Let's Go Tribe!: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: The Record of Wrongs: Vanderbilt Commodores

Sowers

Just to let you know, Jeremy Sowers had another strong performance in Buffalo.  It was his third straight strong outing.  I think his ERA since mid-June is under 1.00...somewhere around 0.95?!?!?!

If this is true, it sounds a lot like the Sowers of last year where he was dominating AAA and he came up to the MLB team and continued to pitch well.

I think we can all agree that his main issue in April/May was control.  He appears to have fixed that now and if that's the case, that is a good sign for us.

I would feel a lot more confident with him pitching successfully along with Westbrook pitching like he did that last two times.

0 recs  |  Comment 35 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Re: Sowers
"Jeremy Sowers continued to work his way back in Triple-A Buffalo's 3-2 win at Pawtucket on Wednesday. The 24-year-old lefty allowed two runs -- one earned -- on four hits over 5 2/3 innings in his third straight encouraging outing. Since June 20, following his dreadful first few post-demotion outings, Sowers has an 0.95 ERA. Neither Wedge nor general Manager Mark Shapiro have ruled out the possibility that Sowers could eventually re-join this year's Tribe rotation."

From indians.com

by world dictator on Aug 2, 2007 5:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
I don't want to be negative about Sowers, but even with this stretch of good games for him the main difference between last year and this year is still there. Last year he had a GO/AO of close to 1.5 and this year its about 1.

Maybe I'm making too big a deal about this but I doubt Sowers, since he is not a strikeout pitcher, can be effective in the major leagues without all the ground outs he was getting.

by cel13 on Aug 2, 2007 5:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
Yeah, my entirely too long post neglected to mention this, which might be the biggest deal of all.

by afh4 on Aug 2, 2007 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
Ummm. That quote can't be right. He doesn't have an ERA of 0.95 since June 20. It must be July 20. I don't want to calculate it, but his ERA in July was 4.54. See his log here. So I guess that that quote is saying is that Sowers has had 3 good outings in a row.

I don't want to rain on anyone's parade but I'm not nearly as optimistic at this point. Sowers:

1-Has pitched less than six inning in each of his last two starts.

2-Gave up a season low in hits in his last start, with 4. In only 5.2. Including that outing, he's given up 69 hits in 9 starts. Ugh. And, there aren't really bad outings to throw out. There all pretty bad. That's 69 hits in 58 innings. His walks are down, but if you add them in, he's got 83 baserunners in 58 innings.

That's a WHIP of 1.4, which isn't too great for a major league pitcher. And he's in AAA.

3-Still doesn't strike many batters out; he's had some games with high totals, but has also had games where he struck out 3, 2, and 2 batters.

Look, I think he's making some progress but I still think he's a long way from being an effective major league pitcher. My fear is that he's doing what he did last year, which is out thinking AAA batters and pitching to contact. He can't rely on batters to create outs for him. He's got to do it himself, in my opinion.

And he has to be able to go at least 6 innings in minor league games. If he's throwing that many pitches (and I don't know-he could be on a count but that seems crazy) to AAA hitters, than he's likely to get eaten alive in the majors.

So, yeah, there's some progress. His ERA is down some. But for every step forward (his complete game on 7-20), there seems to be a step back (his early exits his last two starts).

Part of what I'm trying to say, is that run prevention isn't what I want to see from Jeremy. He's show he can do that at AAA. He needs to get away from contact, to both be able to go deeper and have less baserunners.

I will give him a lot of credit for lowering his walks. He appears to be making real strides there.

by afh4 on Aug 2, 2007 5:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
Last four starts (using his post-allstar split gives us his numbers for the string of three good starts and one bad start).

W  L  ERA  CG  IP   H  R  ER  HR  BB  SO  GO/AO  AVG
1  1  2.45  1 25.2  26 10  7   1   7  18  0.90    .263

How's he posting that ERA?

The only promising stat I see is the HRs as he's always been very good at having low HR/9 rates in the minors, particularly his AA and AAA years, prior to making his ML debut. Its interesting because his GO/AO rate is so low. Either an extremely lucky BABIP thats covering up a poor LD% or hitters are hitting those weak fly ball outs that stay in the park.

by hans on Aug 2, 2007 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
I disagree. He SHOWED he could suppress runs in AAA early last year. I think his performance this season suggests he could do with proving that he still can.

