Week In Review: May 13–19
|
|
|
The series: Hosted the Athletics (win, win, win) and visited the Reds (loss, loss, loss). It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. The Indians rode an absurd run of exceptional pitching to the division lead, devastating the A's to cap off an 8-2 run, only then to get swept by the not-really-even-kind-of-good Reds. How many weeks see a team move from 1.5 behind one team, to 1.5 ahead of everybody, to 1.5 behind a different team?
The big story: The team's most senior and best pedigreed relievers continued to fail in the 9th inning, raising the question, why are we picking our closers this way, anyway? A week ago, Betancourt followed nine innings of shutout pitching from Cliff Lee with a three-run, game-losing 10th against Toronto. A few days later, he appeared ready to repeat the performance against Oakland, loading the bases while attempting to close the door on a three-run victory. Incredibly, Wedge then pulled his closer — something he refrained from doing in well over a dozen similar situations with Joe Borowski on the mound — in favor of Kobayashi, who had "backed into" his first career save two nights earlier. Kobayashi loosed a run-scoring wild pitch but slammed the door with two strikeouts — and the controversy was on. Wedge said several guys might share the closer role until Borowski returns. Kobayashi was inserted into the next save situation a few nights later and promptly blew the game — bloop single to left, hit-by-pitch, and a three-run walkoff homer to Adam Dunn, who should have been wearing a giant cape with the words "Don't Give This Guy Anything Good To Hit" emblazoned on the back.
Many stupid things have already been written about this, and many more will be written in the coming weeks. We've already heard the brainless drumbeat starting against closer-by-committee, and no doubt much more will follow. You will hear that Bill James invented closer-by-committee (not true) and thinks it's a great idea (not true), that the Red Sox tried closer-by-committee a few years back (true) at James' urging (not true), and that that Red Sox bullpen failed (true) because closer-by-committee is such a terrible idea (not true, it was because they didn't have any good relievers).
Mind you, I don't really care for closer-by-committee much myself, but I like dumb, superstitious baseball commentary even less, and for some reason, the Holy Role Of The Closer seems to bring out the village idiots like little else. As you suffer through it, try to hold firm these simple facts:
- Betancourt has not been steady all season. When Borowski went on the DL, Betancourt had given up two home runs in his last four games. In fact, Betancourt's best stretch of the season came in the two weeks immediately following his being annointed the closer — allowing just one single (and that was the only line drive) and one walk over four games.
- Kobayashi, despite a very impressive career in Japan, is an older pitcher who has never established any level of performance, good or bad, in the U.S. And similar to Betancourt, he had given up two home runs in the five games preceding his first career Save in the U.S.
So there's no reason to think any of this has anything to do with the 9th inning being "different." We've got two veteran relievers struggling, getting inconsistent results in any inning — but we also have a number of younger relievers thriving within limited opportunities. And for whatever it's worth, Betancourt looks to have been extremely unlucky on balls in play (.380 BABIP, compared with .287 career and .240 last season) and is still not giving up any walks (only two unintentional in 72 PA).
In other news: The starters ended a historic run of more than 44 scoreless innings when Aaron Laffey threw a ball into right field while attempting to field a lame squib in front of the mound — even that it was only an unearned run — leading to the curious ESPN headline, "Indians starter gives up run". The streak spanned seven days in seven games, and over that span, the Indians entire pitching staff gave up just six runs — aside from Betancourt, only two runs over 62.2 IP, one unearned, with nine pitchers combining for an insane ERA of 0.14. Over that span, Sabathia and Laffey gave up two runs in 30 innings, and Carmona and Lee pitched 18 scoreless innings in a single day. Byrd contributed another 7+ scoreless innings, and four relievers contributed six scoreless appearances as well.
Cliff Lee ended his own historic run with his first poor start of the season, allowing more runs in that one start (5) than in his first seven combined (4) and nearly as many extra bases. Lee's historically good launch to the season got heavy press coverage, and he still leads the AL by a significant margin in both ERA and FIP.
