Email
PrintComments
Very true…Speaker’s a good choice, but I went with Feller. Most baseball fans don’t realize how dominating he was, and how big he was at such a young age. He was LeBron way before LeBron.
The Shin-Soo Choo of LGT.
Just to elaborate…..he pitched in the majors during the summer between his junior and senior years in high school!! That’s ridiculous! And he struck out 17 batters in a game when he was 17 years old. His high school graduation was carried live on NBC radio. If only WW2 hadn’t taken away those years . . . .
The Shin-Soo Choo of LGT.
My grandfather (not an Indians fan so no bias here) insists that Herb Score would have been better than Sandy Koufax had he not been hit with the line drive. Interesting to hear how dominating he was at such a young age
Poz on Herb Score. I’ve always heard the basic story; how he was dominating as a young pitcher then got hit in the face by a line drive and was never the same after that. But I never realized how great he actually was (245 and 263 strikeouts in his first two seasons, better ERA+ than Dwight Gooden’s fabulous rookie season) and never heard about what really happened after that fateful day.
The Shin-Soo Choo of LGT.
if so, LAME.
I’m curious what you guys think of this one:
http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation/pollingMLB?event_id=3543
The whole thing is just “like sooo” SSS. I mean, Longoria will probably win this poll in 2014.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
Pete Rose won the Reds vote — with more votes than everyone else combined.
This is incredible, considering the Reds arguably had the best player ever at two different positions, plus the greatest hitter nobody ever talks about, Frank Robinson.
by Jay on Aug 8, 2008 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree that F Robinson is the most underrated great hitter.
by JulioBernazard on Aug 8, 2008 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Stan Musial is the greatest hitter nobody talks about. Posnanski wrote a great piece on Stan the Man recently, which I’d link except I’m getting a 404 on his site.
Greatest players ever at two positions? Johnny Bench at catcher, and…Dave Concepcion at short? Joe Morgan at second? Ted Kluszewski? George Foster? Heinie Groh? Leo Cardenas?
Morgan, of course.
You won’t find many guys who are flat-out the best hitter in their league for two straight years, while also being good enough at a skill position to win five straight Gold Gloves. For that matter, you won’t find many middle infielders who ever led the league in slugging, but just for good measure, Morgan also led the league in OBP three times.
Morgan also stole 689 bases, which is 11th all time and 67 more than Kenny Lofton. Just to give a frame of reference, the active SB leaders are Pierre (426), Vizquel (384), Damon (350) — that’s the entire list of active major leaguers who have half as many career SB as Morgan, and stealing bases wasn’t even his main gig.
Mind you, I’m not saying Morgan is clear-cut, head-and-shoulders above, dead-obvious greatest ever at his position — nor is Bench for that matter — but he’s clearly in the discussion. Incidentally, here’s how the Hall of Merit crew recently voted on the best 2B ever:
RK Player 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 TOTAL 1. Eddie Collins 17 6 2 515 2. Rogers Hornsby 6 14 5 501 3. Joe Morgan 2 5 8 10 474 4. Nap Lajoie 10 14 1 457 5. Charlie Gehringer 12 9 3 1 407 6. Jackie Robinson 1 11 8 3 1 1 405
Morgan narrowly edges out Lajoie for 4th but finishes ahead of Jackie Robinson on all 25 ballots — making him unquestionably the greatest 2B of the past 70 years, better than everyone else who played the position for 30 years before he arrived and 30 years after he departed. Does that towering fact in and of itself not suggest that he might just be the greatest ever?
No argument here. I had to listen to a lot of people—none of whom had even heard of Charlie Gehringer—tell me that Ryne Sandberg was the greatest 2b ever. But I watched Morgan play at Riverfront in the 1970s, and I agree wholeheartedly with you.
For readability, here’s the same chart with fewer columns and more rows:
RK Player 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL 1. Eddie Collins 17 6 2 515 2. Rogers Hornsby 6 14 5 501 3. Joe Morgan 2 5 8 10 474 4. Nap Lajoie 10 14 1 457 5. Charlie Gehringer 12 9 3 1 407 6. Jackie Robinson 1 11 8 3 1 1 405 7. Bobby Grich 5 3 6 5 4 2 344 8. Rod Carew 1 7 4 4 3 4 2 329 9. Ryne Sandberg 1 2 4 7 2 6 3 313 Post-1940 RK Player 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL 3. Joe Morgan 2 5 8 10 474 6. Jackie Robinson 1 11 8 3 1 1 405 7. Bobby Grich 5 3 6 5 4 2 344 8. Rod Carew 1 7 4 4 3 4 2 329 9. Ryne Sandberg 1 2 4 7 2 6 3 313
Based on this, at least 20 out of those 25 guys would say Morgan-Ronbinson-Sandberg, and again, all 25 would put Morgan first.