I'm with you, though. Progress is progress. Keep at it, Jeremy.

by fleerdon on Aug 3, 2007 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
What I'm hoping is that he continues to pitch like this, then we can use him as a trading chip in the offseason to get something else. Let another team wish and hope he can major leaguers out.

by talonk on Aug 2, 2007 5:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
i have a feeling other gm's would be gun shy (value wise) till they saw him indeed succeed at the major league level.  in other words he needs to have a few 'show' starts in order to drive his value back up beyond what any other non-proven commodity has...

by Brick. on Aug 2, 2007 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
Its way way way to soon to give up on a guy after pitching poorly for less than half a season. Thats just silly

by world dictator on Aug 2, 2007 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
That would be like a team giving up on a pitcher after 36 major league innings pitched in three years.
Champion of the Kelly Shoppach for Catcher and Franklin Gutiérrez for Right Fielder campaigns. LGT resident kineisologist

by E5 on Aug 2, 2007 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
Yes, it's too bad they didn't give Brian Sikorski more of a chance.

by Ryan on Aug 3, 2007 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
Forgivce him Ryan, he's still pining foor Guthrie (am surprised it isnt part of his sig). This was his way of getting around Rule #8 ;)

by talonk on Aug 3, 2007 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
I really don't want to belabor this point, and I don't really care what one thinks of Guthrie, or Brandon Phillips, or other controversial Indians topics. I do, however, want to keep those topics from being foisted upon topics that have little to nothing to do with them.

If you want to talk further about something, all you have to do is to create your own diary.

by Ryan on Aug 3, 2007 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
Do you know that the Indians have minor league teams?  Maybe that's the disconnect.

by JK in CBus on Aug 3, 2007 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
I just don't think he'll have a spot in our rotation next year. If he can be packaged with another player or two to solve any of our other needs, why not. If he stays, he stays. But I wouldn't shed any tears if he gets dealt ala Kouz last year (I know the situations are vastly different).

Next year, we'll still have CC, Carmona, Westbrook, Byrd (am assuming his option is picked up), Lee (if he isn't dealt), Miller and Laffey. Lofgren should be ready by 09 as well as maybe Smith.

I know you can never have enough pitching, but if we can get something for Sowers, I say go for it.

by talonk on Aug 3, 2007 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
  1. This is what everyone said this year about our rotation. Now look at us...looking for a 5th pitcher hoping laffey can catch on.

  2. Even if laffey catches he could still have a soweresque sophmore slump.

  3. We have no way of knowing who will outpitch one another out of those possible options for the 5th spot. For all we know Sowers could go on a tear and light things up, Lee could find himself again and return to 18 win form, Miller could get moved to the bullpen, and Laffey could get , knock on wood hurt.

You dont just throw away a pitcher after one bad half of a half of season because he's not a sexy pitcher. Why did we draft him in the first round then. Why did we develop him then. Thats silly

Don't get me wrong if we get a good deal for him or anyone else I'd listen but you guys are practically just trying to get rid of him.

by world dictator on Aug 3, 2007 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
I don't think he's not sexy. I don't think he's any good.

For me, it's a mix of numbers and feel, but this guy does not look like a useful major league pitcher to me.

Obviously, others disagree with my pessimism, and that's fine, he's a young pitcher. We're certainly allowed.

by afh4 on Aug 3, 2007 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
We drafted Tim Drew in the first round too.

by homelytourist on Aug 3, 2007 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
And we traded him* for Grady Sizemore, so look how well that worked out!

*Well.. you know.

by zempf on Aug 3, 2007 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
I think you guys are being overly negative about Sowers.  He's probably on a pitch count.  And those 18 hits in his last three starts?  16 singles, 2 doubles, no triples or HR.  Sounds like he's suppressing runs like crazy even while giving up an unlucky number of hits on BIP.

by Jay on Aug 2, 2007 10:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
They certainly haven't been overly conservative when it comes to Sowers' pitch count. Since the beginning of his July the number of pitches thrown in his outings have been:

93 (6.2 IP 6 ER)
101 (7 IP 5 ER)
108 (6 IP 5 ER)
113 (9 IP 0 ER)
95 (5 IP 1 ER)
101 (5.2 IP 1 ER)

I'd say there's a happy medium he still has to find between going deep into games and keeping the ER down. But I'm happy with the progress he seems to have made, especially keeping those extra-base hits to a minimum.

