Tribe 3 way trade per ROSENTHAL
8:46 p.m. — Mets close to landing Putz
The Mets are close to landing a setup man for new closer Francisco Rodriguez — and that setup man is another closer from the American League West.J.J. Putz appears headed to the Mets in a three-team trade with the Mariners and Indians.
Mets right-hander Aaron Heilman, outfielder Endy Chavez and first-base prospect Mike Carp are in the deal, as is Indians outfielder Franklin Gutierrez.
It is not yet clear which players are headed where.
UPDATED 10:19 p.m. — Mets working to acquire Putz
Under terms of the deal, the Mets would get Putz, outfielder Jeremy Reed and reliever Sean Green from Seattle. The Mariners would receive reliever Aaron Heilman, outfielder Endy Chavez and first baseman Mike Carp from the Mets. They'd also get Franklin Gutierrez from the Indians and minor leaguers. The Indians would get reliever Joe Smith from the Mets and infielder Luis Valbuena from Seattle.
6 months ago
volapuk
526 comments
0 recs |
Comments
meh, we’d be receiving someone back from the Mets, I get excited too easily
by millionairesrow on
Dec 10, 2008 9:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wonder who that would be?
Like I said, Carp would seem unlikely – he’s a solid prospect from what I’ve heard and read (though I haven’t heard as much about him over the past season), but we have a LOT of depth at that position, and likely will for at least the next 4-5 years, based on my post below.
Fernando Martinez? That’s probably unlikely, as Gutierrez would likely not be enough to fetch him. Is there a starting pitching prospect (Jon Niese, who is from Defiance HS in Defiance, Ohio? See this link) we could maybe get from the Mets.
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 9:23 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hmm… that could be a possibility, depending on the price, but I’m not sure just including Gutierrez would be enough to get that done, though maybe since Beltre only has 1 year left on his contract.
However, if Rosenthal is correct, it sounds like there are additional prospects that are unnamed, so Beltre wouldn’t qualify there, unless the negotiations turn toward Beltre, but maybe that’s why the Indians are involved in the first place in this proposed deal?
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 9:18 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hello volapuk,
This is the link to that report.
If I had to guess, the only one that would make sense for us of those names mentioned would be Heilman, probably for the bullpen (unless they planned to make him a starter again, which I think he wanted to be, didn’t he, or am I incorrect?) Then again, he could just as easily go to Seattle since they’ll need a quality arm in the bullpen to help replace Putz (though Heilman is not at that level).
I suppose Chavez could be a possibility as well, though he’s more of a speed guy that probably is best as a 4th-OFer/defensive replacement-type rather than a starter. I’m not sure he’d fill in for Gutierrez if that is the idea. Again, though, perhaps he’s off to Seattle.
I don’t see how Carp is involved – we allowed Brown to be left off the 40-man roster because we already have a lot of 1B options, both now (Garko/Martinez/Hafner/Aubrey), the near future (add LaPorta to that previous mix), and even the far future (Mills/Hodges/Weglarz?!), so I really can’t see Carp coming here unless he’s additional trade bait or they really want increased depth (possibly allowing another trade that would include Mills, or possibly Garko, though Carp likely won’t be ready for another 1-2 seasons, and there would still be the other 1B options we have, so I still find Carp to be included to be unlikely, probably the most unlikely of the three names mentioned).
Could Carp head to Seattle? Perhaps, though I thought Clement was a possibility there, especially since they still have Johjima as well. Like I said before, I’ll be a bit surprised if Carp comes here, only because we have considerable depth at 1B, unless another possible trade is in the works. I’m not sure Carp can play elsewhere (OF, perhaps? Not sure).
The report also mentions that one or more prospects (not named in the report, it would seem) would also be in the deal, but it’s not mentioned who or where they would go.
Just my 2 cents – this is interesting to see who we’ll get – presumably Heilman, perhaps Chavez, perhaps someone else or in addition to one or both of them, though I would suspect Seattle would get the majority of the haul because of Putz’s inclusion in the deal. Who would we get?
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 9:14 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
My thoughts:
1. People saying this is a precursor to a Dunn deal should chill. There’s zero reason to believe Dunn is going to Cleveland. If anything, I can pretty much gurantee he’d choose the Nats over us, and that’s just one team.
…But yeah Dunn would rock.
2. Why are we trading for a reliever? Don’t we already have too many relievers and too few spots? I know Shapiro believes in stacking up his bullpen but damn dude.
3. I think we’re getting Heilman to start for us personally. (As in I think we’ll wind up with Heilman)
4. Regardless of motives, this is a good trade for us. Gutz for two decent players with good upside? I’ll take that anyday of the week. Gutz had great defense but seriously, he wasn’t fufilling his true potential as a part time RF.
5. I think we’re going to be throwing in another decent prospect.
6. I think Shapiro is going to let this 2nd baseman prospect/Barfield/Marte at third duke it out to see who starts next season.
by world dictator on
Dec 10, 2008 10:32 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Obvious precursor to an Adam Dunn signing.
