Let's Go Tribe!: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: SEC Basketball at the Half

Off topic in that this is about basketball, but this article was written by Moneyball author Michael Lewis. It casts Houston Rockets GM Daryl Morey in the Billy Beane role and explores his work to move beyond traditional stats to gain an edge on the competition. Shane Battier is the main example of an "unappreciated" player who helps his team win despite putting up mediocre numbers in the categories normally used to evaluate players' talent.

11 months ago Medium_carlos-santana-2009_tiny cleveland teamer 248 comments 1 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

SHANE BATTIER FOR PRESIDENT.

I cannot explain to you the feelings I have for Shane Battier. He is the best college basketball player I’ve ever seen and he played for my alma mater. Awesome. He is so, so awesome.

When Boozer went down in ‘00-’01 and they came out against Carolina with a trapping zone, all three point shooting monster that ran the Tar Heels out of the gym by 14? With Battier anchoring the zone as basically a center?

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 12:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Andrew and I missed the Battier era by a season. But I can still remember upperclassmen my first few years who would talk of him in hushed tones. He was far more popular than any mortal athlete… the general consensus was that—beyond his obvious dominance on the court—he was also smarter than you, nicer than you, and classier than you. It seemed like every student on campus had met him at least once and been impressed.

I love that he’s now the figurehead of a new era of thinking in basketball. It validates some of the mythos.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 12:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Did they talk about his ugly head? That’s the first thing I think of when I hear the name Shane Battier.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 20, 2009 1:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently, he would scrunch it together on request.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Of course, I read this in the “Blazing Sea Nuggets” (student comic) compilation book, so take it with a grain of salt.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 1:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Christ, Dukies – the Yankee fans of NCAA basketball.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 2:26 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Only those who, didn’t, you know, attend Duke

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 3:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Makes no difference, they’re all jackasses.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

/throws chair at Chuck

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 3:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would challenge anyone to make the comparison in a logical well. Duke doesn’t operate with a competitive imbalance and isn’t that the bottom line?

Oh, no, wait. Stereotyping is the bottom line.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 4:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

’logical way."

Though, seeing someone trapped in a logical well would be alright.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 4:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Didn’t say nothin’ about no competitive imbalance. What I’m talkin’ about is all those morons in blue in and around Cameron. Now are they a bunch of smug, self appreciating jackasses or what?

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously, I’m running out of chairs.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 4:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I honestly have no idea who you’re talking about. Duke Basketball has genrally four classes of fans:

1-“Cameron Crazies”: Undergrads who tend be very, umm, nerdy. They are completely unassuming and completely not smug. They are dorks.

2-“Cameron Attendees”: Undergrads who get worse grades, stand in line less for the game, and get worse seats. They are not smug, because they generally consider cheering for a basketball team as not the cool thing to do.

3-“Alumni”: Act like the alumni for any university. Stand around, rarely cheer very loudly.

4-“Other Adults”: Range from locals to people who adopted the team. They can be annoying but not any more so than the same class of fans for OSU or UNC or whatever.

I’m sure Duke has many smug, self appreciating fans. So does every major sports university or franchise. I just don’t think it’s some overarching theme of Duke fans; for the most part I think Duke fans are currently pessimistic about the future of the program and, over the past 15 years, have been enthusiastic about cheering on the team, not much else.

Most Duke alumni I know lay relatively low because everyone hates Duke so much. The catch is that, at least in the last 5 years or so, there isn’t even a good reason to hate the team. The players are non-descript and the results are ‘meh.’ People hate Duke because of the way it’s covered by ESPN; and guess what? Most of us hate that too.

If anyone ever hated Duke it was just because Duke was good. There are far, far better reasons to hate the Yankees or their fans. The Yankees are and have been genuinely evil, bad for baseball. No person should cheer for that. Duke is great for college basketball and I can’t think of any way to construe the program as evil. If they attract some idiot fans, well, what good program doesn’t?

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 5:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s boil it down to its essence:

Duke basketball fans = Notre Dame football fans.

Get it?

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 5:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

if you go to the school, what are you supposed to do – not root for them?

by Brick. on Feb 20, 2009 5:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I managed to spend 4 years at OSU and only step foot in the Horseshoe for one game – and it was a Browns/Bengals preseason game.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 5:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

hmm. when you put it in the context of the Buckeyes, suddenly i get what you’re saying. seriously.

by Brick. on Feb 20, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Somehow I knew this thread would turn in to ripping on Buckeyes fans again.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 20, 2009 8:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey ya wanna hear some more about Columbus hillbillys? I got a lot more material.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 8:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, not really. I mean, Notre Dame hasn’t been any good in about 20 years and Notre Dame steeps itself in a whole bunch of religious traditions.

But, I don’t really understand why people hate Notre Dame fans. I hate the Notre Dame program, because I thought the Ty Willingham thing was assinine and because they’re always making excuses and Jimmy Clausen’s hair, but the fans?

I mean, that’s who they want to cheer for. I’ve never had any of them really put it in my face or something, like Yankees fans tend to.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 5:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You never went to grad school with Notre Dame alums, did you? If you did you’d “no” what I mean.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 5:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I actually do go to grad school with a bunch of Notre Dame alums and I like most of them pretty well.

I get what you are saying though, about the Notre Dame, Duke comparison. It’s ridiculous that going up in central Ohio that I knew several “Duke” fans, but as I said in a thread a couple of months ago,“Nobody is comparable to Yankee fans. They are exceptionally awful.”

by ClarkM on Feb 21, 2009 1:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I know more Duke fans than I know fans of Xavier, OSU, KSU, UA, UC, OU or Toledo and I live in Akron. Duke fans who are Duke students are fine. Duke fans who cheer for Duke because they win and are nationally recognized are jackasses.

by fwembt on Feb 21, 2009 4:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, like I said, it’s going to end. Duke’s not really winning anymore.

by afh4 on Feb 22, 2009 1:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The distinction between Cameron Crazies and Cameron Attendees is a great description based on my friends and interaction with Duke alums. Most of the attendees do not want to be associated with the crazies

by Roger Dorn on Feb 20, 2009 6:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have been both. Now I’m #3

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 7:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ditto. You’ve got to do the campout at least once. It’s fun.

And then…it’s not so fun.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 9:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s one of those things you absolutely have to do once, and you absolutely shouldn’t do more than once

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 9:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Like going to Wrigley Field

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Feb 20, 2009 9:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I did it like 1.5 times. Once as a very high tent and then once as one of those Johnny Come Lately tents that knows how to work the rules a little.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 10:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We’re basically the same person. It’s creepy.

Sophomore year we had what we called the “paper tent”—as in, it only existed on paper. We never bothered to even invest in a physical tent. The monitors were so lax on the rules that year that I slept in my own bed (Edens) for all three nights we were on the list.

That was also the year it was the first Saturday on Spring Break—the massive K-ville party the night before is one of my favorite nights in college. Unfortunately, it was also one of Redick’s.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 10:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I remember JJ wandering around. It was so obvious this was going to be a problem.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 10:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Please expand on this.

by JulioBernazard on Feb 21, 2009 1:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Redick, as became obvious with his DUI, liked to party. K-Ville is where the students camp out and, the night before the big game, each consume approximately 20 beers each and do not sleep. JJ basically partook in that tradition, and then played terribly.

by afh4 on Feb 21, 2009 1:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The next year there were a lot of sprinkled quotes around about Redick’s rededication to the game, and—I think this was Daniel Ewing’s term—giving up his “extracurricular activities” during the season. Probably not coincidentally, that was the year he took his Big Step Forward.

I have reliable witnesses that can put JJ there at 5 AM. He went 3-9 from the floor, although we won thanks to a good game from Luol Deng and McCants dribbling the ball of his foot on the last possession.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 21, 2009 1:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Most Duke alumni I know lay relatively low because everyone hates Duke so much. The catch is that, at least in the last 5 years or so, there isn’t even a good reason to hate the team. The players are non-descript and the results are ‘meh.’ People hate Duke because of the way it’s covered by ESPN; and guess what? Most of us hate that too.

