A stadium by any other name...
Richard Jacobs bought the naming rights of the new Indians Park before the 1994 season; he then re-named it Jacobs Field, after both himself and the real estate company he owned. The name didn't sound corporate, like PNC Park or Qwest Field or Network Associates Coliseum, but more along the lines of Busch Stadium, a park with an aesthetic corporate name.
After Jacobs sold the team to Larry Dolan, he retained naming rights through the 2006 season. The Indians couldn't get a replacement in time for 2007, so the old name was kept through that season. But now the team has found a replacement, the name of one of the few remaining Fortune 500 companies left in the area. The new deal will net the Indians, after initial costs, about $48M over the next 16 years. Needless to say, it won't dramatically change the team budget, but it's still a nice little revenue stream.
To those who grew up with Jacobs Field, including myself, it will take a long time to think of it as anything but The Jake. By the time this current contract runs out, the stadium will have been known as Progressive Field longer than its original incarnation, and time will probably have overcome human stubbornness. It's not a blatantly obvious company name, in fact most people would associate the word more with the forward movement of institutions and society than car insurance. It could have been a lot worse.
0 recs |
30
comments
Read Related
Comments
Re: A stadium by any other name...
I don't care what they call it, in my mind it will always be the Jake. Jacobs brought the Indians from cellar dwellers to national page news. He poured his hard earned money into the team and the teams infrastructure. He never questioned his baseball people and never told the GM to keep payroll low so he could make a profit. He is by all accounts the best owner in Cleveland sports franchises, so that is why to me it will always be Jacob's Field.
That said Progressive field isn't horrible. My aunt worked for Progressive insurance until some drug addictive flipped out and killed her after work. She was an awesome aunt and was kind enough to give this man and other maintenance people pizza for doing a job cleaning/maintaining her office and this is how he repaid her. GGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRR
by E5 on Jan 12, 2008 3:09 PM EST 0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
It's kind of funny that the name took on the personality of the stadium (too corny?) and became so closely associated with a lot of fans' memories of Cleveland baseball. That's the sticking point for me, the whole "Jake" thing became ingrained in my memory and it's difficult to chalk it up to just a name at this point. The name represents the stadium to me and the stadium represents a lot of great memories.
Illogical? Yeah, but I'm sure I'll get over it eventually.
by Pronk33 on Jan 12, 2008 3:58 PM EST 0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
We'll all get over it quicker than we think.
by nickjs21 on Jan 12, 2008 6:19 PM EST 0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
Jacobs Field is synonymous with winning baseball. In the 90's everyone was at "The Jake". It was the place to be, and the name was the dawning of a new era of baseball. I can't even imagine not seeing Jacobs Field on the front of the stadium.
http://www.csuohio.edu/ce/assets/Cleveland_Pics/jacobs_field.jpg
by gahnki on
Jan 13, 2008 12:22 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
I loved The Jake, and I'll probably still call it that for a while. But as long as that ballpark is still there, it's still the same place. When demolition crews show up, that's when I'll be upset.
by nickjs21 on
Jan 13, 2008 12:33 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by nickjs21 on
Jan 13, 2008 12:36 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by jakesinger777 on
Jan 13, 2008 7:00 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
Unlike Jacobs, League Park (1920) and Cleveland Municipal Stadium (1948) were each home to a World Series Champion. Note that League Park was known as Dunn Field from 1916-1927 after owner Sunny Jim Dunn. Although that was the name in 1920, it is little remembered today.
This link provides a detailed history regarding the long gestation of Municipal, from which one can draw interesting contrasts and parallels to today's era. Note that the stadium was a by-product of the Progressive era. The site was originally designated for a railroad station, which became unnecessary after one was privately built under Terminal Tower.
