Let's Go Tribe!: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Headlines: BC Beats BU 4-3 in 58th Beanpot Championship

Carmona's box score at Akron today. Nice line, no walks in 7 innings. Perhaps his delivery was successfully rebuilt...we can dream right?

7 months ago Schrute_farms_beets_tiny stickpiano 84 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

It could also be that hitters at that level have never seen a ball that moves as much as his does and are a bit awed to be facing someone of his calibre. A two seamer that is running like that will be the end of the world for an AA batter who faced Ryan Edell (just for example) the previous night. Carmona will continue to get a lot of swings on pitches that a major leaguer will take as he progresses through the minors. It’s nice to see the numbers, but without the Pitch F/x it’s hard to really know.

I become an expert simply by doing something.

by fwembt on Jun 30, 2009 11:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. Enthusiasm should be tempered. But it’s better than a walk per inning.

by TribeJay on Jul 1, 2009 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As I said in the game thread, this might be good, it might be meaningless. It’s impossible to tell without having seen him pitch. On the one hand, he could be getting strikeouts instead of walks because the hitters aren’t familiar with him and are swinging at a lot of stuff out of the strikezone.

by Logodaedalus on Jun 25, 2009 8:43 PM PDT

I agree with this, of course…. but if it continues to happen, it’s a good thing.

by Logodaedalus on Jul 1, 2009 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is the same discussion we had during Carmona’s last start in Lake County. Like I said before, these are valid points, but valid points that can be made about any major league player demoted/rehabbing in the minor leagues. It seems kind of pointless to point this out every time Carmona pitches, especially when no one mentions this about other players.

by world dictator on Jul 1, 2009 1:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

AAA could be revealing in this respect—I’d like to see him run into a veteran lineup, especially with guys who have stood in against him before.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jul 1, 2009 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Rec for veiled “run into one” reference.

by gte619n on Jul 2, 2009 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously. People are going to pull a muscle trying so hard to avoid anything postive.

by dgcambridge on Jul 1, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, I’ve done extensive stretching.

Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.

by Turkmenbashi on Jul 1, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It should be noted that Dontrelle Willis didn’t exactly light up the stat line when he did his tour of duty through the minor leagues. So, while Willis is the bottom of the barrel when it comes to comparisons, it should give you hope that Carmona isn’t completely wrecked.

by Toxicadam on Jul 1, 2009 1:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You know, if Carmona does get fixed, a front five next year of Lee/Carmona/Westbrook/Huff/Laffey…

If you squint hard enough… is that… is that a strength??

No depth, granted, with or without SLew (I can’t live…) but that does look pretty. In fact, it looks a lot like 2007.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jul 1, 2009 8:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

well our depth would be Lofgren, Gomez, Rondon who would all be in the Colombus rotation. Plus whatever veteran we sign during the offseason.

I’ll say it now…that would be pretty decent depth. But i’ll also say, I’d like to sign another starter. And not a Jason Johnson starter, at decent veteran starter, ala Paul Byrd or what Pedro would’ve ideally been.

by world dictator on Jul 1, 2009 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

it all comes down to the bullpen

by Roger Dorn on Jul 1, 2009 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know…when you look at the 2010 rotation like that, it makes me a lot more willing to trade Lee, if overwhelmed. I also think any Lee deal needs to have a high quality STARTING pitcher prospect. If we traded Lee for a quality SP in AA then they could be in Columbus next year, or heaven help us, during the second half of the season, and in a position to possibly help us in 2010 at some point.

by world dictator on Jul 1, 2009 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d think I’d put the value on a Lee trade at somewhere between 50% and 75% of the Oakland-Arizona Haren trade. It’s half the time Haren was under contract, with a bump to reflect our mid-season leverage and the fact that Lee is a better pitcher.

That trade was for Carlos Gonzalez, Brett Anderson, Aaron Cunningham, Greg Smith, Dana Eveland, and Chris Carter. In this hypothetical trade, we’d have the advantage of getting guys who aren’t sucking right now.

So, just as a starting point, do we do Cliff for a Brett Anderson-ish-level talent and a Chris Carter-ish level talent?

by fleerdon on Jul 1, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or is that unfair? Is it a time-value thing — would it have to be for a winter 2007-level Brett Anderson and Chris Carter?

by fleerdon on Jul 1, 2009 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am trying to remember how well regarded Anderson was; are we talking a top 15 pitching prospect or something?

I haven’t been following too closely but I’d have to think the Rays are a potential fit. I know they’re not desperate for starters but it wouldn’t exactly hurt and they’re in the hunt. Plus, they have more than enough talent in the minors (still) even with Niemann and Price producing in the majors.

