A Trip Back to the Park
Recent talks about the state of League Park inspired me to take the drive down to E. 66th and Lexington to get a taste for what we're talking about. I'll try to keep my comments brief and let the pictures do most of the work.
It doesn't take long heading along Superior Ave for the neighborhood to get rough. I took this shot from my car. Once you hit E. 66th off Superior, you see an old yellow bar sign that says "League Park Bar." Like an old ticket stub that fell to the ground after the game.
I travelled just a few blocks down E 66th before running into Lexington Ave. Here it is, League Park.
I'd like to mention that I'm not satisfied with the pictures I took because I was legitimately afraid being at this place alone. This neighborhood could not be worse. Along E. 66th, around a hundred feet from the park, there was a house with 15-20 guys sitting in the front yard. If they had wanted to mess with me, they would've had an easy time with it.
Right across the street from League Park is a dilapidated church.
Kitty-corner to it, however, is a new community center and day care - the softest breeze of hope in a wrecked land. I parked my car here.
And here she is. The back of the ticket booth. Aside from the first-base line grand stand fascade and the foul polls, this is all you get.
I'm standing in left field right now. How many great ballplayers used to roam this ground? I wonder if any big plays ever happened at this exact spot.
This is my most disappointing shot. I was skittish, so I shot quickly and didn't get the context of what this picture shows. This is the tunnel connecting the club house to the first base dugout. Cy Young used to ascend these stairs on his way to the mound.
League Park was built in 1891 and expanded in 1909 by an upstart Cleveland firm called Osborn Engineering - the same firm that went on to build Fenway, Yankee Stadium, Old Municipal - and even did the structural work for Progressive Field. Recently, Osborn has done special-consulting and repairs for Wrigley Field. Funny thing about Osborn: I work for them right now. Motivated by LGT talks, I sent an email to our company's President, pitching the idea of Osborn getting on board with the renovation of League Park. Think about it: one company designs, builds, observes the decommissioning, demolition, ruination, and subsequent rejuvenation of a structure and a neighborhood more than 100 years later.
But why care about this place? Hard to say. An Indians fan might appreciate the first place that housed Tribesmen. Others might see League Park as a possible symbol for urban reform, or inspiration for black American youth to take back the game. Some might look at League Park as Cleveland and American history, something that has intrinsic worth and should be preserved as such. Or you might just see an old building, begging to be put out of its misery. It all depends on how the light hits the brick, or where you're standing when you look at it.
Time to go home now, League Park. I'll be back later.
UPDATE:
Back sooner than I thought. Osborn sold most of its original drawings in the early 90s (whoops) but I made a copy of an elevation and street view. That, and Osborn plans to be involved in a renovation of League Park should it ever get off the ground. Possibly more to come...
13 recs |
106
comments
Comments
Some pictures are a little crooked, I apologize. I was using an unfamiliar company camera.
by joeee on Jul 24, 2008 11:19 PM EDT 0 recs
Very nice. Thanks for the legwork. Keep us updated on your suggestion to the company president if you can.
by PatBordersHelmet on Jul 24, 2008 11:41 PM EDT 0 recs
My father told me about seeing games here. The Indians played weekday games at League Park until 1947, playing at the lakefront for big series (Yankees) and weekend games. I like the idea of using two stadiums.
by odradek on Jul 24, 2008 11:49 PM EDT 0 recs
Also, thanks for the photos. They’re really cool. Cuckoo Charlie Jamieson stood where you took your outfield picture.
by odradek on Jul 25, 2008 12:05 AM EDT 0 recs
Nicely done. I had never even seen a picture of League Park before.
Proud supporter of the Cleveland.
by fwembt on Jul 25, 2008 12:35 AM EDT 0 recs
Very nice. The dugout picture is fantastic..

These guys thank you.
Wedge: [letting go of Casey's hand] I'll never let go, Casey. I promise.
by cclemens31 on Jul 25, 2008 1:02 AM EDT 1 recs
Great pictures, thanks for sharing. A buddy and I stopped by on July 4th a two years ago before taking our own tour of Lakeview Cemetary. I got a nice little pic of Ray Chapman’s grave, complete with an Indians cap, baseball, and bat on it. If i can find it I’ll post.
