Transactions: Indians Trade for Juan Salas
Traded IF Isaias Velasquez to the Tampa Bay Rays for RHP Juan Salas
The Rays had DFAd Salas earlier, so it looks like the Indians didn't to want risk being trumped by another club's waiver claim.
Valasquez has spent two seasons with the Indians domestic farm teams, last year playing mostly shortstop and second base with Mahoning Valley. The Panamanian is two years younger (in baseball years) than Luis Valbuena and Asdrubal Cabrera, and at best a full three years away from the majors, assuming he progresses a level a year. Tony Lastoria ranked Velasquez #82 in the Cleveland organization, noting his athleticism and versatility.
So the Indians gave up a very young and marginal prospect...what did they get in return? They got a 30-year-old reliever with impressive minor-league numbers but no real major-league success. The Indians are only the second organization for Salas; he was signed by Tampa way back in 1998 as a third baseman, but he couldn't hit. Like most young third baseman, Salas had a strong arm, and because of it he remained in professional baseball as a pitcher.
His first full season on the mound was a success; he averaged more than a strikeout an inning with Visalia (A+) and Montgomery (AA) in 2004. In 2005 he completely dominated Southern League hitters in his second season with Montgomery, striking out 52 in 35 innings, and not allowing an earned run. He was promoted to Durham, continued to impress, and pitched in 8 September games for Tampa. He appeared ready to jump to a full-time role with the Rays the next season.
But after an uneven first month with the Rays in 2007, he was suspended by Major League Baseball 50 days for testing positive for performance-enhancing drugs. He returned from the suspension in late July and finished the season in the majors, but his final line showed vast underachievement for a pitcher with his stuff; he allowed 36 hits in 36.3 innings, struck out just 26, and walked 17. In 2008 Salas encountered more off-the-field problems; he couldn't obtain a work visa until April, so he went to Durham in order to get his arm back into shape. He ended up spending most of the season with the Bulls, striking out 53 batters in 44.2 innings. He only appeared in 5 games with the Rays, performing poorly in his first two appearances. He was left off the postseason roster, and was Designated for Assignment earlier this month when Tampa signed free agent reliever Brian Shouse to a one-year contract.
The major reason the Indians were interested in Salas, besides his minor-league success and low-90s cut fastball, was that, believe it or not, Salas still has an option year left. That means the Indians can stash him in Columbus and have their pitching coaches work with him in a lower-pressure and lower-stakes environment, and if he works out, will have a very nice option in the minors to call upon if needed.
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
Won’t we have to clear up a spot on the 40-man?
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 22, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Spot was created by DFA-ing Ted Cox.
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Feb 22, 2009 1:55 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
so, i don’t know why this is just popping in my head, but why not 60-day Westbrook to get that roster spot?
are they saving that one because they anticipate needing it anyway? did they just think now was the best time to sneak andy through waivers? or are they just planning on 15-daying wesbrook in case he comes back and can start rehab sooner than in 60 days? or something else that’s not occuring to me?
Can you put players on the DL at this point in the season?
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 22, 2009 4:58 PM EST up reply actions
I didn’t have time to do more than a cursory google search, but I didn’t find anything. My intuition is that you can’t begin to put players on the DL until some date—perhaps after camp breaks, perhaps after the last ST game, perhaps 48 hours or something like that before your first game. After all, there is a point in the offseason when you have to take guys off the DL—otherwise, the concept of a 40-man roster becomes nullity.
Without knowing the rules, it’s nearly impossible to determine through transaction data, because teams wait until the season’s about to start as it is.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 22, 2009 5:08 PM EST up reply actions
Correct. There is no 25-man roster and no DL until the end of March. At that point, you have to take your 40-man roster and get it down to 25 for the active roster. You can do that putting guys on the 60-day DL or DFA’ing them, which frees up a spot on the 40-man, or by putting them on the 15-day DL or optioning them to the minors, which doesn’t free up a spot on the 40-man. Of course, any spots that get freed up on the 40-man can be used to purchase the contracts of any non-roster invites you want to break camp with.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
Yep, so the Indians have one more spot on their 40-man roster because Jake Westbrook won’t be ready until mid-season. They don’t have to use it right away, but it’s there if they need a spot.
But they couldn’t have stashed Marte there.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 22, 2009 10:11 PM EST up reply actions
This guy is the next Raffy B. I can feel it.
by cleveland teamer on Feb 23, 2009 12:55 PM EST reply actions
So this must be the longest any guy has been on our 40-man without my knowing much of anything about him. I’m halfway blocking him out. Here’s what I know so far:
- He has an option remaining. (It’s basically my job to know that.)
- Had good numbers in the minors, hasn’t made it happen in the majors, Mastnyesque in that sense.
- Suspended 50 games for PED use at one point.
Do I need to know more than that? Because for some reason, I’ve avoided reading this post.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by 



















