Bulls in the pen
Paul, over at the DiaTribe, did a nice breakdown of the Indians starting pitching options as they stand now just three weeks away from Spring Training. I thought I'd try to provide something similar with the bullpen, which as we all know is good in odd number years for Cleveland and bad in even number years (so why bother, right?).
To begin, the relievers on the Indians 40-man roster at the moment (roughly in order from likely to close to least likely to make the 25-man roster):
- Kerry Wood (R, 6'5" 210, 32.0 - app. age July 1, 2009)
- Rafael Perez (L, 6'3" 195, 27.1)
- Jensen Lewis (R, 6'3" 210, 25.1)
- Rafael Betancourt (R, 6'2" 200, 34.2)
- Joe Smith (R, 6'2" 210, 25.2)
- Masa Kobayashi (R, 6'0" 195, 35.1)
- Adam Miller (R, 6'4" 200, 24.5)
- Ed Mujica (R, 6'2" 215, 25.1
- Rich Rundles (L, 6'5" 210, 28.1)
- John Meloan (R, 6'3" 230, 25.0)
- Tony Sipp (L, 6'0" 190, 26.0
The top 6 guys on that last are essentially guaranteed spots barring injury during spring training. The battle for the final spot seems to be primarily between Mujica, Miller, Rundles and Meloan. Mujica's spot on the roster is in the greatest jeopardy and might just get cut to make a space for Miller. Given the noticeable absence of lefties, I wouldn't count out Rundles (who seems like a sure thing to spend at least some time in Cleveland during the season).
Bullpen performance is notoriously volatile, but we can at least look at what this group has and has not accomplished over the past several years. Here is the same list with number of appearances/innings, level, and FIP over each of the past three seasons, in order from 2006 to 2008.
- Kerry Wood (4/19.2, 22/24.1, 65/66.1 - MLB - 4.12, 3.33, 3.26)
- Rafael Perez (43/107, 52/107.1, 73/76.1 - AA/AAA/MLB, AAA/MLB, MLB - 3.25, 3.20 3.26)
- Jensen Lewis (27/142.2, 60/81.1, 62/86 - A+/AA, AA/AAA/MLB, AAA/MLB - 3.75, 2.65, 4.50)
- Rafael Betancourt (50/56.2, 68/79.1, 69/71.0 - MLB - 3.69, 2.29, 4.44)
- Joe Smith (27/32.2, 62/53.1, 82/63.1 - A+/AA, AAA/MLB, MLB - 3.20, 3.90, 3.95)
- Masa Kobayashi (2008 only - 57/55.2 - MLB - 4.59)
- Adam Miller (27/159, 19/65.1, 6/28.2 - AA, AAA, AAA - 2.95, 3.06, 3.08)
- Ed Mujica (32/51, 44/50.2, 51/64.2 - AAA/MLB - 2.40, 4.00, 4.00)
- Rich Rundles (27/129.1, 40/61, 63/57.2 - AA, AA/AAA, AAA/MLB - 4.80, 3.55, 3.15)
- John Meloan (21/52, 54/74 33/119.2 - A+/AA, AA/AAA/MLB, AAA/MLB - 2.00, 3.20, 4.50)
- Tony Sipp (29/60.1, 0/0, 21/29.1 - AA, 0, A+/AA - 1.94, 0, 3.20)
I posted the above mainly to give an overview of the workload/performance of these guys. A number of the Indians key relievers are relatively recent conversions from starters to relievers. Perez, Lewis and Rundles were at least part-time if not full time starters as recently as 2006. As such, they've got a fair amount of innings workload behind them. But they've also been used pretty heavily out of the bullpen the past two seasons. Perez and newly acquired Joe Smith, who was used very situationally - but who logged 82 appearances last season, have been ridden especially hard.
We can also briefly look at peripherals. In this case I'll list K%, BB% and GB%. I prefer K% (K/PA) to K/9 because it gives a better indication of a pitchers likelihood of having a positive outcome any given AB. For example, using K/9, you could look at Betancourt's numbers from the last 2 seasons (9.1, 8.1) and think there wasn't much of a drop-off. The number is misleading, however, because of all the extra batters he faced last season because of walks and hits. His actual K% dropped markedly from more than 27% to under 21%.