The offense continued to struggle to stop continuing to struggle, but the problem shifted as some hitters showed some at least signs of recovering (Hafner, Garko), others showed at least an up-and-down tendency (Peralta, Dellucci), while still others displayed an increasingly chornic-looking awfulness (Cabrera, Gutierrez). Jason Tyner was ditched out of a need to summon Jeremy Sowers for a spot start. Sowers was demoted and replaced the next day by Michael Aubrey, a highly touted prospect around 2004 who has been chronically injured ever since. Aubrey made contact in every plate appearance and sent his first major league hit over the Cincinnati fence, and to nobody's particular surprise got more playing time than Andy Marte.
Post of the week: Should we talk about it?
Who fed it: Despite disappointing results, many Indians had a great week, none moreso than Ben Francisco, who piled up five singles, three doubles and a home run in just 18 at-bats, good for a 1359 OPS. Sabathia delivered the club's best start of the week and arguably the whole season, a complete-game shutout in which he faced 32 batters, only two of whom even reached second base, in both cases with two outs. Carmona, Byrd and Laffey each contributed a seven-inning gem, combining to allow only one run, one walk, one HBP and one extra-base hit (a double). Rafael Perez added four more scoreless appearances and hasn't allowed a run in more than three weeks, spanning 11 games. Jorge Julio continued his march on the Circle of Trust, retiring all four batters he faced, two on strikeouts; he's now retired 21 of his last 25 batters, allowing just two singles and two walks. Peralta chose feast over famine with a 1038 OPS, including two doubles and two home runs. Jason Tyner exceeded our wildest expectations, getting released before he could make our wretched offense any worse. Absolute Best: Francisco. Relative Best: Tyner.
Who fed it breakdown: What if Travis Hafner rebuilt his swing and nobody noticed? With half the week's games in the NL, Hafner had a limited role but still produced a home run and three walks — and in fact, he has a very healthy .318/.483/.545 — that's 1028 — over his ten games, which included seven starts and three pinch-hitting shots. It's far too soon to announce that he's back, or even to have any real optimism, but considering his OPS was well under 600 for a month of games before that, it's at least an encouraging sign. Garko, meanwhile, slugged 700 this week with two doubles and two home runs but drew no walks, and he's drawn only two walks in 75 PA over the past four weeks.
Who ate it: Gutierrez is playing himself out of a job completely, or at least into a significantly reduced role, and this week, he failed to reach base even once in ten trips to the plate, which included five strikeouts and a GIDP. His OPS for May is 328, and it's just 545 for April and May combined (that is, the whole season except for his heroic Opening Day act on March 31). Dellucci was also terrible this week, managing just a single in 16 at-bats; he's also having a terrible May (444 OPS) but at least had a good April (871). Cabrera managed just two singles in 17 at-bats (285 OPS) and is carrying a 492 OPS all the way back to April 6. Betancourt retired just one batter out of four and ominously did not appear in any other game. Absolute Worst: Dellucci. Relative Worst: Gutierrez.
Who ate it breakdown: As noted above, the weakness of our offensive attack was nowhere near as widespread this week as it was at the start of the month — the team hit just .232 and slugged .423, but if you exclude AbaCab, Gutierrez and Dellucci, the other 11 position players hit .278 and slugged .523 — more than respectable. This is not to prescribe just leaving those three out of the lineup, as this is just a tiny slice of the season. But it is nice to know that based on this past week's numbers at least, it is possible for us to field a lineup that can produce good numbers.
The other guys. false alarms and open questions: Will be posted later.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Unfortunately for Looch, he is thrust into a role he should have never been in in the first place. But with the horrendous offense, he just kind of fell into the top of the lineup. DD should be expected to have bad weeks .. but they should occur when he is batting 6th or 7th in the lineup.
