Let's Go Tribe!: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

This is not a demand for Hey Jaysie, or Hey Jay-Z, though either would be sweet. In fact, I think Hoynes is at his relative best here. But just read the questions he selects; you'd think we have a baseball team that is paid in scratch-off tickets and Bazooka Joe.

Jean wants to know why it's "so hard" to take on additional payroll, as if it's anything more than Econ 101. Tom wants to know why the Sabathia trade should be viewed with anything other than scorn. Marty wants to know if the Dolans are just "using fans to make money." (Hey Marty: Of course they are! It's called capitalism!)

So honestly, why are fans so angry? Do you guys know any fans who talk like this? They seem to be more than just uninformed; they're furious. (And just for laughs, please read the Joe Beimel question. So, so awesome).

11 months ago Burgandy_1__tiny tabler84 155 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

If you’ve ever seen my record for predicting what the Indians are going to do before they do it, you would never ask me such questions.

Well, at least he has a sense of humor.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 2, 2009 8:29 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

My quality of life has increased since pretending that Hey Hoynsie didn’t even exist. Part having to read his responses, but also part not having to read the (mostly) stupid questions.

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Mar 2, 2009 8:47 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Think about the kind of person that would take time out of their day to write Paul Hoynes and ask him a question about baseball.

by Toxicadam on Mar 2, 2009 8:48 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

They’re all angry by definition? I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make. There are plenty of cheerful people who are writing to him.

At least I think there are. Here’s what has me confused: I realize there are plenty of fire-breathing whack job fans for any team. But if his mailbag is filled with vitriol, does this mean that average, run-of-the-mill fan is furious about the perceived lack of spending by Dolan? Is this more rampant than I realize?

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 8:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No I really don’t think so. He likely picked the worst questions he could fine so as to make the point against the idea of the “cheap Dolans”.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 2, 2009 9:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But he doesn’t make the point as effectively as he should. Hmm, perhaps I do demand Hey Jaysie after all.

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 9:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Funny, my very first reaction after reading your initial post was that you were, in fact, not only demanding, but screaming for, Hey Jaysie.

"Lotta heart in Cleveland." - Ian Hunter

by Denver Tribe Fan on Mar 2, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What I don’t understand is the question selection process the PD uses. As an example, in Sunday’s paper there was a Hey Tony section in relation to the Browns. Someone asked if the Browns should select Brandon Spikes from Florida. As Tony responds, Brandon Spikes actually isn’t even draft eligible till next year. This is a question based on factually incorrect (and easily available) information. What purpose does it serve the reader to get this response?

by APV on Mar 2, 2009 9:35 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I actually think these columns struggle to get enough good questions for a column and so they sort of take all comers. I submitted a question once to Grossi and it was published the next week. I also recall several LGT’ers saying Hoynes has taken their questions.

Further, I would modestly propose that if we hate the questions so much we should start asking better questions. Here’s the link (which could admittedly be much easier to find.)

by NickFantana on Mar 2, 2009 11:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is a fine idea. We should all take a crack at it.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 2, 2009 11:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That would be interesting. But I do think that it’s not so much that we hate the particular questions, but rather that we don’t like that they might be a representation of popular fan-think.

by dgcambridge on Mar 2, 2009 12:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think we should do a coordinated mass question-asking one week

by APV on Mar 2, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, that would be interesting. APV, sample question?

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m down

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Mar 2, 2009 1:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Why don’t we also submit the questions to Jay for a Hey Jaysie column as well.

"It's hard to win when you don't score." Cliff Lee, 9/28/05.

by Harry Doyle on Mar 2, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Woo hoo.

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 2, 2009 10:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, you’re exactly right. The biggest concern isn’t that there are mostly bad questions submitted, it’s that the majority of fans might actually think this way. Most of the people I talk to about sports don’t think like this so it’s hard for me to judge how many fans do. But when you read so many questions like these, it makes you wonder if you’re in the minority.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 2, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, there was one Hey Brian about the Cavs that had one question. One idiot in the comments section was railing on Brian for his lack of effort, but another person astutely pointed out that he can only answer questions that are asked of him.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 2, 2009 1:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The person asking that first question seriously comes across as angry as Jeanie Bueller when she slams the phone down after she calls the police to report there’s an intruder in her house “possibly armed, definitely weird”.

by lenred on Mar 2, 2009 9:53 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I just keep thinking of someone ranting to Hoynes and finishing with “SPEAK’N DE’ ENGLISH?!” before slamming the enter button. Thanks for that.

by painaxl on Mar 2, 2009 10:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think, overall, the level of vitriol that people generate over sports is troubling. I can get impassioned about sports as much as anybody and, in the heat of the moment, can scream, yell, feel emotions of anger.