I would start at Wade Davis and work our way down. Maybe Davis, Reid Brignac and Eduardo Morlan. That might be too much.

I’m not sure if Hellickson is considered a better prospect than Davis at this point, but I’d do Hellickson or Davis as a centerpiece. Brignac doesn’t seem to fit in TB long term and he could certainly do something in Cleveland even if just super utility for a couple of years. If JP finds the door, I think you could find ABs for Valbuena and Brignac and between them and Cabrera get a lot of offensive production.

Morlan is just a bullpen arm that it would be nice to have lying around.

Looking at BA, that’s the 3,4 and 8 best prospects in the system in Hellickson, Davis and Brignac. I know it’s a loaded system but Cliff, on that deal, is really worth two top 30 in baseball prospects, I think. Especially in a playoff hunt.

by afh4 on Jul 1, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Forgot to add re: Brignac, everyone seems to love Tim Beckham as the Rays’ future SS. Plus, Brignac is regarded as a good defensive infielder, at least by BA.

by afh4 on Jul 1, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the Rangers would make more sense considering their pitching prospects and their payroll issues. We could easily take on Blaylock’s contract/eat Lee’s 2009 salary in return for a Smoak, Neftali Feliz, or Holland

by world dictator on Jul 1, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They both make some sense. Neither makes total sense but they both make some.

by afh4 on Jul 1, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you haven’t already read TCF’s article on this today, it addresses this topic and specifically mentions Texas (courtesy of Fox’s Ken Rosenthal) as a potential trading partner (with Feliz and Holland being mentioned as possible prospect targets).

As Andrew mentioned, I think the Rays and Rangers would both make sense. I’m thinking Texas in particular for three main reasons:

1. They’re in first in the AL West, a place they haven’t been in a while, and have a legitimate shot of making the postseason, which would be their first since 1999. Adding a quality starting pitcher (and an AL starting pitcher at that) in Cliff Lee could potentially put them over the top in holding off the Angels and Mariners, plus increase their chances of competing deep into October.

2. They have one of the better, deeper farm systems around, so they probably would be more willing to part with some young pitching talent for an established high-quality starter, especially in a season where they could legitimately win the AL West.

3. Tom Hicks has a good amount of money and probably could afford to resign Lee long-term. Being that Lee lives in Arkansas in the offseason, which is right next door to Texas, I could see where Lee would resign with them.

Add them all together, and I think you certainly have a potential trading partner in Texas. As Cousineau mentions in the article, Lee’s value would be the highest this month – therefore, if Feliz, Holland, and maybe a lesser prospect were offered for Lee, would you pull the trigger? If it’s true that Lee is likely to leave after 2010, I think you have to strongly consider it for that package, especially if Feliz and Holland aren’t that far away and have that high a ceiling, even if we are a bit weakened for 2010 (depending on how strong Westbrook, Carmona, Laffey, Lewis, etc. come back).

Just my 2 cents.

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Jul 1, 2009 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, to the best of my memory Anderson was a big deal not too long ago. More so than Cahill.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Jul 1, 2009 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

what about a michael bowden/lars anderson based offer from the red sox?

if the red sox called and offered me bowden/anderson/tazawa for lee, i wouldn’t be able to agree fast enough.

other pitchers that would make a nice start to the offer: tim alderson, jake arrieta, mat latos, madison bumgarner, brian matusz or jarrod parker.

by stickpiano on Jul 1, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Bowden is kind of overrated. Not that he’s a bad prospect, he’s really good, but there’s definitely some big market inflation going on.

by world dictator on Jul 1, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also true of Lars.

by afh4 on Jul 1, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed on both counts (Bowden and Anderson).

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Jul 1, 2009 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chris Carter could help the Browns.

by gte619n on Jul 2, 2009 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hell, Chris Perez could help the Browns.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jul 2, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reyes is out of options, but still under our control, right?

by APV on Jul 1, 2009 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Could he get through waivers? I’m genuinely curious, although I’d imagine so after surgery and a long layoff.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jul 1, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No doubt he could, but what would be the point? If we don’t add him back to the 40-man in the fall, he’s a minor league free agent. If we have any interest in him at all, we have to keep him through the winter, sneak him through waivers in the spring if necessary. Having said that, we may not have any interest in him at all.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jul 1, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m thinking more of the 25-man roster in April.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jul 1, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We’re on the same page here. Add a middle rotation guy, which will cost us talent. And of course, the normal flyers during spring training. Although I wouldn’t put Lofgren in the same category with Rondon and Gomez. It pains me to say, he’s just replacement filler at this point.

by dgcambridge on Jul 1, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d agree except for the fact that that’s how I felt about 2009 this time last year.

