Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Diego Sanchez and the Dangers of Fame in MMA

Bedard to Mariners finally official

News from out here in Seattle is that the Mariners finally completed the Bedard trade with Baltimore.  Week after week, physical exam after physical exam, and Baltimore finally made the trade.  Now, how long will it take to trade Brian Roberts . . . ?  Is there a more frustrating to deal with and root for than the Orioles?  

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
I have to believe it is the preference of every general manager to first try and deal with the Seattle Mariners.

by rick @ Let's Go Tribe! on Feb 8, 2008 4:16 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
What kind of statement is that.  The Mariners are not a great team to trade with. (i.e you get steals from them)  Sure Astro Cab seems to work for us but he hasn't been around long enough to bear out a steal.  Revisionist history on your part I would say.

Secondly, if they were the number one team to trade with and they always made bad deals (i.e for their organization) why aren't they the worst team in baseball.  Blanket statements with no evidence is just plain silly.  Bring forward some awful trades they have made and maybe I might see you point of view.

Thirdly this is not a bad deal for the M's.  They acquire a very good starting pitcher who is still very much in his prime for a outfielder with the big P word.  Remember Alex Escobar, Brandon Phillips and the like who were suppose to be mega stars but didn't pan out.  Heck if we would have traded Marte for Bedard two years ago we would have had a major steal.

All Truth Goes Through Three Stages 1.It is ridiculed 2.It is violently opposed 3.Finally, it is accepted as self-evident LGT kinesiologist! Straw,Drink

by E5 on Feb 8, 2008 5:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Hey everybody!  Look!

Edgar just referred to He Who Shall Not Be Named in a dismissive way!!!

by NickFantana on Feb 8, 2008 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Blanket statements with no evidence is just plain silly.

by Brick. on Feb 8, 2008 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
But Scott, you didn't even make an original comment there!  You just repeated what...oh, wait. I get it.

by Thommy on Feb 9, 2008 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
we're overdue for a beer, by the way.
"a nutting satisfying lager with hints of oak and cherries, with a strong opening and a polished finish" - Chuck

by Brick. on Feb 9, 2008 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
You said in a previous thread that you thought Adam Jones was overrated.  I asked for your justification, you provided none.  I would like to hear what specifically you don't like about him, other than he has no prolonged experience at the major leauge level.  I like the fact that he has continued to improve as he has progressed through the minors and that he can play center field.

You neglect to mention that Bedard does not come without question marks as well.  I like Bedard, but his durability remains in question.  Zero season over 200 innings pitched.  On the plus side, he has shown continued improvement in his performance over the past few seasons.

by ClarkM on Feb 8, 2008 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Clark, Clark, Clark...Edgar doesn't usually make it a habit to carry on a conversation.  Good try though.
-Erik

by drerikbrady on Feb 8, 2008 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
"You keep using that word.  I do not think it means what you think it means."

There's nothing revisionist about calling the Eduardo-Asdrubal swap a steal.  It was clear right from the first day.  I mean, just a few months ago, a bunch of guys were on Baseball Tonight marvelling about what a steal it was -- including Eduardo himself.

It's hard to imagine something less valuable than an aging first baseman who can only hit lefties and is two months from free agency or retirement.  Eduardo should have yielded something along the lines of Shawn Nottingham, not a guy who will probably be an everyday player for us for six-plus years under contract.

by Jay on Feb 8, 2008 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Is the big P word payroll? Because that is probably why Seattle isn't the worst team in the league.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 8, 2008 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Excuse us, they are just one of the worst teams in baseball and a perennial also ran. Haven't made the playoffs since 2001, haven't had a winning record since 2004.

2006- The Asdrubal trade, Acquired LHP Horacio Ramirez from the Braves for RHP Rafael Soriano.

2007- Signed RHP Carlos Silva to a four-year contract with a mutual option for 2012. Signed RHP Jeff Weaver to a one-year contract. Traded away Yorman Bazardo. Sent RHP Gregorio Rosario to the Cleveland Indians.

And that is just from flipping through two years. Not exactly resume material.

I swear, next year is it.

by Brad D on Feb 8, 2008 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
I know it's ancient history, but Felix Fermin for Omar wasn't exactly a great deal for the Mariners.
"the most vehement Yankee-hating guy I know" - Jay

by mauichuck on Feb 9, 2008 12:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Jose Cruz Jr. for Mike Timlin/Paul Spoljaric
wasn't all that great in my opinion either.

While Cruz never became the "superstar" some thought he might, he's had 2 30+ HR seasons and 2 20+ HR seasons in his career.