What I don’t get is how someone can stew and draw on this anger all the time. If you go to youtube and look up a video of any popular but polarizing team or figure, be that A-Rod, Duke basketball, the Yankees, Allen Iverson, whatever, you’ll most likely find a string of comments that can only be described as vile, in the truest sense of the word.

And, I don’t mean vile as in the kind of thing that makes you want to block quote the word “Yankees” and reply “Yeah, but it’s the Yankees.” I mean comments that blatant overtones or are explicitly homophobic, racist, exceptionally vulgar, dealing with issues of sexual assault, etc etc. You can find it on tons of blogs as well. Heck, you it on parts of SBN.

I just don’t understand how people are capable of such standing hate regarding sports. It’s not cute sports hate, it’s actual hate and I find it really, really disturbing.

I don’t know that any of Hoynes’ questioners rise to this level (their being printed in a newspaper after all) but just thought I’d chime in.

On a related note, the lack of this kind of dialogue is exactly what I think makes LGT legitimately incredible.

by afh4 on Mar 2, 2009 9:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Geez I dropped some words out of those sentences. Don’t think it’s unclear, though.

by afh4 on Mar 2, 2009 9:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It would be nice to have an edit feature. Even if only for a few minutes after the initial post.

by Toxicadam on Mar 2, 2009 10:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A timed edit feature would be hilarious. You have 60 seconds to get your edits done. Go!

by afh4 on Mar 2, 2009 10:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I actually fully support this.

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 10:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You couldn’t have jokingly misspelled one of these words?

by NickFantana on Mar 2, 2009 11:24 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I want this

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 2, 2009 2:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There are a bunch of the PHP-based forums that have this feature. It is legitimately helpful.

Don't be stupid. PUT IN MELOAN.

by gte619n on Mar 2, 2009 11:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that would be cool, actually.

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 2, 2009 11:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There’s this awesome preview button that works.

Signature to be named later.

by emd2k3 on Mar 2, 2009 10:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Blah. Preview is for the weak.

by afh4 on Mar 2, 2009 10:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Preview is for people who do crosswords in pencil.

by woodsmeister on Mar 2, 2009 12:07 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

/steps quietly away

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 2, 2009 2:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Preview is for people who draw straight lines (that have to be inked) in pencil then make themselves successfuly do something twice that they obviously expect to fail at.

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 2, 2009 11:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And the wrong use of ’they’re.’

I swear to god I’m not this stupid.

by afh4 on Mar 2, 2009 10:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The jury’s still out. You went to Duke, didn’t you?

(Emory, class of 1987.)

"It's hard to win when you don't score." Cliff Lee, 9/28/05.

by Harry Doyle on Mar 2, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

“I went to the Harvard of the South.”
“Duke? That’s good!”
“Not Duke.”
“Vanderbilt?”
“A little further south. Don’t make me say it.”

(Emory Law, myself.)

by Fire Slider on Mar 2, 2009 9:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

who knew so many of us Cleveland fans were Emory people

by APV on Mar 2, 2009 9:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My father is an Emory man. Me, not so much.

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 10:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Very well said. Some fans seem to think that it’s Dolan’s duty to GIVE THEM A CHAMPIONSHIP at any cost. Anything less is evidence of avarice.

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 10:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

it’s not even that. they want the championship AND the cost. there are many indians fans who, through their insecurities, want to be Jackasses.

by Brick. on Mar 2, 2009 10:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know; I think it’s more likely that they’ve become convinced that jackassery and over-spending is the only way to win. I’m reasonably sure that there are thousands of Tribe fans who believe the Yankees have won every WS since 1996.

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 10:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps Hoynes could dispell some of this anger by politely mentioning the payroll was increased by ~$15 mm with the additions of a starting third baseman and closer.

He could go the extra mile and point out how much the payroll is increased through pay raises to Grady, Victor, Hafner, Westbrook, Honny, etc etc. (I’ll let someone else figure out the exact dollar amount those contracts increase the payroll this year.)

by lenred on Mar 2, 2009 12:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

On a related note, the lack of this kind of dialogue is exactly what I think makes LGT legitimately incredible.

This is because Cleveland fans are smarter than any other sports city in the country. We’re the best. We’re number one.

by NickFantana on Mar 2, 2009 11:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just don’t understand how people are capable of such standing hate regarding sports. It’s not cute sports hate, it’s actual hate and I find it really, really disturbing.