In terms of depth, I like all those guys w.d. mentions. I just … it’s a lot of rookie mistakes to work through, you know? And of course, there’s the bullpen thing, as R.D. says.

Hmmph.

by fleerdon on Jul 1, 2009 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t feel that way about the rotation—at that point it looked like Lee (and he’d only been Clifton Phifer for three months)/Carmona/Laffey/Sowers/Rookie Huff. Reyes, SLewis, and Jackson weren’t even on the radar at that point.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jul 1, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But in an ideal world, IE a world where our payroll stays the same or ha ha increases, we could use the majority of our free payroll on a SP. Especially if we trade Lee

by world dictator on Jul 1, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just stop it. There are no strengths.

-Erik

by drerikbrady on Jul 1, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is no Dana, only Zoooooul.

I just wanted to believe.

by mjmarble on Jul 1, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unless there is strength in ennui. I don’t even care what he does to this baseball team anymore. I just wish it would happen sooner, like yesterday.

by fleerdon on Jul 1, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Time will tell if Fausto has figured anything out, but I’m heartened by this: 2 of his 5 strikeouts were called-strike-threes.

by FredOx on Jul 1, 2009 11:13 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It’s better than a bucket of warm spit (ie. Willis) so I’ll take it. Good news is better than bad news.

I just wanted to believe.

by mjmarble on Jul 1, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s a not-very-encouraging rundown from Lastoria’s site.

by NickFantana on Jul 2, 2009 10:15 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yuck.

Nice incidental praise of Santana’s receiving skills, if we are looking for optimism.

by bewwolv on Jul 2, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think I read that Fausto is scheduled to start for Columbus on Sunday. Perhaps that will result in praise for the Clippers’ infield defense? Let’s hope so.

by peter m on Jul 2, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That would be better than praise for the outfield defense, agreed.

by bewwolv on Jul 2, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was very sad. Depressing even.

But, hmmmm, brutally honest analysis of the problem + positive attitude + good history with some of our guys + smiles about Jhonny + team winning expected number of games + no talk of grinding =

Brad Kommisk For Next Tribe Manager!

by dgcambridge on Jul 2, 2009 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i’m confused. i thought we wanted him to stop trying to be a power pitcher.

by Brick. on Jul 2, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps he’s confused too?

by peter m on Jul 2, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m guessing that when the Tribe brass decided what to try to do with Fausto, their first call wasn’t to Brad Komminsk.

by FredOx on Jul 2, 2009 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He thinks that Carmona is a good 8 MPH slower on average with his pitches

…and that’s where I stop reading. I mean, seriously? They just said he was sitting 87-92. So Fausto used to sit 92-100?

by afh4 on Jul 2, 2009 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So Fausto used to sit 92-100?

On his bad days. On his good days fans in the lower rows were advised to bring protective ear equipment in case of any sonic booms.

by APV on Jul 2, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice load of crap detection

by Roger Dorn on Jul 2, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

More seriously, I think Fausto did throw harder when he first came up. I was at his major league debut, and if the guns at Comerica Park are to be believed, he was steady in the 95-96 range. I’m not sure that harder, at least harder in the sense of consistently hitting peak velocity, was necessarily better when it came to movement and effectiveness. Fangraphs data has his average steadily declining from 2006 to the present, but not a terribly precipitous drop going from an average fastball velocity of 94.1 to 92.6 over that time.

by APV on Jul 2, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He also went from reliever to starter though… so some velocity drop is to be expected, right?

by Logodaedalus on Jul 2, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that first season was mixed…his first few outings were as a starter before he got moved to the pen

by APV on Jul 2, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A little, perhaps, but he was still hitting 93-96 with that sinker in 2007, which would indicate a slight drop from when he was hitting 95-98 out of the bullpen in 2006(? – I think). Certainly, I don’t think we were expecting him to “only” hit 87-92 – that’s too much of a drop in my opinion – pitchers don’t lose 6-10 MPH going from a reliever to a starter.

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Jul 2, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whoops – I meant to add that, conversely, Meloan’s velocity should have went back up to or closer to his reliever velocity, which I believe was 95-98 MPH, but never made it back up there – it was reported at 91-93, with an occasional 94-95, which again brings up the point on why our power-arm pitching prospects of late are losing velocity?

