Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

Outfield Platoons

I know I'm not alone in my disappointment with the corner outfielders this year.  Nixon started off the year on fire, but has since settled into a bad stretch. Dellucci has been next to useless in key at-bats and his defense has been nothing to write home about.  I find myself cringing whenever these two guys come up to bat now, it's really been that ugly at times (as I type this, Dellucci hits a 3 run homer....awesome, but he still isn't off the hook).  I really can't complain about Michaels, but he seems to get a lot fewer at bats compared to Dellucci.  The table below shows the splits for all three platoon outfielders for the 2007 season, up to June 13.

Pitcher    Bats    Player         AB       BA      OBP     SLG     OPS     BA w/ RISP
Lefty       Left     Dellucci       23     .174      .208     .261      .469         .163
Righty                                 140    .250     .308     .407      .715  
Lefty         Left      Nixon       45     .222     .275      .289      .563        .226
Righty                                 131    .260     .355      .366      .722  
Lefty         Right    Michaels   59       .288     .377      .492      .868        .346
Righty                                  52       .250     .264      .385      .649  

As a platoon, each player's at-bats obviously correlate with the type of pitcher they've historically had the most success against. Dellucci and Nixon have seen about the same number of at-bats and neither has been much better than the other offensively.  The only standout stat is Nixon's .226 BA with runners in scoring position compared toDellucci's miserable .163.

Meanwhile, Michaels is sitting with a .868 OPS and a .346 BA with RISP.  J-Mike also sports better range in left field, making several game altering catches this season.

It's unfortunate that both left-handed platoon bats have failed to make a significant impact so far, since there is no easy alternative for Wedge other than to give them playing time.  First, Wedge is notoriously stubborn and will likely stick with the pure platoon all season, even though the two lefties lack of production arguably cancels out any benefits of matching up a righty bat in the lineup against a lefty pitcher.  Second, benching Dellucci/Nixon for an extended period of time would likely create some dissent in the clubhouse.  Taking scheduled at-bats from the team's veteran leadership is not the message Wedge wants to send to the rest of the team.

To add another layer to the issue, Casey Blake has been playing some of the best baseball of his career with solid defense in right and third (a 22 game hit streak doesn't hurt either).  At the beginning of the year Michaels had to split time with three other players, but now that Blake has moved to third base full time and Dellucci and Nixon are struggling, you would think Michaels would see more time right?  Nope, still a benchwarmer more often than not.

Given how upset Michaels gets with himself for so much as striking out, his confidence is probably suffering as he watches Dellucci misread flyballs in left and flail away at the plate.  Dellucci has done nothing to deserve 32% more at-bats than Michaels this season.  Dellucci (.208 OBP) batting second in the lineup instead of J-Mike (.377 OBP) only exacerbates the issue.  The biggest strength of a platoon is its flexibility, whether that means matching up against a pitcher or playing the hot hand to maximize production.

What do you all think of how the outfield has been managed so far this season?

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: Outfield Platoons
I wish J-Mike got more playing time.
Disclaimer: this post doesn't mean what you think it means.

by AngG on Jun 14, 2007 2:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
scratch one thing off the list you'd think you'd never hear a person say.

by ASP on Jun 14, 2007 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
Believe me, I never thought I'd be saying it.
Disclaimer: this post doesn't mean what you think it means.

by AngG on Jun 14, 2007 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
It's so early still. You've got to give these guys at bats before you start making choices between them.

I wish Michaels was playing more but I can't fault Wedge for trying to see 200 ABs out of the guys he thought were going to be the best and who have largely the best track records (Dellucci and Nixon).

The only real problem I have is that Nixon and Dellucci have a total of about 70 ABs against LHP. Those should've been Michaels'.

None of these guys have 200 ABs yet. I understand everyone's frustrated because we've lost some games but there's no reason to think these guys can't right the ship, especially if Shapiro gets in Wedge's ear about, uhh, which guys can actually hit lefties.

by afh4 on Jun 14, 2007 10:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
Agreed. This configuration is designed for strict platoons, and the Indians have two right-handed outfielders on the bench.  

by Ryan on Jun 14, 2007 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
Yeah, this is the kind of thing that baffles me about not just Wedge but baseball managers in general. Michaels and Frankie both have essentialy an equal number of ABs against lefties and righties.