It does seem particularly stupid in sports, or any entertainment. But I think it’s a larger trend in how people discuss any public subject. Check out how people discuss Tom Cruise, or George Lucas, or Stephanie Meyer, or Diablo Cody. At that’s just entertainment; people are unable to even mention an opposing political figure or commentator without going overboard.

by dgcambridge on Mar 2, 2009 12:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

DIABLO CODY SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Signature to be named later.

by emd2k3 on Mar 2, 2009 12:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re exactly right. Everything in life has become so divisive and people have no respect for anyone who doesn’t agree with them. It’s especially true in politics. Joe Posnanski’s blog has an article about the death of the newspapers, and the comments sections turned in to a debate about bias in the news. So many people just refuse to listen to any opposing veiwpoints, and they’re just looking for a place to pick a fight with people.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 2, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lebron sucks. buckeyes suck. grady batting second sucks.

by Brick. on Mar 2, 2009 1:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

. . . capital letters suck.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 2, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

it’s really just the shift key i have a problem with. both of them can go straight to hell.

by Brick. on Mar 2, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

grady batting second sucks.

this

grady batting third sucks.

that

grady batting fourth sucks.

and this

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 2, 2009 11:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rush Limbaugh disagrees with your liberally nonsense.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 2, 2009 2:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

D****it… liberal. How long before we get that timed edit?

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 2, 2009 2:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

“Liberally” makes your dismissal sound much more flippant.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 2, 2009 7:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just had to google Stephanie Meyer. I’m getting old.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Mar 2, 2009 1:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t know either, though I have heard of the book.

by ClarkM on Mar 2, 2009 2:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Stephanie Meyer’s characters suck!

"It's hard to win when you don't score." Cliff Lee, 9/28/05.

by Harry Doyle on Mar 2, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

completely agree with this. I certainly could never see myself doing that. If you check out MBs of NFC East teams, you’ll see them name-dropping a Cowboys QB just so they can call him ‘Homo’.

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 2, 2009 11:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Troy Aikman?

Signature to be named later.

by emd2k3 on Mar 2, 2009 11:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wade Wilson?

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Mar 3, 2009 8:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah Chuck, why are some fans so angry all the time?

-Erik

by drerikbrady on Mar 2, 2009 10:29 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Actually I find this whole concept pretty ironic since it demonstrates an inordinate lack of insight. First, I thought I was surrounded by soccer fans – no? When those boyz go off more than people’s feeling get hurt. Second, some words are more powerful to different social/economic/age/education groups than others. The use of homophobic slurs, for example, is a common, every day occurrence amongst our military personnel. Here at LGT most folks find them abhorrent – many of our soldiers find them funny. Similarly, one of our noted moderators once said about a certain left-handed pitcher, "I’d like to punch him in the face". I remember this since it was so out of keeping with his character and it put me aback. In some environs I’ve been in this would be considered an inappropriate response to a simple ball game. What I’m trying to say here is that a little perspective is needed.

Finally you need to remember that rooting for a baseball or any other team is in and of itself irrational. We don’t know those guys and they sure as hell don’t know us. Exactly none of them are from our hometown. And for once I agree with Seinfeld – we’re just rooting for laundry. Occasionally I forget this – in fact it’s part of the attraction of sports. A friend of mine is an Oncologist and rabid Indians fan. He uses his fandom as an escape from the pressure and tragedy of his job. But he knows that the Indian’s performance has very little impact on real life. In fact that’s the beauty of it.

Bottom line: sports are the male equivalent of the soap opera. A meaningless, compelling, mind game of little true worth, but you just can’t stop watching and caring.

by mauichuck on Mar 3, 2009 12:16 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Hallelujah. Generating a caste system of fans, deconstructing the psychology of fandom and generating personality profiles of the fan hierarchy – to me, this is all just noise. I’m not interested. Some fans are smart but antisocial. Some fans can’t grasp the big concepts but are fun to watch a game with. No great difference, they both have a place. If I’m watching a ballgame, I’ll laugh at the witty heckler. Sometimes I am the heckler myself. It’s entertainment. We all love the same team. What we have is the game, and ironically – it’s all that matters, and nothing that matters.

by joeee on Mar 3, 2009 2:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The witty heckler deserves a special place in fandom.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 3, 2009 8:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Budweiser Real Men of Genius salutes you, Witty Heckler Guy.

by woodsmeister on Mar 3, 2009 9:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ll give ESPN the Mag credit for one article in their past 5 or 6 years, and that’s a pretty good piece they did recently on the best heckling in sports.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 3, 2009 9:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

“The 10 Commandments of Heckling” ?

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 3, 2009 10:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s the one.

