Cleveland's New Starting Pitcher?
It will be....
CARL PAVANO!!!
Seems like a very interesting, incentive based signing. I never loved him when he was with Florida but I guess he could be an average acquisition. I would rather spend a little more and get an injury prone guy like Sheets.
According to ESPN's Buster Olney, the Indians are in serious discussions with free agent starter Carl Pavano. Pavano will visit Cleveland soon and a deal could be wrapped up quickly. We'll have to see if Pavano can come close to the $2MM guaranteed Mike Hampton received from the Astros.
[attributed to Buster Olney by a rumors site, and not substantiated - Ryan]
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You beat me to the punch on this one…by one minute nonetheless. I certainly would rather sign someone else, but with our limited resources, this is probably the best we can do. If he stays healthy, maybe we get 8 wins out of him as our #4 starter…more likely scenario is that he’ll end up on the DL before the season starts. Here’s hoping (praying, wishing, dreaming) this is another Kevin Millwood signing for us!
Sure it can. We’re the Indians. Remember Jason Johnson. Oh, and a serious flag here for linking to MLBTradeRumors.
by woodsmeister on Jan 6, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions
I think the real JJ mistake was sticking with him for too long, not his actual performance.
Hopefully Shapiro learned that lesson.
Based on his response times to the Pronk, Victor, and JoeBo injuries, he didn’t.
by JulioBernazard on Jan 6, 2009 2:58 PM EST up reply actions
ok, even assuming he can stay healthy (big assumption, giving that the last time he pitched a full season was 2004), it’s not a given he’d be better than David Huff, whose spot he’d be taking in the rotation.
I’d like to see Huff start next year in the Cleveland’s rotation too, but given the Indians past history that unlikely in my opnion.
by world dictator on Jan 6, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think it is that unlikely. He doesn’t have much to prove in the minors; he spent half the season in Buffalo, 16 starts, and actually had even better peripherals there (4.43 K/BB) than in Akron (5.40 K/BB). I think any of the optionable guys will have to significantly outperform the non-optionable guys (Reyes and maybe Pavano) in order to take a spot from one of them, but I see little reason that Huff could take a job away from Jackson or even Sowers. I guess Huff would take a 40-man spot away, but they’re going to have to deal with that at some point in order to use him, and I think it’s better than even money that that happens this season.
I would think Laffey has a leg up on the other optionable guys, simply based on having the most big-league success over the last season or two.
Here’s a scary fact: Lee racked up more PRC last season (139) than Carmona, Sowers, Laffey, Reyes and Westbrook combined (33 + 32 + 31 + 25 + 17 = 138).
by Jay on Jan 6, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions
(5.4 k/bb in Buffalo and 4.43 k/bb in Akron)
Has there been any serious discussion of a 4-man rotation lately?
by cleveland teamer on Jan 6, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions
Castrovince mentioned Pavano and kris Benson as possibilities in an article yesterday
by millionairesrow on Jan 6, 2009 12:55 PM EST reply actions
For the record, I do not care, at all. If we spend less than 2 million dollars on Carl Pavano, I don’t care. It’s just another arm to compete.
I thought this might happen… This is typical Shapiro/ Wedge take a chance with an old star dont spend much money and sign a 1 year deal. Lots of upside not much down side.
There should be a name for this type of deal….or is it a signing?
by cleveland teamer on Jan 6, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Geez, isn’t this just a textbook KMTS, except with less money upfront?
All those who want that kind of signing have to realize … this is basically what the guy looks like at the start of that deal.
by Jay on Jan 6, 2009 1:45 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
For under $2M I would rather trade for a pre-arb pitcher, but of course there’s a) talent lost and b) needing to find a team willing to make a trade.
Steel Nick
If it’s really under $2 million, this is just a hair above a minor league signing in terms of significance and risk.
by Jay on Jan 6, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions
Where does this rank relative to the Gutz for Teahen deal, in terms of legitimacy (at the time it was reported)?

by 