As far as
This neighborhood could not be worse.... yes, yes it could be. I regularly travel from work in Shaker Heights to downtown via Kinsman and Woodland. I travel from my home in Cleveland Heights to concerts at Beachland Ballroom in Collinwood. And I’ve been in the old Hough neighborhoods. While it ain’t pretty, it could be, and is, worse in other areas of Cleveland.
You know Selig? Ombudsman.
by rolub on Jul 25, 2008 8:32 AM EDT 0 recs
That area between Shaker and downtown is pretty dismal.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Jul 25, 2008 8:39 AM EDT
up
0 recs
i was just thinking, i live at lexington and E100th, but in manhattan, and honestly that neighborhood looks pretty nice to me.
nice pics joeee.
by emil minty on
Jul 25, 2008 9:54 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Great stuff, very well done. Thanks!
Burn on, big river, burn on...
by Turkmenbashi on Jul 25, 2008 9:39 AM EDT 0 recs
This is really nice. I had no idea there was anything left from the old park, honestly. I want to go check it out now. Good luck with your company, I like your idea.
by NickFantana on Jul 25, 2008 10:04 AM EDT 0 recs
I’m sure that the neighborhood is rough, perhaps too rough to go around walking up to people and asking for interviews, but I can’t help but feel curious about how people who live and work in the area feel about the park – both as a historical entity and as a potential renovation project? Have you contacted any residents?
by bentausig on Jul 25, 2008 10:47 AM EDT 0 recs
A sociologist who studied gangs and projects in Chicago. Great books.
by odradek on
Jul 25, 2008 6:14 PM EDT
up
0 recs
This is one of the questions I was wondering about yesterday.
by afh4 on
Jul 25, 2008 4:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
It’s an important question. Sitting here in my DC office I cannot answer it, but I know that a serious answer to it would affect my enthusiasm for the project, in one direction or another. And it is questionable whether anything should be done before we fix the schools; then again, it sucks to go to school in a bad neighborhood that you hate. It’s a very tough problem. If the answer was easy, this very problem wouldn’t exist in every major city.
by jhon on
Jul 25, 2008 5:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Well, to briefly dip into what I was hesitant to get into yesterday:
I struggle a great deal with people wanting to restore this park because it’s historic; it’s neat that Cy Young once walked up those steps and it’s awesome that Babe Ruth once hit a homerun over that wall. However, that sort of focus, the idea that this project has intrinsic value and is important no matter where League Park is located does not jibe with me.
This space in the middle of this terrible area should be rehabbed and something great should be done with it. But it should be because of the needs of the community not because of a need to preserve the area where a Cleveland franchise once played.
Why not a reasonable park, with 500 seats or something, coupled with a much larger community center that offered a variety of programs that the area needs-maybe a free clinic, tutoring sessions, counseling, conflict resolution, a boys and girls club type deal, additional park space.
I know, that all costs money and requires people. But to me, it’s a lot easier to get behind than any ballpark designed to seat over a few hundred people.
The tone and motives of the league park website are emphasizing saving League Park for League Park’s sake; I can sympathize with that as a baseball fan and as someone who loves old things and places. And, I get the idea that a sweeping change might offer a sense of identity and theoretically invigorate the economy. I just don’t really agree and I think it’s the wrong tact.
A baseball museum, a huge baseball park, all of these things are things that I would love in my neighborhood. I just don’t see how they make sense in that neighborhood today.
by afh4 on
Jul 26, 2008 1:01 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Assuming that the people in that neighborhood have wants and needs different than your own neighborhood may be your first mistake.
I live in Cleveland. I don’t claim to have al the answers and I think you have some great ideas in there. Funny thing is, the stadium, after sports had left, was a community center for a while. But it fell into disrepair somewhere along the way. Today, directly across the street is the Fatima center (St. Agnes Our Lady of Fatima.) It is relatively new and quite nice inside (They even let me use their bathroom one time.) Aside from providing daycare and youth programs they do other things for the community as well. Part of what you say the LP project needs to do, would be redundant.
The blocks that surround the park really aren’t much of a neighborhood at all. A few blocks away there is new housing and a so-far successful a Hope VI mixed-income project. Parts of Hough look much better than they did a decade ago. The blocks around League Park are primarily vacant lots with what looks to be less than 50% occupied homes on them. The majority of the vacants have been demolished.