Don't forget to pay your parking ticket.
by TheVanillaGorilla on
Dec 10, 2008 9:23 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
what?!?
fyi, rosenthal has changed the entry title “to trying to land putz”
by macasson on
Dec 10, 2008 9:23 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
NO NOT GUTZ
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:25 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
If we need to unload him to land Dunn, sign me up.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 9:29 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My daydreams about this have a little more Dellucci and a lot les Gutz.
Don't forget to pay your parking ticket.
by TheVanillaGorilla on
Dec 10, 2008 9:31 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ugh.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:31 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hello westbrook,
I’m not enamored with Dunn either, but at the prices that he might go for, he MIGHT be worth a shot, perhaps. I wouldn’t go overboard with him, though. Defensively, you’ll get next-to-nothing from him, but our DH spot is currently being taken by a player who can’t play defense without it hurting him (Hafner), so he will have to play some defense (I presume Grady in CF, Choo in RF, Dunn in LF, with Francisco the 4th OFer?)
Dunn is the type that can carry a team when he’s hot, but also get quite cold for extended periods. If we do sign him, I hope he has more hot streaks and can keep the cold streaks to a minimum, with better contact rates.
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 9:34 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
not as cheap as the #1 defensive OF in baseball who I believe will hit well this year.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:36 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Is there a reason to believe that? Dunn is a known, and very, very good, quantity. Dunn has a career OPS+ of 130, Gutz of 86. Gutz has a career high OBP of .318. I really am not seeing how he is any more valuable than Dunn would be. What is the argument?
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 9:39 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The late stretch last year, and a couple stretches in 07.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:40 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’ll take seven years of fantastic output over that. It’s really not even close. Gutz will never, ever be the hitter that Dunn is. He will struggle to be half the hitter Dunn is and all the defense in the world can’t make up for that.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 9:42 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes. I want this deal to happen, I think.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 9:43 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am very low on Gutz as anything but a great 4th OF.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 9:30 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And I’m willing to trade away our defensive replacement for short-term help.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 9:38 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rotoworld
Sources told FOXSports.com’s Ken Rosenthal that the Mets could be close to landing J.J. Putz in a three-team deal also involving the Indians.
Rosenthal has Aaron Heilman, Endy Chavez, Mike Carp and Franklin Gutierrez in the deal, but doesn’t know who is going where. We’re guessing that Heilman would go to Cleveland as the return for Gutierrez, who would be penciled in as Seattle’s center fielder. Chavez and Carp would likely go to Seattle as well. Chavez is no asset at his salary, but Carp is an intriguing first base prospect and Gutierrez has quite a bit of upside. It still doesn’t seem like enough of a return for Putz. Dec. 10 – 9:07 pm et
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:33 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
The particulars of the deal were still being worked out Wednesday night at the Bellagio, but it appears Franklin Gutierrez is headed to the M’s, and Mets right-handed reliever Joe Smith and Mariners infielder Luis Valbuena are coming to Cleveland.Mets right-hander Aaron Heilman and Mariners outfielder Jeremy Reed are also believed to be involved, though it is unclear who is headed where.
by FredOx on
Dec 10, 2008 9:33 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
can I swear, Jay?
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:34 PM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Now I am just confused.
Either way, are we getting enough of a return for Gutz?
by jakesinger777 on
Dec 10, 2008 9:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Gutz would be more valuable to a team playing him in CF, which won’t happen in Cleveland as long as Sizemore is here (that’s for the next 3-4 seasons).
Gutz’s value isn’t what it once was, so we likely won’t get a boatload for him. Still, a quality reliever like Smith, who will be just 25-YO in March, with 2 solid seasons in the MLs is still decent value, along with a middle infielder who could be solid defensively, but doesn’t appear to be much of an offensive force, though he is only 23-YO.
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 9:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I mean this from the bottom of my Ohioan heart.
Who the hell is Aaron Heilman.
by fleerdon on
Dec 10, 2008 9:37 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What the hell do we need another reliever for?
by bewwolv on
Dec 10, 2008 9:37 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can’t believe we might have traded Gutierrez for a reliever who is well, a reliever.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:39 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was about to… I’d better be blown away.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You won’t be. But seriously. Gutz is not that valuable.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 9:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
On second thought, these Venezualan infielders from the M’s seem to work out pretty well.
Luis Valbuena:
.381 .483 .864 in 240 AB @ AA
.383 .373 .756 in 212 AB @ AAA
by bewwolv on
Dec 10, 2008 9:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but this isn’t Bavasi we’re dealing with.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:42 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Valbuena looks like an interested dude. He’s young (22) with minor league numbers that say…I’m not good at evaluating them.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 9:40 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually… his age 22 minors season looks pretty similar to droobs’ age 21
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 9:44 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So are we getting him to hand him the 2B job?
