LaPorta Slugs 2 HRs in Playoff Opener

Matt LaPorta certainly had an auspicious playoff debut for the Aeros, going 4-for-5 with two homers and a walk in Akron's 6-5, 12 inning victory over Bowie. LaPorta tied the game at 2 with a leadoff homer in the fourth, drove in Wes Hodges to give the Aeros a lead with a two-run blast in the sixth, and drove in the winning run with a single in the 12th.
Wyatt Toregas also went deep for the Aeros, and Wes Hodges was 2-for-5. On the pitching side, Scott Lewis performed adequately, giving up three runs in 5.2 IP, Tony Sipp struck out two but uncorked two wild pitches, and Neil Wagner closed out the game with three scoreless innings, working around a single and a walk in the 12th (with the final out coming, fittingly, on a flyout to LaPorta).
LGF(uture)T.
0 recs |
120 comments
Comments
I feel like I’ve waited for Wyatt Toregas to get to Cleveland for all of my life.
Maybe he’ll come next year.
by jhon on
Sep 4, 2008 10:45 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Clutch exists when I want it to, and I think this proves Matt LaPorta is clutch.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Sep 4, 2008 12:39 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That’s always the risk when you trade for a prospect. You have no way of knowing if he’s totally clutch or just another A-Rod. No amount of minor league success can make up for veteran leadership
by jhon on
Sep 4, 2008 1:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I sure hope LaPorta doesn’t turn out to be just another A-Rod….
"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself."
by Fiddlesticks on
Sep 4, 2008 1:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
2 recs
Perish the thought.
Can one be a captain of a major league team while still in the minors?
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Sep 4, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LaPorta has a career postseason OPS of 1.739 in the minors. His pores are full of sweaty clutchiness.
by FredOx on
Sep 4, 2008 1:37 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The only thing that would make Matt LaPorta more clutch is if he grew a beard
by ShawnK on
Sep 5, 2008 9:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So..we won the trade?
You have no idea the physical toll that three vasectomies have on a person
by jakesinger777 on
Sep 4, 2008 12:58 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
We’ll probably be watching Brewer games in October. So, I will say no .. for now.
by Toxicadam on
Sep 4, 2008 1:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey, but CC will blow up in the playoffs. He always lets his team down. Everybody says so. Remember?
by peter m on
Sep 4, 2008 2:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don’t worry, Tubby’s gonna crap his diaper this year in the NLCS like he did in last year’s ALCS.
Resident LGT beer kinda sewer
by mauichuck on
Sep 4, 2008 2:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
lmfao
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Sep 4, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can’t wait for you to be wrong like usual.
by mjschaefer on
Sep 4, 2008 3:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bookmark this post and we’ll talk in October.
Resident LGT beer kinda sewer
by mauichuck on
Sep 4, 2008 3:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Kids, take a tip from the master. If all of your predictions happen in some seemingly soon but actually somewhat far-off future, everyone will forget and you can go on saying whatever you want with authority.
by Voltaire on
Sep 4, 2008 7:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pretty sure that even you will remember this one. Here, I’ll do it again. CC’s gonna fall on his face hard in the NLCS at least once. And by hard I mean less than five innings pitched and more than six runs allowed. Can you remember that?
Resident LGT beer kinda sewer
by mauichuck on
Sep 5, 2008 7:15 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your like somekind of jealous boyfriend who wants his ex-flame to get hit by a car or something. Seriously dude its kind of pathetic.
by mjschaefer on
Sep 5, 2008 10:42 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Here’s the way I read CC: he’s immensely talented with a terrific fastball, plus curve, good baseball instincts and an exceptional athlete. But – but – he cannot control his emotions. He presses so hard in "clutch" situations that any upset, any upset at all – a walk that he thinks shoulda been strike three – a boneheaded play in the outfield, and he’ll unravel. And yes, I expect the Brewers to make it into the play-offs and into the second round. That’s when the pressure will be up a notch and my boy will delaminate. Let’s see if I’m right.
Resident LGT beer kinda sewer
by mauichuck on
Sep 5, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think psychology explains last year’s playoff performances, but maturity and experience might get CC over the “anti-clutch” hump (unfortunately too late for the Indians). He’s not a head case like Carlos Zambrano. He might have learned some better self-control after the ALCS and this year’s season-starting train wreck.
