Bedard to Mariners finally official
News from out here in Seattle is that the Mariners finally completed the Bedard trade with Baltimore. Week after week, physical exam after physical exam, and Baltimore finally made the trade. Now, how long will it take to trade Brian Roberts . . . ? Is there a more frustrating to deal with and root for than the Orioles?
39 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
by rick @ Let's Go Tribe! on Feb 8, 2008 4:16 PM EST reply actions
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Secondly, if they were the number one team to trade with and they always made bad deals (i.e for their organization) why aren't they the worst team in baseball. Blanket statements with no evidence is just plain silly. Bring forward some awful trades they have made and maybe I might see you point of view.
Thirdly this is not a bad deal for the M's. They acquire a very good starting pitcher who is still very much in his prime for a outfielder with the big P word. Remember Alex Escobar, Brandon Phillips and the like who were suppose to be mega stars but didn't pan out. Heck if we would have traded Marte for Bedard two years ago we would have had a major steal.
by E5 on Feb 8, 2008 5:09 PM EST up reply actions
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Edgar just referred to He Who Shall Not Be Named in a dismissive way!!!
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
You neglect to mention that Bedard does not come without question marks as well. I like Bedard, but his durability remains in question. Zero season over 200 innings pitched. On the plus side, he has shown continued improvement in his performance over the past few seasons.
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
There's nothing revisionist about calling the Eduardo-Asdrubal swap a steal. It was clear right from the first day. I mean, just a few months ago, a bunch of guys were on Baseball Tonight marvelling about what a steal it was -- including Eduardo himself.
It's hard to imagine something less valuable than an aging first baseman who can only hit lefties and is two months from free agency or retirement. Eduardo should have yielded something along the lines of Shawn Nottingham, not a guy who will probably be an everyday player for us for six-plus years under contract.
by Jay on Feb 8, 2008 7:07 PM EST up reply actions
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
2006- The Asdrubal trade, Acquired LHP Horacio Ramirez from the Braves for RHP Rafael Soriano.
2007- Signed RHP Carlos Silva to a four-year contract with a mutual option for 2012. Signed RHP Jeff Weaver to a one-year contract. Traded away Yorman Bazardo. Sent RHP Gregorio Rosario to the Cleveland Indians.
And that is just from flipping through two years. Not exactly resume material.
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
by Nat on Feb 9, 2008 7:53 AM EST up reply actions
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Jose Cruz Jr. for Mike Timlin/Paul Spoljaric
While Cruz never became the "superstar" some thought he might, he's had 2 30+ HR seasons and 2 20+ HR seasons in his career.
Meanwhile, Timlin had a solid 1998 season with Seattle (70 G/79.1 IP - 78 H/26 ER/5 HR/16 BB/60 K,) but that was pretty much it (1997 didn't provide much value in my opinion - in 25.2 IP over 26 G: 28 H/11 ER/2 HR/5 BB/9 K.)
That's arguably more than they got from Spoljaric, though, in 1998: 53 G/6 GS/83.1 IP/ 85 H/60 ER/14 HR/55 BB/89 K/10 WP. His 1997 season wasn't that much better either - 20 G/0 GS/22.2 IP/24 H/12 ER/1 HR/15 BB/27 K.)
As implied above, Timlin and Spoljaric were only with Seattle for part of the 1997 season and all of 1998. Therefore, I don't think that was a great trade from Seattle's perspective either, being that Cruz was an everyday player for at least 5 seasons after Seattle traded him away (2000-2004 with Toronto, SF, and TB,) plus 300+ ABs in a platoon role for Toronto in 1998 and 1999. Timlin was only effective for one season, while Spoljaric was marginally effective at best for one season.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
it just happened to be this exact trade that someone did a study on that big P word.
http://www.lookoutlanding.com/story/2008/1/11/18858/7669
to sum it up: "Adam Jones is a prospect whose chances of going on to substantial, sustained Major League success are every bit as good, if not better, than those of guys who've already broken in. Talented minor leaguers have flamed out before. Who cares? So have talented Major Leaguers"
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
And just to stay on topic, the Mariners are actually looking half decent. They hit for a good average last year, have a good back end to their pen, and play pretty good D. They're not great, but wouldn't be a lot of fun in a short series now, and played us pretty well last year. Sexson is such an albatross now.