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 9:45 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Target of opportunity for Shap on Gutz’s value, then, is I guess what this deal is.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 9:45 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah..it doesn’t mean he isn’t getting him for the 2B job in 2010. I don’t think they’d hand the job to such an inexperienced guy.
by jakesinger777 on
Dec 10, 2008 9:47 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow, droobs is 17 days younger than Valbuena. $$$$$
So, I just went to check asdrubal’s stats at baseballreference.com, and I swear to god I typed in “droobs” into the search query and it took me a second to realize why I got no results
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 9:46 PM EST
up
reply
actions
3 recs
I just checked – he was pretty meh until last year, age 22: AA: .304/.381/.483 (240 abs), AAA: .302/.383/.373 (212 abs)
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 9:42 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don’t forget that Carlos Santana looked pretty “meh” (which actually was added to the Dictionary as an official word I seen in an online entry a few days ago) until last season.
I’m not saying Valbuena is the next Santana, but sometimes, it takes guys a little while to figure it out. I suspect though that Valbuena is being acquired more for defense and as a throw-in, with the hope that he can become a decent offensive player, particularly with getting on base and showing some speed.
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 9:48 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
at this point I’m hoping Santana is the next Santana…
by Logodaedalus on
Dec 10, 2008 11:13 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I bagged on Gutz a little bit earlier, but now that’s he’s gone, to continue Fleerdon’s brutally honest girlfriend remark, I feel a little queasy, a la just realizing post-dumping that your ex-gf’s hooking up with some other dude.
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 9:38 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Haha, lots more where that came from. “Getting over her” and “finding someone new” are the exact same thing. “I’m waiting til I’m over her” means “I’m too scared and lazy to put my line back in the pond.”
by fleerdon on
Dec 10, 2008 9:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Looks like I just got over him – er, “her” – valbuena actually might be pretty decent
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 9:43 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed, but knowing Shap, this can’t be the 2nd base solution THIS year, can it?
by bewwolv on
Dec 10, 2008 9:44 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
knowing Wedge, he’ll sit on the ML bench for 150 games.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:44 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I feel as if Gutz is the girlfriend you generally found really boring in day to day life, but was crazy good in the bed
by APV on
Dec 10, 2008 10:21 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hire this girlfriend
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 10:22 PM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
I figure he’s more like the girlfriend who’s really good at the kinky stuff but isn’t all that hot to look at.
by Logodaedalus on
Dec 10, 2008 11:15 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but Gutz’s defense was so sexy…he was just never able to put it together with other skills to make it work for Cleveland
by APV on
Dec 10, 2008 11:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you make it sound like the girlfriend who’s really hot but can’t quite figure out how to get her teeth out of the way
by Logodaedalus on
Dec 10, 2008 11:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
I always thought he would end up in a National League setting with his so-so batting and good fielding.
by cclemens31 on
Dec 10, 2008 11:19 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you’re saying there’s some other kind?
by emil minty on
Dec 10, 2008 11:25 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Detroit Tigers are set to acquire right-hander Edwin Jackson from the Tampa Bay Rays for outfielder Matt Joyce, according to a major-league source. — Ed Price
Rosenthal
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:38 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Jackson would have been nice for Gutierrez.
by odradek on
Dec 10, 2008 9:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the feelings on Gutz could prompt this thread to pass, or at least maintain, a comment/minute ratio for the next hour.
You know Selig? Ombudsman.
by rolub on
Dec 10, 2008 9:40 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
My roommate is a huge mets fans (the biggest I know). When I first opened this thread, I went to his room to see what he had to say about Heilman. His reaction was very passive – said that he had good stuff but never got it together. I just went back to his room, poked my head in and said, “Actually, I think we’re getting Joe Smith”. His reaction: “F***!”
I don’t know what that means, but I hope we’re getting Smith instead of Heilman.
by jakesinger777 on
Dec 10, 2008 9:40 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Heilman Era + Last 4 years
2005- 130
2006- 120
2007- 140
2008- 81
Smith ERA+ Last 2 years
2007- 123
2008- 118
Don't forget to pay your parking ticket.
by TheVanillaGorilla on
Dec 10, 2008 9:45 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hello VG,
I was going to say that Heilman has more of a track record, but faltered in 2008, though I’m not sure if he was dealing with an injury or not. It seems to me that the media often mentions him, making him seem to be better than he really is. He’s solid, but I don’t think he’s that significantly better than most quality relievers.
Smith has less of a track record, but is also younger and could be on an upswing. Only time will tell.
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 9:49 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I trust Shap not to waste a quality player like Gutz, but it’s tough to tell what kind of need he’s trying to fill here. I think this is going to tie into either a second trade or another major free agent signing now that we have an outfield roster spot freed up.
Does anyone know anything about Valbuena’s upside? He’s a 22 year old 2b/SS with a .751 career minor league OPS. Joe Smith just seems like an average reliever. Yeah, I don’t get it, I doubt this is near final.
by Pronk33 on
Dec 10, 2008 9:41 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe this is all he can get for Gutz. It wouldn’t surprise me, honestly.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 9:47 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but the Mariners are trading their CLOSER for Gutierrez. That is some indication of his value.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:49 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, an indication of how terrible the Mariners are.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 9:49 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don’t look at his minors numbers as a composite and you might be as pumped as me right now.
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 9:49 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am not pumped. I am not happy with my team today.