I guess whether CC crumbles deep in the playoffs again or pitches gems, it won’t surprise me.
by cleveland teamer on
Sep 5, 2008 2:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It’s true. People are to quick to write off someone that fails at first in a playoff atmosphere. Peyton Manning is the one I always think of
by Roger Dorn on
Sep 5, 2008 2:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed. People change – CC might have learned something from last year. But that’s not the way to bet. The smart money is on a repeat performance. Kinda like using this new-fangled statistical analysis thing to predict what’s in the future.
Resident LGT beer kinda sewer
by mauichuck on
Sep 5, 2008 2:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You said it well before, “looking in the rearview mirror to see what’s coming ahead.” I personally think you are attaching too much meaning to two games. You’ll look like a god if you get this one right, though.
by joeee on
Sep 5, 2008 2:56 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, he’s not. Making an accurate prediction isn’t impressive if you don’t have a semblance of a sensible theory behind it.
by Voltaire on
Sep 5, 2008 4:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, he won’t look like a god. I can predict an earthquake to hit San Francisco tomorrow. It probably won’t happen, but if it does that doesn’t mean I’m prophetic. I just got lucky.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on
Sep 6, 2008 9:30 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tell you what, I’ll let you know the day before the game starts when he’s gonna fold. That good enough for you?
Resident LGT beer kinda sewer
by mauichuck on
Sep 6, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So, just for records sake …
You state that CC will choke in the playoffs because of past perfomances ….
Yet we cannot count on past perfomances to judge what our other players will do in the future.
That to me seems to be a riddle, wrapped in a conundrum.
by talonk on
Sep 5, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nope, the statistical reference was sarcasm. I expect CC to choke in the play-offs because of his inability to control his emotions. CC’s been an outstanding pitcher in at least 75% of his starts. Assuming that, like chicken parts, a starts a start, it would be foolish to think that CC will have a one percentile type start in a particular game – like a pivital championship game. The odds favor him having an average – for him – start. I’m saying he’ll stink. Which, on average, is highly unlikely.
Resident LGT beer kinda sewer
by mauichuck on
Sep 5, 2008 3:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You cite two conflicting past performances as basis for your judgment – last year’s ALCS and this year’s regular season. You’re having your cake and eating it…additionally.
by joeee on
Sep 5, 2008 4:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That still doesn’t resolve the issue talonk stated.
by Voltaire on
Sep 5, 2008 4:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Aunt Fae is back for her monthly visit!
I agree, C.C. totally gets overemotional and fails in clutch situations, which is why he’s folding like a cheap suit in all those close games down the pennant stretch for the Brewers — not — just as he did for us in 2007 — not — and 2005 — definitely NOT.
by Jay on
Sep 6, 2008 7:35 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey, he didn’t pitch a complete game shutout yesterday. Must be the beginning of that inevitable fold!
by peter m on
Sep 6, 2008 10:25 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So you’re saying they’re going to get to the NLCS?
Looks like they’ll be playing the Mets or possibly Phillies in the first round.
by Jay on
Sep 5, 2008 11:47 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Probably my favorite matchup looking at how the playoffs seem to be shaking out. Cubs vs. West is kind of meh. It’s interesting that one of the White Sox/Twins/Rays should be guaranteed a spot in the ALCS.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Sep 5, 2008 11:54 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Mets pitching is a mess right now. The Brewers might just get by them, if they get in, that is.
by peter m on
Sep 5, 2008 11:59 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
C.C. is gonna throw a perfect Game 7 in the WS. And I will be cheering him the whole time.
by Voltaire on
Sep 4, 2008 6:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but not in 2001, whatever that means.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 4, 2008 4:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And in 2009, we’ll have LaPorta, Jackson, Bryson and Brantley/Green, while the Brewers will have fond memories of the Sabathia Months.
by FredOx on
Sep 4, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and get to talk about how they destroyed his arm in that time for the team that eventually signs him for 1 billion dollars.
by Brick. on
Sep 4, 2008 2:10 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can’t understand why I’m the first to rec this. His face is perfect.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Sep 4, 2008 3:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I rec’d it too, but it has to be the first time anyone has made a connection between CC and Mini-me.
"It's hard to win when you don't score." Cliff Lee, 9/28/05.
by Harry Doyle on
Sep 4, 2008 3:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Prince Fielder, speaking of C.C, said “I’m like his mini-me.”
by DixonCayne on
Sep 4, 2008 5:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and in only 20 minutes too. Impressive.
