Recovering addict opens a 2009 Topps Pack
I got a kick out of this article because I collected around the same time he did (86-90). 1.99 for a new pack of cards? Man, I'm getting old.
I wish he would have posted a pic of the Andy Marte card.
almost 3 years ago
Toxicadam
40 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I wish he would have posted a pic of the Andy Marte card.
This was my first thought as well. I need help.
I’ve had this same temptation before. Though I’d probably buy a whole case and rip through it.
Also, there are some very touchy fans of Span and Guzman out there.
If Tabler84 is still worried about anger, he needs to check out the comments to this Yahoo! article. I’d say the whole populace is pizzed if this is how folks are reacting to a goofy feature piece on baseball cards.
by JulioBernazard on Mar 3, 2009 3:39 PM EST up reply actions
I can only guess that was a popout to shallow left. Sigh.
DISCLAIMER: I may be bitter.
by zempf on Mar 3, 2009 8:00 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Growing up in a small town, a newspaper with a crap sports section, and no TV, baseball cards were my passion. I still have them, boxes and boxes of 50s Topps (and Bowmans), most of which are worth just about zilch now (anyone want a ’54 Topps of Bob Kuzava? How about 8?).
Every so often I take them out and thumb through them, recalling the buzz of anticipation each new unopened pack brought (so much bliss – despite the gum – for just a nickle!).
I still buy a new pack every year. It’s a ritual I suppose, and I still feel anticipation before opening the pack, but it seems like I always get the Indian players the year after they leave: Thome, Manny, (Please, God, not CC this year).
Actually, unlike most people, whose collections from 87-93 aren’t worth a penny total, if you have boxes and boxes of vintage 50’s Topps you’re sitting on some cards that truly do still have value. You’d be surprised what commons from 50’s Topps sets sell for. Even in poor condition, there is demand for them.
If you have boxes and boxes of late 80’s Topps, that’s another story.
I’ll have to pick up a Beckett price guide. But maybe not. Considering the way the economy is tanking I might slit my wrists if I find that my Topps were worth big money…last year.
Just check ebay. Beckett is outdated.
Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.
eBay. Bob Kuzava, near mint $55.
Bob Kuzava.
Be still my heart.
by LeftyCatcher on Mar 4, 2009 12:18 AM EST up reply actions
Well, like every other Topps set since the early ‘90s, it’s generic, white, crisp, glitzy, hard to read and, ultimately, forgettable.
Um, no. All respect to the author, but this shows that he hasn’t been paying attention all these years. 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, and 2009 featured white designs. That’s hardly every year since the early 90’s. In fact, I’d argue that these cards aren’t white. They have white borders. Take a look at this 2004 card below for an example of a truly white card. This one, I think, is elegant.
This is my favorite modern card design. Sure, it’s white, but it’s also beautiful. Look at all the detail on that card – Team, name, position, uniform number, team logo, and that cool outline of the player in the same pose as on the card – all while looking clean and uncluttered
I will admit that many designs suck (2007 Topps comes to mind). But there are plenty of good designs.
You also don’t want to focus just on Topps – Upper Deck has been producing the best sets for the past four or five years. Their photography is unmatched.
I am a baseball card nut and current collector, so take this all with a grain of salt. I love me some baseball cards.
God, those 2007’s are gross. I remember being a kid and being into all the obnoxious sets. Remember the “Metal” series that was made by Fleer? Atrocious, but I loved them.

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck
I’m working through it. It sort of hit me, when I was working on the “Top 25 Seasons of the Last 25 Years” list with Ryan for the Annual, that in Nagy’s best years, I hardly ever got to watch an Indians game, and then suddenly I was able to get “the package” and started watching almost every game … and Nagy was terrible pretty much from that moment on. So while my frustration with him was probably totally valid, I probably had an underdeveloped appreciation of him from ‘92, ’94 and ’96, while I also felt that he was just sort of going along for the ride in ’95. Anyway … I’m working on it.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
Me too! I have them all upstairs, my mom finally got sick of them kicking around her attic. I should really look through them some day & remember all those dudes that Topps bothered to note as “ALL-STAR ROOKIE” who were out of the league in two years. Also, Cory Snyder was totally my idol as a kid.
DISCLAIMER: I may be bitter.
Wow, the memories. Those wood cards were the first I remember collecting as a kid. Was it Donruss that had the “Rated Rookies” cards?
I also collected Nolan Ryan cards (not sure why, really). I had a whole set of “Ryan Express” cards featuring just him. I don’t even remember who made those cards, but they had pictures of him throughout his career with interesting facts on the back.
by Buckeye Brad on Mar 3, 2009 11:28 PM EST up reply actions
Is Cory playing catch with a 5-year-old boy in that shot?
by JulioBernazard on Mar 4, 2009 8:37 AM EST up reply actions
I loved that show, but I just can’t buy him as the Lady’s man on “How I Met Your Mother.”
by tabler84 on Mar 4, 2009 5:27 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
rec, because I thought the exact same thing
by JulioBernazard on Mar 4, 2009 8:36 AM EST up reply actions
My abiding baseball-card memory of my childhood is, of all things, the “cards” you could get on the bottom of a Hostess Twinkies box. Maybe it was the abiding smell of partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, or the way the edges were only as straight as my seven-year-old scissoring skills would allow, or the very real risk of paper cuts, but I loved those things, and still have at least 50 of them.



















