Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Terry Collins, David Wright, And The Mets/Brewers Kerfuffle

Our Place In The Sun

If the season were to end right now, at this very moment, today, the 2009 Cleveland Indians would be the worst pitching team you've ever seen, in spades. Their team ERA is a spectacular 8.82. Opponents are OPSing .982 when facing Indians' pitchers. The pitching staff has walked too many batters (25), not struck enough batters out (41), hit too many batters (3), allowed too many homeruns (10), and won too few games (1). In short, if the last 156 games of the season were canceled tomorrow it would be no contest: worst pitching staff ever, easily.

Obviously, that's a lofty title and one that this staff is not going to just luck into. They would have to keep the pedal far, far from the floor for the for the next 156 games if they're going to be the worst ever. Everybody would have to give far less than their full effort; some individuals would fail spectacularly but others would need to put in a workmanlike failing effort. It's harder than it looks to just show up and fail at the little things, day in and day out.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves-being the worst pitching staff ever is probably not a realistic fail potential. Can this team even approach being the lousiest pitching staff in Cleveland Indians' history?

Star-divide

8082_medium

With apologies to the 1985 Tribe and their franchise low ERA+ of 84, I submit to you the 1987 Cleveland Indians.

Those '87 hurlers' stats were so vulgar that no other team could compare. The highest full season team ERA in franchise history (5.28); the most homeruns allowed (210); 9.67 hits per game; worst or second worst in the AL in runs, earned runs, walks, strikeouts, homeruns, WHIP, double plays turned, and saves. There was nothing this team couldn't do poorly. 

But how did they do it? What allowed this monstrosity to come to life? Who animated this angry god of failure?

For starters, Darrel Akerfelds. Looks like Darrel was all cock and circumstance on the day Topps came to take his photo but I imagine his collar got de-popped pretty quickly once the realities of 1987 rolled around. The Indians gave up 835 earned runs that year and Darrel gave up 56 of them, good for 8th on the team.

Right now, you're probably thinking "8th on the team? Akerfelds and Akerfelds and pray for more Akerfelds!" However, Darrel surrendered those runs in just 74.2 innings pitched-a 6.75 ERA. There was a run in August when Akerfelds gave up  24 earned runs in 15.2 IP over 4 consecutive starts. All this helped to make Darrel the worst qualified rate-stat pitcher on the worst Indians' pitching staff of all time. At least he got that sweet pullover out of it.

0af5_1_medium

If the current Indians are going to match 1987, they're going to need a young pitcher to explode like Akerfelds and yet still get innings somehow. This isn't a hard one; Sowers' 2006 was a near carbon copy of Akerfelds' 1987.

It's easy to scapegoat Darrel Akerfelds but ultimately it doesn't make any sense; sure, DA the elder gave up 7% of the team's earned runs but he also pitched only 5% of the team's innings. Besides, how's a young pitcher supposed to develop when he's got a 32 year old who's second on the team in IP yet second worst on the team in ERA as a role model?

Ken Schrom. In his first start of 1987, he went 3 innings and gave up 6 runs. In his second, he went 1 inning and gave up 5 runs. With these audition performances done, Schrom settled down and made 29 starts. This is how you compile the worst Indians' pitching staff of all time-you show up every day and do your job, badly.

Schrom failed to make it to the fifth inning in 15 of these 29 starts. He gave up 5 runs or more 9 times. And, somehow, he threw three complete game wins.

Basically, if the 2009 Indians want to find a Ken Schrom in their midst, they're going to have to give Carl Pavano 29 starts (and three relief appearances) and he's going to have to self-immolate every other start.

 

Who kept trotting Schrom out? Pat Corrales, for the first half of the year, Doc Edwards for the remainder.

Pat_20corralles_medium

Doc_edwards_autograph_medium

Based on this photo, I'd hire Pat Corrales to manage the Indians or be my grandfather, right now. He looks awesome. Once Corrales was relieved of his managerial duties, Doc Edwards took over. I know it seems impossible but I'm pretty sure that's the same pullover that Akerfelds was wearing. Man makes the clothes, not the other way around.