Helium Watch: Chuck Lofgren, OF
by jhon on
Dec 10, 2008 10:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I found him in BA’s 2007 handbook.
They say he handles the bat well, draws walks and has some pull-side power which should be more evident as he gets stronger. He’s a below-average runner, with solid yet unspectacular defense. Later in the season the M’s were positive about the improvements he’s made in the field.
This is all before the 08 season which seems to be his best so far (.813 OPS). Not sure if he’s gotten better on defense, but his upside could be a solid #2 hitter with pretty good defense. His floor is probably as a utility infielder (much like Carroll)
by JP_Frost on
Dec 10, 2008 9:51 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Luis Valbuena:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/v/valbulu01.shtml
http://www.baseballamerica.com/statistics/players/cards/?pl_id=83780
by millionairesrow on
Dec 10, 2008 9:42 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I really like the idea of a Mariners" infielder. Considering the track record, i’ll take our chances.
by PatBordersHelmet on
Dec 10, 2008 10:14 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Joe Smith is no joke folks
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 9:43 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
he was off and on one of my fantasy teams last year
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 9:46 PM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Ah. Yeah, looking at Vanilla Gorilla’s stat line above I take back my “average reliever” comment. He’s at least better than that.
by Pronk33 on
Dec 10, 2008 9:48 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You know what this means:
More Benfran
More Looch
:x
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:44 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
NO! NO! NO!
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 9:45 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And more Carroll, for the hell of it.
by fleerdon on
Dec 10, 2008 9:45 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you take that back right now
by cleveland teamer on
Dec 10, 2008 9:47 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can’t, sir. We’re not getting Dunn. And that makes me happy. Sign me up for Early Laporta over him.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:48 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A. How do you know?
B. Why not? Beyond a 1950’s ish aversion to K’s, you haven’t said why you don’t want him.
Try this
1. Sizemore
2. Choo
3. Martinez
4. Dunn
5. Pronk
6. Jhonny
7. Garko
8. Asdrubal
9. Third baseman
That is a great lineup with pretty solid defense all told.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 9:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
1st of all, replace PRONK with travis.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:54 PM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Travis bats 7th. Pronk bats 5th.
by jakesinger777 on
Dec 10, 2008 9:54 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pronk hits 35 homers, travis hits .210
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Stop pussyfooting around and answer the Dunn question.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 9:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would rather have a guy who I can count on day in and day out than a guy who hits a grand slam once every 2 weeks and hits homers at times that may or may not mean a damn thing.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You can’t count on Gutz. Not at all. You can count on Dunn being on base at a greater rate than any current Indian and hitting for more power than any current Indian. Is that not good enough? The “grand slam once every two weeks” is disingenuous and not at all a reflection of reality. Sorry.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 10:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We need more people like you so we can sign Dunn for 2/$15 or something.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 10:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’ll take 12 grand slams from Dunn.
by cleveland teamer on
Dec 10, 2008 10:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeayeayea
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and hits homers at times that may or may not mean a damn thing.
Really brutal. I’m not even convinced this isn’t satire. You’ve proven to be too smart to be this stupid.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Dec 11, 2008 1:50 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I DONT LIKE ADAM DUNN. PERIOD.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 11, 2008 1:47 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Then just understand I’m writing it off as irrational. Which is cool. But won’t be taken seriously.
by Voltaire on
Dec 11, 2008 2:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If he’s such this big slugger who can carry a team, why does he have 0 career postseason ABs?
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 11, 2008 4:20 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So I can mark you down for:
1. selfish empty home runs
2. real players single-handedly get their teams to the playoffs
Did I miss anything?
by Voltaire on
Dec 11, 2008 4:31 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’ll take him hitting to his projections (Marcel/James, whichever) any day.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 9:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
we talked about this earlier, but Pronk’s projections are meaningless
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 9:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know that, I just said that I would take him doing that. I think we all know the value of projections.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 9:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pronk’s projections**, not projections in general.
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 9:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Projections in general have their flaws. Pronk’s are more problematic than most but they still reflect a projection based on numbers he has put up.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 10:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
From my (limited) understand, projections can’t “see” injuries, and probably the most mysterious injury in baseball right now is Pronks’.
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 10:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Definitely. We can all agree that an .880 OPS would be nice to see though, can’t we?
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 10:03 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’ll take Early LaPorta, just hoping that Dellucci never starts a game for the Tribe next year.
by cleveland teamer on
Dec 10, 2008 9:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Wow, if this means we land Dunn, I’m so jazzed up right now it’s crazy
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 9:47 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
/Antonetti pacing in office.
“Sunuvagunsunuvagunsunuvagun ALL RIGHT LET’S GO GET HIM!!!!!!!”
by fleerdon on
Dec 10, 2008 9:49 PM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
I’m still not following why anyone is tying this move to Dunn – are you thinking this frees up an OF spot?
by millionairesrow on
Dec 10, 2008 9:50 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That’s what Dunn people are thinking. Still don’t know if I’m a Dunn person.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 9:50 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it has to. Gutz is our 3rd best OF.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:51 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was joking earlier. I don’t really see it happening at all but i would love to have Adam Dunn at a reasonable price. I don’t see this alone having much effect on us getting him.
