Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 Budweiser Shootout Entry List Released

Joe Posnanski has an aticle at SI.com where he discusses with Bill James how pitch counts have changed baseball over the past few decades. They talk about Nolan Ryan's crusade to increase the workload of his starting pitchers in Texas.

Both of them wonder why 100 became such a magic number for pitchers. Of course, everyone in baseball wants to keep their pitchers healthy, but where is the proof that 100 pitches should be the limit for starters -- because it's such a nice number? Why not 110 or 120 or 130? And we know that Bill James loves any discussion that confronts conventional wisdom.

Rob Neyer also gives his two cents on their discussion.

over 2 years ago Jared_sullinger--300x450_tiny Buckeye Brad 39 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Very interesting, although it’s bizarre to hold up Ryan as someone challenging conventional wisdom. Isn’t he really just pining for an old form of conventional wisdom?

by afh4 on Jun 16, 2009 3:19 PM EDT reply actions  

I love when the freaks of nature like Ryan and Feller complain about how wimpy the new pitchers are for not being able to throw as much as they did. Like all pitchers should be held to the standard of two of the greatest pitchers to ever live

by Roger Dorn on Jun 16, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

the only reason we know that’s feller’s opinion is because some reporter paid him 15 dollars so he could print it one day.

by Brick. on Jun 16, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Autograph: $5
Questions: $15 per
Full Interview: $55

FE WEE

by westbrook on Jun 16, 2009 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

What if you just say hello to him? ;)

by TribeJay on Jun 16, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ryan is so not one of the greatest pitchers ever.

by joeee on Jun 16, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would include him. His fatal flaw was high walk totals, but he was pretty awesome

by Roger Dorn on Jun 16, 2009 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

His fatal flaw was allowing a lot of runs to score. 244th all-time in ERA. He did win two ERA titles in 25 years; Millwood could tie him this year. Never won a Cy Young and only came close once.

Anyone who has the Annual can check out the best two pitching seasons in Indians history, both by Feller. Ryan never had a year comparable either one of those. Back in 2000, BIll James ranked Feller #12 all-time, Ryan #24. They are not particularly close together.

Feller sneaks into the greatest-ever conversation because he was truly dominant in his own era. Ryan belongs in that conversation only if you think Pete Rose belongs in the greatest-hitter conversation. That is, he belongs in it only as long as it takes to acknowledge and politely dismiss his candidacy.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jun 17, 2009 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yea, I wasn’t saying top 5 or 10 all time. I do give Nolan bonus points for being the man

by Roger Dorn on Jun 17, 2009 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Ryan isn’t, then neither is Feller.

by jhon on Jun 16, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Feller was better than Ryan, but I’d rather include both in “greatest talks” than include neither.

by joeee on Jun 16, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s exactly right. As Neyer mentions, Joe wants facts and research but I don’t think Ryan has any of that. He just wants pitchers to be more like him, and that’s just not psysically possible for most people.

But this is a good discussion to have.

by Buckeye Brad on Jun 16, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah it was a good article, but that was my problem with it too. Did Ryan actually do any research?

FE WEE

by westbrook on Jun 16, 2009 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

i wasn’t there, but i will garraunteee the answer is, no.

by Brick. on Jun 16, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Recommended for spelling.

by NickFantana on Jun 16, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. His research is his life experience with his own career and watching other pitchers as well.

by TribeJay on Jun 16, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

more pitchers should do advil commericals too

As General Manager of this team, I demand to know when I'm getting a start.

by bigbrabbs on Jun 16, 2009 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

While I think this is a fair criticism, I don’t think Ryan necessarily believes pitchers can be that much like him, just maybe a little bit more like him. He’s intelligent enough to understand that he’s a unique specimen.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jun 16, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Clue: He didn’t give his kids names that start with K, did he?

by odradek on Jun 16, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lookin at Ryan’s B-Ref page, it looks like his numbers in late innings and late pitch counts aren’t noticeably worse than earlier in games. I have no idea whether this is common or not.

by supermarioelia on Jun 17, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