There were, of course, some bright spots for the 1987 Tribe. Two hall of famers appeared in 45 games for the Tribe. Those hall of famers were 42 year old Steve Carlton and 48 year old Phil Niekro, who were 8th and 9th respectively on the staff in ERA (5.37 and 5.89). Carlton only recorded a Game Score below 10 five times in his career. Three of those were in 1987, inlcuding his all time low of 3.

The 2009 Indians have no one on hand to do what Carlton and Niekro did. Essentially, the Indians need to sign Pedro Martinez and get Phil Niekro to come out of retirement.

The rest of the Indians starters turned in decent performances: Tom Candiotti, Scott Bailes, Greg Swindell, and John Farrell took most of the rest of the starts and turned in ERA+'s approaching 100.

Let's turn to the bullpen. To give you an idea of how insane this bullpen was, consider that only two pitchers who appeared for the 1987 Indians didn't at some point appear out of the bullpen. Everyone but Candiotti and Niekro worked a portion of an inning in relief. I can't possibly do this group justice:

Pitcher IP ERA
Jeff Kaiser 3.1 16.20
Tom Waddell 5.2 14.29
Ernie Camacho 13.2 9.22
Mike Armstrong 18.2 8.68
Reggie Ritter 26.2 6.08
Sammy Stewart 27.0 5.67
Rich Yett 97.2 5.25
Ed Vande Berg 72.1 5.10
Mark Huismann 35.1 5.09
Frank Wills 5.1 5.06
Jamie Easterly 31.2 4.55
Don Gordon 39.2 4.08
Doug Jones 91.1 3.15

 

Doug Jones had 144 ERA+ in 1987 and would save an average of 28 games per season over the next 8 seasons. The worst Indians' pitching staff of all time had a shut down closer at the back.

There's really no comparison to the 2009 bullpen here; essentially, every reliever except for Kerry Wood would have to implode, plus 3/5 of the rotation would have to appear in relief and pitch terribly, plus a half dozen relievers from the minors would have to appear and be worthless.

The 1987 Cleveland Indians used 21 pitchers. Of these:

  • 7 have an ERA+ over 100 for their career (7 were league average or better pitchers for their careers)
  • 12 pitched less than 50 more innings in the majors
  • 7 never pitched in the majors again

The 2009 Cleveland Indians staff so far has featured two pitchers (out of 12) with a career ERA+ under 100: Pavano and Zack Jackson.

Don't worry: the 2009 Indians are not the 1987 Indians. Not even close. Right, guys?

Camacho-ernie_1_medium

19995_medium

Easterly_medium

Stewart-sammy_medium

 

Comment 45 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This was all just an elaborate attempt to use the Sammy Stewart card, wasn’t it?

I had that Doc Edwards card.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Apr 13, 2009 7:48 AM EDT reply actions  

That IS a great card, though.

I had the Rich Yett card.

by painaxl on Apr 13, 2009 8:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

7 never pitched in the majors again

That seems impressive, although I wonder if the 2000 squad can match it.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Apr 13, 2009 8:56 AM EDT reply actions  

I think it’s probably most notable that a third (7/21) of the pitchers never appeared again.

2000 is it’s own kind of modern mess. I guess back in the 80s you mostly just decided your team sucked and waited for the end of the season. The 2000 squad kept trying different things, eventually featuring a staggering 32 pitchers. 32. That’s 7 more pitchers than players you can carry most of the year. That is, in fact, the franchise record for pitchers used in a season with ’02, ’03, ’04 and ’08 cascading down at 31, 30, 29 and 28,

Of these, by my count, Brewington, Kamieniecki, Williams, Navarro, Cairncross, Martinez, and Newman never appeared in the majors again.

So, that’s 6 out of 32. Bad but not ’87 bad.

That 2000 pitching staff is so strange; were it not for Burba, Finley, and Colon consuming a full 40% of the team’s innings at elevated ERA+’s (118, 110, 127), they almost certainly would’ve been the worst pitching staff ever.

In fact, the Indians top 6 that year-those three starters plus the three best relievers (Karsay, Speier and Shuey) were responsible for 53% of the innings and pitched to great effect. Karsay, Speier and Shuey posted 131, 149, and 145 as ERA+’s.

But nearly everyone else who appeared, with the exception of Steve Reed, Jaret Wright, Tom Martin, and Bob Wickman, was horrendous.