All of this is completely true. It’s always mystified me that Carolina is never subject to the same vitriol as Duke, even though in this decade, they have been a much better team and have employed much more hateable personnel, from Rashad McCants to the absurdly nicknamed Tyler Hansborough. And as to the ESPN point, I couldn’t name a single classmate who can stand Dick Vitale.

If I had to compare Duke to Notre Dame in any way, you know what it would be? I think people are comfortable when sports are associated with state schools instead of elite, education-centric, Ivy-caliber schools. When those schools have good sports programs, it creates a visceral, anti-elite reaction.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 7:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And let’s be honest … this is part of the anti-Michigan thing, too.

by Jay on Feb 20, 2009 8:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Makes sense to me

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 8:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you mean by Buckeyes fans? I disagree; OSU fans hate Michigan because of the football rivalry, not because of anything about the academic standing of the university. I’m sure many Buckeye fans don’t have any idea about Michigan’s academic rankings.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 20, 2009 8:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m sure many Buckeye fans don’t have any idea about Michigan’s academic rankings.

I’m sure that most Buckeye fans don’t know much about academics period.

OSU fans hate Michigan because they’re a bunch of lemmings. If Woody wouldda told ’em he hated fried chicken Col. Sanders wouldda went outta business in Columbus.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 8:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I saw a special on TV about the OSU/MICH rivalry, and Michigan’s “silver platter” was a big-talking point for most commentators. For what it’s worth.

by joeee on Feb 22, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I love this. Everybody hates us. It’s a failing on their part. Dig yourself dude.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 8:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I dig. I’m just sensitive about being labeled a front runner when (a) it’s my alma mater and (b) they really haven’t won anything since I got there.

And, Chuck, you compared us to Yankees fans! You come at us with the worst slur you have, and expect it not to hurt?

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 8:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, it was a little over the top – but close. My bad. How’s BoSox fans then? That’s a little closer.

And I didn’t call Dookies front runners – jackasses and morons, yes, but not front runners.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 9:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Alright, morons?

Really? Morons?

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 9:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, everybody knows Duke grads are morons.

Hey, Chuck, is there any college in the country whose sports fans aren’t morons or idiots?

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 20, 2009 9:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

CWRU!

It takes a shrewd sense of sophisticated irony to be a CWRU sports fan.

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Feb 20, 2009 9:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK, I was thinking big-time D1 colleges. I don’t think there are many moronic B-W or John Carroll fans. Mount Union, possibly, but that might be it.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 20, 2009 9:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bingo Turk! and BW fans and KSU fans and BGSU fans and Hiram fans and Otterbein fans – the list for Ohio schools is endless – except for that – ahem – school on High St.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 11:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Now why do you have to start picking on this school?

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 20, 2009 11:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t worry Brad, it doesn’t matter what school, town or topic it is. If chuck didn’t attend AND like that school, or have a good time in that town, or approve that topic, it is more fun to ridicule them and their fans, etc.

Heck, he even gave me grief for my alma mater, a small but revered California school for goodness sake that he knows little about.

C’est la vie … am guessing he just likes to get everyone’s blood boiling a little to match that Italian fervor he has.

by talonk on Feb 21, 2009 2:01 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I know that, but did you click on the link? It was supposed to be a joke, but I guess Chuck missed it.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 21, 2009 4:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Close talonk, but just a bit outside. Never attended KSU, or BW, or BGSU, or Otterbien, or Hiram, or a host of other Ohio colleges/universities whose athletic programs and academic accomplishments I admire. So, no I won’t ridicule their fans.

BTW, I ripped so many colleges and universities I can’t recall which is your alma mater? If I somehow offended your sensibilities, I apologize – profusely.

by mauichuck on Feb 21, 2009 9:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They may have 1600 on their SATs but inside that arena they’re acting like – yes – morons.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 11:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

By what? Jumping up and down? Shouting? God forbid 18 year olds paint their faces and cheer for their classmates.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 11:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good teams/programs are hated. I’m fine with that.

But, as MTF points out, it’s not that offensive that you think we deserve some hate. It’s that you think we deserve Yankees hate. Or even BoSox hate.

Both those teams are, effectively, cheating when compared to our club. That’s not true of Duke.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 9:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

See UCLA fans handled this a lot better back when Wooten was coaching. So did Alabama fans with the Bear and going waaaay back Army when they were winning football championships. No, sorry it’s not the success of the program; there’s been plenty of dominating athletic programs that handled success with aplomb. Get used to it: Duke ain’t one of them.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 11:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah but why do you think that? Because you apparently dealt with some smug Duke fan once? Duke graduates 1,500 people a year. Yeah, the planet is just teeming with incorrigible Duke fans.

Whatever. I can’t imagine anything more ridiculous than someone telling me that Army handled it’s football success in the 1940s better than current Duke basketball. Or UCLA in the 1970s. It’s not as if the advent of cable, or the internet, or the 24 hour sports cycle has changed anything about the way teams and fanbases are perceived.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 11:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ND fans have been percieved as jackass since pterodactyls perched on Touch Down Jesus and they graduate about the same 1,500. I’m sorry but this is not a new phenomenon.

One more time: the reason everybody hates Dookies is cuz they deserve it. Wear it well Adrew, wear it well.

by mauichuck on Feb 20, 2009 11:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m still just seeing conclusory statements.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 21, 2009 12:03 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

OK, MTF then you tell me why Dookies are universally hated. This “everybody’s jealous” stuff sounds like the mean girls in high school defense.

by mauichuck on Feb 21, 2009 12:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As we’ve both said a number of times, the team is:

1-Horrifically overexposed

2-Consistently overrated

3-Had a long run of success with kids that were pumped up as smarter, cleaner, and classier than every other player in college

If you are a sports fan and not a Duke fan, all those things generate a lot of vitriol. Everyone assumes Duke fans are obnoxious and smug because ESPN is obnoxious and smug when they talk about Duke.

In actuality, I’d bet most people on this board, unless based in the Southeast, don’t know more than a few Duke fans. I go to a Duke bar in Chicago to watch some games. This is the only bar I know of that is full-on “We’re the Duke bar, we’ll show the game.” This bar doesn’t fill up for any game except for UNC. Not even close. In Chicago.

In contrast, there are at least two bars dedicated to all of the major Big 12 and Big 10 schools and they all overflow on Saturdays in the fall. This is the Midwest, sure, but you can still throw a rock and hit a Red Sox fan.

I’m genuinely curious, do you really find that you encounter a lot of Duke fans, period? Let alone a lot of obnoxious fans?

The hey (hay?) day of Duke as a program that kids in middle school want to cheer for appears to be fading if not totally over. I’ll readily admit that there was a time around 1994 or so when Duke was the hottest thing in the country for kids to cheer for-like the Braves or the Yankees or whatever. I just don’t think that’s the case any more. My students don’t care about Duke. Duke is boring in style of play and in being mired in March mediocrity.

Many people hang on hating Duke-there is a terrible website called “Truth About Duke” that is a testament to just how ridiculous people can be about sports. But, for the most part, I think Duke is largely irrelevant. It pains me to say that but since 2002, this hasn’t been a major program in terms of talent or results.

And I think that’s the crux of what flummoxes the modern Duke fan-people are hating on something that doesn’t exist any more. Since I was 15 years old or so the last time Duke was a really, really big deal, it’s incredibly odd to me that people want to claim I’m a loathsome figure because I cheer for Duke. It feels like somebody thinking the fans of the Twins are intolerable. I mean, they’re a good little team and they have their strong points, but are they really worth the time for people on a national level to hate?