I truly welcome you arguments, they help sharpen the case to rebuild. But you need to get some fresh facts in there because from where I sit it seems like your just searching for any reason to oppose the forward momentum of the idea. At noon on any day of the week, it isn’t scary at all. If you ever get a chance, I highly recommend, to anyone, to take a walk through the park.
by PatBordersHelmet on
Jul 26, 2008 12:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Two additional points and I’ll keep it shut for awhile:
Why historic preservation versus something small and/or more modern that would ultimately reflect the original park less? Because the federal government will match the amount raised by the city, donors and partners combined. One of the current designs is tagged at $8 mil.
If this moves from the idea stage to the development stage, you know the Congresswoman and Councilwoman will want to be a big part. Rest assured their constituents will let them know what they want, need and expect. very block club for miles will be there along the way and every reverend will be their too. When and if the shovels turn for a groundbreaking, you can guarantee community members and local politicos will outnumber the baseball bloggers and historians in attendance.
by PatBordersHelmet on
Jul 26, 2008 12:29 PM EDT
up
0 recs
At noon on any day of the week, it isn’t scary at all.
Looking at the story accompanying this post, this hardly appears to be a consensus opinion.
by afh4 on
Jul 26, 2008 1:27 PM EDT
up
0 recs
It is a mater of perspective, but at noon, when the playground across the street is in full swing it isn’t very daunting. Or on the weekend when a dad is showing his son how to show a tight spiral. Most times it is empty.
I’m guessing Joeee went towards the end of the work day. That’s a little different, not much, but enough to feel a little unsettled in any part of the city that’s seen better days and you don’t know anybody in. part of what keeps the small amount of security in a bad neighborhood is the fact the neighbors are looking out. Most of the time those eyes you feel are watching you are doing it in a good way, as unsettling as they may feel.
by PatBordersHelmet on
Jul 26, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Yeah I have to say the comments in the original post are a bit extreme. I just went there a few days ago to check out the park with couple friends, and it was no different than walking in a park in Lakewood, Parma, whatever, I did not feel any threat or anything during the day time. Its not that bad there (perspective) and there are some nice new houses sporadically placed between some dilapidated boarded up ones, so at least its not all dilapidated boarded up houses..
by hans on
Aug 3, 2008 1:17 PM EDT
up
0 recs
It depends how you read it, I guess. The photos are deceiving; the author went after work, when his presence is a little more conspicuous. Ok, so the neighborhood could be worse, or at least feel worse. But let’s be fair: this is not a good place to be.
I think this neighborhood actually is slowly getting better, and progress should be noted. I think I mentioned somewhere that the field is well maintained—it hasn’t always been that way by my recollection. The steady expansion of the Cleveland Clinic has been a marginally good influence in these parts. But this is a thinned-out area, deserted because of violence and the large number of homes that have burned over the years or just disintegrated. Keep in mind this is nearly the epicenter of the Hough riots, so it’s like a defeated, post-ghetto,
I have a friend who works on a construction crew that contracts with the city. His role is to install temporary water connections when and where they’re doing work. In the last couple years he has spent a lot of time down here. As bad as these dwellings look on the outside, they’re much worse on their interiors. He tells me vivid accounts of water damage, animal feces, death traps. Many of the homes are beyond repair: they were built with copper plumbing that has been dismantled and robbed for salvage money. The efficiency of the copper robbers is unbelievable; they’ve done this to thousands of homes in the area.
In other words, most of these homes aren’t fixer-uppers that can be made suitable for the gentry by some ambitious developer. They’re total ruins.
On a side note, I have a lot of stories about DC area slums. I’ve worked on a number of rehabilitations around here and you see some awful stuff. You wouldn’t believe how much poo a pigeon nesting in an abandoned structure can produce. It can amount to inches in depth, covering all flat surfaces.
Those nice new houses are just a veneer. The ones that are occupied at all were built 10 years ago and still-I believe-are tax exempted. That’s why they were built in the first place. In other words, they’re not helping the schools. On top of that, I hear that the company that built them bankrupted itself and couldn’t finish some of the homes it had started.
Lastly, my grandfather was once carjacked at gunpoint not far from here, so yeah, I certify the badness of this neighborhood.
by jhon on
Aug 3, 2008 2:02 PM EDT
up
0 recs
re: copper thieving
blank”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubbles(The_Wire)
by Gradyforpresident on
Aug 3, 2008 3:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I’ve been outed.