Perhaps something like the anecdote Bruins wing Shawn Thornton shared: “My favorite heckle had nothing to do with me. It happened in the Western Hockey League, where a player named Rob Skrlac had an oversize cranium. Somebody held up a sign that said, ‘What would you rather have, a million dollars or Skrlac’s helmet full of nickels?’ It’s legendary—players still talk about that.”

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 3, 2009 10:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s great to hear, the author Eddie Matz is a good friend of mine. We were college roommates.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 3, 2009 10:21 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Good on him.

I wonder what sharing a dorm with Jay Levin is like…

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 3, 2009 4:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Off-campus place, actually. Upstairs from (and sharing a door with) Casa Mexicana at 40th and Chestnut. It actually was a house of singer-comedian drunkards, and one guy who was an amazing cook.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 3, 2009 6:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

so, i don’t want to get in to what this says about me, but skimming, i read that last word as having two c’s not two o’s.

*this laugh brought to you by Brick’s shamelessness.

by Brick. on Mar 3, 2009 7:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In total agreement with you and Chuck here. The beauty of sports is bringing together all these ridiculous groups of people for one common goal.

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Mar 3, 2009 7:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One common goal: Hating the tightwad Dolans.

by odradek on Mar 3, 2009 9:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We all love soap operas …. just noone admits to it.

by talonk on Mar 3, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sometimes I think columnists pick out the most ridiculous questions to answer in an effort to make themselves appear smarter. It’s the low-hanging fruit.

Was I the only one whose immediate reaction to this column was “oh my god… Hoynes reads the Bill James Handbook??”

Professional Lurker. Non-Baseball Posting Specialist.

by fingolfin on Mar 2, 2009 10:30 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Or, he just picks out the most ridiculous because, otherwise, his column would be pretty boring for most readers.

Signature to be named later.

by emd2k3 on Mar 2, 2009 10:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe he’s baiting us. Paul Hoynes has become one of the most popular subjects on LGT in the past three months.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 2, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, Hoynes did a fair job with the answers this time around. I think he tries to be as judicious? as possible with his responses … it’s as if he doesn’t want to alienate anyone.

I wish he would have been more specific about Abreu’s brutal defense and DeRosa’s flexibility that helps to make DeRosa a much more valuable player for a team like the Indians. I suppose he could cut a question or two and get more specific (if he can) with each answer, but I’m not sure that’s what the PD is looking for.

Signature to be named later.

by emd2k3 on Mar 2, 2009 10:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wish he would have mentioned that Abreu wouldn’t have been so cheap had there been competition for his services.

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 2, 2009 11:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There’s a reason he’s a popular subject: He has more access to players and management than almost anyone else, and he’s paid to provide thorough, accurate, and occasionally stimulating coverage. He ought to be scrutinized.

I’m very much enjoying the added video interviews they’re providing. The web layout still sucks hard, but there are, it seems, some small steps underway.

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 10:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like the video a lot but I don’t like having to hear Hoynse talk. It’s a moist bluster.

by afh4 on Mar 2, 2009 10:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Was I the only one whose immediate reaction to this column was "oh my god… Hoynes reads the Bill James Handbook??"

Nope.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Mar 2, 2009 1:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But yet higher ticket prices to support a larger payroll would make them even angrier…

Signature to be named later.

by emd2k3 on Mar 2, 2009 10:30 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ticket prices seem to my main beef with sports anymore. Not that they are high. I just get frustrated when people whine and moan about the amount of money professional athletes make, and then we drop a decent amount of cash on seeing them play, therefore we are paying for those high salaries. If Indians fans genuinely want Dolan to shell out cash, Tribe fans should take their interest to the ballpark and sell the stadium out.

Maybe my argument is conflicted, feel free to let me know if it is. It’s a pet peeve of mine I had to get off my chest, but I could be totally wrong seeing as how I’m not addressing the fact that people make more money in cities like New York, Chicago, and LA because the cost of living is higher there than in Cleveland.

by Tribe_Hippie on Mar 2, 2009 12:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder if maybe people are just frustrated and angry in general, and sports provides a somewhat socially acceptable outlet for this. Or maybe there’s an element of invented community at work; people feel screwed on an individual level every day, but this guy Dolan, man, he’s screwing all of us. Maybe people use that perception to comiserate.

It’s tragic, really. I think most of us on here probably have a lot more fun following sports than the Angry Fan does.

by still ill on Mar 2, 2009 12:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think the most frustrated and angry are more likely to take pen to paper (or fingers to keyboards) than the non-angry fans. That’s why there’s that imbalance in the mailbag.

The curious among us are already out there, searching for these answers on our own … we’re not interested in asking Hoynsie because we know he probably doesn’t quite have the answers we’re looking for.