In the same vein, as I was discussing with Roger Dorn, I find it pretty staggering that people still buy into the hype of beating Duke-that it’s a big deal, that it matters. This is a team that hasn’t advanced meaningfully in the tournament in going on 5 years and hasn’t been really, truly good in nearly a decade. And whose February-March record over the past 3 years has to be close to .500 if not under it.

That’s all hard for me to write, because I’m a fan after all, and I’m confident that they’ll eventually get back on top. It’s a basketball school and they devote a great deal of resources to it and March makes anything possible. But I don’t see a period of sustained dominance, like what UNC is in right now or what Duke used to be in, on the horizon.

I’ll also parrot what MTF said earlier-people are inclined to hate schools like Duke to start with because the university, truly or falsely, frames itself as elite in every sense of the word. It’s marketing that has worked, as evidenced by Duke’s rapid rise in the national academic picture, but it also opens Duke up to the hate that all those kinds of schools receive-as nerds, or rich nerds, or rich kids who want you to think they’re smart. And then add to that these kids that people are already inclined to hate painting their faces and jumping up and down on national television for 40 minutes twice a week. It’s totally harmless and anywhere else it would be ignored (it is, in fact, ignored at dozens of other schools) but when Duke kids do it, it’s this thing to be studied, criticized, and disgusted by.

On top of all that, the face of Duke basketball inspires intense hatred for a variety of reasons that some psychologist could work out. People find his voice annoying, they find his hair annoying, they find his nose totally unacceptable. I don’t know that there’s any old, white man in America who people hate so intensely.

by afh4 on Feb 21, 2009 12:58 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

OK, it’s the ESPN variant of the mean girls in high school defense. I don’t think it’s sufficient to negate the universal hatred, but what do I know? I’m no legal or social scholar. I’ll leave it up to the juris doctors on this site to decide.

by mauichuck on Feb 21, 2009 2:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My point is I’m not even sure everyone hates us anymore, Chuck. I think you just think everyone does.

The only people who hate us are those that take literally all their sports from ESPN.

by afh4 on Feb 21, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s ask Jay to get out his gavel and give us a ruling.

by mauichuck on Feb 21, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m stroking my beard thoughtfully on this. I’m trying to educate myself, because the problem is that I’ve never followed college basketball closely. As very casual fan, I’ve always admired Duke — achieving an elite athletic program within the framework of excellent academics, well, that just sounds really hard to me. And if Duke never gets its mojo back, it will probably be because the essential difficulty of that challenge, and the cutthroat level of competition unburdened by the academics, finally has caught up with them.

On Duke fans being awful: From what I’ve read here, it seems like the best analogy is Cowboys fans. The accusation is that Duke not only enjoyed immense success, but that they did their best to “whore themselves out” and cultivate a huge, national following of “pink hat” front-runners. Now, those people are all disgusting, I think Andrew and Manhattan would agree. And I have total contempt for Cowboys fans. Problem is, I haven’t seen any evidence that Duke actually did anything to cultivate that fan base, other than just being so damned admirable.

Having said that, regardless of how a fan base got to be obnoxious and awful, if they are, then they are. And there’s no appropriate posture to take in that situation except, “Yeah, I’m a Duke fan, but I went to Duke, and I’m sorry so many Duke fans are a-holes.”

On the other hand, Duke seems to have more national hatred pointed at it than other comparable teams/programs, such as Notre Dame or the Cowboys. And my very strong suspicion is that the main reason for that is simply the general current of anti-intellectualism in America, which has run off and on for decades and is an incredibly destructive force in our society overall. Essentially, Americans don’t hate people for being richer or having a nicer suit, but when you’re smarter or better educated, that somehow provokes the ire. This is a corruption of our pride in our values, pride of our lack of defined social classes, into the old “proud of being proud” — i.e., stupid and proud to be stupid, therefore we will throw eggs at the smart people.

Duke is the smart people and for years, they were great at basketball, too. That is infuriating to a lot of people. They are not the smartest by any means, but they are way smarter than most top basketballers, and they are way better basketballers than most top academic institutions.

Am I on to anything here?

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 22, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think that’s all fair and accurate and the part that’s conjecture or opinion I pretty much agree with, though I’m sure Chuck doesn’t.

I’m especially taken with this idea of Duke “whoring” itself out through the 90s. I really don’t know what that means-college basketball players still can’t do commercials and it’s not like Duke signed individual contracts with ESPN. ESPN just chose their games.

There is the K advertisements, but it’s hard to fault a guy who is at the top of his field and is turning down immense amounts of money to stay in the amateur ranks. For the uninitiated, K makes a cool million a year from Duke on a lifetime deal which is a lot of money. However, he could’ve quadrupled that or more by going pro, especially after the Olympics.

by afh4 on Feb 22, 2009 12:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I think you’re pretty right on. The “pink hat” fans, of course, are what are the most aggravating—for the very reason that they force the rest of us into these arguments in the first place.

The anti-intellectualism idea is one I’ve been germinating for a while, with the way it’s been exposed over the last year or so in the general arena. I’m not ready to fully commit to it as a core reason of anti-Duke feeling, but it’s something that deserves thinking about.

And as a final defense to Chuck, I mean look. I wasn’t a college basketball fan for the first 18 years of my life, beyond enjoying the Tournament Pools. I then went to the best college I got into, and developed a rooting interest in all sports—their renowned basketball teams, the jokey (but improving) football team, the terrible baseball team, even the mostly despicable lacrosse team. If that makes me a moron and a jackass, well, so be it.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 22, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The football team is actually my favorite thing going.

THAD!

by afh4 on Feb 22, 2009 3:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thad is awesome

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 22, 2009 5:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe the anti-intellectual thing is why everyone can’t stand the Northwestern Wildcats?

I disagree with your theory. And there are so many nationally hated programs – OSU being one of them – that aren’t banging on the Ivy league’s door. No one has Duke-level vitriol for Stanford, and they’re no strangers to putting up good teams. There is a conflating between elitism and intellectualism. Often, good, smart schools also bring along an unhealthy dose of superiority air, and that’s what everyone hates, not the fact that their student body is knowledgeable. That is ridiculous.

by joeee on Feb 22, 2009 6:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

To conflate Northwestern or even Stanford with the dominance of Duke basketball is to miss the point completely.

Often, good, smart schools also bring along an unhealthy dose of superiority air

Sometimes. Or maybe it’s the other team’s fans with their insecurities, reading that intent into every little thing the “good school” fans do?

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 22, 2009 7:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Northwestern comment was a joke, poking fun at the fact that a.) no one hates Northwestern because b.) they never win. But if NU was dominant, I expect them to be a prime target for hatred, because of the snobbery-element that the student body can* possess.

UVA, Berkeley, Michigan (outside of Ohio), Stanford – all great programs, all smart schools, none hated. Let’s face it: the stereotype of ND is good-two-shoes Catholic yuppies (I’m Catholic, I can rip on my own kind) and the stereotype at Duke is privileged preppy frat-boys. Right or wrong, that’s why people hate them. That’s the interpretation of many, many outsiders. It’s not: damn them and their awesome SATS! But it might be like, damn them and their snobbery or wealth or just douchiness.

by joeee on Feb 22, 2009 7:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey joeee I grew up next door to this guy. . I got a soft spot for NU football.

by mauichuck on Feb 23, 2009 10:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

**All schools will be hated on a local level by some program, I’m talking about national hatred. Duke and ND are on a separate plane, and I think that the attitudes and demographics of the students OTHER than their brains are what drive people crazy.

by joeee on Feb 22, 2009 7:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I mean, I’m not saying we didn’t throw the “safety school” chant at Wake Forest every year. We did. Hell, I’m saying it right now.

And for accuracy’s sake, like Andrew said above—the preppy frat boy culture is giving way to the more engineering, book-oriented, foreign student-ish culture.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 22, 2009 8:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Of course. But perception is reality, they say…

by joeee on Feb 22, 2009 9:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wake as state school? I can’t remember if I applied there or not, but either way I didn’t get in. You guys are brutal!

by joeee on Feb 22, 2009 9:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Point of clarification, Wake is not a state school.

