So, it seems like every article you read these days that talks about the Indians near future says that Kelly Shoppach is a likely candidate to be non-tendered this off season. Is a catcher one year removed from a break-out 21-bombs in 112 games, .865 OPS season really not worth offering an arbitration salary to?
The recently talked about Bill James projections have him playing 113 games for someone this year at .249 BA / .333 OBP / .465 SLG / .798 OPS and 19 HR.
The payroll is pretty low already. Would Shoppach's contract make that big a dent - so big it's not worth the value he brings as a free swinging, slugging catcher? The Indians don't plan to compete this season. Santana is the obvious future. But what about 2010? Is there not value in a player like this for the coming season?
What should the Indians do with Kelly Shoppach for 2010?
Trade him (93 votes)
Non-tender him (14 votes)
Make him the back-up catcher (21 votes)
Make him the starting catcher (69 votes)
"Platoon" him in at C and DH (39 votes)
236 total votes