Francisco and Aubrey (to a small extent) show what I have been saying about Marte (and to all the apologists) all year. Yes it sucks to get small windows of opportunity .. but you have to show SOMETHING when those chances come. Even if your overall numbers are not good .. you have to at least have flashes of brilliance that make a club want to keep you on.
I’m sorry, but that’s just retarded, or at best blithely ignorant of the facts.
Marte has not gotten regular work all season. Francisco was given regular work from the moment he was called up.
by Jay on May 20, 2008 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
this is a nice feature
we should do this over at red reporter
In the end, life and business are about human connections. And computers are about trying to murder you in a lake. And to me the choice is easy.
by chandrathan on May 20, 2008 3:48 PM EDT reply actions
I, for one, was very encouraged by Wedge this week. He pulled Betancourt when it was obvious that he was struggling, thus saving the tribe a win. This is not his MO.
I think I watched about 3 innings of the Reds series, which is for the best as it sounds like we sucked at either hitting or pitching or both. However, I have faith in our ability to beat the White Sox, mostly because I hate them.
Despite all of my best intentions, I have not, in fact, grown up to be a debaser.
Jensen Lewis had an interesting theory when he was interviewed by WTAM the other day. Said that one of the unintended consequences of having your starters go so deep into games night after night was that no one in the bullpen was getting much work. He claimed this prevented them from building any kind of rhythm and from getting the innings they needed to stay sharp.
Damn you starters and your 0.14 ERA!
I get the sentiment, but really, it’s a matter of roles. Their job in the ‘pen is to come in when needed, and stay sharp outside the game situation. Shoppach’s role is to stay sharp and spell Victor every 5th plus day. Marte’s job is to fetch Wedge coffee (” I said TWO sugars!”). Each of them know their role.
As someone said in another thread, part of the reason Ben Fran and Aubrey may get longer looks than Marte is because they started hitting right away. Same way that Wedge is going to go with the guys in the ‘pen who can come in and mow down batters on whatever time frame is dictated by the starters. “Lack of use” seems like a feeble excuse. I would imagine some research has been done on this anyhow to see how valid it is – days off between appearances vs. effectiveness, compared to career norms?
Well, whatever, it hasn’t really been a problem for. Betancourt has had problems, but he was having problems before as well. The rest of the bullpen has been pretty great other than Saturday’s disaster.
I always date the pitching hot streak back to April 17, which was the first game after C.C.’s last trainwreck. From April 17 to the present, Perez, Masa, Stomp and Julio have given up just 11 runs in 49.1 innings. That’s a 1.99 ERA.
Leave out Masa, and move the date to April 25—that was still 25 days ago — and it looks even better:
Perez, Stomp and Julio — 2 ER in 28 innings, which is 0.64.
So we’ve got plenty of relievers still performing, just not the guys we keep giving the save situations.
Yeah – the bigger concern is that the signs point to giving the future save situations to JoBo, Betancourt, and Masa based on “tenure” or previous experience. It’s a lot of bad pitching to get through to Perez, Stomp and Julio.
But I think this is more just irrational depression with the lack of a go-to shut-down closer than really thinking we can’t solve it.
Borowski gives me an ulcer too, but let’s say he comes back and manages to save a league average percentage of games (i.e., if he’s adequate). That would do a lot to put bullpen guys into roles they’re familiar with/comfortable with - maybe Betancourt can find it again if he’s not pitching under intense 9th inning pressure; Masa looked pretty decent pitching set up; the other guys can settle in (although I still worry about Lewis) to their roles and all of a sudden the bullpen isn’t the problem. I’m not optimistic that Borowski can do this - if he really has arm problems, I doubt a few weeks will “cure” them. But, if he CAN do it, a few frayed nerves may be worth the price for settling the bullpen down.
Yeah – this is the real hope. But meatballs like the ones he was cookin’ up don’t inspire much faith.
I feel like I’ve gotten used to a closer situation being very tense. But I also realized that, growing up and living in the Midwest my whole life, I’ve gotten used to the fact that April baseball sucks for going to the ballpark, because the weather is awful. Then, this year, I went to a game while in Florida and it was a lovely April game, and I was like, “Hey, it doesn’t have to be like that”.