Signature to be named later.

by emd2k3 on Mar 2, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re exactly right, that’s called the response bias. If you ask a question with a voluntary response then you’re going to get most of your responses from peole who feel strongly about the subject. So people who like what Dolan, Shapiro, and the Indians are doing aren’t going to bother writing in, but those who are angry are going to write so they have a forum to take out their anger. Just like response cards in a restaurant; if you have a good meal you’re probably not going to fill them out, but if you meal or service was bad you’re going to let someone know.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 2, 2009 1:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re exactly right. Everything in….
You’re exactly right, that’s called…

rick manning alert!

by Brick. on Mar 2, 2009 1:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ouch, that hurts! I’m just in an agreeable mood today, I guess.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 2, 2009 1:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i am still mad someone pointed that out to me. once you notice it, that’s all you hear sometimes.

by Brick. on Mar 2, 2009 2:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think it’s technical name is Aikmanism.

by NickFantana on Mar 2, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Troy Aikman is the best broadcaster in America.
—Joe Theismann

Rick Manning is the best broadcaster in America.
—Joe Theismann

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 2, 2009 11:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So in other words, for the angry folks it’s not about hearing the answer, it’s about ASKING THE QUESTION ANGRILY.

by still ill on Mar 2, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This actually makes sense. I’ve been doing it backwards, sending my honest roster queries to Hoynes, and failing with google:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=WTF+DOLEN+SHAPIRO+DODGERS+GET+MANNY+AND+ALL+WE+STILL+GOT+ANDY+MF+MARTE3F3F21213F21&btnG=Search

by dgcambridge on Mar 2, 2009 2:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This search gets 3800 times as many hits.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 2, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It even gets one hit when you place it in quotes.

A gamethread here, of course.

by dgcambridge on Mar 2, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ANDY MARTE = CHAMPIONSHIP.

I tried to make Paul Reuschel my Avatar, but he didn’t fit into the box.

by emd2k3 on May 27, 2008 9:51 PM EDT

Somebody deserves a prize.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 3, 2009 8:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This post may seem like an odd choice for the front page, but I think it’s actually a key question for Indians fans and all sports fans. Tabler’s basic question here is related to LGT’s site moderation philosophy but isn’t precisely the same, and it relates to the question of, what is a media entity’s responsibility to its readers/viewers? Writers convey information, but is there a pedagogical role there as well, maybe even a leadership role?

I was disappointed to see Castro dip into this fan-hate cesspool this week, indulging a question to the effect of, Is Andy Marte the worst thing that has ever happened to the people of Cleveland? Castrovince’s work has been remarkably free of the dumbest trappings of old-media orthodoxy in baseball reporting, which is why he’s a favorite around here, but this week, he basically caved in to the Stupids.

A lot of fans wallow around in hate, and if they weren’t following the Indians, they’d be venting on some other subject entirely just the same. I would like to think that they vent at their sports teams because they can’t vent at their bosses and won’t vent at their families. That’s a comforting idea, that the venting is pretty harmless and maybe even helpful to them, but I don’t know if that’s really the case for very many fans.

Ryan and I believe in the pedagogical and leadership opportunity provided by a media presence; I think it’s one of many reasons we’ve worked well together. We share an idea of, hey, I think I’ve figured something out that helps me understand the game better, and now I want to share it with other fans. Even to let other fans pick it apart, challenge and refine it. That drives us. I think we also share an interest in the leadership opportunity, or at least, leading by presenting a specific model of being a devoted fan. One that doesn’t involve getting into unsavory gossippy crap, and one that doesn’t involve irreducible hatred as a rewarded (or even tolerated) behavior.

As to the hateful venting, we don’t necessarily root it out because it’s stupid, or it sucks, or because we disapprove of it. No, we root it out specifically because it’s incompatible with having an Indians discussion site like this one, that is, full of highly amusing and insightful fans. It’s a turn-off for far too many of the reader-contributors that we want to fill the pages here, and it doesn’t attract many of them (you!) if any.

But is it for me to say that, outside of LGT, that’s not acceptable behavior? That that makes someone a “bad Indians fan?” I’m not sure. As a moderator, I am only sure of what works for LGT. As a person, I really pity those people who wallow around in hate; if I thought it made any sense to live life that way, I’d still be a Browns fan. Strictly as an Indians fan, however, I can’t say that being bitter makes you a bad Indians fan. At least, not as much as rooting for Sabathia does.

Maybe we’ll get into the subject of willful ignorance later.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 2, 2009 3:43 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

It is so much more fun to disagree with you, but I’ll happily tip my cap to this post. I would love for Hoynes and Castro et al to read it.

