Wedge Won't be Fired Midseason
Probably not a surprise given how Shapiro runs this team and how much respect he apparently has for Wedge. Another, fuller story to follow on Indians.com, apparently.
[Edit:] Not much more, but here's the full story by Castrovince on Indians.com.
7 months ago
CU Adam
207 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I’m not happy with this decision. Yes, if the Indians play .400 ball the second half Eric will probably be looking for a new job, but I really don’t want Wedge here for the beginning of next season. I think his teams play “tight” until the season is lost and the pressure is off.
I would much prefer to have a new manager and have that manager in place asap rather than at the beginning of a new season (or not at all).
If you believe it's just a game, you're also probably wondering why Santa keeps skipping your house every year.
by LeftyCatcher on Jul 5, 2009 12:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So what Shapiro is telling us is that we should expect to continue playing below expectations and those nifty prospects he’s netted in the last year (and will continue to net this year with his forthcoming trades) will all be mishandled at the big league level for the foreseeable future. We can also expect to see strange lineups with defensive ‘quirks’ that just don’t make sense.
Good one Shapiro. Great.
Loyalty can be a flaw when taken to extremes. Shapiro is showing us this…
I just wanted to believe.
by mjmarble on Jul 5, 2009 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah, I think he gets fired too if we finish with the # of losses we’re now projected for. By sticking with “his guy” he’s asking to be a package deal on the way out too.
Proud Fan of the Worst Baseball Team I've Ever Seen
by westbrook on Jul 5, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, I don’t think so. If ownership wanted to fire Shapiro they don’t need a poor finish to justify it. Finishing in last place won’t tell us anything about Shapiro and neither will finishing well in the second half.
More importantly, I doubt Shapiro would even entertain the idea of trading Victor or Lee if his job depended on the 2nd half of this season.
by world dictator on Jul 5, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree… From ownership’s perspective, it makes no sense to tie a GM’s job to performance in a lost season — a period when his main job should be converting present assets into future assets.
by Logodaedalus on Jul 5, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Performance in a lost season can mean a lot of things, though. Wedge presumably did a nice job in a lost season last year, but not as nice as Shapiro.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 5, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, if you’re defining “performance” in GM-relevant ways, then of course it makes sense. But westbrook supposed that it would be the number of wins that could determine his job status, not what he gets in trades. I should have said "it makes no sense to tie a GM’s job to team performance in a lost season. It obviously makes sense to tie his job to his own performance.
by Logodaedalus on Jul 5, 2009 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Dolan doesn’t look at things the way we do. If we keep sucking like we have, he will be angry with Shap for not firing Wedge, and there’s a pretty decent chance he fires them both because of it.
Proud Fan of the Worst Baseball Team I've Ever Seen
by westbrook on Jul 5, 2009 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But if Shapiro trades Lee and Martinez, say, he’ll very directly be worsening our 2009 record, but it may turn out to be in the best long term interests of the team. If Dolan wanted Wedge gone that badly, he could have made it happen.
by Logodaedalus on Jul 5, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly. The story that came out today is undoubtedly the result of many discussions held between Shapiro and Dolan. Though we obviously don’t know the details, there was obviously some sort of agreement made between them. Dolan seems to be a reasonable guy, I’m sure they had reasonable discussions that had nothing to do with team results going forward in 2009.
by jakesinger777 on Jul 5, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Dolan doesn’t look at things the way we do. If we keep sucking like we have, he will be angry with Shap for not firing Wedge, and there’s a pretty decent chance he fires them both because of it.
And what are you basing this on?
by world dictator on Jul 5, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I see no basis for this at all.
These aren’t 8-year-olds.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 5, 2009 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Paul Dolan: Listen, Baldy, I mean it. You better punch Wedge in the stomach really hard, or else I’m going to tell my father to fire you. Then I’ll kick your ass.
Mark Shapiro: You don’t scare me, you little clown. Go ahead and try. I’ll bite your nose off.
by odradek on Jul 5, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you’re looking too much into a sentence that includes the words “pretty decent chance”
Proud Fan of the Worst Baseball Team I've Ever Seen
by westbrook on Jul 5, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“A master at managing teams once the season is lost.” I wouldn’t want that on my tombstone.
