Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race

CC Sabathia won his 19th game last night, leaving him one win short of Josh Beckett and tied with several other pitchers. In an era of specialized relievers and pitch counts, wins should have become an anachronism, but they still confer a perceived honor that most other statistics can't approach.

So how to translate a simple win-loss record into a more meaningful record of pitcher's performance? Let's start with the most basic tenant of pitching: run prevention.

Runs Allowed

In order to get credit for a win, you must allow fewer runs than your team scores. The best pitcher in a given year should be the one who allows the least amount of runs, assuming all pitchers pitch the same amount of innings. Since a cumulative comparison of runs allowed is going to favor the pitcher who pitches the least amount of innings, runs allowed divided by nine innings pitched, or more simply called Run Average (RA) is a more accurate way of directly comparing pitchers.

Here are the RAs of the main competitors for this season's AL Cy Young:

Fausto Carmona 3.27
Josh Beckett 3.41
John Lackey 3.50
CC Sabathia 3.51
Johan Santana 3.62

RA counts all runs given up by a pitcher scored by runners he allowed to reach base, including unearned runs. Because unearned runs are thought to not be a pitcher's fault, the more accepted run average measure is Earned Run Average, or ERA (difference from RA in parentheses).

John Lackey 3.01 (-.49)
Fausto Carmona 3.06 (-.35)
CC Sabathia 3.21 (-.30)
Josh Beckett 3.27 (-.14)
Johan Santana 3.33 (-29)

Beckett has the smallest difference between runs and earned runs, which makes sense given how good Boston was in making outs out of balls put into play. There is a school of thought, though, that pitchers are in some way responsible for even unearned runs, in which case Beckett would get more credit than Sabathia in the runs allowed department.

Even if you remove defense from the equation, Beckett comes out on top. Fielding Independent Pitching is a statistic that measures "all those things a pitcher is responsible for."

Josh Beckett 3.22
CC Sabathia 3.27
John Lackey 3.66
Johan Santana 3.96
Fausto Carmona 4.05

Innings Pitched

Besides providing value to the team by preventing runs from scoring, pitchers also help their clubs by simply staying on the mound. Physical stamina , pitch efficiency, and knowing how to get the same hitters out 3 or 4 times a game are key ingredients to being able to pitch deep into games, and this ability adds a positive dimension to a starting pitcher. The seventh and eighth innings that a starter pitches reduces innings that a team's primary setup men have to pitch, and over the course of a season, keeps a bullpen rested and healthy.

CC Sabathia 241.0 (7.08 IP/G)
John Lackey 224.0 (6.78 IP/G)
Johan Santana 219.0 (6.63 IP/G)
Fausto Carmona 215.0 (6.71 IP/G)
Josh Beckett 200.2 (6.69 IP/G)

Beckett missed three starts this season, while Fausto Carmona missed a start early in the season after he was optioned to the minors. The other three made their full complement of starts. This is where Sabathia's case can be made: he pitched by far the most innings in the AL, and went deeper into games on a per-game basis than any other contender.

Somewhat related to innings pitched is the Hardball Times statistic, Pitching Runs Created, an equivalent to the offensive Runs Created. It is a cumulative statistic, so those with more innings pitched, all things being equal, will come out on top:

CC Sabathia 131
Johan Santana 124
Josh Beckett 119
John Lackey 118
Fausto Carmona 116

What about peripherals?

If the Cy Young Award is given to the most impressive-looking pitcher, then yes, we should pay close attention to home runs allowed, walks allowed, and strikeouts. But since the award is given to the most effective pitcher, peripherals are more window dressing than the foundation of a pitcher's candidacy. But for what it's worth:

Strikeouts/Game

Johan Santana 10.3
Josh Beckett 9.1
CC Sabathia 8.3
John Lackey 7.5
Fausto Carmona 6.0

Walks/Game

CC Sabathia 1.5
Josh Beckett 1.9
John Lackey 2.2
Johan Santana 2.3
Fausto Carmona 2.7

Home Runs/Game

Fausto Carmona 0.70
John Lackey 0.75
CC Sabathia 0.79
Josh Backett 0.80
Johan Santana 1.45

So who should win?