Jay, you cautiously approach the question of whether such aggressive complaining constitutes bad behavior on other sites. There are two avenues for answering the question. From the perspective of a moderator, I can’t say; I don’t run cleveland.com. From the perspective of a potential participant, I can easily say the answer is yes.

Hoynes, or Castro, or others might argue that they can answer the questions to “educate” their reading public or they can drown out the voice of angry fans. I think it’s a false choice, as it would imply some kind of censorship of the insatiably irascible. Instead, ignoring such vitriol is more effective in fostering healthy discussion than in answering it, even in harsh terms. And let’s be clear: Hoynes does not offer anywhere near enough clarity and force when he attempts to answer that manner of question.

We’ve heard a handful of plausible explanations for why fans get so fired up about sports. While there is merit to some of the theories, the bottom line for me is that those voices ought to remain in the wilderness, not welcomed or engaged. Such engagement shows them more respect than they are due.

Thanks to Jay and Ryan, Adam and Andrew for keeping LGT so focused and, well, awesome.

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 4:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, dude. To clarify, I wasn’t limiting the discussion to this site vs. other sites, but rather this site vs. all behavior everywhere else, both online and in real life and in letters to Paul Hoynes.

As for answering vs. ignoring, if I had my own letter column, I might indulge one or two of these letters each week, but I would answer them (as you say) with clarity and force — as with the legendary Edna Williams letter. I would put forward the idea consistently that this is just a dumb way to be a fan, that being willfully ignorant about the game and angry all the time is just no fun for anyone, so you should either get serious about being a passionate fan or get a new hobby. Not everyone has to agree with that idea, but I would put that idea forward on a regular basis, as I have here.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 2, 2009 5:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

..this is just a dumb way to be a fan, that being willfully ignorant about the game and angry all the time is just no fun for anyone, so you should either get serious about being a passionate fan or get a new hobby

sums up the whole thing very well.

by Brick. on Mar 2, 2009 6:03 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Cleveland fans, it should be pointed out, have reasons to be bitter. There’s a lot of hate in Cleveland, too, much of it based on economic disappointments and longstanding ethnic and racial biases. If being bitter makes one a bad Indians fan, it doesn’t make one not an Indians fan.

People who don’t feel in control of their own lives tend to take it out on others.

by odradek on Mar 2, 2009 11:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t completely buy that. Sure, disappointment is going to affect your worldview, whether it be sports or real life, but I think Clevelanders sometimes enjoy being bitter as a point of pride.

by Ryan on Mar 2, 2009 11:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think it’s quite that bad. Here in Philly, sports fans enjoy being obnoxious and ignorant as a point of pride. Believe me, Cleveland fans have a rough nobility compared to most.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 2, 2009 11:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Better than Cubs fans or Boston fans circa 1988. Clevelanders are bitter, sarcastic, cynical, downtrodden. But who can blame them? Look out the window.

by odradek on Mar 2, 2009 11:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Their one redeeming grace is that Cleveland fans are funny. I can’t think of a time that I’ve been to a Cleveland game – any kinda game – and didn’t have at least one good laugh.

by mauichuck on Mar 3, 2009 12:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 3, 2009 8:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed, that’s what would seem to set us all apart from other “bitter” fans.

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Mar 3, 2009 7:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think we’ve ever deleted something because it was self-flagellistic, but I’ve tried consciously to not encourage it. It may be therapeutic to from time to time wallow in self-pity, but it doesn’t accomplish anything other than to make you somehow enjoy your sports misfortune. Obviously, being a Cleveland sports fan, it’s extremely easy to fall into that rut, but all ruts do is to take you to the same place others have been before, and I’ve never wanted to recreate cleveland.com et al. Sure, there’s a time and place for lamentations, but…this is Spring Training, when everyone’s at least above-average.

by Ryan on Mar 2, 2009 11:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ha. Nice finish.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 2, 2009 11:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah but he didn’t credit Garrison Keillor.

by mauichuck on Mar 3, 2009 12:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Can’t we ever let something go unsaid here?

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 3, 2009 10:16 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

NUANCE FREE SINCE 2003

by NickFantana on Mar 3, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

(a) No.
(b) For Keillor, it’s the children who are above average. The men are good-looking, like Sal Fasano. Credit for the “it’s spring training, where everyone is above average” line should go to Ryan. Or maybe Pat Forde, who said something similar in his pre-ESPN days when he worked in Louisville and wrote a lot about the Reds. And he did credit Keillor.

by FredOx on Mar 3, 2009 10:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, I thought that line (and its source) was pretty much common knowledge by now.

by Ryan on Mar 3, 2009 11:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I really pity those people who wallow around in hate; if I thought it made any sense to live life that way, I’d still be a Browns fan

Ouch. For those of you that like a little abuse, I recommend trying Fantasy Injury Football. It keeps the Browns’ tragedies entertaining.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 3, 2009 8:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I haven’t even finished reading the article yet, but I’m loving Hoynsie’s answers so far. I really am.

by Voltaire on Mar 2, 2009 4:12 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wow, just saw this in the comments section:

“Derek Shelton will turn Shoppach around”

Hmm, let’s all hope not. Do some Tribe fans actually believe he was underperforming or something?