Rizzec’d
by Logodaedalus on
Sep 4, 2008 6:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
this needs to be one of those green starred posts. I fully endorse silly LGT pictures.
by APV on
Sep 4, 2008 7:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Posts only get starred if there’s a subject, I think.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Sep 4, 2008 8:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe there should be a page that collects green’d items from around SBN? Like, it’ll automatically promote the item to a common page for all of the different SBN-MLB sites that gives it some extra significance… it seems to me that the above post is the kind of thing that fans of other teams might find funny. It could encourage interaction across the different home-sites.
I guess an admin would have to approve everything so that people don’t become whores for their own inside jokes.
by jhon on
Sep 4, 2008 8:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Between this and the Red Sox slam, this has been quite a day for recs.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Sep 4, 2008 9:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What would be even better is when Carlos Santana turns out to be some hybrid of Bench, Victor and Joe Azcue. Imagine, getting more for Blake than CC!!
Resident LGT beer kinda sewer
by mauichuck on
Sep 4, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not such a surprise — we got a lot more for Colon than for Robbie Alomar, and Alomar was a surefire HOFer coming straight off an MVP-caliber season.
Of course, it’s not really fair, because we arguably got more for Colon than any team has ever gotten for anybody. It’s up there, anyway.
by Jay on
Sep 4, 2008 5:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh how I wish we had a young Robbie Alomar right now.
by APV on
Sep 4, 2008 7:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Asdrubal Cabrera, age 21 and 22: 444 ABs, 82+
Roberto Alomar, age 20: 545 ABs, 105+
by afh4 on
Sep 5, 2008 3:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
so you’re saying i’ve got 101 at bats left?
by Gradyforpresident on
Sep 5, 2008 5:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i would go back five years if i had one
by Gradyforpresident on
Sep 5, 2008 5:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
… And draft Chad Billingsley instead of Aubrey? That is tempting.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Sep 5, 2008 9:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Blah blah the draft.
What international signing would you change if you could go back five years?
We should have a new rule, no more commenting on the draft without an equal amount of commenting on international signings.
by Jay on
Sep 6, 2008 7:37 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Victor Martinez is the shiz.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Sep 6, 2008 8:10 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LGT’s very own Equal Time Rule
by Gradyforpresident on
Sep 6, 2008 11:27 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the heightened importance placed by fans on the first round draft picks (and the Indians’ failures there) is simply a consequence of frequency. How many international signings do we make a year? 10? 100? I admit I have no idea. But we only have one first round draft pick every year.
by kwoog on
Sep 6, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Carlos Santana is in a dogfight with Mills for the title of my favorite minor league player.
by Voltaire on
Sep 4, 2008 7:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
favorite minor leaguer….hmm….I think I’m going with David Huff right now. I really want to see what he can do in Cleveland.
by APV on
Sep 4, 2008 7:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nothing engenders fondness like far exceeding expectations.
by Jay on
Sep 4, 2008 10:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
see Laffey, Aaron
strangely, do not look at Blake, Casey
by APV on
Sep 4, 2008 10:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lake County also won their playoff opener last night, 10-4.
Despite all of my best intentions, I have not, in fact, grown up to be a debaser.
by zempf on
Sep 4, 2008 1:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Mike Pontius had a memorable third of an inning (2 singles, 2 doubles, 1 walk, 1 strikeout, 4 runs).
by FredOx on
Sep 4, 2008 1:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
HE SHOULD HAVE MADE THAT SPOT START FOR US EARLIER THIS YEAR INSTEAD OF THE INDONESIAN.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
by westbrook on
Sep 4, 2008 3:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hafner to continue his rehab in Akron for the playoffs, beginning tomorrow.
by Fundamentals on
Sep 4, 2008 6:51 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
He’s taking away AB’s from the young talent!
by RD74 on
Sep 4, 2008 7:07 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Per the Akron play-by-play guy, Santana got injured in last night’s game and has been replaced on the playoff roster by Espino. He didn’t say what happened to Santana, but I hadn’t really heard anything about this.
by Fundamentals on
Sep 4, 2008 7:30 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Santana, who recently joined the Aeros when high Class-A Kinton’s season ended, suffered a groin pull and has been shut down from all baseball activity.
by FredOx on
Sep 4, 2008 11:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Akron blown out in the second game, 11-3. Lofgren gives up 4 ER in 1.1 innings, including a salami. LaPorta 0-3.