It really depends on your pitching philosophy. If you gravitate towards rate statistics, Josh Beckett's your man. If you appreciate a pitcher who goes deep into games, Sabathia's your candidate. I personally feel that the 40.1 inning advantage Sabathia has over Beckett makes up for Beckett's superior run prevention numbers. Whatever the case, any distinction between the two should not be based on wins or win percentage, neither of which shows much correlation to actual effectiveness.

 

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
Indians will probably win, not to mess up your analysis, but you know.

by hans on Sep 30, 2007 4:17 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
There are other things voters take into consideration, whether for right or wrong, like strikeouts, which CC is ahead of beckett, and other non traditional stat.

I heard someone on espn mention that the indians were something like 14-1 in CC's starts after they had lost 3 straight. Don't quote me on the exact stat but the point was that CC acted like a true ace in the sense that he literally lead the team by being reliable and stopping losing streaks.

I'm probably butchering this point, but there is something to be said for a pitcher who takes the team on his back and carries them to victory.

by world dictator on Sep 30, 2007 12:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
Tribe has won CC's last six starts.  Lost six of his seven starts before that though.  His ERA during that 1-6 stretch?  2.13.

August was not a fun month...

by Vegas Watch on Sep 30, 2007 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
Rob Neyer's Cy Young Predictor things CC will edge out Beckett, Carmona and Lackey.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/features/cy

by Vegas Watch on Sep 30, 2007 12:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
Here's my Cy Young predictor:
			  1st		Max	   |	   Season Results 
 Rk Name	     Team Place Points Points Share|  W-L   IP	ERA   WHIP  SO SV
+--+----------------+----+-----+------+------+-----+------+---+-----+-----+---+--+
  1 Bartolo Colon     LAA   17	  118	 140  0.84 | 21-8  223	3.48  1.16 157	 
  2 Mariano Rivera    NYY    8	   68	 140  0.49 |  7-4   78	1.38  0.87  80 43
  3 Johan Santana     MIN    3	   51	 140  0.36 | 16-7  232	2.87  0.97 238	 
  4 Cliff Lee	      CLE    0	    8	 140  0.06 | 18-5  202	3.79  1.22 143	 
  5 Mark Buehrle      CHW    0	    5	 140  0.04 | 16-8  237	3.12  1.18 149	 
  6 Jon Garland       CHW    0	    1	 140  0.01 | 18-10 221	3.50  1.17 115	 
  6 Kevin Millwood    CLE    0	    1	 140  0.01 |  9-11 192	2.86  1.22 146	 
I don't think these voters were looking at any "advanced metrics" when they voted for Colon over Santana -- and Lee over Millwood -- in overwhelming numbers.

by Jay on Sep 30, 2007 2:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
Yeah, that's why I tried to keep things simple. It's good that Sabathia did get within a win of Beckett so the voters will have to go look at other things.

I'm still ticked off about the 2005 ballot.

by Ryan on Sep 30, 2007 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand your point about wins, but if it were
all about the wins, Lee and Garland would have been #2 and #3 in some order, though I understand your main point that Colon's 21 wins stood out from the rest of the pack.

Hello Jay,

I guess I'm trying to say, there's still "some hope" the voters will look at more than the wins, but I suspect they'll still choose Beckett because of that round 20 in the win column and the only one to reach that round 20.  It SHOULD be close though - if not, then that's something the voters should be called upon; this should NOT be a slam-dunk vote; as has been mentioned here - you could make an argument for any one of Beckett, Sabathia, Carmona, or Lackey to win it, so this should be a very tightly contested race - let's hope the voters AT LEAST get that right.

Just my 2 cents.  :-)

Go Tribe! :-)

by indiansfan on Sep 30, 2007 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: I understand your point about wins, but if it
The fact that the vote doesn't go straight in the order of wins only shows that the voters are intellectually bankrupt, in addition to being intellectually lazy.  They apply the Wins criteria to the top slot but freelance after that.

