over 2 years ago
afh4
33 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
Reposted:
These media interviews strike me as stupid. Shapiro and the whole FO has shown such a level of disinterest in cultivating anything resembling a compelling relationship with the media over the past 7 years that to ask candidates to do this now, directly after they interview, just seems ridiculous.
You’ve just gone through an extended interview process, probably hours long, and then you’re asked to answer questions asked by Paul Hoynes. In the miniscule media market of Cleveland. How seriously are you supposed to take that?
Valentine makes a couple of really solid jokes. Good deliveries, nice timing. I don’t care what he says about OPS, I’m fine with him as long as Shapiro makes the directives clear. If Valentine recognizes that he’s to manage personalities and player technique, not strategy (where he ought to play to the book), he’d be fine.
I disagree. The Indians are, or at least should be, taking this as an opportunity. First, their is a difference between making baseball moves without regards to what the fans think and bad PR. Making the process and the candidates an open process can be appreciated by all the fans.
Also, being able to handle the media, even in the minuscule media market of Cleveland, is a big part of the job description
by Ryan Kelsey on Oct 24, 2009 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Also, being able to handle the media, even in the minuscule media market of Cleveland, is a big part of the job description
I don’t think the performance in this type of event, where you answer questions like “Are you interested in this job?” directly after interviewing for said job, reflects much of anything with regards to media savvy.
Do we expect some candidate to eliminate himself by accidentally cursing a handful of times? Or by stuttering a lot?
It’s not going to differentiate many candidates, but it is nice when the face of your organization can handle himself in a press conference.
The larger point is that this is (also) a PR exercise, and that doesn’t work without the media.
This complaint about doing interviews seems silly. Should we get off your lawn? It’s harmless. It’s a simple interview in front of some weak-to-average reporters. Big deal.
I don’t mind them doing it, really. More what I’m doing is responding to the other threads where a lot of commenters want to believe that these little media talkbacks are indicative of much of anything.
To rephras, Valentine was taking a lot of heat for his answers. My response is simply, you get some stupid answers when you set up something this low-stakes and silly.
by afh4 on Oct 25, 2009 12:44 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I was a little worried when Valentine admitted that he has no idea about the current state of the teams in the AL, let alone the AL Central, let alone the Indians. Is this really the guy the Indians want managing their assets? Will 15 scoreless spring training innings by Jensen Lewis get him priority as the 8th inning guy in April? Then I started to think that this may be exactly what the Indians need. Pull back the curtain and tell Valentine, "the talent to win 80 games is right here. Do it however you think you should do it. "
It’s not like he’s going to pull crazy roster stunts and realign talent in mystifying ways, like moving slow-footed , defensively-challenged infielders to the outfield or playing 35+ year old career utility infielders at corner positions in place of prospects. That was Eric Wedge’s forte, and it doesn’t get much worse than that. Could Valentine really do much worse? He went to Japan knowing (arguably) less about the state of that league and his roster, and he developed a winner there. Maybe he had a really great support system in place when he arrived in Japan. The Indians can find him a solid bench coach who knows the league. By no means am I condoning an experiment, but there’s no more outside voice than this guy.
I largely agree though I think all of the naysayers, and I know there are many, are vastly overrating how much wiggle room Valentine’s going to have for roster deployment.
Shap’s going to hand him the 25-man and he ought to take a pen and mark the approximate ABs each guy should get. Make it clear that this is the company plan and it will be followed, period. If nothing else, I think that’s got to be the legacy of the Wedge era.
Beyond that, let Valentine make some players laugh, screw around with the batting order and tell guys they’re swing is not in one plane.
And, besides, the Indians are so upside down that outside of a handful of guys, do we really care who Valentine goes with for most slots? Like, Jensen can’t start out as the 8th inning guy after a strong spring? Because that’s totally nailed down by who? C. Perez and Sipp? Hardly.
No one marks on Bobby Valetine’s scorecard! He’s pretty smart about player roles (maybe that’s just selective memory), but I don’t think he’d be the type to invest too much in spring training stats, for example. He’s the last Mets manager to leave the team on good terms with the fans, for what it’s worth.