Don't forget to pay your parking ticket.
by TheVanillaGorilla on
Dec 10, 2008 9:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wonder if we could justify signing Dunn for his offense, then signing an infielder strictly for his defense. I just really want Dunn, but I’m afraid an extra outfielder is too low on the shopping list this year, even if he is a 40 HR, OBP machine.
by Pronk33 on
Dec 10, 2008 9:51 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That’s the problem with Dunn – virtually no defense. BenFran is arguably a better OFer than Dunn, and I’m not sure Dellucci is worse than Dunn.
Therefore, I too wonder whether Dunn is really on the radar or not – BenFran may get regular playing time, if for no other reason, than to replace Dunn in the late innings, since I’d rather have BenFran in the OF (LF probably) than Dunn any day of the week.
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 9:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BenFran is a pretty lame hitter though, no way his mediocre defense makes up for that. His VORP of 0 isn’t exactly a ringing endorsement of him.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 9:54 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
benfran’s D is almost identical to Dunn’s
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 9:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Which is why having him out there instead of Dunn (if he is a legitimate option) would be despair inducing.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 9:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Are you suggesting that or do you have verifiable proof of that?
BenFran’s range to me seems much better than Dunn’s, and BenFran has played CF in the Minors (not great, but passable enough to play many games out there); Dunn has not.
Guys, BenFran is NOT a problem as a 4th OF – we certainly could do worse (Dellucci, for one). Additionally, BenFran and Gutierrez had comparable OPS in the last few seasons – upper-700s, low-800s, so essentially, you have almost the same hitter. Put Francisco down in the lower part of the order if that is the only option we have, and we certainly could do worse.
The question with Dunn is, can we get him for a price that will make it worth our while to live through his lengthy slumps and strikeout barrages? And, like I said before, I’d still take BenFran late in the game over Dunn in the OF – BenFran has speed and can cover some ground; I have not seen that from Dunn. And being that the Indians are focusing more on defense in the late innings, I suspect the Indians will do that (substitute BenFran for Dunn) late in games when we are in close games. BenFran has enough bat to be useful at least as a 4th-Ofer – he’s shown as much as Gutierrez with the bat in the last few seasons.
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 10:07 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
neither of them plays balls in the air very well, and both have good arms.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:08 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Showing as much as Gutz with the bat is hardly a ringing endorsement. He would certainly be better than Dunn in the field but he is not nearly the hitter.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 10:08 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Uh, Benfran does NOT have speed. Past 2 seasons: 4/9 sbs.
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 10:08 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BPro’s Equivalent Base Running Runs thinks he is a pretty good base runner.
by ClarkM on
Dec 10, 2008 10:20 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay, granted, but you can be a good base runner – and have decent range (which he doesn’t) – without being deemed as having speed.
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 10:21 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Speed means nothing if it doesn’t translate. Ben, according to some metrics, is pretty decent in categories that speed is normally associated with, so for baseball terms, he kind of does have speed.
by ClarkM on
Dec 10, 2008 10:31 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Being a good base runner doesn’t have a lot to do with speed. I’m pretty sure Victor is considered by Bill James to be a good base runner.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Dec 11, 2008 1:52 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
“If you never attempt to steal, they can’t catch ya.”
Don't be stupid. PUT IN MELOAN.
by gte619n on
Dec 11, 2008 9:06 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hello joeee,
Small sample size; in his Minor League career, BenFran is 124/158, a 78.5% success rate.
And, as others have mentioned, SBs is not the end-all to determine whether you have speed or not. BenFran, by most accounts, has the characteristics of good speed; he just needs to refine his base-running technique at the ML level, plus 9 SB attempts is hardly enough of a sample size to even begin to determine whether BenFran can steal bases at the ML level.
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 10:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Granted again, but SB is influenced by the decision to send a guy – which is correlated to how the team views his speed.
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 10:59 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He has a little speed. Speedy guys are the ones who are allowed to run at all.
Helium Watch: Chuck Lofgren, OF
by jhon on
Dec 10, 2008 11:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Are you banking on LaPorta breaking out?
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 9:54 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I guess Dunn could be used a 1st baseman, but I remember reading about him no wanting to play there.
by JP_Frost on
Dec 10, 2008 9:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dunn’s 2008 UZR was -20, with a VORP of 27.2.
BenFran had a -4.3 UZR, with a 10.7 VORP.
Dellucci had a -8.8 UZR, with a 0.3 VORP.