I feel the same way about our closer – after Wickman and JoBo, I’m conditioned to tense save situations. Then I watch Joe Nathan or Papelbon go out and shut the team down, and I’m insanely jealous.
Agreed. Jensen shouldn’t be making any excuses for anything.
One thing I haven’t heard is, “Last year’s (insert MLB team) could have been great, however their starting pitching proved too good, pitching too deep into the game thereby ruining the bullpen’s chances to close out games. (insert MLB team) struggled to play .500 ball and finished in 5th place.”
It's the Arizona talking, really.
Tonight’s lineups:
CF Grady Sizemore
RF Ben Francisco
DH Travis Hafner
C Victor Martinez
1B Ryan Garko
LF David Dellucci
3B Casey Blake
2B Jamey Carroll
SS Asdrubal Cabrera
SS Orlando Cabrera
C A.J. Pierzynski
LF Carlos Quentin
RF Jermaine Dye
DH Jim Thome
1B Paul Konerko
3B Joe Crede
CF Nick Swisher
2B Alexei Ramirez
And apparently no one claimed Tyner so he was outrighted to Buffalo.
I’m steeling myself for listening to Hawk all night on MLB.tv. There are only a few things I miss about living in Chicago, but not getting to go to about 8 or 9 Tribe games a year is definitely very high on the list. There were few things more enjoyable than getting on the Red Line headed north after a Tribe victory and about a dozen Miller Lites.
Il faut d'abord durer.
What did Peralta do? Not that he’s been great, but he’s had his moments. He needs to grow a beard, I guess.
He really must be in the doghouse to be replaced by a guy batting .180. It can’t be about the error on Saturday, I hope.
According to Wedge, in this morning’s PD (Wednesday), it was about the errors. “He’s got to be better than that.” Let’s see that logic applied to Dellucci and Blake for the mess in last night’s game—that will help persuade me that Wedge isn’t picking on certain players unfairly (right now, he’s got some persuading to do, in my book).
I can’t recall what Blake did last night? Please refresh my memory.
It isn’t just the errors. It’s WHY they happened. If they happened because Wedge felt that Peralta wasn’t focused and concentrating, that’s one thing. And we all know that it’s a BIG thing with Wedge.
He’s a lot closer to this thing than we are, and if it’s his determination that Peralta has had problems recently with focus and concentration and wants to sit him a couple of games, I don’t have a problem with it. It’s a long season, and this isn’t Strat-O-Matic where you just plug guys into the lineup every day.
8-2 coming into the Reds series, 8-5 now in last thirteen games. That’s a .615 winning percentage, which rounds out to 100 wins. This is how bad things are going.
How’d we ever get a 3.4?
i’m so depressed about this manny marte thing
by Gradyforpresident on May 20, 2008 7:44 PM EDT reply actions
Some Open Questions:
Has Francisco done enough to win a job or will he be another Church/Ludwick?
Pronk?
How long until we unleash our Atomic weapon?
Is there room for Aubrey?
When Marte is released, should it be a FanShot or a FanPost?
A better question is whether Francisco is Alex Ramirez or Jody Gerut. Ludwick didn’t show much and had injuries when he was here. He blossomed, improbably, much later (after almost being out of baseball). Francisco has had some really good moments when he’s played, but he’s also a risk to tail off when the league adjusts to him. It’s hard to argue against playing him right now, but that’s not the same as having won a job for the long term. In fact, I can imagine a scenario where, if he slumps, the Indians call up Choo and send Francisco back to Buffalo.
Aubrey will be sent down when Borowski returns, IMO.
Are you asking who should be shot if Marte is released?
False dilemmas are more fun. But in any case, we can’t learn much of anything in 50 at bats. The front office surely has more to go on, but we don’t.
by FranklinScott on May 21, 2008 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions

by 