The reason I was so excited to get rid of Wedge and the reason I don’t want Louvello is because of a player like Jensen Lewis. If Valentine watches tape of him, watches him in spring training, and thinks, “this guy doesn’t have the talent to go anywhere near a late and close situation”- then good. That’s the independent outside evaluation I want.
If the GM is going to dictate number of ABs, nobody, is going to want the job. You can’t expect that and I am pretty sure Shapiro doesn’t.
by Ryan Kelsey on Oct 24, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions
If the GM is going to dictate number of ABs, nobody, is going to want the job. You can’t expect that and I am pretty sure Shapiro doesn’t.
I think this is already happening most places and I think most managers are fine with it. It doesn’t have to be reduced to too fine of a point but the GMs clearly identify “starters” and managers realize they have to play them. This is a total non-starter in most discussions because most teams never had to watch Eric Wedge’s lineup hijinks.
So Wedge had more power than “most managers”. I just don’t buy this. Playing time is totally a manager’s call. I can see things like pitch counts coming from above, but I think the manager has the say of who plays when and where, almost all the time.
I assert the absolute opposite. The GM sets the roster and thus dictates player deployment in nearly every category. In any situation where it’s debatable, I don’t think there’s any question that the GM and manager have to come to some kind of consensus and that the GM is the final say. You think Lou Pinella wanted to play Milton Bradley at all? Even one game?
I refuse to believe that a GM is sitting in the luxury box thinking, “Huh. Wonder why that top prospect hasn’t gotten an AB in a month.” If that wasn’t an organizational choice and it’s not in line with organizational goals then the organization has screwed up.
That’s precisely what happened with Wedge and Shapiro. I don’t know if Wedge had “more power” or if Shapiro was just “more deferential” but playing Ryan Garko in the OF was not in line with any organizational goals and shouldn’t have been allowed, period. The GM should’ve said no, you either stop that or you’re being fired. There are a number of these examples over the last few years and they all indicate either:
1-Shapiro didn’t speak up.
2-Shapiro didn’t disagree.
If it’s 1, which I’m operating as if it is, then Shapiro absolutely has to speak up to the next manager. If it’s 2, Shapiro should’ve already been fired.
The makeup of the 25 man seriously constricts the managers choices. Opening day 2009- The decision on who is playing CF for the Indians has been made by the roster construction- there is one clear choice. But a Carroll vs. Valbuena type decision- who gets >5 starts/week, who gets <2 starts/week is totally the manager’s.
Of course, the communication between the two is crucial. And that certainly was a breakdown last year.
I like this guy more than Wedge already. Which is pretty easy to accomplish if I think about it. He seems “free” where Wedge seemed “constrained” and actually everyone from the Indians organization Mark and Chris on down seemed to be constrained in general (personal impression here, but someone who deals with people and drawing impressions about people are my job and training, so….take it as you will).
I thank Adam for posting the video, it brings a different perspective to what I had read in the other thread where Valentine’s transcript was posted.
Connie Mack, Al Lopez and Johnny Sain could be the Indian’s braintrust next year. You think that alone would put us in the play-offs? I’m not so sure.
But say we get Sizemore back next spring – and Westbrook too. Maybe Hafner comes around and Choo goes completely bonkers And then Carmona morphs back into Fausto. Then Cabrera and Valbuena turn into this century’s Omar and Roberto. I wish I could figure out howta do that, cuz then we’d be in business.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
Having Sizemore and Westbrook back healthy should be a marked improvement (we know what we’ll be getting from both of those guys). I’d be content with just one of those other scenarios panning out.
by Chief WaDrew on Oct 24, 2009 3:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
Featured Stories
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recent FanShots
In Association With
Big League Stew - MLB - Yahoo! Sports
- Josh Hamilton on public relapse: ‘It was just wrong. That’s all it comes down to.’
- Photo: The Marlins’ ridiculous-looking home run sculpture is almost complete
- Yankees GM Brian Cashman lures alleged stalker into police dragnet
- Report: Josh Hamilton had a relapse with alcohol
- Happy Birthday Boy! Wes Ferrell, the best-hitting pitcher of all-time, would be 104
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
