Schilling may be hurt
There are numerous reports that Curt Schilling has a serious shoulder problem and may even be lost for the season. Full story here. If true, it is just another reminder of the importance of having pitching depth. Of course, the Red Sox do.
0 recs |
39
comments
Comments
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by supermarioelia on Feb 7, 2008 11:13 PM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by fwembt on Feb 7, 2008 11:16 PM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Jay on
Feb 7, 2008 11:24 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by mauichuck on Feb 7, 2008 11:40 PM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by CU Adam on
Feb 8, 2008 1:09 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
No big deal for the fans. Most in Boston are happy that Buchholz will now be in the rotation, and don't care if Schilling doesn't pitch until August.
by Spidey on Feb 8, 2008 1:06 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
Whatever Schilling's faults, he seems to have some integrity and certainly some competitive pride. He'll pitch this season.
by Jay on
Feb 8, 2008 9:52 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
You're right about his competitive nature - I still get goosebumps from his 1993 postseason with the Phillies. And taking 4 months off at the start of the season can leave him fresh for the pennant race.
by Spidey on
Feb 8, 2008 1:59 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by CaptainEasy on
Feb 8, 2008 10:41 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by pdx on Feb 8, 2008 2:04 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Jay on Feb 8, 2008 9:53 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Roger Dorn on
Feb 8, 2008 10:38 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Spidey on
Feb 8, 2008 2:02 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by ClarkM on
Feb 8, 2008 5:43 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
If the Red Sox manangement knew of this condition, the contract probably would have been for less with more incentives built in.
by talonk on Feb 8, 2008 10:17 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Spidey on
Feb 8, 2008 2:05 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by talonk on Feb 8, 2008 10:22 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Pronk33 on
Feb 8, 2008 8:24 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
Be afraid, Cliff. Be very afraid.
by CaptainEasy on
Feb 8, 2008 10:39 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Jay on
Feb 8, 2008 10:46 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
This article in The Hardball Times concludes that the conventional wisdom is right.
Typically, a LH starting pitcher will face more RH hitters than a RH starting pitcher would, because of platoons and switch-hitters. If RH hitters have an advantage, then a pitcher facing more RH hitters is at a disadvantage.
by CaptainEasy on
Feb 10, 2008 12:16 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Jay on
Feb 10, 2008 2:05 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
The look of confusion and concern on his face was priceless - my little dig into Red Sox Nation. :)
From the reports I've read, there was difference of opinion between the Red Sox' doctors and Schilling's. They settled it with a consult with a third doctor. From what he posted on 38 pitches, Schil seems satisfied. While he wouldn't disclose what surgery his doc wanted to do, he stressed that it was not a rotator cuff repair.
If that's true, and the intended surgery was minor, it seems that the media is trying to make more of this than there is. He would probably be back by the All Star Break either way. Certainly, the Red Sox have enough arms to get them to that point without him.
by Harry Doyle on Feb 8, 2008 11:07 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by CU Adam on Feb 8, 2008 11:17 AM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Ryan on
Feb 8, 2008 12:58 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
(a) the Indians will be so bad they'll trade C.C. before the deadline
-or-
(b) C.C. won't sign a long term deal and will go into the free agent sweepstakes after 2008.
If it's the former (and the Indians are that bad) wouldn't C.C's performance probably be a part of that, so why would you want to trade him? If it's the latter, how is it relevant to the 2008 season that Schilling will be missing from?
I've gotta send a resume to The Globe. I have no qualifications in journalism, but apparently, that didn't stop Nick Cafardo from getting a job there.
by Harry Doyle on
Feb 8, 2008 1:47 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Gradyforpresident on
Feb 8, 2008 1:57 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
(I really like Gammons, but letting himself be used to float the Red Sox "poverty" balloon yet again made me lose a lot of respect for him.)
Oh, and here's another peach from Adam's article: "The Sox really didn't want Santana, not for the outlay of young talent he would have cost."
by mkwng on
Feb 8, 2008 1:49 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Roger Dorn on
Feb 8, 2008 4:37 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Jay on
Feb 8, 2008 7:09 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by nickjs21 on
Feb 8, 2008 7:33 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
Another way to earn Gammon's approbation is to provide him with off-the-record information. I would bet that Epstein and Shapiro are frequent chatters with Gammons. It's not totally one-sided, however. Gammons may reveal what he has heard from his A's and White Sox sources. It's not a big edge: most of it comes out on ESPN a day or two later anyway.
by Rochester on
Feb 9, 2008 11:49 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by mauichuck on
Feb 9, 2008 12:24 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by mauichuck on
Feb 9, 2008 7:06 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by CU Adam on Feb 8, 2008 4:15 PM EST 0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Turkmenbashi on
Feb 8, 2008 4:28 PM EST
up
0 recs
Re: Schilling may be hurt
by Harry Doyle on
Feb 8, 2008 5:40 PM EST
up
0 recs