I think it will be a close vote, but even if Sabathia wins the vote, that too will only be because the writers are stupid about "Wins."  They'll talk about how Sabathia went 5-1 against Santana and Verlander, but look up those box scores.  Sabathia was not outstanding in those six games -- he was solid, nothing more.  It was the Indians lineup that was outstanding in those games, but Sabathia got the "W."  By the time you've looked at all six, you'll have abandoned all pretense of C.C. getting scewed out of wins.

Any way you slice it, they're still being a slave to the "Win" stat, and it's still stupid.

I've given it a lot of thought, and my vote would go to Carmona.  He simply gave up fewer runs by any measure -- fewer runs, fewer earned runs.  He had the most quality starts and the most dominant starts (1 or 0 earned runs).

Carmona's FIP is higher than the others', but his 64.3% ground ball rate shows that his ERA is no fluke.  On the other hand, several of these guys have HR/F rates that do look a little lucky -- Beckett, Lackey and Sabathia all from 8.5 to 9.4%  Carmona, meanwhile, allowed fewer HR than any of these guys, and his HR/F rate wasn't the least bit lucky (11.9%).

Lackey and Sabathia each allowed 12 unearned runs, and Haren allowed 15.  Bedard missed a month and his rate stats weren't more than a hair better than anyone else's.

All of these guys were great, as was Santana.  But as I read the results, Carmona was just a little bit better than anyone else.

by Jay on Sep 30, 2007 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: I understand your point about wins, but if it
Don't know why it didn't occur to me until after posting this, but here's the "support neutral" leaders for the AL.

Expected Wins:

15.5 Carmona
15.4 Lackey
15.2 Sabathia
14.4 Haren
14.4 Vazquez

Expected Win Pct:

.650 Carmona
.646 Bedard
.636 Beckett
.621 Escobar
.614 Lackey

by Jay on Sep 30, 2007 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: I understand your point about wins, but if it
I really really hope Carmona is a young, healthy Kevin Brown (minus the whole punching dugout walls thing)

by APV on Sep 30, 2007 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: I understand your point about wins, but if it
Am I ok with bad facial hair?  I have bad facial hair...

by APV on Oct 1, 2007 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
That's my favorite example as well.  The Neyer thing concentrates on wins and ERA, with IP and Ks also factoring in.

by Vegas Watch on Sep 30, 2007 3:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
I like Rob, but I now prefer the work of everyday LGTers to him.  

Ryan, cheers on an outstanding bit of analysis.

I don't think anyone -- Tribe fans or other -- can get too animated over the Cy Young winner.  It would be nice for CC, but it's obviously superficial anyway, and Beckett has had a very fine season.

2005 is like the guidebook for why voters are idiots.  Officially.

by tabler84 on Sep 30, 2007 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
Beckett will win because his win total has a 2 at the beginning. CC should win, and Carmona should probably finish second.

by Kos @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 30, 2007 10:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
Also, I really hope Borowski gets some votes...good for a laugh.

by Kos @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 30, 2007 10:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: A Guide to the AL Cy Young Race
44 Saves! Clearly Dominant! Even Joba couldn't do that.
D.S. 8/26/07

by Brad D on Sep 30, 2007 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01731_small
Some quick questions for the locals
Etat_small
Eric's 2012 Cleveland Indians Projections...
Its_alive-fstn_small
Oswalt > Carmona/Heredia
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #24
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian — "Country Peach Passion"
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "Fridge Magnet"
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #23
Small
Seriously Go Get Carlos Peña Now
Avatard_small
Indians by the Numbers — #22
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian: "Fridge Magnet"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Indians depth chart heading into spring training (from Acta's twitter account)
Cleveland reliever Vinnie Pestano had the highest fastball swinging-strike...
Oakland Out-Winnercurses MLB for Cespedes
Indians Sign Jon Garland
A look back at the last Tribe arbitration hearing
MLB.COM Tribe Top 20
Jared Goedert is Puddin Head Jones
Chisenhall v.  Hannahan
After watching Lindor in the Fall Instructional League, I have very little...
Coming off of an optimistic 80-82 season, is this the Indians window to win?  

See full post on Beyond the Box Score

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4