by supermarioelia on Aug 2, 2007 11:17 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
Shouldn't we all be happy with this development? I know that some people don't like Sowers because of his low strikeout rate, but this guy has dominated the minors before and had a good run last year in the starting rotation. I"m betting he is able to put it together and become a good pitcher, not an ace, but a solid part of our starting rotation.

by columbus714 on Aug 3, 2007 5:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This needs to be mentioned again to all
the Sowers doubters - how is Jamie Moyer surviving and thriving at the ML level at age 44?  With a great K rate?  No, his highest K rate (post-Cubs era when he was a much different pitcher) was 6.07 K/9 IP with Seattle in 1998 - hardly stellar by any means.  Did he ever have a great K rate, even when he won 20+ games for Seattle?  Uh, no - try 5.11 K/9 IP and 5.40 K/9 IP.  

Jay and I had mentioned in the past that Sowers is young enough where a reasonable increase in his K rate would't be impossible for him to achieve.  Does that mean he'll become the next Moyer?  No, but Moyer and others like him are certainly showing that you don't need great peripherals in order to survive and thrive at the ML level, and last time I checked, Sowers' fastball is anywhere from 88-91 MPH, about 5-7 MPH faster than Moyer's fastball.  Is Moyer's offspeed stuff better?  Yes, but I wouldn't say it's as good as Santana's, or even Sabathia's offspeed stuff.  I really can't say that any of Moyer's pitches are stellar or excellent - a bit above-average at best, maybe, but not at the level of Santana's or Sabathia's changeup, nor the level of a Carmona sinker, etc.  That's why I don't think Sowers improving in the mold of Moyer, even if not as good as Moyer, is that unfathomable, which is why you don't give up on him that quickly unless some deal that's an obvious improvement comes along.  

If a great deal comes along for Sowers, sure, you'd consider it, but just giving up on him because his peripherals aren't that strong at age 24, after not even half a season at the ML level and barely half a season at AAA, when he had a 7.65 K/9 IP rate at AA before that half-season at AAA when he didn't have much time to adapt and make adjustments, another point Jay and I have have brought up in the past, that would not be wise in my opinion.

I'm sorry for the rant, but it baffles me a bit that some of you guys are ripping on Sowers so much.  Heck, Moyer improved himself into a quality pitcher, and he was considerably older than Sowers when he did so (in his early- to mid-30s.)  Why can't Sowers improve enough to be a useful ML pitcher at age 24, especially when he has shown signs of good command before, and his pitches aren't that much worse than Moyer's, who really does not have a great pitch, per se, but keeps hitters off balance by changing speeds and outthinking the hitter?  Isn't that what Sowers did when he was going well last year?  Why do people doubt he can make the adjustments to do it again with more development in his approach, command, and pitches?  

SSS understood, his K/9 IP rate at AAA Buffalo has already increased by over 0.50 K/9 IP in the few starts he's been down there compared to last year.  He needs time to work on things and develop - after all, he wasn't in the Indians' farm system that long, especially when compared to our other pitching prospects who reportedly have better velocity and stuff than he has (Miller, Lofgren, Smith, Laffey, etc.) - think Sowers might have been rushed a bit?  I think that's a reasonable conclusion, and not enough of a reason to just get rid of him without getting something of good value for him that will definitely improve us.  If that deal doesn't come along, you don't trade him for "something" just because of weak peripherals at age 24, after only having 1.5 Minor League seasons before making his ML debut, and a successful one at that.

Plus, didn't we hold onto guys like Guthrie and Davis for longer periods because of better stuff and projection, yet did they perform as well as Sowers did at the Minor League level, even though they had better stuff?  All the more reason why you don't trade Sowers unless it's an obvious improvement for us, not just for "something."

Just my 2 cents - again, sorry for the rant - no offense intended to anyone.  :-)  

Go Tribe! :-)

by indiansfan on Aug 3, 2007 7:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: This needs to be mentioned again to all
I like Sowers better than others here, and I am encouraged about his recent starts. But his changeup is below major league average. I'd grade it as a D.

by TribeJay on Aug 4, 2007 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: This needs to be mentioned again to all
whats your defintion of major league average?

by world dictator on Aug 4, 2007 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: This needs to be mentioned again to all
Moyer became a full time major leaguer at 31 years old. He's had an extrememly weird and circuitous career.

So, what exactly is the comparison supposed to show?

by afh4 on Aug 4, 2007 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That it's too early to give up on Sowers!
Hello Andrew,

Obviously, it's way too early to give up on Sowers; if Moyer can make some adjustments and improve in his 30s, why can't Sowers in his 20s?  Moyer's never had great stuff either - he's just learned how to use it in a way that can baffle hitters.