-Erik

by drerikbrady on Feb 23, 2009 12:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I don’t know where that came from.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 12:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wake brings out some of the worst in Duke fans. They basically tried to steal the whole Cameron gig, except that you have to sign up for a club and wear a tie-dye t-shirt. And their mascot rides a motorcycle.

by afh4 on Feb 22, 2009 11:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’ve lost me completely by blurring all the lines.

I stand by the original point. I don’t think any of those programs is comparable to Duke.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 22, 2009 9:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Michigan football isn’t comparable to Duke basketball – if only to say that UM football is way, way better, historically, and probably in the future. Also, Michigan is one of the best universities in the country/world. OSU fans hate Michigan out of rivalry – the rest of the country probably doesn’t care.

by joeee on Feb 22, 2009 9:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s the point I was trying to make earlier. I don’t think fans across the country hate Michigan the way they do Duke, probably because, while Michigan has been successful recently, it hasn’t been consistantly dominating for decades. And OSU fans don’t hate Michigan because of the school, they hate Michigan because of the football rivalry. The same way Auburn fans hate Alabama and Texas fans hate Oklahoma.

I don’t think Michigan is considered an “elite” school like Duke, Stanford, or Northwestern. I’m not saying that it doesn’t belong in that class, but that the perception of it isn’t there. Maybe because they’ve always had a good football team and schools like that are assumed to suck at football..

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 23, 2009 9:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

When I said Michigan hasn’t been consistantly dominating for decades, I meant consistantly dominating in decades. As in, it’s been a while since they’ve been dominating on the football field. Most young fans probably don’t think of Michigan the way they do USC, Miami, Florida, and even Ohio State.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 23, 2009 9:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Football’s turnover has been much greater in recent years. The marquee programs from 1994 are basically the same as now in basketball-Duke, UNC, Kansas, UCLA, UConn etc. They haven’t all been in there the whole time but the “rotating cast of characters” has been the same, with some mixed in mid-majors.

In contrast, I grew up thinking Miami was legitimately the greatest college football program of all time and, if not them, FSU. USC was a total after thought.

As has been pointed out many times, it’s much harder to consistently compete in CFB, for lots of reasons. Coaching turnover, number of players, one player can’t turn around program, etc.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 10:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Michigan isn’t considered the same because of the number of undergrads and the fact that it isn’t private.

That’s the whole game with which schools are considered ‘elite’ and which aren’t. There’s a cottage industry of very small, very expensive, very private schools in the Northeast that can’t hold up to Michigan but people across the Northeast think of as “elite” schools. That’s blurring the line between “liberal arts colleges” and “research universities” but, honestly, it doesn’t matter. Those schools (Middlebury, Colby, Smith, whatever) have the cachet which Michigan lacks in some circles.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 10:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Having taught at Michigan I think I can say that as an undergraduate institution it can be elite for those students who are really independently driven. In other words, if you are a smart undergrad you can get involved in seriously cutting edge research/scholarship if so motivated. But I think for most undergrads it’s a college not unlike most others in the country. As a graduate school, which it is one of the larger in the country, it is pretty elite across a whole range of programs stretching across the humanities, social sciences, engineering, and natural sciences.

by APV on Feb 23, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Isn’t that true of everywhere though?

There was no reason you had to be particularly academically engaged at my school. In fact, it was sort of difficult to get engaged at times.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s true, but there are limitations at the upper end in terms of what possibilities are available to a student. I’m at a great school now, but it is small, and that does limit what students have available to them. There are very few limitations at Michigan. But you general point is certainly true. For undergrads, what they get out of it is pretty close to what they put into it.

by APV on Feb 23, 2009 12:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Working in education now, one of my real interests for future work is cutting out a lot of the “red tape” (for lack of a better term) in allowing undergrads access to actual, real research.

I put forth what seemed like titanic efforts (which were actually a handful of emails and phone calls) trying to get a gig in a lab I was interested in at Duke. Never got it-never even got a response. If I were in charge of Bio at Duke, I would find that totally unacceptable-if a kid wants to work in an evolution lab, a bio mechanics lab, a whatever lab and is serious about it, he should be able to, no question. At the very least, somebody should respond.

It’s not like that had some great effect on me personally but now, as I think about going back to grad school in Education and what I might like to do, I feel there’s a real disconnect between Universities and their students. At least at Duke, the advisory system was badly broken and connections were too difficult to make.

An 18 year old shouldn’t have to pester/network/schmooze his way into an academically directed job at a university where he’s paying $40,000 a year. That should come with the territory. For one thing, 18 year olds are going to fail at that more often than not and, for another, they’re going to get distracted by alcohol. I don’t drink nearly as much now as I did when I was 20 and it’s because I care about what I’m doing the next morning. Not because it makes me money but because I’m interested and want to do a good job. Some of that’s maturity but some of that is also feeling invested.

It was just far, far too easy to get good grades and not have the professor even remember who you were when you asked for advice later.

Tale as old as time, I guess.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 12:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is something we have discussed a fair bit recently. I think the biggest obstacle is that at most schools faculty get no credit for working with undergrads – no pay, no consideration in tenure, no course relief. So while there might be some marginal benefit in research (although only if you work with a student for several semesters, generally), there is little other benefit to the faculty and a lot of cost in time.

by APV on Feb 23, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No question. I’m just sort of interested in helping to fix that system.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 12:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hate to piss in your ice cream, but I worked with academic biomedical researchers for 6-7 years, and of all the “systems” I’ve ever seen, theirs is at the bottom of the pile in terms of “need to fix.”

What you may be underestimating vastly is the demand to work in those labs. They are largely populated by post-docs, i.e., people who have already earned their Ph.D. and now have to serve as indentured servants for a few years, before they can be offered a junior faculty position. There may be a few grad students in there, but they are the best of the best and treated like interns.

I can tell you, improbable as it may sound, that the environment is very similar to recording studios in this respect. There is simply immense demand to work there, even for free, such that exceptional people will do it for next to nothing. Beyond those people, the effort it takes to manage the additional manpower quickly exceeds whatever production you could get out of those people.

Add on that it’s an extremely competitive field, and the end result is that nobody can afford to devote their time to handholding bright-eyed undergrads. Every one of these guys is under constant pressure to compete for funds to finance their research interests, to justify and cover the cost of his/her own salary based on those grants, and to be able to sustain the jobs of the people they already employ by not dropping the ball on funding.

No time for you, buddy. Not even close.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 23, 2009 1:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, I hate to piss in your ice cream, but my interest isn’t particularly in biomedical labs, that was just my example. The system I’m talking about here is creating an undergraduate experience that means something besides “I have a four year degree, hence I can be gainfully employed.”

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

try the liberal arts. then you won’t even get the gainfully employed with the degree.

So 2009.

by Gradyforpresident on Feb 23, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, that’s cool. Are you willing to pay for the extra value?

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 23, 2009 2:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, I want someone to pay me for providing that value.

But judging from the general level of discourse in the country, even among the college educated, the system’s broken.

And I mean discourse, like, all discourse. From government bills to scientific issues, people who go to college and people who don’t alike can’t reasonably analyze anything.

I don’t even know that this is what I’d want to do with my life but I think it’d be sort of interesting. I think the way universities approach undergrads is fundamentally flawed; not just “more money” flawed but “this whole approach is stupid” flawed.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Universities or major research universities who are profit-seeking and actively involved in technological/medical races and advancements? Big difference between going to Reed or Davidson and going to Duke.

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 3:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There are a lot of different kinds of universities, no doubt. But if you’re going to put yourself forward as a place that trains undergrads I don’t think there’s much argument that, across the board, the experience could be much better in a lot of ways.