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 4:22 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

there is a sect of fans (any team) that think a lot of K’s is bad, no matter what. Never mind if you have a high OBP, see an insane amount of pitches per PA, etc. my brother-in-law whitesox fan genuinely thinks grady isn’t all that good because of his high strikeout totals.

by Brick. on Mar 2, 2009 4:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ditto my in-law Reds fans re: Adam Dunn.

by woodsmeister on Mar 2, 2009 4:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ditto my in-law Reds fans re: Adam Dunn

fixed.

by Ryan Kelsey on Mar 2, 2009 6:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think part of the misunderstanding of strikeouts, at least in respect to Grady, is that most fans usually only pay attention to the raw number. Grady struck out 130 times last year which sounds like a lot, but that doesn’t look nearly as bad as 20.5, which is his K. An example, A-Rod’s K% was higher (22.9%) last year even though he had fewer strikeouts (117) due to the difference in amount of PA (151).

I think in this situation, it is particulary important to seperate the difference between the rate stat and the counting stat as there is no reason to punish Grady for his durability/spot in the lineup.

by ClarkM on Mar 2, 2009 5:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, you’re talking about stupid people, right? I’ve talked to some of them.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 2, 2009 5:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

around here they are like a cult and they are led by something called “Hawk and DJ”

by Brick. on Mar 2, 2009 6:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Shiver. Two of the very few bad things about the encroaching baseball season.

Il faut d'abord durer.

by CU Adam on Mar 2, 2009 11:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i think steve stone is actually joining hawk this year and dj will be on radio. i give stone till the second inning to be so frustrated he quits.

by Brick. on Mar 3, 2009 10:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Do they wear snuggies?

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 2, 2009 11:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If we’re to believe some of the Shoppach analysis out there (ie. Fangraphs), then Shoppach put up huge numbers because he was lucky. While there’s something to that, if there’s a way to help him cut down his K’s while maintaining the rest of last year’s performance, is that a bad thing?

I’m not one to say that K’s are the worst thing a hitter can do. If the bases are loaded, 1 out and Tribe down by 1, I’d much rather see Victor K and give the next guy a chance instead of GIDP.

I’m not taking the time just yet to look up how often Vic or Shop K’d vs. GIDP, but in general, if a player can cut down his K’s to improve his performance, why not?

by lenred on Mar 2, 2009 5:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But if a player changes his approach at the plate, to cut down his strikeouts or whatever, then that might change his production in other ways, also. I’m not saying it will happen, but you don’t know. I’d be worried about messing with Shoppach’s power if you try to reduce his strikeouts. Sure, it would be nice if he struck out less, but you can’t just magically make that happen.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 2, 2009 5:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My view exactly.

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 2, 2009 11:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Isn’t this the mentality that prevents Adam Dunn and Mickey Tettleton from making adjustments? The type of adjustments that would reduce tape-measure homers to merely home runs while potentially increasing hits (or walks, or other results)?

by lenred on Mar 2, 2009 11:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Damn. Mickey Tettleton isn’t about to change. He’s 48 years old.

by odradek on Mar 2, 2009 11:39 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

And what about reducing non-tape-measure home runs to merely fly outs? Is that good?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 3, 2009 7:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you really asking this question?

by lenred on Mar 3, 2009 8:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re saying that all of Dunn’s home runs are monster shots, and all he needs to do is cut down his swing a little bit and he’ll still hit the same number of home runs but they just won’t travel as far. I don’t believe that to be true at all. I’m sure some of his homers barely made it over the wall, and if he cut down on his swing they’d just be fly outs.

The fact of the matter is that if you change a hitter’s swing to reduce strikeouts there’s a very good chance it’s going to affect his power, or his plate discipline, or other parts of his hitting, too. I’m not saying that would happen, only that it could. You certainly can’t guarentee that it wouldn’t happen, that everything else would stay the same except he’d just have less strikeouts. Hitting doesn’t work that way.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 3, 2009 9:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The type of adjustments that would reduce tape-measure homers to merely home runs while potentially increasing hits (or walks, or other results)

It appears you read into my statement something that isn’t there. I never said all of Dunn’s shots are monster.