Looking forward to making the trek (read drinking myself silly on the Amtrak north) up to Seattle after the all-star break to see the Tribe put it over on them. I'd love to see CC/Bedard followed by Fausto/Felix. That would make a fun couple of days of baseball.
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Are you saying there's something wrong with that?
Blake, Howry and Betancourt were all minor league signings of washed-up players. I doubt we've paid even $2 million total for all our minor league signings over the past six seasons, and to acquire these three players alone was money extremely well spent.
The Mariners are a mediocre hitting team -- at best. They were third in the AL in batting average but drew the fewest walks by far -- 389, compared to the league average 536. They were third-worst in extra-base hits with 459 -- tied with Chicago and ahead of only the Twins and Royals.
In other words, their offense is among the very worst in every way except batting average, which is far more luck-driven than walks or power hitting. You can expect their batting average to fall back to the league average of .270 next year, and the rest of their numbers to fall along with it.
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
When I said the M's look decent, I'm not saying that I'm afraid of the expected or most likely scenario. I'm just saying, we only beat them 4-3 on the season last year, however much better we were statistically. Dontrelle Willis totally shut us down when we played him. The Devil Rays gave the Yankees fits for years. The Giants beat the Patriots.
I'm not analyzing them, I'm just saying that youth combined with a few stars and a little experience can breed confidence, which can lead to streaky play (see 2007 Mariners) above or below a given talent level. Its true, though, that Bedard may simply balance the loss of Guillen, Sherril, and Jones, and that they don't get any better at all.
Finally, I don't think solid contact and finding a hole is luckier than getting a walk, which is heavily influenced by the situation. Safeco is huge, AND the M's didn't have a lot of power - why would any pitcher pitch around them? The batters know it and are going to be aggressive.
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Finally, I don't think solid contact and finding a hole is luckier than getting a walk, which is heavily influenced by the situation.
This is not really up for debate, we are talking about arithmetic here -- "luck" is measurable as statistical variance. Walk rates are far more stable and consistent from year to year than reaching-base-safely-on-contact rates. What this tells us is that the one is more skill-based and less luck-based than the other.
Of course walks are still heavily influenced by situation and luck, and "finding a hole" by skill, but despite what your instincts tell you, it nets out pretty heavily for hits being luckier (and unluckier) than walks. We are talking about over 600 PA (6000 for a whole team), not one specific situation.
Also, park environment does have an effect on walk rates, but it's not substantial.
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
And I agree with you that, upon reconsideration, just being in the position to get more walks is earned through skill as well.
I have a question though, about the statistical method, that is related to this question. Is the cyclical nature of hitting (hot and cold streaks) responsible for the variation in "safe-on-contact", while walk rates are more stable because pitchers tend to pitch "to the book" more often than to the current streak the hitter is on? It's been 9 years since I took econometrics, so I'm sure if I did some reading I could improve this question, but what I'm wondering is if the two figures (variation) can be or are being (can't remember the term - "normalized," "equated"?) I doubt the difference would be eliminated, but would it be closer?
Also, I would love to see whether it could be shown whether batters tend to improve their walk rates following an increase in average, power, or movement in the lineup (this would suggest pitchers are more determinative of walks), OR, whether increases in walk rates are followed by (or contemporary with) increases in the other figures (this would suggest that the batters' eye is more determinative of walks). I would guess it isn't all one or the other, but when posed this way, your theory that a good eye is less luck than hacking is more persuasive.
Sorry, I'm thinking through my fingers.