I don’t have real solid opinions on this. I just think it’s interesting.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hm. Not that you’re doing this, but I notice that a lot of kids at my school piss and moan indiscriminately at imaginary problems. If you’re school is a major player in biotech – like Duke – you’re going to attract top talent, you’re going to garner competition, you’re going to force your undergrads to try harder. I mean, its really a choice that you the 17-y/o highschool has to make.

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 3:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Also interesting to me is that we ask high schoolers to make these choices with a straight face.

And it’s not like biology at Duke was hard. It wasn’t. It’s that it was a flat experience-classroom, lab done. No reason or impetus to engage any further in any of the myriad ways that a place like Duke could offer.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 3:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed 100 percent

So 2009.

by Gradyforpresident on Feb 23, 2009 4:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think four-year public universities shouldn’t even be government funded. That’s how “stupid” I think the whole system is that bad. But research is not necessarily where the problem lies. Lives really are being saved, you know.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 23, 2009 4:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Piss in your ice cream = absolutely hilarious.

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 2:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Huh, wha? Can’t get access to any real research? I’m astounded. When I was at Battelle we would pimp part time undergrads like three dollar whores all the time.

Let me tell you a little secret. When Battelle, or SAIC, or Lockheed-Martin or any other large research organization bids on a Government contract – including some huge bio based research – the deciding factor is cost. When you bid on what’s called task order contracts you put a cost on each labor category. For something like a PhD. Biologist his base rate might be something like $95 an hour ($200k a year) you take that base rate and multiply it by your G&A burden – at a place like Battelle it might be 3 to 3.5 – and get the aggregate charge rate, in this case somewhere between $285 to $330 an hour. Naturally for lab techs and other support staff the charge rate would be lower, say $100 to $225 an hour. But for part time workers – because of the Federal Acquisition Regulations, the FAR – you didn’t have the full cost multiplier which is intended to cover the cost of overhead – maintaining the lab, IT costs, administrative support, Health Insurance, matching 401(k), etc. – so the labor costs for grad/undergrad students was less than half the cost of full time lab personnel. Plus you’d get motivated, intelligent help at half the cost. Man, I couldn’t write enough students into one of my proposals.

And hey, didn’t any of you college boys ever hear of co-op? Every engineering firm I’ve ever worked for had college kids working on the job. Usually they’d work six months out of the year and over the breaks. It’d take them a year or so longer to graduate, but when they got their sheepskin they already had experience and 9 times outta ten the company they worked for would hire them.

Man, you boyz musta all went to school with Daddy’s money.

by mauichuck on Feb 23, 2009 11:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Meant to include the link to Case’s co-op office.

by mauichuck on Feb 23, 2009 11:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If getting hired right now is so easy, why don’t you find me a job. No, seriously. Mechanical engineering student finishing up his junior looking for work this summer. Got any hot leads?

by joeee on Feb 24, 2009 12:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Now you’re starting to change your answer. Bringing in terms like “elite,” “northeast,” “private” – it’s wealth and attitude toward wealth, not education. Wealth and education are often associated together, so they are often confounded. I remember my freshman year, a girl from Connecticut was sitting at my table and I was talking about sports. She couldn’t understand that golf and tennis were not games of strategy on the same order of magnitude as baseball and football – she was used to seeing rich, and often smart, people playing golf, not football. It is not the education. No way.

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think you’re following the threads. Two points are being made here:

1-Academically elite schools take hits because of anti-intellectualism. This translates into antipathy towards them especially when they have truly elite sports teams.

2-Michigan isn’t viewed as “academically elite” by many, especially in the Northeast, because their perception is warped by exactly the kind of “privilege = smart” sentiment you’re referencing.

The second point was really started as an exploration of “why isn’t Michigan hated like Duke is.”

I agree those things are confounded by I’m not confounding them.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 12:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And I’ll go ahead and say, while I think I agree with Jay about the anti-intellectualism, it’s pretty impossible to figure out because Duke and Michigan are truly the only examples of schools that well regarded academically who are that good at sports.

UVa, Cal, Stanford, whatever. Those schools haven’t competed for or won national titles consistently in, well, I don’t know how long except that it’s a very, very long time.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 12:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Stanford wins the Sears/Director’s Cup pretty much every year. That does factor in a lot of more traditionally marginal sports, but Stanford does a pretty good job of bringing in stud athletes.

by APV on Feb 23, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Stanford has made a commitment to those “marginal sports” at the expense of the revenue sports. Most (all?) other schools aren’t willing to do that, which is why Stanford dominates that category.

It’s an interesting strategic choice, and good for them. But it should put the Sears Cup into context.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 23, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Baskeball. Football.

Nobody hates anybody because of track. Or lax. Or whatever.

There’s no doubt that Stanford is a great athletic program overall-maybe the best in the country. But, that doesn’t really matter for this discussion, I don’t think.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I actually dislike Stanford because of swimming. But I’m strange.

by APV on Feb 23, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am from the privileged position of knowing nothing real about Duke. I’ve never been there, and the few kids I know from Duke have been acceptable. I only know stereotypes and perceptions. So I’m going to run with that.

Books like Tom Wolfe’s I am Charlotte Simmons (written about Duke, features a fictional college in NC named Dupont with a killer lax/mens bball team) and the lacrosse thing, of which all of those guys were guilty as hell of being Humongous Aholes, go a lot farther toward stoking the fire of Duke-haters than the number of Rhode scholars you guys are pulling down.

1-Academically elite schools take hits because of anti-intellectualism.

In sports, or in general? I think you need to prove this point, and no one has yet.

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 12:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Without some sort of focus group, you’re asking us to prove the unprovable.

Re: Charlotte Simmons, there were even more glaring similarities than you mentioned. Also, Wolfe’s daughter went to Duke. The college was so clearly and obviously Duke that Wolfe had to publicly distinguish Coach K from the ethically-challenged Buster Roth character.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 23, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You don’t think academically elite schools get ragged on because of anti-intellectualism?

Good Will Hunting? Any number of other movies that portray a “Hahvahd” man? Van Wilder and the serious boyfriend who wants to *gasp go to a good med school?

I’ve been called a nerd, dork, worse, by kids from a school basically as good as mine (UNC). This is pretty well established stuff.

As for if it leeches into sports hatred, all anyone ever said was that Jay had a “strong suspicion” and some of us have said we cautiously agree.

It’s not any more possible for us “prove” that Duke is hated because of it’s academic rep than it is for you to “prove” it’s hated because of it’s 15 year old frat boy stereotype.

I’ll throw another hat in the ring-the students you predominantly see in the stands at Cameron now are members of racial groups that already engender a lot of prejudice, hatred etc because of their reputations as overly academic or hard working or whatever. That could possibly be a factor. Who knows?

I don’t think national feelings towards Duke were pushed one way or the other by the Wolfe book or the lax scandal. Maybe for a few months it affected some perceptions but all that stuff is pretty rearview mirror now and people hate Duke in basically the same way they did beforehand. It’s the same as it was before and it wasn’t diminishing before. That’s just my opinion.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good Will Hunting. Psh. People hate on that school just as much because of class/money/status insecurities. Also, overexposure, which Harvard and Duke suffer from. You mentioned this earlier.

People don’t crap on Caltech, MIT, Stanford. Their image is much better. But everybody knows how smart those places are.

I think the Wolfe book and lax scandal encapsulated the school’s image among the masses, and certainly helped concretize it.

People’s insecurities toward status and wealth is more accepted territory than people’s insecurities purely over intelligence itself.

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We’re being far, far too vague. Who are “people?” And is this about anti-intelligence? Because that’s not the place Jay started and not the place I took off from. Anti-intellectualism is, to me, a different. Intellectualism means some that intelligence doesn’t.

Full disclosure, my brother went to MIT. I’m not saying it’s not a huge boon to him but he and his classmates also took a fair amount of crap while at school. They’re still the nerds. And if they were absolutely, unbelievably dominant at a major sport, I think people would have plenty of nasty things to say.