Hypothetically though, if the tribe has a 40-HR guy, would you be happy or disappointed if he cut his HR from 40 to 30-35, but his average went from .240 to .290? (Assuming his plate discipline stays the same.) Is losing 5-10 HR worth an increase of 30 hits? (last year Dunn had 517 AB, 122 hits, .239 AVG. To increase his AVG from .239 to .290, he would need 150 hits to get a ~.290 AVG.)

There are no guarantees in baseball. But the coaches need to do their job of making adjustments to try to get the most out of their players.

by lenred on Mar 3, 2009 11:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, you didn’t say all. But my point was that changing his swing would probably result in less homers. I didn’t know why you were surprised I said that.

I don’t have the stats right now about how many runs a home run is worth compared to a single, but I’m sure somebody knows it or I can look it up when I get home. Using those numbers, you can compare losing 10 home runs to gaining 30 singles. But changing his swing is also going to result in a loss of doubles to go along with a loss of power. So you have to factor that in, also.

I really don’t know why anyone would want to change Dunn’s swing. He gets on base a ton and hits for power. What else do you want? Who cares if he strikes out a bunch. Who cares about his batting average — that doesn’t tell you anything. Go read the discussion about Grady’s batting average.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 3, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Using those numbers, you can compare losing 10 home runs to gaining 30 singles.

It’s about even, but it depends somewhat on what you’re replacing them with.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 3, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How do we know singles are coming out of this adjustment, and not just 30 extra groundouts a year? Doesn’t the adjustment just mean more contact and more balls in play?

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 3, 2009 2:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Piling on—Word on the street is that sometimes groundouts result in two outs at a time. Especially in the case of the fleet-footed Dunn.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Mar 3, 2009 6:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

To (again) quote Earl Weaver: “If you think you’re going to hit into a double play, strike out.”

by odradek on Mar 3, 2009 9:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That guy’s praise cannot be sung enough. Talk about a genius/visionary baseball man.

by joeee on Mar 3, 2009 10:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure, but this is not the point. The person who made the comment is not saying, “I hope Shelton helps him because, while his season was a dream, it might have been propped up by luck.” He was saying, “Shoppach strikes out a lot, ergo he kind of sucks. I wish he were a more productive hitter.”

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 5:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Isn’t the Snuggie ergo?

by lenred on Mar 2, 2009 11:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just read the Beimel question after ignoring your request the first few times. Almighty Lord.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 2, 2009 7:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

It’s not a level, but just in case it were a level, it would be the subtlest, most outstanding level in the history of Hey Hoynsie letters.

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 7:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not sure what that means, but if I were Hoynsie, my answer would start: “Hey Beimel’s Mom:”

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 2, 2009 8:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry; lingo left over from my 2+2 posting days. If I’ve been “leveled,” it just means I’ve been had.

by tabler84 on Mar 2, 2009 10:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess they could have waited and tried to sign second baseman Orlando Hudson instead of trading for Mark DeRosa, but it would have been a gamble that would have left them empty handed

That isn’t a gamble, that’s clairvoyantly knowing your outcome.

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 2, 2009 10:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think he meant “gambol”, over the hills and dales.

Signature to be named later.

by emd2k3 on Mar 2, 2009 11:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.
Start posting about the Indians »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Small
I think we found our utility infielder
Small
Baseball in Japan
3444ant_black_small
Spring Training Trips
Hans_small
Trade Peralta?
3444ant_black_small
Beware the year of the Ox
Bos-fod_small
award-winning independent baseball documentary released
Calavera_small
Create your own 2010 BA Top Ten list (then sign Grady to an extension)
Img_0108_small
Jason Grilli Signs Minor League Deal?
Mariahcareyglitter_medium_medium_small
2009 AL Central Off-Season Transactions and Rumors

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who would you like to see hired to manage the Cleveland Indians?
Bobby Valentine
106 votes
Travis Fryman
41 votes
Manny Acta
113 votes
Don Mattingly
78 votes
Torey Lovullo
30 votes
Other
51 votes

419 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Lee has Foot Surgery
Jamey Wright Signed to Minor League Deal
2010 Cleveland Indians draft preview
Jim Ingraham Angers You.
BP Calls John Hart One of the, STRIKE THAT, BEST GMs of the 90s
Sizemore Addresses Offseason
Can we reach 1,000 on a post about Adam Kennedy?
"At this time, we're looking to make the biggest impact possible on the...
Casey Blake shaved his beard
ICBWDSTGFO550K

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Sweet Baboo

Sweet Baboo, now with glitter


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Authors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4