it will be a BoSox or Yankees lovefest.
You think that this year, now that the Yankees stink, that they might fade out a little. Instead, the lead on every BBTN is OMG WTF IS WRONG WITH THE YANKEES?!?
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Rayman @ Let's Go Tribe! on May 28, 2007 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by portlandtribefan on May 28, 2007 8:57 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by one size more on May 28, 2007 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
And yeah, I've heard that low and away stuff. I don't buy it. Hafner pokes that stuff for basehits like wild.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Here's to hoping he doesn't.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Rayman @ Let's Go Tribe! on May 28, 2007 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Peralta stealing a base = bizarre.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Fiddlesticks on May 28, 2007 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
You know it's Boston's night when Youkilis
Doesn't mean the Indians can't win tonight (a testament to them still being in this game,) but when things like that happen, the slight advantage would seem to shift toward Boston's favor.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Where was Dellucci?!
Not to pick on Dellucci, as he's looking better at the plate lately, but that ball bounced so far off the triangle that you would have thought Dellucci wouldn't have been too far away from it. If Dellucci had hustled toward left-center, MAYBE Youkilis would have only had a triple and/or been thrown out at home plate (at least there would have been a play at the plate.)
Of course, someone might question too why Hernandez was still pitching, but for the most part, he hasn't looked too bad tonight. If he could become serviceable again, that can only help us long-term.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
Re: Where was Dellucci?!
Right. One reclamation project I can handle, but now with Koplove up we're over quota.
Re: Where was Dellucci?!
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Gradyforpresident on May 28, 2007 9:41 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by mkwng @ Let's Go Tribe! on May 28, 2007 9:41 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
(Anyone else having refresh problems?)
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Whatever, it's better than a DP. Do it Vic.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Gradyforpresident on May 28, 2007 9:48 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Gradyforpresident on May 28, 2007 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Gradyforpresident on May 28, 2007 9:49 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by mkwng @ Let's Go Tribe! on May 28, 2007 9:49 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Gradyforpresident on May 28, 2007 9:52 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Gradyforpresident on May 28, 2007 9:53 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
"...but i didn't have to go then."
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Can't win em all.
I hope they prove me wrong ... Boy, I'm negative tonight.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by supermarioelia on May 28, 2007 10:09 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by nctribefan on May 28, 2007 10:12 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by nctribefan on May 28, 2007 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
As I said last night:
Career ERA: 3.5
Career ERA on 0 Days Rest: 4.88
WHY WEDGE?! I KNOW YOU'VE GOT THESE NUMBERS.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Let's see the same splits for everyone on the staff.
Be sure to include the number of innings so we can understand the sample sizes we're dealing with.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
LET'S GO TRIBE!!!
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
is that not a foul ball, then?
by nctribefan on May 28, 2007 10:19 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by TribeLoverInNewYork on May 28, 2007 10:20 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by supermarioelia on May 28, 2007 10:21 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by nctribefan on May 28, 2007 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Kos @ Let's Go Tribe! on May 28, 2007 10:22 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by Turkmenbashi on May 28, 2007 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by nctribefan on May 28, 2007 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Hope you enjoy your win!
Love,
~ Chuck Merriweather
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Does anyone understand the call?
And does anyone know where the hell Travis Hafner is?
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
why do we keep getting stuck with the most brain dead umpires?
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by supermarioelia on May 28, 2007 10:25 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
A batter is out when --
(f) He attempts to hit a third strike and the ball touches him;
Although that wasn't a real swing.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by nctribefan on May 28, 2007 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by NickFantana on May 28, 2007 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
unfortunately, as i read it, a batter is out when he tries to swing at a third strike and it hits him, regardless of whether the catcher catches it.
by nctribefan on May 28, 2007 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by nctribefan on May 28, 2007 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by nctribefan on May 28, 2007 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
b) A third strike is legally caught by the catcher;
Rule 6.05(j) covers in part the dropped third strike:
j) After a third strike or after he hits a fair ball, he or first base is tagged before he touches first base;
Rule 6.05(f) reads logically in context that a third strike swing that then hits the batter is an out.
Rule 5.09(a) makes it a dead ball when a batter is hit.
(a) A pitched ball touches a batter, or his clothing, while in his legal batting position; runners, if forced, advance;
It's not quite appropriate obviously, but it's the closest thing that applies.
I haven't found any rule discussing whether the hands count as part of the bat.
I think the umpires applied the rules correctly to their "interpretation" of the play.
The circumstances made it more ridiculous.
by dave @ Let's Go Tribe! on May 28, 2007 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Grady Sizemore Strike (looking), G Sizemore flied out to center 0 0
Casey Blake Strike (looking), Ball, Ball, Strike (foul), Foul, Ball, Ball, C Blake walked 0 0
Travis Hafner Strike (looking), Ball, Strike (looking), Foul, Strike (swinging), T Hafner struck out swinging, C Blake to second on wild pitch by E Santana 0 0
Victor Martinez Ball, Strike (looking), Ball, V Martinez singled to center, C Blake scored 1 0
Trot Nixon Ball, T Nixon flied out to center 1 0
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Can we move Travis down in the order already?
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
by supermarioelia on May 28, 2007 10:28 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Hafner's in a slump;
Sizemore is having issues;
but still we're in first!
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
The Yankees are an incomprehensible 13.5 games behind Boston, tied with the D-Rays for 8th place in the Wild Card race, 7.5 games back of Detroit.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
I think they need 95 wins to make the postseason, and that would take a .655 performance -- they'd have to play like a 106-win team. And frankly, Pythagoras just doesn't have that kind of sock.
