Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Rights
WTAM is reporting the Indians have scheduled a Friday press conference regarding naming rights for the Jake. Far be it from Kevin Keane to mention the time of the press conference for the 10 minutes I listened.
It will be strange calling it something other than The Jake. I have to imagine the name is changing.
0 recs |
28 comments
Comments
Re: Friday press conference
by fwembt on Jan 10, 2008 10:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re:
by supermarioelia on Jan 10, 2008 11:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Progressive Field?
A tarnished image is what I think they got for their money.
by ploni on Jan 10, 2008 11:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Progressive Field?
Anyone second the motion?
by ploni on Jan 10, 2008 11:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Progressive Field?
Another possibility might be Medical Mutual, or another company in the health/medicine industry. It might be a good forward-thinking move for such a company to get the naming rights now, as Cleveland is a bigger player than its size would suggest in the health field, and is apparently trying to get even bigger.
Either way, as far as I'm concerned the only building to ever sit on the corner of Carnegie and Ontario is Jacobs Field
by mpstable on Jan 11, 2008 12:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference
If Richard Jacobs was dead he would be rolling in his grave right now.
Really though, I'm fine with it.
by nickjs21 on Jan 11, 2008 1:27 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference
by cclemens31 on Jan 11, 2008 1:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference
by nickjs21 on Jan 11, 2008 1:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pronk plays at the Prog - has a nice alliteration
by indiansfan on Jan 11, 2008 2:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference
Eh. Whatever. Yankee Stadium, Fenway Park, Wrigley Field, Dodger Stadium. I thin those are really the only safe parks; everywhere else will be a corporate name eventually. Progressive should just write checks directly to CC for the next 5 years. People would be a lot more understanding then.
by CU Adam on Jan 11, 2008 3:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference
by Roger Dorn on Jan 11, 2008 8:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference
William J. Wrigley Co. never owned the Cubs, nor do I believe it ever paid to have its name on the field.
by Harry Doyle on Jan 11, 2008 11:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference
by Roger Dorn on Jan 11, 2008 8:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference
Will the hot dogs be insured now?
by mikebrowns26 on Jan 11, 2008 8:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference
by woodsmeister on Jan 11, 2008 9:29 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Righ
So at least the company buying the naming rights is a successful, Cleveland-based company (there aren't very many of those!) without one of those stupid made up names like Qualcomm or something. And I personally admire their former CEO Peter Lewis (check out his wikipedia page for a list of his charitable donations), so I'm glad he's now associated with my favorite team.
by mrich on Jan 11, 2008 9:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Righ
by Jay on Jan 11, 2008 9:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Righ
It's hard to imagine something like that in today's atmosphere of corporate tie ins, but, at the time the stadium went it, being tied in with the Indians was not a particularly good thing.
by Harry Doyle on Jan 11, 2008 11:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Righ
Jacobs bought the naming rights through 2007 as part of the terms of sale of the team to the Dolan family.
by Jay on Jan 11, 2008 12:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Righ
He did that on March 24, 1994 - more than 5 and a half years before Dolan bought the team. (http://www.brainyhistory.com/events/1994/march_23_1994_169663.html)
And, most importantly, I remember that he bought them because they couldn't find anyone THAT interested in having their name associated with the Indians.
It's great that the team has done so well that this no longer seems to be the case.
by Harry Doyle on Jan 11, 2008 5:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Righ
by Jay on Jan 11, 2008 6:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Righ
by Pronktastic on Jan 11, 2008 10:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Righ
by mrich on Jan 11, 2008 10:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Righ
by Turkmenbashi on Jan 11, 2008 10:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Friday press conference on Stadium Naming Righ
by Pronktastic on Jan 11, 2008 3:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't even think about the "Letters"
Now, what is the letter abbreviation for Browns Stadium - the "B"? Therefore, we'd have the "B," the "P," and the "Q"?
BPQ - it almost sounds like a new type of BBQ. :-)
In all seriousness, I really don't have a problem with the new name - it has a nice ring to it, moreso than some stadium names I've heard, and the company seems to have a good reputation, including charitable contributions. Add in the fact that the Indians have found another revenue stream and I'm all for it.
It will just take some getting used to not hearing it called "Jacobs Field" or the "Jake," but I'll manage. :-)
Just my 2 cents.
by indiansfan on Jan 11, 2008 4:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: I didn't even think about
by jhon on Jan 11, 2008 7:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















