Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Please, Someone Make Bob Sapp Stop Already

Sheffield released by Tigers

Sheffield released by Tigers

Another Cleveland.com-wanted move that Shapiro thankfully didn't make...

 

DETROIT -- The Detroit Tigers have released nine-time All-Star Gary Sheffield, who is one home run away from 500 for his career.

Detroit parted ways with the designated hitter Tuesday after a disappointing stay with the Tigers. The team was hopeful the 40-year-old Sheffield would be a powerful presence at the plate in the final season of the $28 million, two-year contract extension it gave him after acquiring him from the New York Yankees for prospects.

But he failed to deliver in large part because he often was injured.

The move comes a day after the Tigers acquired outfielder Josh Anderson from Atlanta, forcing the team to make some tough decisions about its roster a week ahead of opening the season in Toronto.

Sheffield hit .178 in 18 games this spring.

 

 

 

Comment 75 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Whoa. I didn’t realize this was on the table.

Also, um, I think you have some html issues.

by afh4 on Mar 31, 2009 10:25 AM EDT reply actions  

You’d think, since they have to pay him 14 million dollars, it’d almost be worth it to just keep him until the 500th homer celebration. You could probably make some money in promotions for that.

by afh4 on Mar 31, 2009 10:25 AM EDT reply actions  

no pudge, no shef. this team is getting slightly tougher to hate. slightly.

by Brick. on Mar 31, 2009 10:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Question on the verbiage of transactions.

Over on espn.com, they show that the Tigers optioned the contract of Clete Thomas to their AAA team. How is this different than if it just read “the Tigers optioned Clete Thomas to AAA Toledo”?

by lenred on Mar 31, 2009 10:42 AM EDT reply actions  

There’s no difference.

by Ryan on Mar 31, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

There are no players. Only contracts.

by dgcambridge on Mar 31, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

yeah, that’s already been mentioned. the question was why the difference in verbiage.

for the record, this was probably a better place to mention there are only contracts. again.

by lenred on Mar 31, 2009 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, i get it. My statement is an oft-used answer to a different set of questions around here, but, see, it could apply here to your question. That makes it a joke. Relax.

by dgcambridge on Mar 31, 2009 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

green

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 31, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Could be the subject of a sequel to Mr. 3000. You know, the one with the “tragic” ending, Mr. 499.

"It's hard to win when you don't score." Cliff Lee, 9/28/05.

by Harry Doyle on Mar 31, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

That trade between the Tigers and Yankees has turned into nada for both sides.

Sheffield ended up OPS+ about 105 for the 2 seasons at $24M, with another $14M for this year.

The Yankees have yet to get anything from the three guys in the deal. Humberto Sanchez got hurt that first spring training and has appeared in a total of 14 games for the organization. Anthony Claggett is a 23 year old reliever in AA, (last year) with an ok K rate, but a poor BB/K rate. And Kevin Whelan is a 24 year old reliever in AA (last year) with poor control.

by talonk on Mar 31, 2009 10:48 AM EDT reply actions  

i can never find this.

/bookmark

by Brick. on Mar 31, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is going to make me sound like a nerd, but I got sick of looking for it and just went to YouTube and did a screengrab.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 31, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

if it makes you feel better, i will also get use out of your effort.

by Brick. on Mar 31, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

So who’s going to pick up Sheffield for the minimum after he clears waivers?

DISCLAIMER: I may be bitter.

by zempf on Mar 31, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions  

SF?

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 31, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

he can’t DH in SF.

by talonk on Mar 31, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

He doesn’t want to DH. He could platoon at 1b for a lot of teams.

by dgcambridge on Mar 31, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oakland, Seattle, Toronto, or Baltimore.

by Chiefroy on Mar 31, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oakland – between Giambi, Barton, Cust … I don’t see many free at bats.

Seattle – as a RH complement to Griffey, perhaps …

Toronto – only carrying four OF, with Lind as DH, I could see this one.

Baltimore – I thin kthey have options problems on some fo their backups, but he may not be better than Luke Scott right now, so less probable here too.