Shouldn’t we be looking for a master at managing teams to the playoffs and beyond? Yes, a torrid finish in September, fighting for third place and .500 is better than sucking all year, but as a fan I’m tired of lost seasons and underachieving.
If you believe it's just a game, you're also probably wondering why Santa keeps skipping your house every year.
by LeftyCatcher on Jul 5, 2009 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In fairness, torrid second halves have carried us to 93 and 96 wins in recent years. The hot finish happens most every year, whether we’re out of it or not.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 5, 2009 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you think that happens with this team so consistently?
by lilkeysdad on Jul 5, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know, but it isn’t a bad thing. The bad thing is falling into profoundly deep holes.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 5, 2009 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“As I’ve said all along, the responsibility for the disappointments of this season don’t rest on one person”
— Shapiro in 2009 on Eric Wedge
“It’s not just about right now, it’s just about what we feel is best for our ballclub today, the future and long term. From an offensive standpoint, I feel we can do better. But it’s not just about Eddie Murray. I just felt that we needed to make a change and I felt this was best for our ballclub.”
— Eric Wedge June 5, 2005 on firing hitting coach Eddie Murray mid-season (emphasis added)
Mark, here’s an idea, take Wedge’s quote and find and replace “Eddie Murray” with “Eric Wedge”
by dvd1204 on Jul 5, 2009 1:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Meh. All this means is that Skinner or Lovullo won’t be installed as an interim. For those of us who would prefer an outsider be hired, this is probably good news, as the interim won’t have had the chance to build a track record.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jul 5, 2009 2:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why not Skinner as interim now? He did pretty good as a minor league manager (.573). He knows the players. He’s not Eric Wedge. But more importantly, he didn’t make a fuss when Wedge was selected over him at the end of the year he filled in for Charlie…he even stayed on as 3B coach. I doubt if Joel would be too surprised if an outsider is picked over him at the end of the year.
My biggest fear is that the Indians catch fire and play well for the rest of the season and Wedge comes back next year.
If you believe it's just a game, you're also probably wondering why Santa keeps skipping your house every year.
by LeftyCatcher on Jul 5, 2009 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you got passed up for a job promotion once does that mean you’re more likely to be alright with it a second time?
by world dictator on Jul 5, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
For this reason alone, there’s no way Skinner would ever get another shot here.
I’ve been saying that if it ever got to an “interim” status … it would be Datz or Lovullo, with Fryman as a long shot.
Although, I did see Robbie Thompson’s name mentioned as well.
by FallsTribeFan on Jul 5, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’re confusing me.
I see no reason why they wouldn’t hire Skinner, unless they want someone else more.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 5, 2009 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pretty simple … Shapiro passed on Skinner as the manager once, I don’t think he’ll be put back in .. even as an “interim.”
Point is really moot to be honest.
by FallsTribeFan on Jul 5, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think that was a negative judgment on Skinner, rather just a preference for Wedge.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 5, 2009 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, obviously they liked Skinner enough to keep him around from staff to staff.
I just don’t know that he’d get another shot …
Regardless, It’s Wedgie-ball for the rest of 2009!
by FallsTribeFan on Jul 6, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But if they appoint Skinner as interim and select someone else over the off-season, Skinner isn’t likely to be asked to stay on (as a 3B coach he’s probably average at best), so it doesn’t matter what Joel thinks.
If you believe it's just a game, you're also probably wondering why Santa keeps skipping your house every year.
by LeftyCatcher on Jul 6, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m okay with them catching fire, even if it means Wedge lasts through the winter. In that event, he would be on a short leash for start of 2010.
by odradek on Jul 5, 2009 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’ll take an 80-win season and more Wedge next year?