Despite all of my best intentions, I have not, in fact, grown up to be a debaser.
by zempf on
Sep 4, 2008 9:53 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
lofgren is like Akron’s Garko
by Gradyforpresident on
Sep 4, 2008 11:37 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yikes, I’m not sure which guy that’s more harsh on.
My first thought was, Garko doesn’t totally destroy most of the games he plays in.
But then my second thought was, Garko did kind of destroy entire months though — not by himself, but he played a pretty big role.
by Jay on
Sep 5, 2008 12:42 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hello Jay,
I understand your point, but one big difference:
Garko is in the Majors and has been pretty much what we thought he’d be, maybe a bit less offensively and considerably more defensively than most thought.
Lofgren, on the other hand, has stagnated at AA, is teetering toward likely becoming a reliever than a starter, and is now showing signs of that wildness occurring in a bullpen role, something he wasn’t doing throughout his first several outings out of the bullpen.
Therefore, while it’s not a nice comment about Lofgren, it’s arguably harsher on Garko – after all, he is a decent, and even solid at times, Major Leaguer. Lofgren is having trouble maintaining any sustained success at AA, and his age factor, which was once such a positive, is starting to become more of a negative, especially if he doesn’t start excelling, or at least succeeding regularly, at AA in 2009, as he will be 23 early in 2009. If he doesn’t pass the AA test next year, he’ll actually be a bit old for the league, not to mention having spent three years there. As important a year as 2008 was for Lofgren, 2009 will likely be even more important in that he finally get past AA and hopefully show some of the promise at AAA, preferably as a starter, but if not, as a dominant reliever with consistent command.
His lack of success the past two seasons is making me wonder if the Indians would ever consider reverting him back to a hitter, much like the Cardinals did with Ankiel. Recall that many teams wanted to draft Lofgren as a hitter, NOT as a pitcher. Would the Indians ever consider reverting him back to a hitter, or even semi-hitter, and if so, when?
Just my 2 cents – no offense.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Sep 6, 2008 10:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hello GFP,
Thanks for that stat – I guess he’s been a bit above-average offensively, at least for his career.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Sep 7, 2008 12:21 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and he’s a 1st baseman, too. but yeah, he’s had major league success and lofgren hasn’t and probably never will at this rate.
by Gradyforpresident on
Sep 7, 2008 12:25 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That 102 OPS+ from a defensively average 1B — and that is charitable — adds up to a below-average major leaguer. If he were a CF or a 3B with a 102 OPS+ bat, we could call him average, but not at 1B.
Look at this way, he’s slugging .360, and the league average is .426. Among all qualifying major league 1B and DH, he is the second-worst hitter.
The EqA stat, which is more accurate than OPS, has him at .249 this season, while the league average is .260.
Now check out his month-by-month OPS:
2006 – 969, 724
2007 – 710, 1064, 573, 1149, 697, 808
2008 – 700, 661, 654, 680, 770, 507
August is the only month this season where he has an OPS over 700.
I don’t know that I ever realized how streaky Garko before this season — he was bad-to-terrible in four of his first eight months as a player, decent one month, though excellent-to-brilliant in three others. He has, so far, never been just plain “good” for a whole calendar month — he jumps straight from 808 to 969.
I also don’t remember noticing how bad he was down the stretch last year, but it makes the trends more distinct. Garko had a 915 OPS in his first 134 career games, including 119 starts through July 24 of last year. In his next 181 games, he’s had a 704 OPS. That is a massive, massive drop-off.
Garko last season generated 4.2 RC/G en route to 83 RC total. He was expected this season to keep that rate up while getting perhaps 20% more PA — nobody would have been surprised to see him top 100 RC easily. Instead, he’s on pace for about 57, in part because of reduced playing time — my point is that we pay the price for both the reduced productivity and the reduced playing time.
I’d say that Garko’s struggles alone have us nearly 40 runs, or solidly four whole wins, shy of where we thought we’d be. Among the healthy Indians, he stands second only to Betancourt in blowing this season for us.
by Jay on
Sep 8, 2008 11:48 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with everything here. Without the benefit of seeing the numbers, I thought Garko was offensive problem numero uno (excepting the injured Victor and Hafner), although his failure has been made more conspicuous with the disappointments from Asdrubal, Dellucci, Michaels, Gutierrez—pause for breath—and Marte). He has pretty much played himself out of a baseball career, though in hindsight there was no little amount of wishful thinking that he was going to generated 4.2 RC/G..