Interesting to ponder if the Indians had built their own bigger park in the 1920's would Cleveland have had a classic stadium, although Wrigley and Fenway were built well before then.
by palcal on Jan 12, 2008 7:05 PM EST 0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by Pronk33 on
Jan 13, 2008 12:46 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by jhon on
Jan 14, 2008 11:28 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by Deaner on Jan 12, 2008 8:16 PM EST 0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by CaptainEasy on
Jan 12, 2008 8:21 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by fwembt on
Jan 12, 2008 8:41 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
But back to baseball, I find that the only upsetting thing for me in transitioning from the quasi-corporate name I have warm feelings for to the slightly more noticeable corporate name is the piece of crap logo we have to suffer now. (I challenge anyone to top that run-on sentence!)
Ten minutes with Photoshop and a picture of Jesus on a dinosaur would make a better logo.
by jds16 on
Jan 13, 2008 12:33 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by nickjs21 on
Jan 13, 2008 12:35 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
Q) How much do we spend on advertising annually?
A) The amount we'll spend on the partnership in 2008 represents about 1 percent of what we spent on advertising in 2007 (we spent about 300 million in 2006).
Q)We recently had a reduction in force to save money. How can we reconcile spending this money on a sponsorship?
A) The only relationship between the two is that both actions are designed to help us grow our business. The auto insurance business, like many industries, is very price competitive. Following our reorganization in September in which we combined our Agency and Direct Businesses into one Personal Lines organization, we determined that there were some redundant activities in Personal Lines. In addition, we reviewed IT staffing levels and determined that we were overstaffed in IT. The decision to let go about one percent of our countrywide work force was driven by the need to reduce redundant activities and staff to more appropriate levels in IT. These changes will also allow us to operate more efficiently which can help us bring lower prices to more customers and grow our business.
We continuously invest in advertising and sponsorships in order to build awareness of Progressive and grow the business. While we are
very excited about our partnership with the Indians and the national awareness this can bring the company, the amount we'll spend on this
per year is a small percentage of our overall annual advertising spend. This sponsorship now becomes part of that yearly amount we'll
spend; it will not be incremental to that amount, and our expectations are that it will give us national exposure, help build awareness and help us grow faster.
Take that information for what it's worth...
I'm not a big fan of cooperate names on stadiums/parks, however, it seems to be everywhere else. If this money can be used to keep our home grown talent or sign a big free agent then I'm all for it. Like most of you, I think I'll still be referring to it as "the Jake".
Sorry for the lengthy post.
by vindicate2 on
Jan 13, 2008 11:15 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by nickjs21 on
Jan 13, 2008 11:59 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by hans on
Jan 13, 2008 4:24 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
I work for Nationwide in Columbus. On one hand we're facing layoff announcements over the next month, while simultaneously committing to sponsoring some second-tier NASCAR circuit. They are certainly compatible actions. The insurance market is quite cyclical and the current market is very soft (lots of competition). Trimming expenses/prices and boosting advertising are both good ways to fight for market share.
by CBusSteve on
Jan 14, 2008 12:18 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by elsandito on
Jan 14, 2008 12:37 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
I'm sure that Progressive had planned for this potential move long ago, and it's not as if they got together in a meeting, asked how they could afford the naming rights, and one exec said "let's lay off some folks and then we can afford it!"
by rolub on
Jan 18, 2008 11:26 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by royalsreview on Jan 12, 2008 11:48 PM EST 0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
isn't 16 years a really long term, though? (i have no idea how long other parks' contracts are. but it's hilarious to me to think that the Padres might be playing at "PETCO Park" into the 2020s.)
anyway, won't this seem like an inordinately sweet deal for Progressive by the time the contract is up, or no?
by jeremy on Jan 13, 2008 5:32 AM EST 0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by supermarioelia on Jan 13, 2008 1:35 PM EST 0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by Turkmenbashi on
Jan 13, 2008 2:41 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by palcal on
Jan 13, 2008 10:52 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by mkwng on
Jan 18, 2008 11:39 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
by Brick. on Jan 14, 2008 6:14 PM EST 0 recs
Re: A stadium by any other name...
I kid, I kid.
by Turkmenbashi on Jan 15, 2008 11:53 AM EST 0 recs