Dangit. I wanted people around here to think I was something other than a white inner-ring suburbanite.
by jhon on
Aug 4, 2008 9:19 AM EDT
up
0 recs
(The location of the car jacking was near John Hay High School, ~ 15 blocks from League Park.)
by jhon on
Aug 3, 2008 2:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Thats a good point. Although I’ll still stand that aside from a gentleman using the park to do some running exercises, there was maybe one person on street to the west of the park and nobody else around. I’ll give you that at night, I wouldn’t be caught dead walking around that neighborhood, but there are other neighborhoods north of their that I would be much more afraid of being in. And in I would say the Denison area on the west side, makes me more nervous than League Park area. But this is all subjective anyways.
by hans on
Aug 3, 2008 5:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs
afh4: it looks like you and I aren’t going to be agreeing any time soon on this issue. It’s also likely that this isn’t the place to flesh it out (as you noted in a previous thread) and, more importantly, it’s certain that I am an armchair social reformist at a cleveland.com level of awareness – except with good grammar. I don’t know you, and I don’t want to be presumptuous, but it wouldn’t surprise me if you were in the same boat. Neither of us studied economics. Don’t know much about it, but I wish I did. So I will loosely appeal to it, maybe someone can correct me where I am wrong.
Ideally, The Big Hand would put a perfect school on the lot filled with only the best teachers and best resources – and filled with students who want to learn and whose parents actively encourage their education. That would be pretty sweet. But that doesn’t exist. What does exist is the ruins of an old ballpark. It doesn’t seem like that could add much to a community, right? But I would speculate (NO data here) that there are unintended consequences to pumping bad neighborhoods with things like community centers and boys and girls clubs. I won’t enumerate what those unintended consequences might be, but I would guess that they are bad, and would rather get into it in private.
Second, we are talking private dollars here! I can’t see how to siphon government money into more community centers in favor of private donations – a cause de celibre that someone with a big wallet might actually get behind. Your line of thinking can contribute to this neighborhood’s stasis. Here’s everyones first thought: “Only the best should go in this lot – something that helps kids get an education/seek help/shelter from their terrible homes and lives. That’s the only thing that belongs here.” The second thought is never, “ok let’s go rustle up this money from the city of Cleveland.” So nothing happens. Oh well, at least there isn’t a new baseball field.
If you allow a private investor to actually try to get something done, you might be surprised. Some would argue that the first – and only – step to rejuvinating a neighborhood is through a strong economy. Get private businesses back in there – however you want to – and the whole thing improves.
But what do I know, really? I’m no expert – at anything, let alone this. So your voice is welcome, absolutely. Play ball.
by joeee on
Jul 26, 2008 12:27 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I’m frankly confused by who’s actually doing the project. It seems like a mix of public and private funds, at least from the news clippings on the website.
by afh4 on
Jul 26, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Nobody is doing, it’s all talk and a few mock ups right now. LPS is doing it as much as Fannie Lewis’ office is doing it. Clearly ex-Mayor Jane Campbell dropped some $ for a study a few years back.
by PatBordersHelmet on
Jul 26, 2008 1:36 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Projects such as this one can revive bad neighborhoods. They can be a fountainhead for economic revival. They can, if they work, bring jobs into a community. The reality of the situation is that anything that might bring money into the community would be a good thing. Anchor developments such as this—like the Inner Harbor in Baltimore, though on a much lesser scale—can help everyone in Hough. In downtown Gary, Indiana—which is a real dump—the Railcats (an Independent League team) have a new stadium, which is supported by the City of Gary, the U.S. Steel Foundation, and the Railcats. In Memphis, the new stadium has contributed to the revival of downtown. A viable business that would bring people from around Cleveland to E. 66th and Lexington would be worthwhile, in my mind.
by odradek on
Jul 26, 2008 2:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs
the idea that this project has intrinsic value and is important no matter where League Park is located does not jibe with me.\
Your damn right. The location of a Negro League Championship team in an all black neighborhood is damn important.
by joeee on
Jul 26, 2008 12:29 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Not that I’d hold my breath, but in light of all of the history mentioned above (especially the Negro League Championship), you’d think that maybe MLB would toss something into the mix, monetary or otherwise.