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
I think it is almost universally believed at this point that hot and cold streaks at the plate -- according to the box score -- are actually caused by variations in luck and defense, not the other way around. The most advanced stat guys are sure of it, and the scouts and coaches are equally sure. The coaches will tell you they know how well a guy is seeing the ball by how hard and/or far he's hitting it -- regardless of whether they're ending up hits or outs. So the coaches say, "You can't always trust the numbers." And the stat guys agree with the coaches, because they've come to understand the effect of variance on batting average.
The Indians actually track every ball hit by every prospect and score which ones were "hard hit" -- and then they give an award at the end of the year to the hitter with the highest percentage of "hard hit balls."
The theory on walks is that they demonstrate knowledge of the strike zone, i.e., the ability to lay off balls and, to some extent, the ability to swing at strikes (i.e., to not get caught looking excessively). Walks are good in and of themselves, but what they tell us about a hitter's selectivity is arguably more important.
No doubt a hitter gets pitched more carefully once he becomes more fearsome, but fundamentally, a pitcher really has to take the approach that he can get any batter out or he can't win. My guess would be that it changes how a guy is pitched on a 2-0 or 2-1 count but perhaps not much otherwise. What I know is that for a lot of these guys, the walks clearly came first.
Almost all power hitters are extreme "work the count guys," which is the flip side of being an extreme contact guy. Not all -- Vlad is the obvious modern exception -- but almost all, from Ruth and Williams right on down the line to almost every great, active hitter you could name ... Bonds, Pujols, Ortiz, Manny, Thome, Giambi in his prime, Sheffield, Frank Thomas.
Sammy Sosa makes a fun example. He was a talented but far from great player straight through 1997. Here's his monthly walk totals from that season: 9, 9, 4, 9, 6, 8. Now here's his monthly walk totals for 1998, the season he broke out and hit 64 home runs: 11, 16, 6, 12, 16, 12. And here's his monthly home run totals: 6, 7, 20, 9, 9, 13, 11.
He was already having a career year by the end of May, on pace for 39 home runs. But more to the point, his walk totals were starting to jump, which suggests a jump in his selectivity ... and then he hit 20 home runs in a month. It's still a little chicken-and-the-egg, but he only hit six home runs in April, so why would pitchers walk him 16 times in May?
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
I want that in two years this is simply re-named the "The Goedert"
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Are there really that many players in the Mariners lineup who frighten you? Most of them are the type of guys I hope are batting in an important spot if I'm the opponent. And remember there are still 3 other guys that have to pitch. Ichiro is still tough (better than tough, but if I ever complimented Ichiro I'd punch myself in the face). Ibanez can hit a home run but can just as easily let an inside-the-parker roll by him. I irrationally like Beltre but I know he makes too many outs. Then we've got Wilkerson, Sexson, Lopez, Betancourt, Vidro, and Johjima (league average).
I'll tell you who I like on the M's. That Jones kid.
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
I think Ichiro is a pretty good pick to have a serious down year in 2008. He's 34 now, and while he should age relatively gracefully, he's certainly not in his prime anymore, and his speed has got to be declining.
His ISO has plummeted from .133 to .094 to .080 over the past three seasons, and the only thing that kept his numbers up at a solid level was -- you guessed it -- a ridiculous BABIP of .389. Ichiro has done even better than that in the past -- .399 in 2004 -- but he was 30 then and 33 last season.
His career BABIP is .357, far above the norm of around .310, but I think it's unrealistic to expect him to be much above .350 next season unless he gets exceptionally lucky. So what happens if you take Ichiro's 2007 numbers and run them through a .350 BABIP? .317/.362/.397 ... an OPS of 759, which is just a little above league average. That is about what I expect out of him this season.
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
by Jay on Feb 9, 2008 3:49 PM EST up reply actions
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
by Jay on Feb 9, 2008 3:49 PM EST up reply actions
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
by Jay on Feb 9, 2008 3:51 PM EST up reply actions
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
Re: Bedard to Mariners finally official
by woodsmeister on Feb 9, 2008 12:58 PM EST up reply actions

