The consensus on ordering Grich, Carew and Sandberg is not as strong, but clearly they’re all behind Robinson, who is clearly behind Morgan.
Where’s the love for Grady?
You have no idea the physical toll that three vasectomies have on a person
I thought that was pretty clearly not serious..but I guess not clearly enough! I forgot my tags.
You have no idea the physical toll that three vasectomies have on a person
by jakesinger777 on Aug 8, 2008 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions
LGT should have sarcasm shortcuts, kinda like how FE WEE works.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
Funny, because in my post just now I wrote “forgot my SARC tags”, in between a < and a >, and it ignored it when I posted it.
You have no idea the physical toll that three vasectomies have on a person
by jakesinger777 on Aug 8, 2008 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions
I went for the delicate balance of sarcasm and sort-of seriousness. CC would have worked for me too.
You have no idea the physical toll that three vasectomies have on a person
by jakesinger777 on Aug 8, 2008 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions
As with all of these kinds of ridiculous polls, the central issue is what they (or we) mean by “best.” Is it best overall performance over a career (maybe Speaker or Feller)? Most important contributor historically (Doby)? The one who contributed most to us actually winning a World Series (arguably Boudreau)? It’s just all stupid. So, why is it still so appealing to think about?
"Lotta heart in Cleveland." - Ian Hunter
by Denver Tribe Fan on Aug 8, 2008 4:41 PM EDT reply actions
None of those competing theories would explain a vote for Rose, so obviously there is some other central issue.
Somebody had a “Face of the Franchise” poll last year. The “face” could be a player, manager, GM, or anyone else. Billy Beane won for Oakland, for example, and Vin Scully for the Dodgers.
You can argue that Rose is the all-time face of the Reds franchise, based on longevity, historic accomplishment, notoriety, and being a hometown kid. But a better player than Morgan, Bench, Robinson, even Larkin?
Also, don’t dismiss the tendency in these polls to vote for Pete just to stick it to Selig. Remember he was elected to the all-century team a few years back and got a bigger ovation in Atlanta than Hank Aaron.
Fans love Rose because he seemed like a regular guy, and he always hustled and played hard. He’s like David Eckstein or Darin Erstad—except he was actually very good. Unfortunately not as great as some fans think.
The Shin-Soo Choo of LGT.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 9, 2008 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Pete would not get as warm of a reception at this point — that All-Century thing was before he admitted that he had bet on baseball.
by Jay on Aug 9, 2008 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Absolutely. That was the night of the Jim Gray ambush interview. But while Pete was still a somewhat sympathetic character then, he didn’t belong on that team (he beat out Stan Musial, among others), and he’s not the best Reds player of all time, either.
But some people (and probably not just Reds fans) vote for him on these things for various reasons. All polls involving Pete Rose carry a dose of irrationality.
Foxx and Clemente probably deserve spots, too.
by JulioBernazard on Aug 10, 2008 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions
There was a generally laughable omission of modern pitchers — perhaps due to obsession with the Win stat, which those old-timey pitchers could pile up like crazy. We were in the middle of a golden age of HOF pitchers at that point — Maddux, Clemens, Johnson, Martinez — and none of them were on the team.
The modern pitchers included generally were guys who inspired awe without directly competing on Wins — Ryan with his strikeouts, Koufax with his short-lived but stunning briliance. Maddux, Johnson and Pedro all had peaks of 5-6 years that were absolutely comparable to Koufax.
Without the cultural aspect, I don’t know that there’s a genuine argument for Clemente. Are people really going to argue that you take Clemente over Barry Bonds, Frank Robinson, Rickey Henderson and Carl Yasztremski, plus one of the guys who actually made the team, I guess either Rose or DiMaggio?
Wasn’t this point made earlier this season, when Ozzie Guillen said Clemente was only the third best player from Puerto Rico, behind Pudge and Robbie Alomar? Is Clemente the best Latin player ever, or the first great Latin player? I suspect it’s the latter, though who’s better? Vlad? Manny? Robbie? Pedro?
Are we talking about anyone from Latin America, or anyone of Latin descent?
If it’s descent, it’s A-Rod.
Otherwise, it seems like a much more open question.
Could Manny Ramirez be the best righthanded hitter ever? Probably not as good as Aaron, without looking it up.
But he’s a serious contender for best Latin player ever.
That’s who I was thinking of. His career offfensive numbers are comparable to Clemente’s in every way that matter. He hit for less average but more power, so he didn’t get to that nice round number of 3,000 hits. But he hit more homers and got on base just as much, so his career OPS is a tad higher.
Sorry, the Cepeda ref was for you, but it ended up in the wrong place. Orlando was locked up in Eglin Air Force Base, so the character stuff can’t compare to Roberto.