I'm not saying Sowers can duplicate it, but the possibility certainly exists, enough so where giving him away wouldn't be wise in my opinion.  If it's a trade that will definitely help us and it involves him, certainly you'd consider it, but I wouldn't give him away for "just anything."  Like I said, he was a bit rushed through the Minors, faster than any of our other pitching prospects, even though arguably they all have better "stuff" than Sowers has.  Shouldn't we see if all he needs is to catch his breath and figure things out before we think his usefulness is gone?  He is only 24 after all.

Heck, I'd think Lee would be the likelier one to be traded in the offseason, and since he has a "track record," I'd think you'd be able to get something more of value for him than you would for Sowers at this point, and being that Lee is older, all the more reason why I'd have more doubts about Lee finding what he "once had" compared to Sowers figuring out how to best use his stuff in order to regularly get ML hitters out, something he hasn't figured out yet, in addition to refining his pitches and approach further, which would certainly seem possible being that he is only 24-YO.

Just my 2 cents.  :-)

Go Tribe! :-)

by indiansfan on Aug 5, 2007 1:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: That it's too early to give up on Sowers!
Not to speak for Andrew, but my response would be, if Moyer could have done it in his 30s than why didn't Moyer do it in his 20s? Maybe there's a longer (in chronological time) development period for a Moyer-esc type pitcher to be as efficient (or close to) as Moyer.

I guess I would like to see a comparable pitcher who did what Moyer did in his 30s, but in that pitcher's 20s. Is there anyone you can think of? If Sowers takes till his 30s to do what Moyer did, he's not going to be in our organization that long.  

by hans on Aug 5, 2007 2:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: That it's too early to give up on Sowers!
That's what I was saying. If you want to point out a comparable pitcher and say "This is a pitcher who Sowers' can emulate", then I would think you have to look at how that pitcher actually developed. I don't think it's a stretch to argue that Moyer needed those 750 minor league innings to develop whatever advantage it is that he has.

And, again, I don't think this needs to be nearly so polarizing. I don't like Sowers' chances right now. IF does. I have my reasons, related to his peripherals, others have their reasons related to his major league success and supposed makeup.

We don't have to keep repeating these arguments in vague terms.

by afh4 on Aug 5, 2007 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: That it's too early to give up on Sowers!
And all else that I'm going to add is:

1-I never said trade him for "anything." I don't think anyone is seriously suggesting trading him for filler.

2-This idea of Sowers being rushed is a tad overstated. He was a college pitcher and one of the main advantages to drafting him was that he could get to the majors quickly, because of his college experience and his pitching style.

I mean, c'mon. Aaron Laffey just debuted younger than Sowers. This isn't a Felix Hernandez situation. It's not even a Matt Garza situation. He's a college pitcher; you draft them high so they optimally debut like Sowers did. We could list a number of high draft pick pitchers every year who debut like Sowers did or earlier.

by afh4 on Aug 5, 2007 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: That it's too early to give up on Sowers!
Maybe Sowers is smarter than Moyer, or has better coaches.

Moyer was a solid fifth starter at age 24 and a solid 2-3 guy at age 25.  He struggled after that point, but the fact remains that a pitcher in this mold can be successful in his 20's, even without looking past Moyer as a model.

by Jay on Aug 5, 2007 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thoughts on Sowers!
Hello everyone,

Andrew - first, no, you yourself did not say to trade "Sowers for anything" - I'm sorry if I implied that.  However, some are making it sound like we should trade him off for whatever half-way decent piece we can get - at this point in his career, I think it's too early for that.

2.  When I made that comparison to Moyer, I didn't mean that it will take Sowers 10 years to figure out how to throw like Moyer; I meant that his style of pitching and the way he has to go about attacking hitters is pretty much what Moyer has done, and that's probably the best way Sowers will be able to succeed at the ML level.  My point is, if Moyer could figure out in his 30s, don't you think Sowers might be able to figure it out sooner?  