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Jul 2, 2009 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

According to this, his average velocity has declined, yes?

by odradek on Jul 2, 2009 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One thing I know about you, Andrew, is that there are certain sites where you get your BS Detector all shined up and polished before you even click the link.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jul 2, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Undoubtedly true. I’ve got a serious bias when I click on Prospect Insider.

by afh4 on Jul 2, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Andrew,

No, Fausto never hit 100, but his sinker was regularly 93-96, even hitting an occasional 97-98. Therefore, the point still stands that his sinker is no longer a power sinker like it was when Komminsk had him in the Indians’ system. And Komminsk should know as well as anyone – he had Carmona for some time in the Indians’ system, so his evaluation should be given careful consideration; this isn’t a blogger or an interviewer just guessing here. And I presume also they were evaluating his velocity with a radar gun, so they should have empirical data to prove that he was only hitting 87-92 (very specific numbers, not numbers you would normally conjure off the top of your head, like 85-90 or 90-95).

As I mentioned in the Meloan-Abreu trade thread, this continues a disturbing trend in our system where our pitching prospects seem to lose velocity. I can understand reducing the velocity on one’s fastball to better harness command of it, but it’s to be expected that you regain the lost velocity after you have harnessed the command so that you can be back to your former velocity with better command.

If you look at our recent pitching prospects, Lewis, Carmona, Meloan – all these guys threw consistently harder at one time (Lewis was 93-95 in 2007, now is only about 90-91, with an occasional 92-94; Carmona was 93-96, with an occasional 97-98, in 2007, whereas he’s only being clocked at 87-92 – that velocity is very similar to Sowers’, so it’s not that surprising that Carmona was described as a “right-handed Jeremy Sowers,” even if Carmona’s sinker still moves more than Sowers’ pitches; Meloan, I believe, used to hit 93-95, even touching 97-98 when he was dominating and moving up the Dodgers’ Minor League system, but was only hitting 91-93, occasionally hitting 94-95).

My question is, “Why does it seem virtually every notable pitching prospect of late has been losing velocity and not regaining it?” I understand you have to take velocity off of the fastball in order to work on command, and I understand that Carmona’s sinker will work better if it’s not thrown too hard, but he was hitting 94-96 with it and it was still moving a ton in his banner 2007 year (sometimes, too much, but the point is that it had plenty of movement – it wasn’t straight), but you expect these guys to regain that old velocity, especially at their ages.

Therefore, is it something with our organizational philosophy in trying to harness command that is making our prospects lose velocity, an unintended “side effect” if you will? This doesn’t just seem like a coincidence to me – Lewis looks like an average reliever (reminds me a bit of David Riske, a pitcher with no plus pitch and who pitches on “guts” more than stuff, and not able to get away with the same mistakes he did in 2007 without giving up a ton of long balls) without that 93-95 MPH fastball, Meloan didn’t look anything close to his dominating form with the Dodgers (I understand he was turned into a starter, but to look virtually nothing like his old self after a year or so of being a starter still seems unusual to me – he shouldn’t have lost that much that quickly), and Carmona pitching like a finesse guy when he had an overpowering power sinker that gave him a front-of-the-rotation starter ceiling, but now looks only like Jake Westbrook’s sinker (solid, sure, but hardly overpowering), effectively knocking down Carmona’s ceiling to a 3-4 starter.

Somehow, I find this hard to believe that this is just a coincidence – if it is, we have pretty bad luck then (and I know this is Cleveland, with its recent poor sports history), but come on – there seems to be something up; the few power arms we do have all seem to be disappearing and turning into average-velocity arms, which is all the more reason why we are trying to pick up power arms from other organizations, such as Perez, Veras, and now, Abreu.

Just my 2 cents.

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Jul 2, 2009 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is not a pitcher alive that has ever thrown a sinker 98 mph

by Roger Dorn on Jul 2, 2009 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re right in that that 98 MPH was likely Carmona’s 4-seam fastball, which he used more when he was coming out of the bullpen, but his sinker did hit the mid-90s with regularity (remember the Yankee series and his striking out A-Rod on a power sinker down and in in the 9th inning – I’m pretty sure that sinker registered 94 MPH).

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Jul 3, 2009 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, that is more reasonable. The 4-seamer is the only pitch I am aware of that can reach teh upper 90’s

by Roger Dorn on Jul 3, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is ridiculous. Why are we even considering Comminsk’s opinion? He has worked with Fausto less than, see, everyone currently in the Indians’ organization.

And he has not worked with him at all since 2006.

Seriously, people.

by afh4 on Jul 2, 2009 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know how many starts Fausto had in Akron while Komminsk was there? 30. 30 starts.