Proud Fan of the Worst Baseball Team I've Ever Seen
by westbrook on Jul 5, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’d take Wedge to start 2010 if it means an 80-win season. Lots of good things would have to happen to get to 80 wins. I’m not sure 80-82 saves EW’s job.
by odradek on Jul 5, 2009 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At this point, what’s the value of an 80 win season over a 65 win season? Wouldn’t a top 3 draft pick be worth more than that?
by jakesinger777 on Jul 5, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve had this discussion before. This isn’t the NBA. Draft choices are longshots. Having a team that could come back from this hole to win 80 games is a far greater indicator of future success than signing the next Homer Bailey (at top dollar).
by odradek on Jul 6, 2009 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I seem to remember an extremely long discussion about this about 10 months ago….
by Logodaedalus on Jul 6, 2009 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we get over this fallacy that what we, as fans, are a causing factor?
It might not the best thing for the Indians, but for Christ’s sake, I want to see them win every game I watch. Period. I’m unapologetic about it, and my rooting has zero impact on their draft status. Celebrating losing leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jul 6, 2009 7:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Winning is the best thing for the Indians, period. Draft status has minimal impact on future success, unless you’re Tampa Bay and plan to be at the bottom of the barrel for a decade or so.
Think about it: if the Indians lose 102 games, would Stephen Strasburg restore you to contention? The only way this sort of magical thinking works is if you believe, somehow, that the Indians are a 75-loss teams masquerading as a 102-loss team. Purposefully tanking games, and for what? If the Tribe loses 102 games, they suck. They’re not a better team.
The difference between Strausburg and Tony Sanchez, the number four choice, is hardly worth it.
by odradek on Jul 6, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Winning is the best thing for the Indians, period. Draft status has minimal impact on future success, unless you’re Tampa Bay and plan to be at the bottom of the barrel for a decade or so.
Think about it: if the Indians lose 102 games, would Stephen Strasburg restore you to contention? The only way this sort of magical thinking works is if you believe, somehow, that the Indians are a 75-loss teams masquerading as a 102-loss team. Purposefully tanking games, and for what? If the Tribe loses 102 games, they suck. They’re not a better team.
The difference between Strausburg and Tony Sanchez, the number four choice, is hardly worth it.
by odradek on Jul 6, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we get over this fallacy that what we, as fans, are a causing factor?
Who has implied this?
I want to see them win every game I watch. Period.
This was my position the last time around as well.
The way I see it, I’m going to root for the Indians to win every game, but at least now that they’re out of it, if they lose I have the consolation prize of moving toward a better draft position.
by Logodaedalus on Jul 6, 2009 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think we’re a causing factor. I will note, however, that Shapiro has stopped defending Wedge, except by saying that the whole organization is accountable.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 6, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have found that when I do not pay attention to the Indians, they perform much better.
by odradek on Jul 6, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who has implied this?
In this conversation, no one, least of all you. But last year—before I was a poster (look at me, taking retroactive potshots)—there was an undercurrent of this as the team went on their second half run; especially as they neared the magical 15th mark. I’m just marking a line in the sand; if they can’t make the playoffs (and they can’t), I’m unabashedly rooting for an arbitrary thing like 82-80. When the dust settles, I’ll worry about draft position. And the gauntlet is thrown to anyone who challenges me!
I don’t know why I’ve had so many self-serving rants lately. This season has worn on me.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jul 6, 2009 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, this is the discussion I was referring to. I was basically taking your position — I can’t possibly root for an Indians loss, no matter the ramifications.
by Logodaedalus on Jul 7, 2009 1:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I root for whatever gives us the best chance to win the WS, not for an individual win
by Roger Dorn on Jul 7, 2009 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can understand those who won’t root for the Indians to lose games by the bucket for months on end, just so we can get the #9 pick rather than the #12 pick. But the difference between the 15th pick and 16th pick is significant, and it’s crazy not to root for the Indians to lose whatever extra 2-3 games are necessary for that.
This year, it’s different. We have no real shot at finishing 15th anyway, but how we do from here on out could make the difference between the #2 overall pick and the #9 overall pick. And most years, as I understand it, there is a big slope in the talent you can expect get between those slots. I’m not sure where that leaves us as day-to-day rooting fans.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I understand all of these things. I’m not really sure there’s a fundamental psychological conflict between rooting for the Indians to win every given game on any given day, and wanting them to finish with the 2nd worst record…. paradoxically. I’m not really sure how that works, but the two seem to coexist fine in my mind. I mean, people internalize much weirder contradictions than that for, say, religion.
