Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How A Letter From Tom Coughlin Helped One Fan's Recovery

Keeping Victor Martinez?

Should the Indians resign Victor Martinez, and if so, when?

Currently he is signed through this season, with a club option ($7m) for 2010.

Last year, when Martinez was injured, Shoppach was hitting, and the Indians had just snagged Carlos Santana, I figured that the Tribe planned to let Victor play out his contract and move on.  Martinez would be in his early 30s, prone to injury and natural breakdown as a catcher, and the Indians would have Shoppach and Santana (and Wyatt Toregas and Chris Gimenez for depth).

Sure, Victor could play 1B, but the Indians had potential star 1B players (LaPorta and Mills, for starters) in the minors who could play inexpensively.  And would Victor's offense, so impressive at Catcher, be as impressive at 1B?

This year, with Martinez hitting .400 with power in the heart of the order, his presence is clearly fundamental to this season's success and it has made me question my assumptions of last year.

Yes, there are also intangibles to consider, such as how he handles pitchers and his leadership, but don't fall in love with your assets, right?

So should the Tribe approach Martinez after this season, when they still have exclusive negotiating rights and can tear up his option year in order to sweeten the deal and get him to sign?

Or should they just exercise the option and see how 2010 goes?  Trade Martinez if the season goes bust (surely it won't), but get to the end of 2010 and take stock of where Shoppach, Santana, LaPorta, and Mills are in their development and then make a decision about whether to compete for Victor's services?

And how much would Victor Martinez, if healthy, command on the free agent market in dollars and years at that point?

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Where do we honestly think LaPorta will end up? LF? RF? 1B? DH?

If we can determine that, then I think we would have a better grasp on whether keeping Vic as primarily a 1B would be the right move. Vic may tend to age better playing first, so a new contract would be much more viable.

I would move Shoppach if possible.

Sometimes, I just like to b****.

by emd2k3 on May 15, 2009 12:21 PM EDT reply actions  

When he’s healthy, Martinez is one of the best hitters in baseball (as we’ve seen again this season). He’s also one of, if not THE, leader of this team. I would be really reluctant to let him walk, but if he asks for 5 years at huge dollars (which he might), that’s another story (see Travis Hafner). I certainly think they should try to keep him; he’s too good a player to write off.

by peter m on May 15, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think there is too much that can happen from now and then it is impossible to project. Wedge could be gone (and change Victor’s attitude toward the organization), prospects could have injuries or difficulties adjusting, an agent could be in his ear telling him to go to free agency no matter what (ala Sabathia).

Ideally, we go onto a dream season this year and win it all. Then we are in a position to dump Victor and Lee at mid-season of 2010 if things go poorly. What an awesome wealth of picks we could acquire from that.

Realistically, we are good enough to win a division, but probably not a WS title this year. We go into 2010 in a similar situation where we are never truely out of the race in this division and we keep both guys the entire year and lose them in FA.

Let’s not forget that their payroll is 90 million dollars (and likely to be slightly higher next year) in a deep, deep recession and could last longer in Ohio. I can’t forsee them adding significant costs for 2010, unless they are able to dump more salary (aside from Derosa, Dellucci and Masa),.

by Toxicadam on May 15, 2009 12:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Realistically, we are good enough to win a division, but probably not a WS title this year.

dead topic.

by Brick. on May 15, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah – if you are good enough to make the post-season, you are capable of getting lucky enough to win the WS

by APV on May 15, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

And in our specific case, if we win the division, it will probably be because we played .600 ball for 4.5 months, at which point we might even be a slim favorite to win it all.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on May 15, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

No more dead than Marte. Long live false optimism.

Case of the beet bandit. Missing beets from all over the farm, no footprints. Inside job. Mose in socks. Boom. Case closed. -Dwight Schrute

by mjschaefer on May 15, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Since the introduction of the wildcard, only 2 teams have won a World Series that had less than 90 wins (2000 Yanks, 2006 Cards).

Not very good odds.

by Toxicadam on May 15, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. I know anything can happen in the playoffs, but an 85-win team winning the WS just isn’t very likely.

by Buckeye Brad on May 15, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

see. this is why things get designated as dead topics. they get brought up, discussed, etc. then someone brings it up again, says “nuh-uh” and the same conversation ensues.

by Brick. on May 15, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gee, thanks for the defintion of a dead topic.

by Buckeye Brad on May 15, 2009 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

seems like you obviously needed it.

by Brick. on May 18, 2009 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Since the introduction of the wildcard, only 2 teams have won a World Series that had the best regular season record in baseball (1998 Yankees, 2007 Red Sox [tie]).

Not very good odds.

by SuddenSam on May 15, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

i think victor dictates this. my guess is he will fall under that ‘special player’ category when the team considers keeping him longer term and that he would be willing to stay at a hometeam discount. if he stays heathly – which if he only plays half-catcher, i think is likely – then i think they’ll work something reasonable out. when, i’m not sure.

by Brick. on May 15, 2009 12:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I think we talk to him this season, and see what he’s thinking. Is he willing to take a significant cut to stay with the team for a few more years? Do he really value (as in, value at millions of dollars) being an Indian his whole career? If not, then we part ways after 2010. I love love love the guy. He’s been a great Indian, but we should not pay what he’ll get on the market. No way.

by dgcambridge on May 15, 2009 1:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Replying to myself, as is the fashion these days.