So, Dunn was only 0.8 runs better than BenFran last season? Did I do that right? I think I just blew up my own bandwagon….
by Pronk33 on
Dec 10, 2008 10:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
PMR and RZR really like Francisco’s defense.
by ClarkM on
Dec 10, 2008 10:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
we’re not signing Dunn. Signing him to a 2-3 year deal means we’d eventually be facing a situation where we have Hafner, Dunn, Laporta, Mills and Weglarz – all potentially with the bats to play, and no defensive abilities at all
by APV on
Dec 10, 2008 10:26 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe we start lobbying heavily to add two more DH’s.
by NickFantana on
Dec 10, 2008 10:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That’s assuming that Laporta, Mills and Weglarz all pan out, and Hafner is still around, and that none of them get hurt. A 2/$18 deal would not be bad for us at all.
by fwembt on
Dec 10, 2008 11:18 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m assuming Hafner’s contract is still around.
by APV on
Dec 10, 2008 11:19 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I definite support signing Adam Dunn for eighteen dollars.
by FredOx on
Dec 11, 2008 8:42 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
2/$18m would be outrageously fantastic.
I think we all might have a bit of priapism after the Wood contract.
Don't be stupid. PUT IN MELOAN.
by gte619n on
Dec 11, 2008 9:07 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Looks like Valbuena played with Asdrubal for 3 games. Maybe they were such a killer DP the tribe wanted to reunite.
Speaking of which, what is with the Mariner’s promoting these young guys to AAA for the end of their A/A+ seasons? Looks like Asdrubal stuck in AAA while Valbuena started the next year (2006) back in A ball.
by jakesinger777 on
Dec 10, 2008 9:52 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I should add, those 3 games were in 2005 in AAA Tacoma.
by jakesinger777 on
Dec 10, 2008 9:53 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m guessing it’s due to the logistics – their SS A-ball team is in Everett, WA, while their AAA team is in Tacoma, WA. However, their AA team is in West Tenn. (not sure if it was in San Antonio in 2005 – I keep thinking it was), but either way, their AAA team is closer to their SS team than their AA team is.
All the more advantage why our Minor League teams, outside of Kinston and the AZL indians are so close together, and even closer together with the move to Columbus. We don’t have to resort to moving our guys from SS-A Mahoning Valley to AAA Columbus (or Buffalo in the past), since we have Low-A Lake County within a few earshots of MV.
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 9:59 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Some early thoughts. Joe Smith gets tons of ground balls, like Fausto Style, but he’s a match-up guy. Pretty large platoon split. Not much service time.
Valbuena is interesting. He is 22, controls the strike zone well, which means he hits for a good average and draws walks. Little power, but he’s still young so it may get better. The defense is a mystery.
On Gutz, he’s more valuable to teams that need a center fielder. It makes sense to trade him, especially because the difference between Gutz and Ben isn’t likely to be that great. WARP3 had them about equal value last year. Yes, it includes FRAA, but I think FRAA has it right with these two.
by ClarkM on
Dec 10, 2008 9:54 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
And Gutz is even more valuable when you have an outfield like Safeco.
by bewwolv on
Dec 10, 2008 9:58 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
god, and I wanted to get to bed at a reasonable hour tonight.
by ASP on
Dec 10, 2008 9:59 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I’ve got an exam on Friday! Jesus, Shapiro. A little help here?
by fleerdon on
Dec 10, 2008 10:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, me too. And two more next week.
by ClarkM on
Dec 10, 2008 10:03 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was thinking, “I’ll just check LGT and then get to the giant stack of grading I need to do….” apparently not for a while.
by Logodaedalus on
Dec 10, 2008 11:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe Wood deal has gone south, and Putz is coming to Cleveland.
by odradek on
Dec 10, 2008 10:00 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
All places reporting this deal (which admittedly may have the same source) have Putz going to the Mets.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 10:01 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also, just a general comment, I would’ve thought that the Mariners could get a better package for Putz
by millionairesrow on
Dec 10, 2008 10:00 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I would’ve thought many things about the Mariners. They usually don’t come true.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 10:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did you think Carlos Silva would suck?
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your wishes do come true.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:04 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As foolish as the Silva deal was, he suffered some pretty bad luck last year. He should bounce back some next year.
by ClarkM on
Dec 10, 2008 10:05 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
To me it seems like we’re getting the short end of the stick if this deal goes through. Maybe we’re overrating Gutz a little, but getting a fringe middle infield prospect and a righthanded LOOGY seems a bit meh.
I always thought that building a package around Shoppach and Gutz would net us something more.
by JP_Frost on
Dec 10, 2008 10:02 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Quote from lookout landing:
“I really really really don’t want to trade Valbuena”
They’re livid over there. Hahahahaha
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 10:04 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
do they have some more info on him?
by JP_Frost on
Dec 10, 2008 10:05 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
At least they agree with me on the Jackson/Joyce deal.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:06 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the replys aren’t all in agreement tho.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:08 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
which is probably the same thing they’re saying about Gutz after reading this thread.
You know Selig? Ombudsman.
by rolub on
Dec 10, 2008 10:15 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe they’re afraid because of how Cabrera is developing for us.
I wasn’t sure if Valbuena could develop the offense, but heck, he still seems young enough where he could be a decent-enough hitter, and I’d presume he would be sent to AAA Columbus (does he still have options or not?)