Meanwhile, Timlin had a solid 1998 season with Seattle (70 G/79.1 IP - 78 H/26 ER/5 HR/16 BB/60 K,) but that was pretty much it (1997 didn't provide much value in my opinion - in 25.2 IP over 26 G:  28 H/11 ER/2 HR/5 BB/9 K.)

That's arguably more than they got from Spoljaric, though, in 1998:  53 G/6 GS/83.1 IP/  85 H/60 ER/14 HR/55 BB/89 K/10 WP.  His 1997 season wasn't that much better either - 20 G/0 GS/22.2 IP/24 H/12 ER/1 HR/15 BB/27 K.)

As implied above, Timlin and Spoljaric were only with Seattle for part of the 1997 season and all of 1998.  Therefore, I don't think that was a great trade from Seattle's perspective either, being that Cruz was an everyday player for at least 5 seasons after Seattle traded him away (2000-2004 with Toronto, SF, and TB,) plus 300+ ABs in a platoon role for Toronto in 1998 and 1999.  Timlin was only effective for one season, while Spoljaric was marginally effective at best for one season.  

Just my 2 cents.  :-)

May the Tribe be great in 2008! :-)

by indiansfan on Feb 9, 2008 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
"for a outfielder with the big P word"

it just happened to be this exact trade that someone did a study on that big P word.

http://www.lookoutlanding.com/story/2008/1/11/18858/7669

to sum it up: "Adam Jones is a prospect whose chances of going on to substantial, sustained Major League success are every bit as good, if not better, than those of guys who've already broken in. Talented minor leaguers have flamed out before. Who cares? So have talented Major Leaguers"

by 7foot3 on Feb 10, 2008 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
I happen to find Bedard and Felix as a 1-2 to be pretty scary. Then I remember how much money they gave to Carlos Silva.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 8, 2008 4:34 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
then i remembered how lucky they were to win 88 games with a (-19) run differential.
You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Feb 8, 2008 4:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
You have to think Felix will step it up big time at some point though

by Roger Dorn on Feb 8, 2008 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Did we really just sign Scott Elarton to a minor league contract?  Shapiro's can't stop playing the nickel slots!  

And just to stay on topic, the Mariners are actually looking half decent.  They hit for a good average last year, have a good back end to their pen, and play pretty good D.  They're not great, but wouldn't be a lot of fun in a short series now, and played us pretty well last year.  Sexson is such an albatross now.

Looking forward to making the trek (read drinking myself silly on the Amtrak north) up to Seattle after the all-star break to see the Tribe put it over on them.  I'd love to see CC/Bedard followed by Fausto/Felix.  That would make a fun couple of days of baseball.

by pdxtribefan on Feb 8, 2008 9:45 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Shapiro's can't stop playing the nickel slots!

Are you saying there's something wrong with that?

Blake, Howry and Betancourt were all minor league signings of washed-up players.  I doubt we've paid even $2 million total for all our minor league signings over the past six seasons, and to acquire these three players alone was money extremely well spent.

The Mariners are a mediocre hitting team -- at best.  They were third in the AL in batting average but drew the fewest walks by far -- 389, compared to the league average 536.  They were third-worst in extra-base hits with 459 -- tied with Chicago and ahead of only the Twins and Royals.

In other words, their offense is among the very worst in every way except batting average, which is far more luck-driven than walks or power hitting.  You can expect their batting average to fall back to the league average of .270 next year, and the rest of their numbers to fall along with it.

by Jay on Feb 8, 2008 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
I actually love Shapiro's style.  He's seeking low-risk assets, and like you said, if only a few work out, they pay for a lot of flops.  There are benefits to this approach that don't materialize in the player signed. Shapiro develops a great relationship between the organization and players in the league - an important advantage.  Also, the importance of competition and mentoring in spring-training is big - its like a pressure at-bat  in that statistics cannot fully account for the effects.    

When I said the M's look decent, I'm not saying that I'm afraid of the expected or most likely scenario.  I'm just saying, we only beat them 4-3 on the season last year, however much better we were statistically.  Dontrelle Willis totally shut us down when we played him.  The Devil Rays gave the Yankees fits for years.  The Giants beat the Patriots.  

I'm not analyzing them, I'm just saying that youth combined with a few stars and a little experience can breed confidence, which can lead to streaky play (see 2007 Mariners) above or below a given talent level.  Its true, though, that Bedard may simply balance the loss of Guillen, Sherril, and Jones, and that they don't get any better at all.  

Finally, I don't think solid contact and finding a hole is luckier than getting a walk, which is heavily influenced by the situation.  Safeco is huge, AND the M's didn't have a lot of power - why would any pitcher pitch around them?  The batters know it and are going to be aggressive.

by pdxtribefan on Feb 9, 2008 6:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Agree with most of your message, but ...

Finally, I don't think solid contact and finding a hole is luckier than getting a walk, which is heavily influenced by the situation.