If I recall correctly, Moyer's pitching style was vastly different between his 20s and 30s; he didn't really learn how to use his stuff effectively until he got to Seattle when he was in his 30s; when he was with the Cubs and with Baltimore, from what I understand, his whole method of getting hitters out was considerably different, a main reason why he was so inconsistent and really nothing like the pitcher he's been with Seattle.  If Sowers understands that he has to take a similar approach to what Moyer is doing now at this point in his career, he might be able to come close to duplicating Moyer's success at an earlier age.  As I've already mentioned too, Sowers does throw his fastball a good 5-7 MPH harder than Moyer does, so Sowers' fastball can conceivably be used more as a weapon than Moyer's could, which should only help him become that type of pitcher sooner than Moyer did.

That's all I was saying - that's why it's too early to give up on him for "something" unless it really upgrades us, but for some marginal veteran reliever or some veteran bench player who's a marginal upgrade, for instance, I say, "no deal."

And no offense, Laffey was a HS pick, and spent more time in the Minors than Sowers did (a lot more time - 4.5 seasons compared to Jeremy's 1.5,) so while Laffey was younger than Sowers debuted, Sowers would have had to debut immediately after he was drafted to be the same age Laffey was - no college pitcher does that nowadays, even Mark Prior didn't.

And also, it seems to me there are far more college pitchers that take longer than 1.5 seasons to make the Majors than those that take fewer than 1.5 seasons.  A's RHP Joe Blanton (58 G) took over 2 seasons.  LHP Barry Zito (31 G) took the better part of 2 seasons as well.  While Mulder (24 G) and Hudson (49 G) only took 1.5 years, keep in mind that most soft-tossers will take longer to adapt to the Majors than guys who can throw regularly in the low- to mid-90s, like the four mentioned above.  

Other examples:

LHP Cliff Lee took 2.5 seasons (58 G,) and I think most thought he was on the fast track when he was going through the Expos' system.

RHP Jeremy Guthrie took 1.5-2 seasons (55 G) to reach the Majors, and he clearly wasn't ready when he was called up.

Just because Sowers has hit a roadblock doesn't mean he can't adapt and overcome it - he's 24-YO!  I still say his 1.5 seasons (42 G) was a bit fast, especially for a guy with his profile.  Sowers wasn't "slow" by any means as you're implying.  Give him a chance to catch his breath and see if he can't adapt.  Looking back over those names I mentioned, their first season or two in the Majors weren't exactly smooth sailing either, and they had better stuff than Sowers had.  Sowers' struggles right now should hardly be surprising, nor insurmountable to overcome due to his age, work ethic, and the speed at which he was brought up, which arguably was too early based on his peripherals, despite the stellar ERA and W-L record.  

Just my 2 cents.  :-)

Go Tribe! :-)

by indiansfan on Aug 5, 2007 8:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Thoughts on Sowers!
I don't know what to say except that I'm allowed to not like Sowers' chances, just as your allowed to like them. You don't need to keep writing 700 word posts about how there is a chance Sowers will succeed. Of course there is. No one's issuing definitive statements of his failure that I can see. If they are, go talk to them as opposed to taking every sentence I write and providing weird anecdotal evidence about how it may or may not be indicative of Sowers' future.  

by afh4 on Aug 6, 2007 1:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sowers
Overall, I'm undecided on Sowers, but am encouraged that he was able to go down to Buffalo and have some success (peripherals notwithstanding).

by rog on Aug 6, 2007 12:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.
Start posting about the Indians »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Small
I think we found our utility infielder
Small
Baseball in Japan
3444ant_black_small
Spring Training Trips
Hans_small
Trade Peralta?
3444ant_black_small
Beware the year of the Ox
Bos-fod_small
award-winning independent baseball documentary released
Calavera_small
Create your own 2010 BA Top Ten list (then sign Grady to an extension)
Img_0108_small
Jason Grilli Signs Minor League Deal?
Mariahcareyglitter_medium_medium_small
2009 AL Central Off-Season Transactions and Rumors

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who would you like to see hired to manage the Cleveland Indians?
Bobby Valentine
106 votes
Travis Fryman
41 votes
Manny Acta
113 votes
Don Mattingly
78 votes
Torey Lovullo
30 votes
Other
51 votes

419 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

2010 Cleveland Indians draft preview
Jim Ingraham Angers You.
BP Calls John Hart One of the, STRIKE THAT, BEST GMs of the 90s
Sizemore Addresses Offseason
Can we reach 1,000 on a post about Adam Kennedy?
"At this time, we're looking to make the biggest impact possible on the...
Casey Blake shaved his beard
ICBWDSTGFO550K
Masterson Interview
Nagy in Columbus

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Sweet Baboo

Sweet Baboo, now with glitter


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Authors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4