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 10:44 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know most of us are meh over Gutz, but hell if teams are ready to “pencil” him in as their starting centrefielder, then I want the world for him gosh darnit.
by supermarioelia on
Dec 10, 2008 10:12 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
rec
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Mariners are ready to do that, and are the Mariners exactly a pinnacle of smart baseball decisions?
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 10:13 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah I guess. But we’re talking about the leading candidate for MVP on March 31/08 here. Tell me that’s not worth something….oh wait, it’s not? Shoot.
by supermarioelia on
Dec 10, 2008 10:15 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that was a good day
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 10:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Assuming Smith lands here, there has to be another trade coming, right? There would be entirely too many relievers that other teams would have interest in.
by Fundamentals on
Dec 10, 2008 10:13 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
We said this when we signed Dellucci
by NickFantana on
Dec 10, 2008 10:15 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i think that was Nixon
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 10:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did we? Shap said that deal was unexpected but basically a perfect opportunity. At the time it felt “complete” on its own to me.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 10:19 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Perhaps the Indians don’t want to rush Adam Miller out of the gate; admittedly, though, even without Miller, I’d think we’d still be pushing our limit, though the removal of Mastny might be enough to account for the inclusion of Smith.
I still think they want to take it easy with Miller and not rely on him too early, even if he does well in ST. Perhaps they want him to go to Buffalo to get into a rhythm of working out of the bullpen for a little bit, then bring him up. By then, something might emerge (a trade or releasing someone).
Or we could package a reliever and Dellucci – maybe we could get something. (I partly jest. :-)
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 10:46 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
too early, too hazy to comment
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 10:17 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
but i’m gonna miss Gutz
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 10:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That mid-May doubleheader against the Jays catch in the 9th was intense!
by PatBordersHelmet on
Dec 10, 2008 10:19 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
as long as ben fran is not the starting LF in 2009 i’m OK
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 10:17 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Heilman would be heading to Cleveland
According to the Newark StarLedger.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:20 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
oops.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:20 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
USS Mariner says Heilman demanded a trade so he could be a starter.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 10:21 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah, this makes no sense on our end unless we’re trading sowers or … Laffey God no
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 10:23 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought Heilman had mentioned that last year – could we be looking to acquire Heilman to be our 3rd starter? I’m not sure how that would turn out – it would depend on what we’d have to give up to get him.
The last time he started a game was back in 2005, and hasn’t had 10 or more ML starts in a season since 2004. Hmm… I hope he works out for us if that is the plan.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 10:48 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Most reports say Heilman to Mariners now.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 10:50 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I first read that as “could we be looking to acquire Heliman to be our 3rd baseman”… I was thinking, “that’s….some outside the box thinking there…”
by Logodaedalus on
Dec 10, 2008 11:32 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
though it would be cooler if he had one of those gadget propeller thingies
by Logodaedalus on
Dec 10, 2008 11:33 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
lol to these last three posts
by cleveland teamer on
Dec 10, 2008 11:37 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Quick glance at bref – kinda looks like Valbuena plays a slick 2b. Oh boy.
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 10:18 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m finding some more comments on Valbuena (made by fans, but hey, look how much knowledge we drop in these threads). Alot of people like him, both as a hitter and as a fielder. He supposedly made strides in the field and has a good approach at the plate. In fact, he’s almost major league ready.
Of course we’ll have to know more about this deal, but I’m starting to like this kid.
by JP_Frost on
Dec 10, 2008 10:20 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I think there’s several players missing here, going in every direction, but especially to the Mariners and the Mets. Those players might be prospects but, for us, they’ll change the meaning of the deal. My six cents.
by NickFantana on
Dec 10, 2008 10:21 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
a little presumptuous of you to think that this comment is worth three of indiansfan’s comments… and given its relative brevity, it’s quite a strong claim per word…
by Logodaedalus on
Dec 10, 2008 11:34 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no, Google I “did not mean astroturf.”
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:21 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
This tells me he would be a good replacement for Jamey Carrol next year, not a second baseman of the future.
by NickFantana on
Dec 10, 2008 10:24 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
At the plate, he’s intelligent. Compared to the rest of these losers, anyway. He has a pretty compact line drive stroke, but more than that, he doesn’t swing at many bad pitches. While he only collected 49 at bats, his 22% swing rate on balls out of the zone was the best on the team, and his (small sample) approach was comparable to those of Mark Ellis and Jason Kubel. In other words, he’s not a guy who’s going to get himself out as often as a Yuniesky Betancourt or Jose Lopez. He knows he doesn’t have the most punishing bat in the world, so he’s compensated for that by developing a good eye and the ability to hit for a decent average. Those are valuable skills.
Well at least Shap would be going after a guy who fits the hitting philosophy of the club. Doesn’t exactly excite me though.
by supermarioelia on
Dec 10, 2008 10:25 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hello Mario,
Contact guys can be useful – having a team full of mashers or guys with high-strikeout totals need to be compensated with guys who are strong on fundamentals.
Granted, we don’t have exactly a team full of mashers or guys with high-strikeout totals (not extreme strikeout totals, anyways), but adding a guy like that, especially if he is more of a utility guy, is not a bad move. Those are the types of guys who can do some things off the bench, being that their swings aren’t as likely to fall into slumps (as compared to someone like Marte, who has that long swing).