I think the Blue Jays are the best fit of what you’ve suggested.

by talonk on Mar 31, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

But can he play the OF? There’s no reason to be shy about running him out there if he’s being paid something near the league minimum to do it.

by jhon on Mar 31, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought his shoulder was shredded to the point that he’s pretty much a DH or nothing at this point.

DISCLAIMER: I may be bitter.

by zempf on Mar 31, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rec

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Mar 31, 2009 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was wondering if anyone was going to get that.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 31, 2009 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ron Washington, of course.

Oh, wait, no?

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Mar 31, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have to imagine most people did. I saw a list today of four (4) OF/1B they are shopping.

by afh4 on Mar 31, 2009 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

This a blog about baseball, correct?

by rockemsockem on Apr 2, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t the Indians need a designated hitter?

by odradek on Mar 31, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

He says Tampa (his hometown) will have right of first refusal.

by odradek on Apr 1, 2009 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

WOW. My first question: They couldn’t find someone willing to take Sheffield and $10 M for a minor leaguer. Really? How about $12 M?

by dgcambridge on Mar 31, 2009 12:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Thinking it over, I’d rather bet against Marcus Thames developing on-base ability than bet against Sheffield’s power returning. If that makes sense. Thames, by the way, is 32.

by dgcambridge on Mar 31, 2009 12:31 PM EDT reply actions  

I find Sheffield hilarious. His comment on his “Beyond the Glory” segment that he didn’t do drugs because his drug of choice was “women” was comic gold. Also, who can forget his statement that steroids is something “you put in your butt.”

by piersall on Mar 31, 2009 1:00 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

After 2006, I thought we’d be battling the Tigers for years to come for the division title. It shows you how fast things can go south,

Ben Francisco's only fan on LGT

by Toxicadam on Mar 31, 2009 2:30 PM EDT reply actions  

All the stat-based projections still have them as our best competitor. Just saw the DiamondMInd sims, we win the division 55% of the time, and they win it 25% of the time. Of course, last year the sims had us at 50% and them at 45%.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 31, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bad move. How are they gonna score 1000 runs without Shef?

by still ill on Mar 31, 2009 3:04 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

http://www.instantrimshot.com/

"It's hard to win when you don't score." Cliff Lee, 9/28/05.

by Harry Doyle on Mar 31, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

What can I say, I’m a traditionalist.

"It's hard to win when you don't score." Cliff Lee, 9/28/05.

by Harry Doyle on Mar 31, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Meaning, you like your old-school stats like Runs Created and VORP, can’t really hang with all these new stats like “FIP” and “Value Wins” that are killing our ability to enjoy the game.

Right?

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 31, 2009 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Absolutely, whatever you say, Jay.

BTW, what’s VORP?

"It's hard to win when you don't score." Cliff Lee, 9/28/05.

by Harry Doyle on Mar 31, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, and the first 3 hits in a Google search for “FIP” are for “Feline infectious peritonitis”

"It's hard to win when you don't score." Cliff Lee, 9/28/05.

by Harry Doyle on Mar 31, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whether or not a sleepy kitten has FIP is a strong predictor of his pitching success…

by Logodaedalus on Mar 31, 2009 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Outside of Jay and a few others, I can’t say that it has really caught on here on the level of other rate stats (such as those measuring walks and strikeouts). I’m still not confident in using it, since for me FIP values lack context. Can you, Andrew, give me an example of why you love it and what it has shown you?

by jhon on Apr 1, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because it measures the three things that a pitcher has, more or less, full control over.

So 2009.

by Gradyforpresident on Apr 2, 2009 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not after the rote depiction of it. Not what it is—I can find that easily on the internet—but why it works, and how well.

by jhon on Apr 2, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t answer that question.

So 2009.

by Gradyforpresident on Apr 2, 2009 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

FIP is scaled to ERA, so that’s the context.