I don’t think insecurity over wealth is any more established than insecurity over intelligence or, more specifcally, the concept of anti-intellectualism. Both are huge parts of our culture. You prefer one in this debate, fine, but that doesn’t make it ‘more accepted.’

There’s an entire section of halloween costumes where you dress up like a rich guy and whole section where you dress up like a nerd. The whole premise of a nerd or dork-someone who has a calculator with him at all times because he might do math. Or like math. How preposterous.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 12:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s my thought about anti-intellectualism: people get jealous over opportunities that they themselves don’t have. Often, higher education represents an unreachable opportunity – and that’s what everyone gets so hot and bothered about.

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 2:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m a math guy and I have a calculator with me at all times. I never leave the house without it. Of course, it’s part of my cell phone.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 23, 2009 2:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was being /sarc. Hope that came across.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, yeah, I was playing along with the joke.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 23, 2009 3:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d like to throw out there that the common perception of Duke really has nothing to do with nerdiness/braininess, even if those qualities are much more in-touch with reality.

The common, Duke-ignorant man like myself sees privilege and douchiness. I mean, the name “Duke” – feudilistic, noble-sounding – coupled with disdain for southern gentility and wealth, I think that’s what insecure people get so frothy about.

by joeee on Feb 24, 2009 12:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I bow to no one in my ignorance of Duke.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 24, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

From the moment I learned that there were two LGTers who went to Duke (what are the odds?), I anticipated this conversation. It’s been a good read so far. I don’t intend any sarcasm, as usual.

I have it in good authority that Joeee’s brother dreamed of going to MIT.

Because of self-selection I don’t know as much about the comparative academic echelons of schools as you guys, but I used to fantasize about MIT. I guess only because that’s where the smart guy went in Go to the Head of the Class.

Incidentally, I’ve only met two MIT alumni. Both are very attractive girls. So much for that stereotype.

by jhon on Feb 23, 2009 8:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve only met two MIT alumni. Both are very attractive girls.

I think you would need two MIT grads to figure out the probability of that happening

by APV on Feb 23, 2009 8:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’d be three if we counted a girl I knew of at Wellesley who also took classes at MIT. As a guest student at another school she had the most impressive undergraduate architecture presentation and final critique I’ve ever seen. It was a jaw-dropper, in more ways than one. It must be a pretty fine institution you’re running over there.

Also! I think I’m gonna put a Tom Wolff novel on my to-do list. I kinda forgot about him. Not sure which one to take on. I’ve read a couple of the smaller ones and loved ’em.

by jhon on Feb 23, 2009 8:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t like Charlotte Simmons, and it had nothing to do with the Duke stuff.

By elimination, that leaves Bonfire of the Vanities as the only other I’ve read—and I loved that one.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 23, 2009 10:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Had to be from some other MIT. Or possibly robots from MIT.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 23, 2009 10:41 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Not that it’s got anything to do with anything, but the Duke family is responsible for the deaths of more human beings than Pol Pot, Kim Jong il and Saddam Hussein combined . Not that that is a reason to be hating on Duke or anything – just sayin’.

by mauichuck on Feb 23, 2009 11:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I’m with you. Although today, Duke is not a smoke-friendly campus at all. Which I liked.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 24, 2009 11:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

almost assuredly so.

So 2009.

by Gradyforpresident on Feb 22, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Problem: This is still a large group.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 21, 2009 1:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think I’m biased due to my UNC fan roommate. He’s from Durham, and I think he mostly takes exception to the number of Northerners that come to Duke and, in his estimation, treat the south as some quaint little vacation spot.

But reall, I have no horse in this race other than being a tacit UNC fan through him. I “hate” Duke only for show, but really don’t care one way or another.

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Feb 21, 2009 1:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have the pleasure of disliking both teams, but in fairness I dislike every ACC team except my own

by Roger Dorn on Feb 21, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just hated Dudley. Man, did I hate Dudley.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 21, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Dudley was probably the only basketball player I communicated with in my 4 years. Craig Smith permanently wore headphones around campus so that people wouldn’t talk to him

by Roger Dorn on Feb 21, 2009 6:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Duke guys were masters of the phantom cell phone calls. I knew two well enough to talk to—I won’t divulge confidences here. One in particular, if I said hi, would just put the phone away without saying anything to the “person” on the other end. It was hilarious.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 21, 2009 6:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Shavlik was a sweetheart/umm really odd.. I had a friend who freestyle rapped with him often.

by afh4 on Feb 22, 2009 1:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A friggin’ goofball is what he was

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 22, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As a southerner who went to Duke, I struggled with the student body and it’s attitudes towards the South.

However, that’s pretty “insider” knowledge. I don’t think most people outside of that part of NC know much about Duke’s student body.

And besides, Duke used to be very Northern. Now it’s just sort of Northern and more than just sort of foreign (exchange, whatever). It’s a weird place.

by afh4 on Feb 21, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I can agree with that. So I mean, I can see hatred of Duke from a Southerner’s perspective, but otherwise, I personally find them annoying at worst. Not evil.

Where are you from originally, and how did you become a Tribe fan? Why do I not know these things already?

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Feb 21, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Born in Alabama, grew up in about ten states, but mostly Virginia.

Lived in Ohio for about a summer when I was maybe 4 years old. That’s about all it took. It helps that I grew up somewhere (Central VA) without strong baseball rooting interests.

by afh4 on Feb 21, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Huh, cool

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Feb 21, 2009 3:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I had some of the same problems/perceptions at Vanderbilt.

-Erik

by drerikbrady on Feb 23, 2009 12:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I knew people who claimed they could understand the attendants at gas stations, etc because of accents. Ugh.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 12:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The only people who hate us are those that take literally all their sports from ESPN.

Not true. I loathe Duke basketball, only basketball, and I hardly get any sports from ESPN. I was coming of age in the mid 90’s and Duke was the team then. Front runners jumped on board while I cheered for a hometown team at a school I desperately wanted to attend. Duke basketball whored itself out as much as it could and it worked, but it also engendered some ill will. I’m a product of that. I cheer for the Indians, not the Yankees, the Browns, not the Cowboys and Xavier, not Duke.

For all that though, I don’t hate the school, don’t hate the alumni, don’t hate Andrew and don’t hate the academia. I’ve never met a Duke grad who was anything other than polite and a normal human. Despite that, I still loathe the basketball team.

Frankly, Chuck is going to make conclusory statements about everywhere and Brad from Columbus (as opposed to me) is going to get offended. It’s not a big deal. People only bother to hate teams that matter and even then, not rationally.

by fwembt on Feb 21, 2009 4:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I really don’t get offended by Chuck’s statements, I just try to understand the logic behind them. Which is a futile process, I guess, because there is none.

By the way, “Brad from Columbus” is much better than “the other Brad.” Thank you!

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 21, 2009 4:58 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I do what I can.

by fwembt on Feb 21, 2009 5:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough.

Like I said, I don’t mind people hating programs for being the “it” program, the program that does the ads, is on tv, etc.

I just find it odd that Duke has continued to be treated like such a program. I’m not sure I’m communicating this effectively but what’s weird is that we don’t think of ourselves as the big bully anymore and, believe me, we used to.

We used to relish in being the team in college basketball. Now, I don’t know a single fan who thinks we’re anything other than a pretty good team, and we’ve felt that way for a while. It’s just weird to know people hate your team for being that program when really we don’t feel like we’re that program.

This stuff dies hard though, obviously. The Cowboys still get treated like that and they haven’t actually been good in a long, long while.

by afh4 on Feb 22, 2009 1:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ll take Jay’s decision as fair and accurate. The anti-intellectualism thingy I find a bit off but that doesn’t really impact the conclusion.

But I will remind you that ND is also an elite institution – albeit one without a med school – and it’s football program is in the crapper but their fans are universally despised. I still see a similarity with Duke but I’ll admit the Duke hatred thing is deminishing.