This is not really up for debate, we are talking about arithmetic here -- "luck" is measurable as statistical variance.  Walk rates are far more stable and consistent from year to year than reaching-base-safely-on-contact rates.  What this tells us is that the one is more skill-based and less luck-based than the other.

Of course walks are still heavily influenced by situation and luck, and "finding a hole" by skill, but despite what your instincts tell you, it nets out pretty heavily for hits being luckier (and unluckier) than walks.  We are talking about over 600 PA (6000 for a whole team), not one specific situation.

Also, park environment does have an effect on walk rates, but it's not substantial.

by Jay on Feb 10, 2008 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
I should mention that there are a handful of players who elevate "finding a hole" to a skill, what you might call "extreme contact hitters."  Gwynn, Boggs, Nomar.  And on the other extreme you have guys whose contact is so weak that they can't stay in the majors outside of an infield utility role.  But aside from the extreme, contact hitting rates are much more about luck than skill.

by Jay on Feb 10, 2008 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
You're right there, I should have differentiated between hitters (I would say Ichiro belongs in the group you mentioned).  

And I agree with you that, upon reconsideration, just being in the position to get more walks is earned through skill as well.

I have a question though, about the statistical method, that is related to this question.  Is the cyclical nature of hitting (hot and cold streaks) responsible for the variation in "safe-on-contact", while walk rates are more stable because pitchers tend to pitch "to the book" more often than to the current streak the hitter is on?  It's been 9 years since I took econometrics, so I'm sure if I did some reading I could improve this question, but what I'm wondering is if the two figures (variation) can be or are being (can't remember the term - "normalized," "equated"?)  I doubt the difference would be eliminated, but would it be closer?

Also, I would love to see whether it could be shown whether batters tend to improve their walk rates following an increase in average, power, or movement in the lineup (this would suggest pitchers are more determinative of walks), OR, whether increases in walk rates are followed by (or contemporary with) increases in the other figures (this would suggest that the batters' eye is more determinative of walks).  I would guess it isn't all one or the other, but when posed this way, your theory that a good eye is less luck than hacking is more persuasive.

Sorry, I'm thinking through my fingers.

by pdxtribefan on Feb 10, 2008 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
I'll try to dig up some links for you about this, but some great research has been done on it -- and then more great research in response to the first round.

I think it is almost universally believed at this point that hot and cold streaks at the plate -- according to the box score -- are actually caused by variations in luck and defense, not the other way around.  The most advanced stat guys are sure of it, and the scouts and coaches are equally sure.  The coaches will tell you they know how well a guy is seeing the ball by how hard and/or far he's hitting it -- regardless of whether they're ending up hits or outs.  So the coaches say, "You can't always trust the numbers."  And the stat guys agree with the coaches, because they've come to understand the effect of variance on batting average.

The Indians actually track every ball hit by every prospect and score which ones were "hard hit" -- and then they give an award at the end of the year to the hitter with the highest percentage of "hard hit balls."

The theory on walks is that they demonstrate knowledge of the strike zone, i.e., the ability to lay off balls and, to some extent, the ability to swing at strikes (i.e., to not get caught looking excessively).  Walks are good in and of themselves, but what they tell us about a hitter's selectivity is arguably more important.

No doubt a hitter gets pitched more carefully once he becomes more fearsome, but fundamentally, a pitcher really has to take the approach that he can get any batter out or he can't win.  My guess would be that it changes how a guy is pitched on a 2-0 or 2-1 count but perhaps not much otherwise.  What I know is that for a lot of these guys, the walks clearly came first.

Almost all power hitters are extreme "work the count guys," which is the flip side of being an extreme contact guy.  Not all -- Vlad is the obvious modern exception -- but almost all, from Ruth and Williams right on down the line to almost every great, active hitter you could name ... Bonds, Pujols, Ortiz, Manny, Thome, Giambi in his prime, Sheffield, Frank Thomas.

Sammy Sosa makes a fun example.  He was a talented but far from great player straight through 1997.  Here's his monthly walk totals from that season:  9, 9, 4, 9, 6, 8.  Now here's his monthly walk totals for 1998, the season he broke out and hit 64 home runs:  11, 16, 6, 12, 16, 12.  And here's his monthly home run totals:  6, 7, 20, 9, 9, 13, 11.

He was already having a career year by the end of May, on pace for 39 home runs.  But more to the point, his walk totals were starting to jump, which suggests a jump in his selectivity ... and then he hit 20 home runs in a month.  It's still a little chicken-and-the-egg, but he only hit six home runs in April, so why would pitchers walk him 16 times in May?

by Jay on Feb 10, 2008 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
The Indians actually track every ball hit by every prospect and score which ones were "hard hit" -- and then they give an award at the end of the year to the hitter with the highest percentage of "hard hit balls."