It’s bizarre-they actually had 10 pretty good to great pitchers by my count and yet still found themselves in need of 22 other warm bodies.

by afh4 on Apr 13, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Looks like 7 actually. So 7/32-same gross total, lower %.

by afh4 on Apr 13, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I had blocked from my memory that Willie Martinez had ever made the majors, or that Navarro had ever pitched for the Indians.

This was the first summer I could drive, had a job, and received serious interest from the fairer sex. I watched very few full games—the timing simply could not have been better.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Apr 13, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

We had such high hopes for Kamieniecki. Even took the time to learn to spell his name.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Apr 13, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

The 1899 Cleveland Spiders. A team so bad, the franchise never played again. The team’s best pitcher, Jim Hughey, finished 4-30 with an ERA+ of 68. They were outscored by 10 runs or more 24 times. They lost games 21-6, 20-2 and 19-3 (the last one so fun, they did it twice). Think 1-5 is bad? That team started 1-7, topping the start by closing the year on a 1-40 slide, and finished 35 games out. That’s 35 games out of 11th place.

On the upside, they did have a pitcher named Highball.

by FredOx on Apr 13, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Why did you let those guys sign those cards? They’ve ruined the resale value!

Il faut d'abord durer.

by CU Adam on Apr 13, 2009 9:43 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I have at least 26 of those Rich Yett cards

I'm *always* in the driver's seat, cugino -- Chuck

by Turkmenbashi on Apr 13, 2009 9:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Me, too. Everyone and their Aunt was collecting that year.

by scripteye on Apr 13, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

When did you guys stop caring about baseball cards?

I was probably 13.

by mjschaefer on Apr 13, 2009 10:09 AM EDT reply actions  

I never really got into it. I bought them sometimes, but I hardly ever got a card of someone I cared about and quickly tired of it. I don’t think I’m young enough that I missed the popularity. I suspect it’s just that the only person I had to trade cards with was my big brother, who was a darned liar.

by AngG on Apr 13, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Toys R US was having a buy one, get one 50% off sale the other day, so I got my 9 year old two boxes of Topps for Easter. That’s 110 cards. There was a total of one Indian in the stack.

Andy Marte.

by FredOx on Apr 13, 2009 10:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Well she at least got good players then.

by mjschaefer on Apr 13, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

I fell in love with the Tribe in ’86, and somehow that never faded, even given the ’87 season. How did SI look at our pitching corps and think there would be an “uprising”?

I think the ’09 club needs more single moustaches. Can we get a third column on the bullpen table, showing whether or not the guy had a sweet ’stache?

by JulioBernazard on Apr 13, 2009 10:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Never underestimate the power of a crafty knuckleballer over the media.

by FredOx on Apr 13, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

they just wanted to use the phrase ‘Indian uprising’.

Ben Francisco: An Outfielder only on baseball cards and roster sheets.

by westbrook on Apr 13, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t remember if it was ’85 or ’87 that I saw 76 home games. Was a member of the Rick Manning fan club—then Ricks Rejects after the Milwaukee trade. We sat out in Section 42-43—the last sections in left field. The tribe bullpen was in left field. Was some epic hecking going on. Back then, with not many fans in the stadium, some heckling boomed around the stadium.

Probably saw 300+ games during the 80’s. Great weekend games in the bleachers. Couldn’t forget Art Model replanting the outfield grass during baseball season.

Kevin in Arizona

by tamariskisme on Apr 13, 2009 11:12 AM EDT reply actions  

I’ve never wanted a baseball card, but now I want a Sammy Stewart.

by Julie on Apr 13, 2009 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

That card is exactly what I’ve always imagined an ironic “rec” looked like.

by AngG on Apr 13, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Now I will too. It’s AWEsome. I just made it my wallpaper at work.

by Julie on Apr 13, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

rec for all the baseball cards. i unfortunately own all of them.

by Voltaire on Apr 13, 2009 11:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Just going by my gut but I assume that Jamie Easterly has some value.

by afh4 on Apr 13, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love Easterly’s photo – like he has no desire to be there. Hey Jamie, HR says that we need to take a photo of every employee for our records, it’ll just take a second.

by dgcambridge on Apr 13, 2009 12:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Easterly appears to be wearing prescription safety goggles. I think Camacho might be wearing lady glasses.

by afh4 on Apr 13, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

The Ernie Camacho is my new favorite card of all time. That’s INCREDIBLE. That dude was a professional athlete. He got paid to (ostensibly) play a sport. Look at him. I’m in awe, and feel like a total loser sitting at my desk as a lawyer, wondering how I couldn’t have made of my life what Ernie made of his.

