Lugo for Robertson or Willis?

What? I don't have the energy to even consider what that means.

about 3 years ago afh4 13 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

I can see it, it gets the Red Sox one step closer to an all-white team.

by Toxicadam on Nov 16, 2008 2:55 PM EST reply actions 2 recs

rec

"Lotta heart in Cleveland." - Ian Hunter

by Denver Tribe Fan on Nov 16, 2008 4:45 PM EST up reply actions

Even the Red Sox can’t turn Dontrelle Willis into a white man.

by peter m on Nov 18, 2008 9:59 AM EST up reply actions

In 1985 Dennis Oil Can Boyd league the majors in hits allowed: 273.

by odradek on Nov 18, 2008 11:52 PM EST up reply actions

I’d go with Robertson if I were Boston. He’s a little cheaper, 17 M compared to 22 M owed to Willis, and a little better. Robertson, according to FIP, suffered some bad luck last year. He would no doubt benefit from Boston’s much superior defense.

If I was Detroit, I’d do it for Willis, but not for Robertson. Robertson should bounce back to being a decent back end guy, and they don’t exactly have an abundance of those in Detroit. To give up that for Lugo, who costs just as much and will be 33 next year doesn’t seem like a good idea.

by ClarkM on Nov 16, 2008 3:24 PM EST reply actions

Here’s a question. Why do we keep getting stories about Boston and Manny? Who cares?

by APV on Nov 16, 2008 10:15 PM EST reply actions

No idea. This big story about how Manny got the letter from the Red Sox threatening to suspend him … it’s front-page now, but I read that exact same story in July, either on ESPN or in one of the Boston papers. It’s not remotely a new story.

by Jay on Nov 16, 2008 10:33 PM EST up reply actions