- Kerry Wood (30.4, 6.5, 42.0)
- Rafael Perez (27.5, 7.3, 58.0)
- Jensen Lewis (18.5, 9.2, 36.5)
- Rafael Betancourt (20.7, 8.1, 30.0)
- Joe Smith (19.4, 11.2, 63.0)
- Masa Kobayashi (14.3, 5.7, 52.0)
- Adam Miller (2007 numbers - 23.8, 7.3, 53.0))
- Ed Mujica (18.5, 7.0, 34.0)
- Rich Rundles (27.1, 10.9, 50.0)
- John Meloan (2007 numbers - 32.5, 10.9, 47.5)
- Tony Sipp (34.1, 8.1, 43.5)
Wood and Perez are studs. It would be really nice to see Miller join them in that pairing. Joe Smith induces tons of groundballs, something I hope Wedge recognizes everytime he leaves the starter in an inning too long and they proceed to walk the leadoff batter. He, along with Rundles and Meloan, also walk a lot of guys - something to watch out for. Kobayashi struggled to get guys to miss his pitches last year (something Lewis and Mujica haven't fully translated from AAA either), which hurt him.
One of the Indians challenges with the bullpen the past couple of seasons has been trying to be effective through craft rather than pure stuff. Most of the Indians key bullpen guys get by with a fastball that hovers around 90 mph and a healthy dose of deception and control. Perez's slider was really the most (arguably only) effective non-fastball pitch of the group, and no one really featured a power fastball. This season's group at the very least brings in Wood's elite fastball (as well as slider and occasional curve), Smith's side-arm approach with both his fastball and slider, and also potentially Adam Miller's mid-90s fastball, power slider, and effective change. On paper at least, the Indians have a much more diverse set of options coming out of the bullpen heading into 2009. One challenge will be the lack of an alternative lefty for Raffy P (FYI, bold pitches are used +40%, italicized between 20-40%, and normal 5-20% via fangraphs).
- Kerry Wood (FB [93-95], SL [82-84], CB [79-81])
- Rafael Perez (FB [88-90], SL [82-84])
- Jensen Lewis (FB [88-90], SL [80-82], CH [80-81)
- Rafael Betancourt (FB [91-92], SL [81-82], CH [83-84])
- Joe Smith (FB [87-90], SL [78-81])
- Masa Kobayashi (FB [90-91], SL [85-86], CH [83-84])
- Ed Mujica (FB [90-92], SL [81-82], CB [78-80], SF [85-87]
Clearly I'm eager for some baseball to start. I'm not sure what any of this means except that I am pretty optimistic about the Indians bullpen going into the season. I think injury concerns are real throughout the bullpen, but if people stay healthy, Wedge has a lot more different looks he can throw at the opposing team than he has had in...well...ever.
23 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I would be surprised if Miller doesn’t take the final bullpen spot. If he has time to adjust to pitching at the ML level in low-leverage situations early on, he could really bolster the pen if the usual late-inning guys start to wear down.
I also think Kobayashi can make a positive impact, but they’ll need to give him plenty of rest during the season. I think he just wore down in the second half. I’m not sure he ever threw that many innings in a season in Japan.
I could see Masa, especially if Miller makes the club, becoming the last man out of the pen. In part, because the team probably can only use him every 3rd game. Last year he made 12 appearances in April (and was very effective), 13 in May (effective), and 13 in June (slipping). I’d expect to see that fall back in the 8-10 range.
My excitement for Adam Miller is completely making me forget about my dismay that Meloan won’t make the team out of spring training.
Steel Nick
Hello nickjs21,
Hopefully, Meloan and Sipp can get off to good, fast starts at AAA Columbus – if those two do well, that could also help to bolster our bullpen depth, and both those guys have above-average stuff (Meloan with a mid-90s fastball, Sipp reaching the low- to mid-90s with great swing-and-miss ability).
