Huntington Snags Iwamura
Don't know much about this pitcher they gave up, but it seems like a good deal for Neal.
over 2 years ago
westbrook
43 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
Interesting move. Not sure what Huntington thinks he needs with an above-the-minimum rental player in 2010, but this does give him some options. If he can’t extend him, he can trade him at the deadline, probably for a lot more than that reliever dude.
Yeah, this a deal you make if you think you’re close. Maybe he knows something we don’t. Maybe he doesn’t.
The once and future
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Nov 3, 2009 8:06 PM EST up reply actions
I have a friend who works for the Pirates and he raves about Neal Huntington. But this one leaves me scratching my head and wondering if I had let my friend poison my mind a little bit because lately I had been thinking highly of Huntington. This sounds too much like signing Sean Casey, Doug Mientkiewicz, Joe Randa, or any other veteran “name” the Pirates might have picked up over the last decade. The fans (that haven’t traded their Pirates jerseys for Steelers gear) recognize his name a little, but Iwamura really doesn’t help the ball club all that much.
My uncle says you've got a screw loose.
Your uncle molests collies.
by gorilla_baller on Nov 3, 2009 8:34 PM EST up reply actions
We talk about how we wish Shapiro didn’t do everything like intelligent bloggers would.
Huntington does something that seems hard to understand.
Does this mean LGT prefers Huntington?
Personally, who cares if this move is for this year or not. Chances are, he got more than he gave up. And “[i]f he can’t extend him, he can trade him at the deadline, probably for a lot more than that reliever dude.”
Finally convinced my dad that Jeter is immensely hatable.
He’s not terrible. But it’s a stretch to call him good. Slightly above average hitter, mediocre defender. He would be a good backup for most teams and would get a few starts because he can play a couple infield positions.
And yeah, he’s probably not a veteran name. In my head I heard “Iwamura” and think Rays and World Series. There’s some kind of name recognition going on there.
My uncle says you've got a screw loose.
Your uncle molests collies.
by gorilla_baller on Nov 3, 2009 10:03 PM EST up reply actions
He’s at least average as a fielder according to any accounts I’ve ever looked at. Probably depends on what stats you’re looking at.
Steel Nick
He was a butcher in the postseason last year, but that might’ve been nerves.
I like the move for the Bucs.
by JulioBernazard on Nov 4, 2009 9:11 AM EST up reply actions
Actually, the more I think about it, this isn’t such the radical overpayment I thought it was. A replacement-level player for the Pirates isn’t the same as replacement level for the NL. It’s Iwamura or Delwyn Young. I’ll take Iwamura.
Plus their big league roster has like five guys getting paid more than league average. So I reverse my stance.
My uncle says you've got a screw loose.
Your uncle molests collies.
by gorilla_baller on Nov 3, 2009 10:12 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, but we didn’t get DeRosa with the intention of doing that.
The once and future
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Nov 4, 2009 7:58 AM EST up reply actions
Just seems a lot riskier, is my point.
The once and future
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Nov 4, 2009 7:59 AM EST up reply actions
If his market tanks, you end up paying $3 million for the privilege of trading for Jimmy Hamilton. I misspoke when I said it was riskier when you didn’t plan on contending… it’s not the risk that changes, it’s the potential reward. With DeRosa, the Perez/Todd thing was the second-best of three alternatives. If you’re not planning on winning, that’s your plan A.
The once and future
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Nov 4, 2009 9:15 PM EST up reply actions
Just remembered! Huntington worked for us when we almost signed him.
Finally convinced my dad that Jeter is immensely hatable.
That was an example of the Indians’ institutional difficulties in identifying skill. They were in the running for Iwamura, and then, voila, he was gone. Just like Alexei Ramirez.
and then, voila, the other teams offered more money.
by Brick. on Nov 4, 2009 9:59 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Not much money. I don’t remember the specifics of the posting terms with Daisuke Matsuzaka, but teams submitted sealed bids (I think they were sealed) for the right to negotiate with Iwamura. The Rays had the winning bid of $4.5 million. Other teams might have been scared off by the insane amount of money tendered to negotiate with Matsuzaka, but I remember (perhaps incorrectly) that teams were surprised by the low winning bid. Iwamura then signed a three-year contract with the Rays worth $7.7 million, with a club option for a fourth year at $4.25 million. If I read that right they got him for three years for $12.2 million. That’s roughly equivalent with the Dellucci contract. So I don’t think it was a matter of a team coming in and throwing around money.
Agreed. Lots of teams reportedly were interested in Iwamura, but none of them, Indians included, seemed to value his rights very highly.
by Jay on Nov 4, 2009 7:47 PM EST up reply actions
I always wonder how differently things would have played out if we had out-bid the Rays for Iwamura post 2006; we never knew how it went down but i thought the word was we were really close to top bid.
It became kind of moot with the 2007 ALCS run, but All of the Marte crap, maybe they trade Peralta earlier, etc. Probably never make the Valbuena trade. Would have been interesting.
I remember one of the reasons I was so high on Iwamura during the posting process was because he could apparently play left field. This has turned out to be either untrue or, more likely, just unneccessary in Tampa. But we ended up with Dellichaels instead. Both were subpar offensively for a corner spot.
Steel Nick
What a weird reason to get excited. Who can’t play left field?
by Jay on Nov 4, 2009 8:09 AM EST up reply actions
A decent joke ruined by bad formatting, or just a weak joke?
by JulioBernazard on Nov 4, 2009 6:05 PM EST up reply actions
“It is hard to put into words what Aki has meant to the organization,” Friedman said.
I had to chuckle at this. We could say the same about any number of former Indians—Mike Rouse, for example.
by ken from alexandria on Nov 4, 2009 2:49 PM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
Featured Stories
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recent FanShots
In Association With
Big League Stew - MLB - Yahoo! Sports
- Photo: Padres fan regrets letting mother capture moment with Trevor Hoffman
- Marlins agree to unretire No. 5 for Logan Morrison, who will honor his father’s favorite player
- Weatherman Derek Holland does Dallas TV
- Ask Alex: Will Julio Teheran or Matt Moore win rookie of the year?
- Ku Klux Klan, umpires and bowling: Why the minor leagues tossed out Jim Evans academy
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