by odradek on
Sep 8, 2008 5:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey, you know who else was a disappointment? Blake. I’m glad he had a (BA/bip inflated) great stretch of 200 PAs to bump his trade value, but ignoring his defensive and offensive contributions to how much we sucked April-June is just not giving blame where blame is due.
by fleerdon on
Sep 10, 2008 6:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m reluctant to say anything bad about Casey, because his reputation is pretty high around here. And I was concerned I would have to hear about his clutch hitting, and how he is actually a solid third baseman, and an above-average player, etc. So I purposefully avoided him. Also, I don’t know how much of a disappointment he was, because he was expected to be a replacement-level player, and he almost was. He was a millstone around the neck of the team, but his performance wasn’t totally unexpected.
by odradek on
Sep 10, 2008 11:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m reluctant to say anything bad about Casey, because his reputation is pretty high around here. And I was concerned I would have to hear about his clutch hitting, and how he is actually a solid third baseman, and an above-average player, etc.
Is this a joke? I must not pay any attention anymore.
by afh4 on
Sep 11, 2008 12:22 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
“Casey Blake is not a mediocre hitter. He is a good hitter. Better than mediocre by any measure, and surprisingly consistent in his above-mediocre-ness.”
Some people seem to think Casey is a good player, and we should get him back so he play every day. Looking longingly back at the good old days, when Casey played alongside Lofton.
by odradek on
Sep 11, 2008 7:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m reluctant to say anything bad aboutCaseybeer, becausehisits reputation is pretty high around here. And I was concerned I would have to hear abouthis clutch hittingits frothy head, and howheit is actually asolid third basemannutritious breakfast, andan above-average playera friend to those in need, etc.
Fixed.
by FredOx on
Sep 11, 2008 8:57 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
2 recs
I’m wondering why you didn’t capitalize Beer. That’s just disrespectful.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Sep 11, 2008 9:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would never say anything bad about beer. Ever. Unless it was Bud Light on draft.
by odradek on
Sep 11, 2008 7:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Amendment: …and there were other beers available.
by odradek on
Sep 11, 2008 9:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It may not have been unexpected by us, but the fact that he notched 181 PAs in the first 49 games suggests it was unexpected by the Indians. He OPS’ed about .680 over that stretch, hitting only 4 home runs. From your veteran everyday third baseman? Shrügenblech.
by fleerdon on
Sep 12, 2008 9:33 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That’s a good point. But in this case I was talking about 2008. You said above you thought he deserved part of the credit for the debacle that is the 2008 Indians. I think Casey played to his level, timed his hot streak well for trade purposes. He sucked, but wasn’t much of a disappointment.
by odradek on
Sep 12, 2008 11:21 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Looking back, we will one day say that Casey’s performance was the best part of 2008, as he played well enough to make himself worth giving up C. Santana for.
by FredOx on
Sep 12, 2008 11:35 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just as Bartolo Colon has never played better for the Indians than he has this season.
by Jay on
Sep 12, 2008 12:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
His play for the Reds has been a mild disappointment, however.
by peter m on
Sep 12, 2008 12:54 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Broussard is having a great second half.
I’m somewhat surprised that Shawn Nottingham is still in the organization.
by FredOx on
Sep 12, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Drese and Einar Diaz spent most of the year out of organized baseball.
by peter m on
Sep 12, 2008 2:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Was just telling Erik last night, I’m going to have to change my Colon-as-Expo avatar for a Bavasi avatar, if Choo and Cabrera can really establish themselves next year. I still can’t really believe those two trades happened, even after two years.
Nottingham isn’t looking great overall, but he’s got the strikeouts, and he’s still got some youth. He certainly handcuffs the lefties — 9.75 K/9, 53.1% groundballs and only 7.8% line drives allowed. His peripherals against righties aren’t bad, but they just hit him too hard.
(One thing about lefty relief prospects, they face righties much more often than lefties, so their overall numbers may disguise the fact that they’re dominating lefty batters. Thank God for minorleaguesplits — I really felt lost without it.)
by Jay on
Sep 12, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can’t find Gregario Rosario’s name on any of the ol’ reliable stat sites.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on
Sep 12, 2008 2:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hello Jay,
Thanks for the stats.
What, then, would cause someone like Garko to fluctuate so much as a hitter from month-to-month – I don’t recall him being this erratic in the Minors, at least, not until he repeated AAA in 2006 (I think?) He seemed to be on a steady line up until then, and while that doesn’t guarantee a smooth transition to the Majors, it wouldn’t seem to infer he’d be this erratic from month-to-month either.