I believe that FIP underrates extreme groundball pitchers significantly, but it’s useful as a quick way to assess luck-neutral ERA.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Apr 2, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Better than PRC? I really like the RC ease of use, though I can’t speak intelligently about its vigor.

by fleerdon on Apr 2, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

One’s rate, the other is a counting stat. It’s not either/or.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Apr 2, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rephrase: Better than [P]RC/G?

by fleerdon on Apr 2, 2009 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Per start, maybe.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Apr 2, 2009 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

In what way does it underrate extreme ground ball pitchers?

Are you saying that happens when the FIP is used as a comparison to ERA because they may up hits (that don’t always turn into runs that go into ERA) instead of K’s which lower FIP?

If that’s the problem, I can see that the ratio of ERA:FIP of a ground ball pitcher may be different than a strikeout pitcher, but as a way to compare pitchers based on FIP alone, it seems like a good tool.

"It's hard to win when you don't score." Cliff Lee, 9/28/05.

by Harry Doyle on Apr 3, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

My limited understanding of FIP is that it only calcuates hr given up, strikeouts, walks, and hbp. Extreme groundball pitchers virtues show up in the hr allowed, but not in any other way.

FIP assumes that all balls in play are equal, but we know that is not true. Groundballs, while more likely to turn into hits, are less likely to become extra-base hits and there is also the double-play factor.

by ClarkM on Apr 3, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s basically it. FIP is fielding independent, of course, but for the top groundball pitchers, there really is no point to seeing what their FIP is.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Apr 3, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m kinda disappointed that we may not see Fausto v. Sheffield 2.0 anytime soon.

by woodsmeister on Mar 31, 2009 4:47 PM EDT reply actions  

we don’t need fautso amped up. we want him zen.

by Brick. on Mar 31, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Neyer takes Dombrowski to task for the eating this contract (which he gave to Sheffield) and all the millions owed to Willis, Odonez, Guillen, Robertson, etc.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 31, 2009 7:41 PM EDT reply actions  

It’s a layup.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 31, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

To me the Willis contract was the most puzzling of all.

by supermarioelia on Mar 31, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, it seemed to be intended to rationalize the trade. A bit like the Lawton deal, but much, much dumber.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Mar 31, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: the Lawton trade, it almost doesn’t seem like the same GM, huh?

by NickFantana on Apr 1, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Man, talk about a trade that didn’t really work out for anyone involved. I’d almost put that out of my mind. I think Alex Escobar was still bouncing around in the minors last year.

DISCLAIMER: I may be bitter.

by zempf on Apr 1, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

DH in AAA Columbus (Yankees).

Ben Francisco's only fan on LGT

by Toxicadam on Apr 1, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Last year Escobar was in Columbus, but they were the Nationals AAA franchise.

by woodsmeister on Apr 1, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh ok. Thanks.

Ben Francisco's only fan on LGT

by Toxicadam on Apr 1, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Watching late night infomercials here….someone should tell Dr. Ho that Sheff was just released.

by supermarioelia on Apr 1, 2009 2:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Hello, Mets — it seems.

Travis Hafner is overrated. Clarity is underrated. David Dellucci is David Dellucci.

by westbrook on Apr 3, 2009 3:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01731_small
Some quick questions for the locals
Etat_small
Eric's 2012 Cleveland Indians Projections...
Its_alive-fstn_small
Oswalt > Carmona/Heredia
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #24
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian — "Country Peach Passion"
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "Fridge Magnet"
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #23
Small
Seriously Go Get Carlos Peña Now
Avatard_small
Indians by the Numbers — #22
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian: "Fridge Magnet"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Indians depth chart heading into spring training (from Acta's twitter account)
Cleveland reliever Vinnie Pestano had the highest fastball swinging-strike...
Oakland Out-Winnercurses MLB for Cespedes
Indians Sign Jon Garland
A look back at the last Tribe arbitration hearing
MLB.COM Tribe Top 20
Jared Goedert is Puddin Head Jones
Chisenhall v.  Hannahan
After watching Lindor in the Fall Instructional League, I have very little...
Coming off of an optimistic 80-82 season, is this the Indians window to win?  

See full post on Beyond the Box Score

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4