Bottom line: Yeah, Dookie hatred was much stronger when they were winning/competing for championships and is waning now.

So, Andrew, if you and I get to Goodyear at the same time I’ll buy you a beer and we’ll smoke the peace pipe. I’ll bring the makin’s from Maui as I hear that Illinois stuff is pretty lame.

by mauichuck on Feb 22, 2009 2:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hakunna matata, cugino.

by afh4 on Feb 22, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

True story. A friend of mine applied to Duke for a residency. When he went there for his interview with a bunch of other residence-to-be, each in turn got up and gave his name and where he went to medical school. The first coupla guys went to Harvard and Vandy and Yale. My friend got up and gave his name and said “Ohio State”. The gathered throng let out a little titter as if to say, “What’s this doofus from a state school think he’s doing applying to the prestigous Duke University?” The attending told the little twerps that the best resident he ever worked with, Earl Metz, was an OSU grad. My friend said the bottoms just about popped off his shirt, he was so proud.

Not apropos of anything, just a good story.

by mauichuck on Feb 21, 2009 2:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re clearly using it as apropos to your argument right bleeping here.

"Less of an Indians fan" - Jay

by Voltaire on Feb 21, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am from SC and the people that were Duke fans were a minority. Everyone was a huge UNC fan. I don’t know why, and neither did they.

I went to Winthrop, which had a good basketball program for a while, but nobody at school really knew that because they always rooted for UNC.

I completely see what you are talking about, Duke fans are a minority in the south. UNC is the big name, and Clemson every once and a while.

Walt

by curly1229 on Feb 21, 2009 2:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In the South itself, especially in the state of North Carolina, Duke is hated mostly because it has a high proportion of out-of-staters. I don’t really have a problem with that part of it.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 21, 2009 9:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was a Duke fan back when college basketball was interesting (mid 80’s to early 90’s).

by Toxicadam on Feb 21, 2009 3:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I never really hate Duke or Duke fans, Living my whole life in Ohio, I honestly don’t think I even know any Duke fans. Like most people, I get annoyed by the way they’re overhyped on ESPN, but of course that’s not their fault. As far as hating them because their students paint their face and jump up and down during the game, well, that’s just ridiculous. Students do that at every college and I think that kind of fervor adds to the excitement of college sports. That’s the same fervor that makes OSU football games so exciting, and people hate on them, too.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 21, 2009 9:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have nothing to add to this.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 21, 2009 9:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know that there’s any old, white man in America who people hate so intensely.

His mentor.

by SuddenSam on Feb 21, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, there’s at least a reason to hate Bobby-I mean, he’s gotten physical with kids. But, yeah, point take.

Also, if this weren’t a political site, there a couple of other obvious counterpoints.

by afh4 on Feb 21, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We’re finally in agreement in this thread.

by mauichuck on Feb 21, 2009 1:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You just hate college sports, don’t you? Unless it’s Case baseball or Bowling Green football?

by afh4 on Feb 21, 2009 1:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t knock Case baseball… Ken Macha’s son!

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Feb 21, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nothing wrong with that.

Duke baseball had a steroids scandal before they were really en vogue.

by afh4 on Feb 21, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, never heard about that. I briefly considered joining the baseball team at CWRU. Then I realized that even though it’s CWRU, the fact that I hadn’t played in high school was probably a dealbreaker.

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Feb 21, 2009 2:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Same here.

"Less of an Indians fan" - Jay

by Voltaire on Feb 21, 2009 3:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You should have given it a chance.

When I was there (97-01), they didn’t have enough players to have cuts.

by CBusSteve on Feb 23, 2009 4:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think they do now. I’ve seen the baseball guys and they look like actual athletes.

"Less of an Indians fan" - Jay

by Voltaire on Feb 23, 2009 8:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The reporters got the Selena Roberts treatment, too, if I remember.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 21, 2009 2:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think that was Matt Sullivan. He was in my freshman dorm.

He was also rumored to be one of the anonymous sources for that hideous Rolling Stone article.

by afh4 on Feb 21, 2009 2:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nope, I like college sports. I only get fired up when there’s a lack of perspective. In the end I think of colleges and universities as places to get an education. Pretty novel, huh?

by mauichuck on Feb 21, 2009 5:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

See, you’d like Duke after all.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 21, 2009 5:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Our players go to class. For serious.

by afh4 on Feb 22, 2009 1:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Went to Med School with a coupla ND ballers – those were some bright boyz too.

by mauichuck on Feb 22, 2009 2:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Out of curiosity, what is the Duke bar in Chicago?

Great point about 2 bars+ for every Big Ten team… the jerseys come out of the woodwork in Sept.

by cheech99 on Feb 21, 2009 4:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sedgwick’s over at like, what is that, maybe Lincoln and Armitage or something? Right next to Stanley’s Kitchen and that bar, umm, Gamekeeper’s.

by afh4 on Feb 22, 2009 1:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was at that intersection Friday. River Shannon.

by joeee on Feb 22, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s a decent bar I guess.

by afh4 on Feb 22, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely.

by fwembt on Feb 21, 2009 4:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This post placement is hilarious. Thank God for the up button.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 21, 2009 4:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

it is quite a trek up there

So 2009.

by Gradyforpresident on Feb 22, 2009 3:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and now….Duke is relegated to losing to Boston College and the like!

by Roger Dorn on Feb 20, 2009 12:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

/throws chair at Dorn

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 1:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That happened in like 2006-2007. We’re used to it.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 1:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

BC, though had not beaten Duke since 1985, so we have been pretty excited about it. We beat UNC and Duke this year, and yet still sit on the bubble

by Roger Dorn on Feb 20, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not to take away from it but I think most Duke fans know that beating Duke doesn’t mean much any more.

At least Elliott Williams is finally seeing some time.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 4:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Amen to that.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 4:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My top pet peeve in the last 4 years is people rushing the court after beating us.

I mean, really?

Especially when it’s like, Wake. You’re a top 5 team! Don’t rush the court after beating another top 5 team! You’re in our league! We’re not goliath. We’re Kyle Singler, Gerald Henderson and a bunch of players that would sit your bench.

Same to Clemson. Ugh.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 5:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I’ll admit to storming the court once when BC was actually higher ranked than its opponent. The thing about BC though is that we legitimately do not have any hope for a championship, our entire sports history has been remarkable upsets, and these are basically the moments that our fan base cares about (Flutie Hail Mary.)

Beating Duke in a regular season game for BC is huge, I mean the school has only made the Elite 8 once in its entire history. So yes, even if BC has a solid team, beating a big basketball program during a nationally televised game will probably result in a storming of the court every time.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 20, 2009 6:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s really about having to watch it happen, umm, let’s see how many away games do we lose a year…well, that many times. Every time we lose away and it’s not Carolina, they storm the court. And that becomes difficult to watch at some point.

I just want to scream “You know St. John’s is going to lose to us by like less than 10 in a week, right? RIGHT?”

But, BC deserves it moreso than like Wake or Clemson. Wake always wants to act like we’re they’re rival, then they storm the court. Really? You don’t storm the court against your rival. You nod smugly and walk out.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 9:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough, but I think that a lot of Wake fans (which I count myself) get frustrated by being ignored by the other “big 3” in the state. Vanderbilt had the same problem, ignored by UT and most of the rest of the SEC, even when they are relevant.

-Erik

by drerikbrady on Feb 23, 2009 12:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Really? I’ve always thought of Wake as superior to State in pretty much every department, including basketball. Could just be me, of course, and I’m not connected to NC in any way except for the four years in Durham.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 23, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Certainly not the perception if you live in the greater Raleigh area.

-Erik

by drerikbrady on Feb 23, 2009 4:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just Tom the Carpetbagger, then

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 23, 2009 5:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There’s no doubt that Duke and UNC fans try to actively ice Wake out. We’re the big kids on the block and we don’t want to acknowledge a third party. State is acknowledged sort of nostalgically at this point, I guess. Duke and Wake also have a particular set of bad feelings in being similar schools, recruiting similar players, attracting similar students, etc.