Sometimes I think we need to rethink our expectations as fans with regard to player’s careers. After 2010, Victor will have spent part of 9 seasons with the major league Indians. 9 seasons busting his butt and entertaining us with line drives and crazy handshakes. Here it makes sense for both the club and the player to part ways (assuming no huge discount). The Ripken model of staying with one team for a whole career isn’t just the exception, it’s the extremely rare exception. There’s a balance struck by baseball’s free agent rules, and it’s a pretty good one. He’s going to leave, and it’s OK.

by dgcambridge on May 15, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

jay hinted at this in the gamethread yesterday. i love the sounds of victor as the starting 1B and then be like Fausto’s personal catcher. Shoppach is your starter till Santana is ready and you just phase him into the fold and victor out. a choo-sizemore-laporta outifield sounds good to me for a little while. when hafner’s shoulder gives out and/or brantley is ready to start you move him to DH. it’s too early to make any decisions based on mills or weglarz may do someday in my opinion.

by Brick. on May 15, 2009 1:34 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Does anyone know if Carlos Santana can play another position? I know they are grooming him as a catcher (and rightly so), because you can’t count on Martinez leaving for more money elsewhere, but at least that gives us some more options.

However, if Victor stays then Shoppach really seems to be the odd man out here, especially bc Garko can at least play 2 positions (1st base/outfield).

If Victor leaves then Shoppach becomes invaluable as a fall-back option. The Indians will no doubt give Santana the majority of the catcher at-bats in his first year called up.

The thing that sucks for Shoppach is that in either scenario – he is nothing more than a backup catcher on this team. Regardless, he is still our biggest trading chip – and we all know Shapiro loves to deal from a position of strength to fill a weakness.

I really feel bad for the guy bc I’m pretty sure he would be an upgrade over the starting catcher for at least 20 teams out there. Tough luck – a 20 HR campaign and the next year you’re on the bench. Such is life when you play behind V-MART (and he’s hitting .400).

by Proder1039 on May 16, 2009 11:31 AM EDT reply actions  

Santana split time between 3B and the outfield in his first two pro seasons, 06-07. He conceivably could be moved by to third base. I think they’d play him there occasionally if they didn’t want to focus completely on his continuing development as a catcher.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on May 16, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

And also if we didn’t have a sure-shot 3B prospect in AAA.

by fleerdon on May 18, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Prompted me to take a gander at the AAA lines. I see that Chulk is still with us (I’m not able to read everything anymore, and I haven’t seen this noted on site).

by jhon on May 18, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hello Jay,

I think it would depend on how quickly his defense catches up to his bat – the thinking was that his offense was progressing at such a pace that the Indians may not be able to keep him down in the Minors long enough to let him fully develop his defensive skills behind the plate. If that occurs, then it’s likely he’ll have to be finished defensively as a catcher at the ML level – if he would struggle for any length of time or if they’d want to give him a break here and there, I could see where he would play 3B for us.

If Santana would continue to struggle long-term defensively behind the plate at the ML level, I could see where Santana could become our 3B long-term. Even if this would occur, though, I’m still not sure I’d see Martinez staying behind the plate long-term if he did resign here – his bat would likely remain strong longer-term playing more or all of the time at 1B. Yes, Victor might not have 30+ HR power, but hitting between .300-.400 and being one of our most consistent hitters with a relatively low number of strikeouts (especially compared to guys like Sizemore and Peralta), that’s nothing to sneeze at, so I’m not worried about whether his offense would fit at 1B.

Additionally, if Sizemore is still in CF, and someone like Valbuena at 2B and/or Santana at C are hitting HRs, that will help to “make up” for the lack of power at 1B – in my mind, it’s not where on the field you get the HRs, just as long as you get some HRs as part of your overall offensive arsenal. Where it comes from on the field does not mean that much to me, and shouldn’t be that big of a factor when considering whether Victor is worth paying if he is going to play 1B full-time in the future – his overall skill as a hitter, not just his power numbers, should be taken into account when determining whether to offer him a long-term contract or not.

Just my 2 cents – no offense.

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on May 20, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "Fridge Magnet"
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #23
Small
Seriously Go Get Carlos Peña Now
Avatard_small
Indians by the Numbers — #22
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian: "Fridge Magnet"
Stinkees_small
Are you saying Jesus Christ can't hit a curve ball?
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "English Leather"
Etat_small
2012 Cleveland Indians Simulation Results
Dortmunder_l_small
Fan Survey Request from the Cleveland Indians
5_small
Cleveland Indian podcasts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?

  115 votes | Results

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Hello my friends! I hope you guys are ready for Super Bowl Weekend? Make...
Heyman reporting Indians will sign Kotchman
Perez, Indians reach deal
Nationals pick up Durbin
Jimenez is in fabulous shape after an offseason of working on his core and...
Q: Any idea how the Indians are viewing the $7 million allocated to...
Manny Corked Bats With Tribe?
Indians Final Winter Ball Stats
Wayne Garland Makes List of 10 Worst FA Deals
The 1908 Cubs and their hilarious mascot. Read who's in the photo and some other facts over at Big League Stew.

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4