I root for them to win on a given day, but when they lose, it’s okay, because they’re improving their draft position. So I’m happy with a win, but I’m not really upset by a loss, now that the season is over.
by Logodaedalus on Jul 7, 2009 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a contradiction directly analogous to rooting for C.C. to do well while the Yankees (magically) fail anyway. The only difference is that rooting for any Yankee to do well is offensive, and regardless of the draft, you can’t really say that rooting for the Indians to win a game is offensive.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In fact, one might suggest that rooting for the Indians to lose on any given day is offensive (even though it’s not offensive to want, in a calculated way, the Indians to have a lousy record overall).
by Logodaedalus on Jul 8, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, one might, but at least we’re arguing one pro-Indians viewpoint vs. another.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No argument here. I’m not among those rooting for CC to do well in NY.
by Logodaedalus on Jul 8, 2009 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was in this undercurrent, I suppose. I never really rooted for the Indians to lose; I think I covered this in depth at the time. But it didn’t hurt as badly.
It wasn’t the number of the draft pick that mattered to me, it was just making sure that we had our pick protected.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 5:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I can basically echo this whole post.
Proud Fan of the Worst Baseball Team I've Ever Seen
by westbrook on Jul 7, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Imagine if we had signed Kerry Wood and lost a first-rounder. I mean. Come on.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right. Or if we didn’t sign Wood because we couldn’t accept the additional cost of losing that pick.
I don’t know what the market for Type A free agents will be this offseason, but unless we unload some of our youngish veterans, I can’t see us targeting any.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still disagree with the whole lot of you. If the Indians lose games, they suck. Regardless of free agents and draft choices, etc. To me, these are no consolation, or of such minimal conciliatory value as to be worthless.
It’s not like the “real” Indians team is actually an 85-win team simply masquerading as a dud to get a draft pick. The real Indian team is a 100-loss team, and that isn’t good no matter how you slice it.
Again, I think we engage in idealistic thinking when we hope the Tribe—which we know in our heart of hearts is a good team that will contend in 2010—will roll over on a few games just so it can draft a pitcher who will tear up his elbow on a lawn sprinkler in 2011.
by odradek on Jul 7, 2009 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is John Farrell the next managerial choice for Shapiro?
He is familiar to Shapiro and Dolan. He is somewhat knows the organization; just three years removed as Farm Director. He has succeeded as Pitching Coach with the Red Sox. He is a former Indian ball player.
This is the type of choice I expect from Shapiro, if Wedge is removed at the end of the season.
by walkfergus on Jul 6, 2009 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve always thought this was at least in some of the F.O.‘s minds as a long term strategy. I’m sure Farrell will be a ML manager someday, and we’d be a logical place for him to start. But I know nothing about what criteria they use for selecting someone.
"Lotta heart in Cleveland." - Ian Hunter
by Denver Tribe Fan on Jul 6, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pretty good guess.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 6, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A long, long time ago I heard a rumor—a musing, really—that Antonetti prefers Farrell over Wedge and if Wedge is still here and not winning championships by the time CA takes over it’s going to be Farrell’s job.
I can’t even remember by know where I heard/read this. But over the last couple of years it rattles around in my brain every so often that I think I’ve subconsciously accepted it as fact.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 6, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the chances of Marte getting another shot just went from 5% to 0.7%
And by just, I mean six hours ago when this was posted, but it took me some time to finish crying.
by JRontherim on Jul 5, 2009 6:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The only way he gets a shot is if Jhonny gets hurt or traded…whether Wedge is there or not.
by TribeJay on Jul 5, 2009 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he goes insane with the Clippers, they will bring him up. Only if he has incredible numbers.
by odradek on Jul 5, 2009 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He might get promoted, but that doesn’t mean he’ll play.