What's the point? Between that and the 73 mis-assigned at bats with Dellucci and Nixon you're talking about like 140 ABs that just went to the wrong guys. I could understand even 50 ABs-weird situations, matchup problems, pinch hitting in interleague. But 140??

by afh4 on Jun 14, 2007 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
That was basically what I alluded to as far as why this is a difficult thing to work around.  While the outfield was set up as a pure platoon, both leftys are performing poorly, often resulting in two holes in the designated "righty on the mound" lineup.  

by Pronk33 on Jun 14, 2007 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
Michaels, though I think he has earned more playing time, is only doing his job. Many have argued that Shoppach's success so far is indicative of proper use -- doesn't that work for Jason also?

In your spirit of discovery, Andrew, I contend that Gutierrez deserves more playing time against righties. He has a career R/L OPS+ platoon split of 87/125 -- not great, but not atrocious -- and he's still considered a prospective starter, no? Then why not give him some ABs against same-handed pitching? Frankly, how much worse than Trot can he be?

by fleerdon on Jun 14, 2007 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
Well, Michaels' job is to hit lefties and you're right that he's doing it. I'd just like to see him do it even more-against every lefty starter and as a pinch hitter for Trot/DD.

The Franky thing, ehh. I can get behind it on some level but I still want Franky to be dealt. Somebody out there needs him bad-did you see Reggie Abercrombie's and Amezagas' numbers? CF is a commodity.  

by afh4 on Jun 14, 2007 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
Maybe this call-up and some extended time in RF (and even a night in CF) vs. LH & RH is a showcase for a trade.  

Is it a coincidence that Gutz led off in a game against the Marlins, who inquired about him in the off-season?

by The DiaTriber on Jun 14, 2007 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
In defense of Gutz:

-He's undergone a pretty radical swing reconstruction at the Indians' expense, and is only now starting to reap the benefits.
-He's by far our best insurance against injury to Grady, knocking on wood til my knuckles bleed.
-League-average corner with superior defense is still a very probable outcome for him.

All in all, I think it's a bit early for Franky-related trade talk.

by fleerdon on Jun 14, 2007 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
Oh, and he's cheap as all get out.

by fleerdon on Jun 14, 2007 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
As much as I'm against this kind of thinking generally, I look at Frank and I see relief pitching that can help us make the playoffs and win in the playoffs.

I don't like going for broke with trades but I think Frank is more valuable to trying to win a championship this year by converting him into a reliever.

by afh4 on Jun 14, 2007 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
I know you mean he's more valuable as a trading piece to return a reliever, but the idea of Gutz moving to the bullpen being the spark for a championship run is funny to me.  Then again, I think everything taken out of context is funny apparently.

by NickFantana on Jun 14, 2007 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
Yeah I was vaguely aware of that when I typed it and actively chose to keep it. It's a funny idea.

by afh4 on Jun 14, 2007 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
That's fair. The idea of trading for relievers gives me pause, though. Eddie Moo has yet to get his fair shot this season, and I have a feeling that a few of the Akron guys -- Jensen Lewis, for example -- will be pressing the ML bullpen this summer, Tom Mastny-style. I'd hate to spend Gutz to get production we could bring in-house.

by fleerdon on Jun 14, 2007 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Outfield Platoons
I think it would be interesting for someone to compare how strictly platooned these guys have been so far compared with historically good platoon pairings.  Pitching changes will keep any platoon from being completely R/L determined, but here are the numbers, based on plate appearances, for these three guys this year.

percentage of plate appearances
Dellucci:
Left - 14%
Right - 86%

Nixon:
Left - 14%
Right - 86%

Michaels:
Left - 57%
Right - 43%

by APV on Jun 14, 2007 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #24
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian — "Country Peach Passion"
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "Fridge Magnet"
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #23
Small
Seriously Go Get Carlos Peña Now
Avatard_small
Indians by the Numbers — #22
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian: "Fridge Magnet"
Stinkees_small
Are you saying Jesus Christ can't hit a curve ball?
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "English Leather"
Etat_small
2012 Cleveland Indians Simulation Results

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?

  194 votes | Results

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

A look back at the last Tribe arbitration hearing
MLB.COM Tribe Top 20
Jared Goedert is Puddin Head Jones
Chisenhall v.  Hannahan
After watching Lindor in the Fall Instructional League, I have very little...
Coming off of an optimistic 80-82 season, is this the Indians window to win?  

See full post on Beyond the Box Score
Praising the Indians offseason
Brooks Baseball Stats
Hello my friends! I hope you guys are ready for Super Bowl Weekend? Make...
Heyman reporting Indians will sign Kotchman

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4