Re: Game Thread: May 28, 2007
Thoughts on 2 issues!
Question: It looked to me like Blake didn't swing the bat around until AFTER it hit him; as he tried to get out of the way, the bat went through the zone. Therefore, shouldn't Blake have been on 1st, or at worst, got another pitch if the ball hit his bat? Seems like a bad call to me, or at the very least, a very disputed call.
The other issue I have is, will Hafner ever break out of this? He doesn't look at all like the same hitter. I know he has a long track record of succeeding, but teams will probably continue to pitch him like they are until he makes an adjustment and not chase so many bad pitches like he did in his last AB and foul off so many pitches he usually drives. The question is, what if he doesn't? What if he's like this all year, or even into next year? I doubt teams will go back to the way they used to pitch him.
Question: Would it be better to resign Hafner long-term or CC long-term if you could only sign one of them, and why? For the record, I always thought Sabathia was #1, followed by Pronk, then Westbrook, but we've already signed Westbrook, so at most, we'll probably only be able to retain one of Pronk or CC. The question is, which one would be easier to replace? I keep thinking that CC's production will be harder to replace than Hafner's - opponents can keep walking/avoiding Hafner, and if he tries too hard like he's doing now, he'll keep getting himself out by either chasing garbage or fouling off pitches he'd normally crush.
On the other hand, opponents can't avoid CC (barring injury, of course, but that would go for Hafner as well,) and even though CC only pitches once every 5 days, it seems to me you can replace a powerful hitter/slugger easier than you can an ace pitcher - 3 solid hitters in a lineup can make up for the lack of a slugger than 3 average pitchers can make for the lack of an ace (see mid-90s Indians.)
Just something to consider - the more I watch Hafner, the more I wonder if this slump will be broken soon or if this is something that Pronk will put up with all year, if not into 2008 as well. He's never been in a slump for this long and looked this bad, and teams likely won't change their style of pitching as long as it's working - if Pronk can't make the adjustment, I'm not sure I see him being the consistent hitter he has been over the past several years. I hope I'm wrong on that, but by now, he would have already gone into one of his hot streaks, regardless of what adjustments pitchers had made to him.
If he wasn't chasing so many bad pitches and mishitting the few pitches that are in the strike zone, I probably wouldn't be as concerned and wouldn't be asking this, but I'm starting to think this will be more of a season-long slump for Hafner, not a month-long slump. I hope I'm wrong when I say that.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
Re: Thoughts on 2 issues!
the difference-maker is that CC will cost a bajillion dollars to resign, whereas Pronk might only cost a quarter bajillion dollars.
by nctribefan on May 28, 2007 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I think I'd rather spend the bajillion for a guy
In essence, I agree with you - I think CC is the more valuable of the two, but I get the feeling the Indians will have a better chance of keeping Pronk than CC, and will likely make a "better" effort to resign him than CC.
Re: Thoughts on 2 issues!
That said, there are reasons not to be quite so despondent. We feel like this is a two-month slump, but it isn't -- not at all. The slump is worse than you think, but it hasn't lasted that long.
- .185/.340/.333 over 23 games, since arriving in Baltimore on May 4.
- .381/.494/.651 over 25 games leading up to that point.
- May is Pronk's worst month, per career splits.
- Although not this severe, May was Pronk's worst month in 2005 and a close second in 2004.
I don't know what the Indians' last contract offer was to him. Emotionally, I'm pulling that offer off the table before I get sick and pass out. But intellectually, I'm moving in for the kill, and I'm not changing the number.
Re: Thoughts on 2 issues!
Re: Thoughts on 2 issues!
by Kos @ Let's Go Tribe! on May 29, 2007 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Thoughts on 2 issues!
That's not what Pronk needs right now. Pronk needs the collective to concentrate on the pitch low and away. Pronk needs us to see the ball with him. Pronk needs us to get on the exercise bike and peddle like hell right before his at bat.
Seriously people, Pronk needs us. We need to step up. Who's with me?
Re: Thoughts on 2 issues!
Is there a realistic chance he signs that contract
Regarding the Yankees!
I would think if the Yankees don't get it going in full force by July 4th, I'm thinking they'd have to give serious consideration to pulling the plug. Boston isn't likely to slow down any time soon, and with the other three AL East teams standing in the Yankees' path, not to mention other teams in the WC hunt, going .500 or slightly above in June is not likely going to cut it. I'm thinking they're going to have play at least .600 ball or more in June to really have a realistic shot of reaching the postseason in 2007, and right now, that looks like a very tall order, even for them and their $200 million dollar payroll (or whatever high figure it is these days.)
Not to rub it in, but it's nice to see the D'Rays tied with them - it seems the D'Rays are finally moving up in the world. :-)
Just my 2 cents. :-)
Re: Regarding the Yankees!
Re: Regarding the Yankees!
Re: Regarding the Yankees!
by woodsmeister on May 29, 2007 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: Regarding the Yankees!
Re: Regarding the Yankees!
by drerikbrady on May 29, 2007 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
I underestimated then! :-)
Thanks for the analysis - I didn't see your post until you mentioned it. I knew their hole was deep, but not THAT deep. They're in more trouble than I originally thought. :-)
89 wins likely won't be enough for the WC; I would think at least 90, and probably more like 92-93 wins would be the minimum for winning the WC this year at this point. Who knows? Maybe even 95 wins might be needed; 93 wasn't enough for us 2 years ago and it wasn't enough for Seattle back in 2002 or 2003 (not sure.)

by 