I don’t hold the weed against him, considering what other players have done, but it is a valid point (and he probably only avoided jail a second time on a more serious charge because the ADA cut him a break for being who he was). Clemente was head and shoulders above most when it came to character, but that wasn’t the original question.
And Clemente had one of the best arms in history.
by JulioBernazard on Aug 11, 2008 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Cepeda did a lot of great things for a lot of people, just like Clemente, he just also smuggled reefer. No biggie.
Jackie Robinson’s selection as the top 2B was also culturally influenced. That’s not to say undeserved necessarily, all things considered. I’d say the Hall of Merit people had it about right. You could reshuffle their top five a little, but that was the right quintet, IMO, if a little skewed to the olden times.
As for the great pitchers of the late 90s, they were doing it in an era of explosive offense. Whether or not any of all of them were juicing, the fact remains that a combination of factors (stadiums, strike zone, ball, whatever) was making the 50-homer season routine, while those four pitchers were putting up ERAs like it was 1968.
I’ve decided the real problem with the team is that too many got included. What team has ten outfielders?
Thirteen position players. Start with the starters.
C – Berra and Bench. They got this right. I don’t know and don’t care who’s starting.
1B – Gehrig.
2B, SS – Hornsby and Wagner. I hate to defer to the old-timers, but Wagner evidently was also a great defender, and Hornsby’s hitting binges were absolutely epic.
3B – Schmidt.
OF – Williams, Mays, Ruth. Yes, that means Aaron rides the pine — he only got to be HR king for 30 years because Mays and Williams went off to fight wars. Ruth is non-negotiable.
So I’ve got my nine starters plus a backup catcher and Aaron on the bench. That leaves me with three more bench spots, and I’m giving them to Bonds, Ripken and Morgan. Ripken can back up at SS and 3B — it’s not like Schmidt needs a defensive replacement with his 10 Gold Gloves. Morgan and Bonds were tremendous hitters who also excelled on defense and stole a ton of bases.
No disrespect intended to Musial and Robinson — who would get my next two spots, I think — or Mantle or Banks or anyone else, but I think those are the right 13 guys. If the century ends a few years later, then A-Rod knocks Ripken off the team.
Pitchers are tougher …
Who does James say as first base in Historical Abstract? Gerhig r Foxx, I don’t remember. In which case I would vote for Foxx because he played in Philly rather than NY.
Without even looking, I’m sure it’s Gehrig, because there’s no way James had some other argument to overcome the OPS+ gap, 179 to 163.
Okay … I looked, it is Gehrig.
Looking at James’ rankings, here’s where he’d presumably differ with me:
• He has Cobb and Mantle (and Musial and Speaker) ahead of Aaron and Bonds, plus Oscar Charleston. Would he really go with Ruth, Mays, Charleston, Cobb and Mantle? Hard to say.
• He likely would have Josh Gibson starting at catcher, and I can’t argue, with Berra edging out Bench for the backup spot.
• Morgan starts at 2B with Eddie Collins making the bench rather than Hornsby.
• Arky Vaughn probably makes the bench over Ripken.
So he might really name only 7 of the 13 that I named.
Oh yeah, I neglected to include “Ended Indians’ starting catcher’s career in meaningless All-Star game” as one of my categories.
"Lotta heart in Cleveland." - Ian Hunter
by Denver Tribe Fan on Aug 9, 2008 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Lajoie or Feller. They are apples and oranges, of course. But they each towered over their contemporaries. In the first decade of the 20th Century, only Honus Wagner rivaled Nap as a position player. Feller was in a class by himself, and spent some of his best years in the Pacific.
Lajoie was the 6th Hall of Famer – highest to fall below 75% in the first year, top vote getter the next. He’d be more appreciated today if he had managed to get into the inaugural class.
I can’t see picking anyone other than Feller. Unlike most of the guy guys that ESPN lists, Feller was a career Indian. He was probably the best pitcher of his generation, and maybe the best Righty ever. He pitched a game with 17Ks as a 17 year old. He wasn’t even out of high school by the time he made he first MLB start. Plus, and this has nothing really to do with on the field accomplishments, but he’s the only worthy guy on the list that is still alive. So if it becomes a coin-flip for you between Feller and some ancient dead guy (Lajoie, Speaker) just go with the guy who’s still living. Snubbing the dead guy wouldn’t hurt their feelings. I voted for Feller.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
Featured Stories
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recent FanShots
In Association With
Big League Stew - MLB - Yahoo! Sports
- Five tips for Showtime’s second season of ‘The Franchise,’ featuring the Miami Marlins
- The 10 best things about being a Detroit Tigers fan
- Surprise! A’s finally end the Yoenis Cespedes derby with $36 million deal for Cuban star
- The time Whitney Houston sang to Jim Bowden
- Pitchers and catchers! Mariners get early start in Arizona
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