I want that in two years this is simply re-named the "The Goedert"

"a nutting satisfying lager with hints of oak and cherries, with a strong opening and a polished finish" - Chuck

by Brick. on Feb 10, 2008 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Actually, he got out-hard-hit by Jordan Brown in 2007 -- but it's still amazing that he beat Kouzmanoff in 2006.  Goedert did win the Walk Rate and OBP awards in 2007.

by Jay on Feb 10, 2008 11:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
the chicken and the egg scene on Flight of the Conchords was priceless.

by ClarkM on Feb 11, 2008 8:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Didn't we just sign Scott Elarton to a minor league contract?  Deja vu.

Are there really that many players in the Mariners lineup who frighten you?  Most of them are the type of guys I hope are batting in an important spot if I'm the opponent.  And remember there are still 3 other guys that have to pitch.  Ichiro is still tough (better than tough, but if I ever complimented Ichiro I'd punch myself in the face).  Ibanez can hit a home run but can just as easily let an inside-the-parker roll by him.  I irrationally like Beltre but I know he makes too many outs.  Then we've got Wilkerson, Sexson, Lopez, Betancourt, Vidro, and Johjima (league average).  

I'll tell you who I like on the M's.  That Jones kid.

by nickjs21 on Feb 8, 2008 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Ditto on Jones.

I think Ichiro is a pretty good pick to have a serious down year in 2008.  He's 34 now, and while he should age relatively gracefully, he's certainly not in his prime anymore, and his speed has got to be declining.

His ISO has plummeted from .133 to .094 to .080 over the past three seasons, and the only thing that kept his numbers up at a solid level was -- you guessed it -- a ridiculous BABIP of .389.  Ichiro has done even better than that in the past -- .399 in 2004 -- but he was 30 then and 33 last season.

His career BABIP is .357, far above the norm of around .310, but I think it's unrealistic to expect him to be much above .350 next season unless he gets exceptionally lucky.  So what happens if you take Ichiro's 2007 numbers and run them through a .350 BABIP?  .317/.362/.397 ... an OPS of 759, which is just a little above league average.  That is about what I expect out of him this season.

by Jay on Feb 9, 2008 12:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Where did you get his .350 BABIP numbers? Curious, not challenging you.

by Thommy on Feb 9, 2008 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
I just did the math.  He had about 595 AB on BABIP, so a drop of .039 in BABIP will turn about 23 hits into outs.  Recalculate his season numbers with 23 fewer singles, and that's what you get.  This actually is a bit conservative, as he should lose a few doubles and triples along the way and not only singles, but it seems appropriate to be conservative when performing an exercise as conceptually dicey as deducting points for good luck.

by Jay on Feb 9, 2008 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
By the way, AB on BIP is easy, it's just AB - HR - K.

by Jay on Feb 9, 2008 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
And in case it's not clear, the number 23 just comes from 595 x .039 = 23.205.

by Jay on Feb 9, 2008 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
So basically Ichiro frightens you if and only if a man is on third base.

by nickjs21 on Feb 9, 2008 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
They invited him to camp, which may just be a professional courtesy to the guy. You know, let him use your gym, shag some balls, repair broken links in the fence, throw a little bit of BP, whatever.  I think it's an altruistic move as much as anything, just giving a guy an opportunity to get in shape so another team might give him a job.

by Thommy on Feb 9, 2008 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Maybe if Elarton looks good in Winter Haven, we can flip him to the Mariners for a prospect.
Free Andy Marte!

Pronk Needs You

by woodsmeister on Feb 9, 2008 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Too bad they already traded Adam Jones.
I swear, next year is it.

by Brad D on Feb 9, 2008 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01731_small
Some quick questions for the locals
Etat_small
Eric's 2012 Cleveland Indians Projections...
Its_alive-fstn_small
Oswalt > Carmona/Heredia
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #24
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian — "Country Peach Passion"
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "Fridge Magnet"
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #23
Small
Seriously Go Get Carlos Peña Now
Avatard_small
Indians by the Numbers — #22
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian: "Fridge Magnet"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

A look back at the last Tribe arbitration hearing
MLB.COM Tribe Top 20
Jared Goedert is Puddin Head Jones
Chisenhall v.  Hannahan
After watching Lindor in the Fall Instructional League, I have very little...
Coming off of an optimistic 80-82 season, is this the Indians window to win?  

See full post on Beyond the Box Score
Praising the Indians offseason
Brooks Baseball Stats
Hello my friends! I hope you guys are ready for Super Bowl Weekend? Make...
Heyman reporting Indians will sign Kotchman

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4