The magic number could be different for every type of pitcher or for each pitcher. And that magic number might be mostly 90 or 80, for all we know. The human body can take only so much repeated stress and pitchers are expected to throw with tremendous velocity these days from a lowered mound.
If Ryan had anything to offer resembling deductive reasoning or data, he should have produced it.

by elsandito on Jun 16, 2009 4:29 PM EDT reply actions  

And for a guy like Anthony Reyes, that number may be more like 55

As General Manager of this team, I demand to know when I'm getting a start.

by bigbrabbs on Jun 16, 2009 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

The question I have been thinking about is why is 100 pitches (or 80, 90, 120, 130) every 5 days optimal? Maybe 40 pitches every other day, or 60 pitches every third day would be better. I would love to see this studied. I suspect that physically and mentally, shorter and more frequent pitching would be better than what is universally practiced now.

by SteveCleve on Jun 16, 2009 7:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Or every 4 days and pitch until the games over. Get good and you don’t have to throw so much.

Shin-Soo Choo, future U.S. Citizen.

by USSChoo on Jun 17, 2009 5:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Doc Halladay plan.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jun 17, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah. But, he actually has been hurt at times.

by peter m on Jun 17, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to comment specifically on this article, but it was our boy Woolner who did a lot of the early research (after the pitch count had already become popular if I’m remembering correctly) suggesting the 100 pitches is the average number when a pitcher’s arm starts to get tired.

He also did extensive research about pitching on three, four, or five days’ rest. I’ve discussed this year more than I’d like to, but essentially pitchers can go on short rest their entire careers if they aren’t throwing more than 100 pitches every start.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Jun 17, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ugh.

“suggesting that 100 pitches…”

“I’ve discussed this here more than…”

Sorry. Will you ever forgive me, Brick?

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Jun 17, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wonder which is the better approach….trying to get 40 starts out of your top 4 pitchers but only averaging 6 innings per (240 innings each, 960 total), or 30 starts out of your top 5 averaging 7 innings per (210 innings each, 1050 total).

by APV on Jun 17, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Woolner says #1.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Jun 17, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

concentrating more innings in better pitchers being the reason, I suppose…but in the case I stated, more innings also go to the bullpen…who are presumably worse

by APV on Jun 17, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

and there’s the issue of when relievers are getting deployed, 3 innings at a time (case 1) or 2 innings at a time (case 2)

by APV on Jun 17, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

because of course, this is a problem similar to evaluating contracts based solely on WAR or VORP or other equivalent measures. Just as talent is inconveniently packed into discrete units known as players, innings over the season are inconveniently packaged into consecutive 9-inning blocks (usually), each of which comes with its own outcome

by APV on Jun 17, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

One more reply and I think you’ve written a Fanpost.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Jun 17, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

And that 5th-best pitcher would presumably soak up a lot of those extra bullpen innings, which he’d have been throwing more of on a 5-man rotation.

by jds16 on Jun 17, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tom Tango, referenced by Joe, also discusses this at his site

by APV on Jun 17, 2009 9:08 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01731_small
Some quick questions for the locals
Etat_small
Eric's 2012 Cleveland Indians Projections...
Its_alive-fstn_small
Oswalt > Carmona/Heredia
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #24
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian — "Country Peach Passion"
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "Fridge Magnet"
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #23
Small
Seriously Go Get Carlos Peña Now
Avatard_small
Indians by the Numbers — #22
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian: "Fridge Magnet"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Indians depth chart heading into spring training (from Acta's twitter account)
Cleveland reliever Vinnie Pestano had the highest fastball swinging-strike...
Oakland Out-Winnercurses MLB for Cespedes
Indians Sign Jon Garland
A look back at the last Tribe arbitration hearing
MLB.COM Tribe Top 20
Jared Goedert is Puddin Head Jones
Chisenhall v.  Hannahan
After watching Lindor in the Fall Instructional League, I have very little...
Coming off of an optimistic 80-82 season, is this the Indians window to win?  

See full post on Beyond the Box Score

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4