Fausto never even spent a full season in Akron.

by afh4 on Jul 2, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but 30 is still a fair number of starts to watch a guy.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jul 2, 2009 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Spread out over 3 seasons? 3 years ago?

What, did Komminsk have his Carmona tape out and was analyzing it?

There is no reason to think this guy has any particularly interesting insight into Carmona at this point, especially when he’s talking off the cuff to Lastoria.

by afh4 on Jul 2, 2009 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Enough to have a strong impression and a clear memory.

But I don’t basically disagree with your take on this.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jul 3, 2009 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

30 starts is essentially a season’s worth.

Sure, our people in the organization now certainly have a better idea of what Carmona is like now than Komminsk does, but it’s not like Komminsk doesn’t have a clue what Carmona was doing at one time either – i.e. he is more familiar with him than someone who never worked with him, so giving his word a little more weight would be in order than an opposing manager who never seen him before or only seen him as an opponent and never worked with him at all – that was my point.

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Jul 3, 2009 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My question is, "Why does it seem virtually every notable pitching prospect of late has been losing velocity and not regaining it?"

Hate to say it, but one possible answer is improved PED testing.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jul 2, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ugh – no offense, Jay, but I hope you’re wrong. You may be right, though – I didn’t stop to think about that. Another ugh if that is true.

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Jul 3, 2009 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would that be just Indians specific? If so, wouldn’t, say, Tigers pitchers be losing velocity too?

by odradek on Jul 3, 2009 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe they are, I don’t know.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jul 3, 2009 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Komminsk thinks that if Sizemore comes back healthy next year, the Indians are contenders.

If?

by odradek on Jul 2, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess you never know about elbows. I’m not surprised though that Sizemore wasn’t totally over the elbow issue (though he has looked better at the plate than he did before went on the DL) – I wasn’t sure that a problem wouldn’t surface while he is playing (and it still could, but for now, so far so good – let’s just hope he doesn’t do anything to it and it can be 100% fixed in the offseason).

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Jul 2, 2009 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m glad to know that some guy named Bruce Komminsk thinks we’re contenders.

Terrific. Any chance we can get a quote from Don Money?

by afh4 on Jul 2, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s a pretty dumb statement regardless. Sizemore more was plenty healthy in 2006 and 2008, and we sure weren’t contenders.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jul 2, 2009 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It takes more than one player, no matter his skills, to make a baseball team a legitimate contender – as mentioned, Sizemore was healthy in 2006 and 2008, and we weren’t close to contending. There are more facets that have to be clicking on all or most cylinders in order for a team to be a true contender; we haven’t had that since 2007.

The "cream of the crop" doesn't always rise to the top.

by indiansfan on Jul 3, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My point in bringing this up was not to indicate that Komminsk thinks Sizemore is the key to Indians’ contention, but that he suggests the possibility Sizemore’s elbow will not be healed in 2010.

by odradek on Jul 3, 2009 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, again, who cares what Komminsk thinks of Grady’s elbow?

My point remains, Komminsk kind of seems like a dunce here.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jul 3, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Odds are he is a dunce. But his comment still sends a chill down the spine.

by odradek on Jul 4, 2009 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, screw him. As if we didn’t already know Carmona was messed up.

Did we really think he was gone to Arizona for a few days, and boom, presto-change-o, he’s “back?”

I never thought that.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Jul 4, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.
Start posting about the Indians »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Small
I think we found our utility infielder
Small
Baseball in Japan
3444ant_black_small
Spring Training Trips
Hans_small
Trade Peralta?
3444ant_black_small
Beware the year of the Ox
Bos-fod_small
award-winning independent baseball documentary released
Calavera_small
Create your own 2010 BA Top Ten list (then sign Grady to an extension)
Img_0108_small
Jason Grilli Signs Minor League Deal?
Mariahcareyglitter_medium_medium_small
2009 AL Central Off-Season Transactions and Rumors

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who would you like to see hired to manage the Cleveland Indians?
Bobby Valentine
106 votes
Travis Fryman
41 votes
Manny Acta
113 votes
Don Mattingly
78 votes
Torey Lovullo
30 votes
Other
51 votes

419 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Lee has Foot Surgery
Jamey Wright Signed to Minor League Deal
2010 Cleveland Indians draft preview
Jim Ingraham Angers You.
BP Calls John Hart One of the, STRIKE THAT, BEST GMs of the 90s
Sizemore Addresses Offseason
Can we reach 1,000 on a post about Adam Kennedy?
"At this time, we're looking to make the biggest impact possible on the...
Casey Blake shaved his beard
ICBWDSTGFO550K

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Sweet Baboo

Sweet Baboo, now with glitter


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Authors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4