Il faut d'abord durer.

by CU Adam on Apr 13, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

legit lol – in class.

Ben Francisco: An Outfielder only on baseball cards and roster sheets.

by westbrook on Apr 13, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ernie Camacho bears an eerie resemblance to Ron Johnson

Also, who’s taking credit for sponsoring Camacho’s B-Ref page today?

by supermarioelia on Apr 13, 2009 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who does LGT explicitly sponsor? I went through the ’09 guys and came up with Grady, SLewis, and Zachson. For older players, I only checked Sammy Stewart.

The Fantasy Baseball Sherpa is killing us, though. He either loves the Indians or doled out thousands of dollars in B-Ref sponsorship.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Apr 13, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

George Uhle, Grady Sizemore, Josh Barfield, Stan Coveleski, Rich Rundles, Luis Valbuena, Scott Lewis. That’s what it says on the Google.

Vinnie Chulk is still available. Carl Pavano is not.

by FredOx on Apr 14, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jamie Easterly looks like he could be:

1. DMV employee
2. The guy that delivers the vending machine food
3. Bus Driver
4. That weird guy in your neighborhood that never talks to anyone, never smiles, and drives an el camino .

by RD74 on Apr 13, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Growing up in Toledo (a tween market), I never really had a team growing up. I gravitated toward Pete Rose and George Brett and would try to watch them every chance I got. The Tigers had such interesting teams in the 80’s (and one of the best radio announcers ever) it was hard not to listen/watch them more often or not. But I was never a fan (never owned any Tiger gear).

We did get channel 43 in Toledo (back when there were 5-6 channels on the tv). So you would catch an occasional Tribe game. The field was so cavernous and unfriendly and all the players had the anonomity of some AAA player (which they most likely were). The atmosphere didn’t really endear itself to the active expectations of a 10 year old. You rarely ever saw the Indians featured on TWIB (the Sportscenter of my generation).

Sorry for the tangent. I just see these threads about the 80’s Indians and feel a twinge of sadness for the fans (many of which are my fellow fans today) of that lost decade (and I realize there were a few more before that, too).

Ben Francisco's only fan on LGT

by Toxicadam on Apr 13, 2009 12:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Wow, what a great article! Let’s see… I was 30, getting married, and it was our year! We’d finished ‘86 on an up tick, Greg Swindell was going to be the next stud pitcher (and he was on our team!). I lived in northern CA so team info was extremely rare. I lived through the 70’s and 80’s always hoping for a 7 or 8 game winning streak. I remember how quickly the season slipped away. No offense, no matter how potent, could overcome getting creamed every night.

by larzko on Apr 13, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I gave an autographed Rick Yett card as a Christmas gift. I went over very well.

by KevinV on Apr 13, 2009 12:18 PM EDT reply actions  

This is really really hilarious — I’ll have to finish reading it in class though.

Ben Francisco: An Outfielder only on baseball cards and roster sheets.

by westbrook on Apr 13, 2009 1:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Someone needs Sammy Stewart as their avatar. NOW.

by Voltaire on Apr 13, 2009 1:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Damn, why didn’t I THINK of that?

by Julie on Apr 13, 2009 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #36
Topps1978-332f_small
Historical Timeline
427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small
Pick 6 Discussion
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #35
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #34
Small
Indians 2012 Player At Bat Music
Etat_small
Tribe Observations - 15 games In
Draft_lens6670022module54040272photo_1251768414louissockalexisicon4b_small
LGT, in the belly of the beast.
Tribe_cap_small
LGT Safeco Field Meet Up?
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #33

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Garko gets another shot
Broadcaster Rankings (Radio): 30-21
Indians at Fenway don't drink beer; they watch TV.
Michael Brantley: A Studious 4-for-5 Night
Damon Makes His Case for HOF
Casey Blake to Retire
To longtoss, or not to longtoss
Grady to resume baseball activities
Indians Podcast
Beltre's three-run homer in the 11th inning Saturday was the first allowed...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4