Besides that, I think they’re getting Valbuena more for his defense, with the hope he can become that type of offensive player that is described. Besides, we still have need for a #2 hitter on this team – perhaps Valbuena is that future #2 (in the lineup, that is).
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 10:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
“Well, we need some contact guys to go along with our mashers. Granted, we don’t have any mashers.”
by fleerdon on
Dec 10, 2008 10:54 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Heyman is reporting that it’s a very large trade:
LAS VEGAS — The Mets, Indians and Mariners are discussing a 12-player trade in which Seattle reliever J.J. Putz would go to the Mets. In the deal being discussed, the Mets would surrender six players, including outfielder Endy Chavez, relief pitcher Aaron Heilman and first base prospect Mike Carp. The Indians would be giving up rightfielder Franklin Gutierrez.
Either we’re getting Chavez or the Mariners are going to have an absurd defensive outfield.
by vegaswatch on
Dec 10, 2008 10:23 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m categorically for any player involving 12 players where we only give up one. How can we not do that?
Get in there! Get some action!
It’s like, a bar fight starts, it’s total mayhem. A donnybrook. You’ve got to at least break a chair on a pool table and yell before you leave the bar.
by afh4 on
Dec 10, 2008 10:25 PM EST
up
reply
actions
5 recs
LOL
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 10:25 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can only assume that you actually would use the word “categorically” during a bar fight as well.
by fleerdon on
Dec 10, 2008 10:29 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tyler, we’ve got to get out of here categorically. But before that happens, help me with this chair…
by afh4 on
Dec 10, 2008 10:30 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would, but I categorically stole a bottle of Tanq 10 during the mayhem and I’m hoping to make off with it.
by fleerdon on
Dec 10, 2008 10:32 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
still depends on the quality.
i’m not giving up one dortmunder gold for 2 rolling rocks and a budweiser product to be named later.
You know Selig? Ombudsman.
by rolub on
Dec 10, 2008 10:42 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
have to qualify that i’m not calling Gutz a dortmunder gold… just commenting on the general theory.
You know Selig? Ombudsman.
by rolub on
Dec 10, 2008 10:43 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That sounds like a bonanza for us! :-)
Heck, we don’t even know the players we’d be getting yet – they could be named Tom, Dick, and Harry. Or Frick, Frack, and Frock. Sounds good to me! :-)
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 10:53 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
there’s no way its a 12 player deal and we’re only giving up one player
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 10:25 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And this is what we need to remember. And why I am crazy-exceited.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 10:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I chuckled out loud. A COL.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A Circle of Losers? I believe that’s the definition of 45 people on LGT posting frantically about a 4th OF being dealt for a AAAA 2B.
Self included.
by afh4 on
Dec 10, 2008 10:29 PM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
no, sir… a Chuckle Out Loud.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:30 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know. I am kidding.
JESUS JOEEEEEZ I AM KIDDING.
by afh4 on
Dec 10, 2008 10:31 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I like replying to things as they appear, even if I’m not replying to them.
by afh4 on
Dec 10, 2008 10:33 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the capz are a nice touch, hafta admit
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 10:38 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That’d be my instinctive response too. I need some time to think this over.
This thread has huge unintentional comic-tragedy potential for down the road.
Helium Watch: Chuck Lofgren, OF
by jhon on
Dec 10, 2008 11:07 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Consider my enthusiasm tempered. Thanks, debbie downer.
by joeee on
Dec 10, 2008 11:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As opposed to a CIMHK, chuckling in my head kinda.
by fleerdon on
Dec 10, 2008 10:30 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
or a new printing technique utilizing Cyan, Indigo, Magenta, ummm, and Black.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:31 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hazel, per google.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay I’m only halfway down catching up with this thread and I’ve seen this a lot.
IT’S A NEW FRONT OFFICE. With a smart guy. We’re not ripping Shapiro for turning down the Pedro-for-Wright trade.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Dec 11, 2008 1:59 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think Andrew and vegaswatch were kidding – we certainly are not getting 12 players and are likely giving up more than Gutz; otherwise, we likely will only get 1-2 minor players in return and be mostly an accessory to this trade, not so much an equal partner.
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Dec 10, 2008 10:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was being quite serious, Heyman reported it was a 12-player trade.
by vegaswatch on
Dec 10, 2008 10:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LAS VEGAS — The Indians reportedly will also be including David Dellucci in the package to the Mariners.
by supermarioelia on
Dec 10, 2008 10:27 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Someone posted this on LL. You’re gonna be killed.
by Voltaire on
Dec 10, 2008 10:31 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Until you link that I assume it’s a joke.
by afh4 on
Dec 10, 2008 10:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
THAT IS NOT EVEN FUNNY MARIO I ALMOST PEED MYSELF
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on
Dec 10, 2008 10:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but what about Marte? Can we attach him to Benfran and hope SEA sees it as = to Gutz?
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Dec 10, 2008 10:29 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