Is it his approach at the plate, a bit of a long swing, overthinking his at-bats, or something else?
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
by indiansfan on
Sep 9, 2008 12:48 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The main reason probably is just that a huge part of his overall value as a hitter is in his batting average — he doesn’t hit a ton of home runs and doesn’t have a great walk rate — and pure contact hitting is simply far more volatile than other skills.
by Jay on
Sep 9, 2008 12:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just to be clear, I’m not saying that the actual skill of contact hitting is far more volatile, I’m saying the statistical results will be more volatile.
by Jay on
Sep 9, 2008 12:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m not sure I’d call this year’s Garko a “contact hitter” (although I know what you mean — he doesn’t have a very high slugging percentage for the number of hits he gets). He actually has struck out quite a lot (likely to wind up near 100), certainly more than the stereotypical “contact hitter,” if one means by that a guy who consistently puts the ball in play.
by peter m on
Sep 9, 2008 2:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Garko did not draw a lot of walks or slug all that many extra-base hits even when he as doing well, not to mention his lack of defensive value. He lives and dies on his ability to hit for solid contact.
by Jay on
Sep 9, 2008 11:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Long swing, tendency to try to pull or upper-cut, overthinking, I guess, and lack of adjustments during at-bats. Last year I remember hearing Hamilton and Hegan talking about his ability to adjust. Not this year.
by odradek on
Sep 9, 2008 7:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
he stands second only to Betancourt in blowing this season for us.
who has actually been half-way betancourt the last month or so.
by Brick. on
Sep 9, 2008 3:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Are we now using Betancourt as a unit of measurement?
Platooning with Jamey Carroll is not freedom. Free Andy Marte!
by woodsmeister on
Sep 11, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think a Betancourt is about 45 seconds, or the average time between Betancourt pitches. For example: Masa Kobayashi slept with 6 different women in just under 16 Betancourts
by Logodaedalus on
Sep 11, 2008 1:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Was he using those suction cups during this marathon? I sure hope so. No wonder he’s tired!!
by peter m on
Sep 11, 2008 2:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually that was just a poor translation. It turns out the Japanese word for “suction cups” sounds very much like the Japanese word for “woman” – hence the confusion and the similarities of the skin contusions.
Resident LGT beer kinda sewer
by mauichuck on
Sep 11, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Interesting questions on Lofgren.
While we have to assume his talent isn’t quite what we hoped — he at one point was on nearly the same trajectory as Atom Miller, without Miller’s pure stuff but also without Miller’s injuries — the reports imply that the problems are predominantly, perhaps even entirely, in his own head. That suggests that the talent may still be significant, but of course there’s no given that he can overcome the head problems.
I don’t know that the Indians have ever played around with the hitter/pitcher thing, and it doesn’t seem like the kind of thing they tend to do. Seems like they hardly ever make sudden, drastic moves — moving Crowe to 2B was far less drastic than this, and they basically chickened out almost immediately.
Here’s that old BA scouting report:
Scouts are divided on whether Lofgren will be drafted as a hitter or pitcher. Teams have gone back and forth on him all spring. Most scouts saw him as a hitter at the start of the year and turned him in as a potential first-rounder. Some even thought he was the surest bet of all the high school players in this year’s draft to hit in the big leagues, and said he could hit 35-40 homers a year. They saw juice in his bat and a solid approach at the plate. He was frequently pitched around, however, and he began to swing at bad pitches. He tried to do too much and his frustration got the better of him. He struggled to hit .250 and sentiment moved to the mound, where scouts saw a 6-foot-4, 200-pounder with a power arm, capable of pitching at 88-92 mph and touching 93-94. They also saw a high-maintenance delivery, an inconsistent curveball and a tendency to lose velocity quickly. The general feeling now is that Lofgren’s higher upside is as a position player, even though he’s an average runner and projects only as a left fielder. He finished the year with a .343 average, but only three homers. Lofgren, a Santa Clara signee, would play both ways in college but has expressed a preference to begin his pro career.
Intriguing but not terribly appetizing. Basically, some felt he potentially was a Weglarz/LaPorta type of player, lots of power but no real defensive value, but he hasn’t faced live pitching in four years now. As for his ongoing progress, age 23 isn’t young for Double-A, but it isn’t old, either.
by Jay on
Sep 8, 2008 12:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs



