Therefore, the potential future of our bullpen is looking quite bright indeed – let’s hope it becomes reality! :-)
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
now. . . is that set in stone, or is that just your 2 cents?
by Cap'n Snegiryov on Jan 26, 2009 7:42 AM EST up reply actions
LOL! – Let’s say that’s my 5 cents. :-) (i.e. It’s 2 cents plus the probability of it happening, hopefully! :-)
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.
I just figured with the downturn in the economy, indiansfans was saving his two cents for the posts during the season.
by talonk on Feb 2, 2009 12:55 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
do all those 0s 1s and 2s mean our pen guys were mostly all born the same 2 or 3 months?
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
Maybe it’s like the way they write a third of an inning as .1. Atom Miller is just such a beast they make him get six outs per inning.
by Logodaedalus on Jan 26, 2009 2:03 AM EST up reply actions
Anybody here read Malcolm Gladwell’s newest book, Outliers? Interesting stuff about athlete birthdates. Basically the argument is that youth league birthday cutoff dates give long-term advantages to kids who are the oldest (and most mature physically) relative to the rest of their leagues. Those kids get the most attention from coaches, the best training, and generally the greatest opportunity to succeed at higher levels. If you have the bad luck to be born just before the cutoff date and thus end up playing, year after year, against competition that has a big advantage over you in terms of time to mature, you’re less likely to advance to the highest levels of your sport throughout your youth. And you then have a lower likelihood of become a pro. Or at least that’s the theory.
It’s actually odd that all the Indians pen guys have May-July birthdays, because August is the most common birthday month in MLB. Of course, a bunch of the guys on this list grew up playing in places other than the US.
Similar info at Sabernomics.
by cleveland teamer on Feb 7, 2009 7:28 PM EST up reply actions
That’s interesting. Thanks for posting it!
by Logodaedalus on Feb 7, 2009 10:57 PM EST up reply actions
This is an interesting theory. I think it neglects that people mature at different ages, it would be a pretty sound theory if everyone grew at the same pace.
That doesn’t invalidate the theory though — it just adds a source of variance. Growth pace is presumably fairly independent of birth month, so when you average that out there could still be a statistically meaningful advantage to being born post-cutoff.
by Logodaedalus on Feb 9, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
Rafael Perez (FB [88-90], SL [82-84])
I’m not sure why, but I thought Perez had more on his fastball. That’s not a lot of separation between slider and fastball.
Lots of movement?
Carmona for Cy Young 2009
Here’s a link to Josh Kalk’s pitch F/X tool for Perez. For some reason Kalk has a bunch of Perez’s stuff classified as a sinker, but those just look like his fastballs to me. I was looking across the data on fangraphs, but it looks like last year Perez’s fastball was a little faster (averaging between 90-91). What I think is interesting is that Perez’s slider is very effective (e.g. 89 swinging strikes on it last season), but not because it has a ton of movement. It actually has very little movement. It does separate pretty nicely from his fastball, though.
Hello danvail,
I too thought Perez had more on his fastball – I’m pretty sure he’s hit 92-93 on it consistently (at least during 2007; I can’t say for sure during 2008, but I’m pretty sure he has hit that consistently; realize that Sowers’ fastball is supposedly 89-91, and I have to say that I think Perez’s fastball has more life on it than Sowers – affer all, how many times have you seen a hitter squarely hit Perez’s fastball as compared to Sowers?)
I also agree that his slider is largely effective because there is enough separation between fastball and slider. I would think Perez’s fastball at 91-93 and a slider at 82-84 would create enough separation (that’s about 8-10 MPH) to be effective, but not if his fastball is only 88-90 (that’s only about 5-7 MPH separation, and that’s 7 MPH at most).
If his fastball only registers 88-90, it certainly looks a lot faster (i.e. he shortarms it and hitters don’t pick it up right away, making it look that much faster, as his fastball is certainly an above-average pitch for him, not just a show-me, get-me-over fastball like Sowers’).
Just my 2 cents.
The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by 