Win an NC and things will change mighty fast.

by afh4 on Feb 23, 2009 12:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Case in point, whatever night that Duke and Carolina played a couple of weeks ago, Wake and State played at 7 in Raleigh, before Duke and Carolina tipped at 9. I turned on the TV to catch the Wake game. Guess what? Not televised. It’s not just the fans that ignore Wake (and State to a certain degree).

-Erik

by drerikbrady on Feb 23, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Also!

State’s kind of crappy right now. A Hodge-Paul matchup wouldn’t have gotten the same treatment. Just sayin’.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 23, 2009 5:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

my favorite basketball memory was when UC beat Duke in the 1998 Great Alaskan Shootout with the buzzer beating Melvin “The Helicopter” Levitt dunk.

by Brick. on Feb 20, 2009 6:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would not have been upset about rushing the court there. Of course, I doubt many UC fans made it to Anchorage.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 7:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I love all late ’90s/early ’00s UC teams. That kid who jumped over three racks of basketballs and almost hooked on with the Spurs later? He was awesome.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 9:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I always wondered what they would have done had Kenyon Martin not got injured. What year was that — ’01? ’02?

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 20, 2009 9:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and that is my least favorite basketball moment. i think that was ‘00. he was so fun to watch. actually, basketball hasn’t been big in my life since that day.

by Brick. on Feb 20, 2009 10:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That wasn’t even his best dunk. In a game against Marquette he jumped over a player and got his legs clipped. He ended up going parallel to the ground, grabbing the ball as it came off, dunking it and then using the rim to launch himself outside of the lane. There is no way to describe it in words and no YouTube video of it. It was the most spectacular dunk I have ever seen.

by fwembt on Feb 21, 2009 4:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that was probably Levitt again. he was always jumping over golf carts and stuff.

by Brick. on Feb 20, 2009 10:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

James White.

A little later than Leavitt but very Cincinnati nonetheless. Except for being a transfer from FL.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 10:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He just won the NBDL dunk contest

by Roger Dorn on Feb 21, 2009 12:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

oh man, i forgot all about that guy. nice.

by Brick. on Feb 21, 2009 10:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I can’t stop agreeing. This makes me just as angry as losing in the first place. Wake was the worst—they’d just been ranked number 1, the week before. Where are your expectations?

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 7:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, definitely.

If there were a decent Duke message board I’d be calling for a changing of the guard in fanposts. Obviously, that’s not going to happen, for many good reasons, but man this is hard to watch.

by afh4 on Feb 20, 2009 9:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

SHANE BATTIER FOR PRESIDENT.

I’m sorry, but Eric B. already has the job.

by jds16 on Feb 20, 2009 7:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Great reference. Eric B. and Rakim are amazing.

by ClarkM on Feb 21, 2009 1:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Great, great article.

by Jay on Feb 20, 2009 12:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

As long as we are point to cool o/t Michael Lewis articles, check out this one. Discussion of it will have to be left to non-LGT venues, but a pretty amazing aricle.

by APV on Feb 20, 2009 1:06 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Or we could mention the Malcolm Gladwell article about NFL Quarterbacks and teacher compensation.

by NickFantana on Feb 20, 2009 1:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Interestingly enough, Lewis claims to have written Liar’s Poker to steer youngsters away from pursuing jobs on Wall Street. The book had the opposite effect of his intentions

by Roger Dorn on Feb 20, 2009 1:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I got this for Christmas. It’s sitting behind some others (if I ever get my Indians Annual, for instance), but I’m looking forward to it.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 20, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that, is a great article. i just saw that piece by frontline this week. when you combine this article with that frontline piece, it helps put together why the financial meltdown happened.

by lenred on Feb 21, 2009 4:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the great link.

Of course, Ruben Bolling explained the crash in ten glorious panels.

by JulioBernazard on Feb 21, 2009 5:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was trying to figure out whether or not the Cavs have adopted this approach. They do seem to really like the corner 3-pointer, so it’s possible.

by JulioBernazard on Feb 20, 2009 2:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Good question. By the way, it feels a littel perverse posting this here instead of at Fear the Sword, but most of the handful of people over there also read LGT.

by cleveland teamer on Feb 20, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not everyone — I see a few names there that I don’t recognize from LGT. You could post it there, also, and maybe get a good discussion going.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Feb 20, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I put it up on FtS. I can give you a hat tip, if you’d like.

by JulioBernazard on Feb 20, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No need. Thanks for posting.

by cleveland teamer on Feb 20, 2009 3:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This thread has been added to my bookmarks menu. Looks like 3 nice articles for me to read sometime at the end of next week when my workload slows down.

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Feb 20, 2009 2:12 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

It’s a fantastic article. When the Cavs played Houston I was pretty overwhelmed at how good they were defensively. You just don’t hear much about them. It’s too bad that McGrady is 1) soft and 2) injured. They could have been a real dark horse this year.

by Toxicadam on Feb 20, 2009 2:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

college sports make me say “meh”

So 2009.

by Gradyforpresident on Feb 22, 2009 3:48 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

can we talk about BMI again, now?

by Brick. on Feb 23, 2009 1:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

the BMI at Michigan is higher than it should be

by APV on Feb 23, 2009 1:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Is that why you left?

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 23, 2009 1:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I figured that this thread is suitably buried to permit such rampant OT discussions. Are my instincts correct on this?

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 2:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Still have to tread carefully in some ways. I think Adam is saying there’s a bunch of fat people at Michigan, but it’s a slippery slope.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 23, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Without evidence, that claim is “ludicrous, absurd, et cetera.” Have you ever noticed that when people use the words “ludicrous” or “absurd,” they often are talking about things that aren’t absurd at all?

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 3:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What I’ve noticed is that your comments about universities are about as relevant as Turk’s favorite band.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 23, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Totally irrelevant. Yours are too, but that’s understood. I think I was offering an OT apology two comments ago, and you responded in a humorous way.

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 5:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, my comments are deep with beard-strokingly rich profundity.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 23, 2009 6:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Holy crap. I was just going to write that, if I had prefaced my comments with beard-strokinging imagery, I would be considered way more pensive. Problem is, I have bad beard-genes and am rocking a mere neckbeard and stache.

by joeee on Feb 23, 2009 6:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, the world needs ditchdiggers, too, son.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Feb 23, 2009 10:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As long as I can network my way to the middle of the pack. Which dirt firm do you work for now?

by joeee on Feb 24, 2009 12:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.
Start posting about the Indians »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Small
I think we found our utility infielder
Small
Baseball in Japan
3444ant_black_small
Spring Training Trips
Hans_small
Trade Peralta?
3444ant_black_small
Beware the year of the Ox
Bos-fod_small
award-winning independent baseball documentary released
Calavera_small
Create your own 2010 BA Top Ten list (then sign Grady to an extension)
Img_0108_small
Jason Grilli Signs Minor League Deal?
Mariahcareyglitter_medium_medium_small
2009 AL Central Off-Season Transactions and Rumors

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who would you like to see hired to manage the Cleveland Indians?
Bobby Valentine
106 votes
Travis Fryman
41 votes
Manny Acta
113 votes
Don Mattingly
78 votes
Torey Lovullo
30 votes
Other
51 votes

419 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

2010 Cleveland Indians draft preview
Jim Ingraham Angers You.
BP Calls John Hart One of the, STRIKE THAT, BEST GMs of the 90s
Sizemore Addresses Offseason
Can we reach 1,000 on a post about Adam Kennedy?
"At this time, we're looking to make the biggest impact possible on the...
Casey Blake shaved his beard
ICBWDSTGFO550K
Masterson Interview
Nagy in Columbus

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Sweet Baboo

Sweet Baboo, now with glitter


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Authors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4