Itcould be some good PR for them.
by ganatz on
Jul 26, 2008 2:44 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Also, Andrew, I think your vision of what this thing ought to be is right on. And Jay mentioned the RBI program, which does very good work along these lines and I’d hope they could be brought in to contribute. I see this as a potential flagship project for the program.
by jhon on
Aug 3, 2008 2:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Most excellent, joeee. Cool idea for a post.
"Lotta heart in Cleveland." - Ian Hunter
by Denver Tribe Fan on Jul 25, 2008 12:15 PM EDT 0 recs
Good work Joey. I read about the history of the park a little. As a playing field, it was famous for mostly two things:
1) The RF wall, 290 ft from home to the corner and 40ft high. The first half was concrete, the upper portion chain link. Crazy.
2) The groundskeeper-I forget his name-who studied the team very closely and contoured the field to their advantage. The excellent home record the team had in his time is partially attributed to his craft. In the Bill Veeck years they had two tarps for rain: one that took just a couple minutes to deploy, used when the Tribe was ahead, and another one that took much longer, to be used when we were behind.
by jhon on Jul 25, 2008 12:25 PM EDT 0 recs
The groundskeeper at the time of the 1920 World Series was Frank Van Dellen, but you’re almost certainly thinking of Emil Bossard, who took over in 1936 and allegedly engaged in many shenanigans, including moving the fences back 12-15 feet when the Yankees came to town. Emil’s grandson, Roger, is the groundskeeper in Chicago, and Smithsonian Magazine had an interesting article about the three generations of the Bossard clan.
Emil’s contributions were so critical that Indians manager Lou Boudreau called him “the tenth man in our lineup.” The stellar condition of Emil’s field, combined with his surreptitious diamond doctoring, facilitated more than a few Tribe victories. “I wouldn’t be surprised if [Emil] helped us win as many as ten games a year,” Boudreau told Baseball Digest in 1955.
by FredOx on
Jul 25, 2008 1:50 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I was actually reading a small 3 page bio on Cy Young last night. In it, they referenced a “League Park 2”. Was that just a clumsy way of saying League Park was renovated .. or was there another site for a second League Park?
by Toxicadam on Jul 25, 2008 12:30 PM EDT 0 recs
Same park. It was renovated in 1910. The ticket booth you see in the picture was a part of the original field, National League Park / Dunn Field. Dunn was the owner. I believe he owned the streetcar line that took people to the park. At the time it was built this site was considered somewhat remote.
by jhon on
Jul 25, 2008 12:39 PM EDT
up
0 recs
+1
Dear Mr. Sabean, I hear you have a reputation of being stupid. Want to deal Lincecum or Cain? You can pick THREE of these 4 players for either: Borowski, Dellucci, Blake, Byrd.
by westbrook on Jul 25, 2008 12:30 PM EDT 0 recs
Very cool, joeee, thanks for going out. I’m sort of embarrassed that I lived in Cleveland for 20 years and never saw it.
It’s nice as a fan to hear that they’re talking about renovations, but what are the plans for it if it ever happens? And what kind of impact do people think that a renovated ballpark might have on the community? Genuinely curious to hear people’s opinions on that. It seems to me, as an outsider now, that Cleveland has a host of issues and projects that could use support and money, and League Park would, to me, seem pretty far down the list.
Il faut d'abord durer.
by CU Adam on Jul 25, 2008 12:35 PM EDT 0 recs
Adam, if this was not a sarcastic question, read here.
You know Selig? Ombudsman.
by rolub on Jul 25, 2008 12:54 PM EDT 0 recs
ah crap, missed the reply button.
i’ll go sit in the corner now.
You know Selig? Ombudsman.
by rolub on
Jul 25, 2008 12:54 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Thanks Rob, I’ve missed most of the fan posts lately because of studying.
Il faut d'abord durer.
by CU Adam on
Jul 25, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I liked the idea of the Negro League museum as part of the proposed program, but on a symbolic level there’s a tiny shortcoming: this park closed for good in 1946, just one year before Doby signed with the Tribe.
by jhon on Jul 25, 2008 1:01 PM EDT 0 recs
I’ll bet Doby played many, many times on the infield of League Park with the visiting team.
by PatBordersHelmet on
Jul 25, 2008 1:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Well, it was the home park for the Cleveland Buckeyes of the Negro League from 1943-1948. That’s something.
by Ryan on
Jul 25, 2008 1:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
















