Jensen Lewis
im glad to see him perform so good out of the bullpen, it seems that the FO did the right move taking him out of the starting rotation, whats your take in this player, nobody thinks that he could help the Major league club sooner than everybody expected???...Take a look at his stats http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?n=Lewis%252C%2520J%2520&pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=460029 they look pretty good to me
0 recs |
19 comments
Comments
Re: Jensen Lewis
by mcrose on Jun 29, 2007 10:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jensen Lewis
by Joe. on Jun 29, 2007 12:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jensen Lewis
by Jay on Jun 29, 2007 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jensen Lewis
by mcrose on Jun 29, 2007 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jensen Lewis
Kinston (A+): 108.1 IP, 110 H, 94 SO, 29 BB
As a reliever, look at those ratios:
Akron (AA): 39.0 IP, 27 H, 49 SO, 13 BB
Buffalo (AAA): 8.2 IP, 4 H, 7 SO, 2 BB
A couple more weeks of this kind of stuff, and he might be pitching in Cleveland.
by Ryan on Jun 30, 2007 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jensen Lewis
by Joe. on Jun 30, 2007 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jensen Lewis
I think that all depends upon whether we already have 5 decent starters (I'd say "yes") or a sufficient number of great relievers (I'd say "no".)
It does seem that, if a starter is converted to a reliever, in the minors, the odds of him becoming a major league starter are pretty slim.
Some of the attributes that a starter needs are: at least 3 good pitches (i.e. sufficient "stuff" that opposing batters don't tee off the third time they see him); the ability to throw enough strikes to average 15 pitches (or fewer) per inning (so he can get through 7 innings); and physical endurance.
I also suspect that if the guy's one "plus" pitch is a slider, he has to go to the pen; he can throw it "a lot" as a reliever, but you can't throw 200 innings of sliders.
If the guy is missing that 3rd pitch, or can't throw strikes, I suppose it's possible that he can remedy that deficiency later, in the bullpen, and later become a starter. But that's not a typical scenario.
by CaptainEasy on Jul 1, 2007 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jensen Lewis
by fleerdon on Jul 1, 2007 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Besides the fact that we have 5 decent starters
Hello everyone,
JRam - while I understand that a starter is more valuable than a reliever, in this case, I think Lewis could provide more value, especially immediate value, to the Indians as a reliever than as a starter. The Indians can use more relievers than starters right now, being that our current 5 are doing pretty well for the most part, plus you have youngsters like Sowers and Laffey, along with veterans like Harris and DuBose pitching at AAA.
The bullpen, while doing pretty well in its own right, could always use another power arm or two (A. Miller and Lewis,) or another veteran arm (M. Miller,) so I agree with mcrose in that I think the choice to change Lewis into a reliever could pay more immediate dividends to the Indians than if they would have left him as a starter because it's not likely Lewis would be pitching in the Majors this year as a starter, but it's certainly a possibility as a reliever.
Plus, the Indians don't absolutely have to go trading for a reliever like Gagne or Otsuka now if the price is not to their liking. Granted, they don't have to even if they didn't have those options, but they'd probably be more tempted to do it if they didn't have nice power-arm internal options to consider, and they have two to consider, along with a veteran arm in M. Miller. Granted A. Miller and Lewis don't have Gagne and Otsuka's experience, but Miller and Lewis certainly aren't lacking in stuff when compared to those two, so that should enable the Indians to feel like they don't have to trade prospects they don't want to trade just to grab one of those two Texas relievers because they do have other viable options to bolster their bullpen because those three are pitching as well as they are at AAA, two because of great stuff, and one because he has ML experience and knows how to use his stuff to get ML hitters out.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
by indiansfan on Jul 1, 2007 4:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Laffey
by APV on Jul 1, 2007 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Laffey
0.87 ERA, 41.1IP, 30H, 4R, 7W, 38K
oh, and 6 wins.
by mcrose on Jul 1, 2007 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Laffey
by Ryan on Jul 1, 2007 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Laffey
But it brings up this obscure theoretical question. Which peripherals are "better"? What Laffey did, or a performance with more ground outs and less Ks? Something like 16 ground outs, 4 fly outs, and 5 Ks.
by oxforddave on Jul 1, 2007 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Laffey
K rate indicates a pitcher's ability to fool hitters completely, at a certain level, which is the strongest indication of whether he'll succeed at the next level.
by Jay on Jul 1, 2007 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Laffey
by oxforddave on Jul 1, 2007 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Laffey
by Jay on Jul 1, 2007 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Laffey
by oxforddave on Jul 1, 2007 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Laffey
by Jay on Jul 1, 2007 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I've been very impressed by Laffey, and
by indiansfan on Jul 2, 2007 1:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