-Erik
by drerikbrady on Jul 6, 2009 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right, that’s my point. If Jhonny is still here and healthy, where would Marte play?
by TribeJay on Jul 6, 2009 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not quite my point. If Johnny were traded, and Barfield, Valbuena, Carroll, and Cabrera were all on the DL, Marte might get called up, but I doubt that he would play. Wedge would probably still play Hafner at 1st, Vic at 2nd, Gimenez at SS and Garko at 3rd.
-Erik
by drerikbrady on Jul 6, 2009 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Craig Biggio moved from catcher to second base. Why not Victor?
by odradek on Jul 6, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m pretty sure Garko would be the SS considering what Wedge considers him to be athletically.
Proud Fan of the Worst Baseball Team I've Ever Seen
by westbrook on Jul 6, 2009 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think my eyes almost popped out of their sockets after the eye-rolling I just did…
Yes, we all know Wedge has this irrational hatred of Marte. Most of us think he should have gotten more opportunities last year (though I’m much further on the other side of the argument than most), but maybe, just maybe Wedge hates the .211/.265/.337 line he’s put up at the MLB level.
I think Marte will get traded soon, but if Jhonny were to be traded or put on the DL, I think Marte would get called up and get some time. And if he hit anywhere near what he’s hitting in Columbus, he’d get more time. But that’s probably a long shot.
by TribeJay on Jul 6, 2009 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We are given to believe that Wedge is too stat-savvy to take Marte’s line seriously, given the limited PA.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is that what some believe or what some hope/wish he believes?
by TribeJay on Jul 7, 2009 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree to disagree. I do not believe that Wedge will accord Marte regular playing time. Ever. Under any circumstance.
-Erik
by drerikbrady on Jul 7, 2009 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably not. But really, who cares?
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jul 7, 2009 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I care about any player not getting at-bats that can contribute meaningfully
by Roger Dorn on Jul 7, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boo.
"Some days are better than others, but it's a long season."
— The Inestimable Eric Wedge
by emd2k3 on Jul 5, 2009 8:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Pluto mentioned today that the FO was surprised that the fans were speculating about Wedge getting fired.
Seriously? Last place isn’t enough for you to consider a managerial change? We aren’t the Nationals or the Pirates, the Indians current record is embarrassing given the talent on this team
by Roger Dorn on Jul 5, 2009 10:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is the kind of thing I can’t stand. Shap and co. are either really naive or like to come off as really naive.
Proud Fan of the Worst Baseball Team I've Ever Seen
by westbrook on Jul 5, 2009 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They should never be naive as to what fans might think.
by TribeJay on Jul 5, 2009 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think a lot of times it’s a job requirement. I know what you’re threatening, the dollars etc etc. But the fans have been idiots for a long time. Doesn’t mean their not right sometimes, but I’m just making a side point.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 6, 2009 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wedge can stop shaving and start blowing the harmonica in the dugout. He’s safe for the rest of the year. He can even start telling weird discursive stories.
by odradek on Jul 5, 2009 11:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
maybe he’s been managing by the Choose Your Own Adventure method this year.
by talonk on Jul 6, 2009 2:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you chose to move Ryan Garko to the outfield, turn to page 144.
by odradek on Jul 6, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think page one had something to do with Milton Bradley and Ricky Gutierrez.
by odradek on Jul 7, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say one day, instead of a baseball game, the whole team sits down criss cross apple sauce on the infield and tells GHOSTS stories! Eeeek!
by JRontherim on Jul 6, 2009 5:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh, shouldn’t they sit down “indian” style?
"Some days are better than others, but it's a long season."
— The Inestimable Eric Wedge
by emd2k3 on Jul 6, 2009 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Criss cross apple sauce sounds funnier.
by JRontherim on Jul 6, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’re missing the point.
"Some days are better than others, but it's a long season."
— The Inestimable Eric Wedge
by emd2k3 on Jul 6, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really can’t believe anybody is surprised by this. Disagree with it, sure, but I never for a second thought that Shapiro would fire a manager in the middle of a season in which the club has no chance of making the postseason. Again, I’m not defending his point of view, but it has always seemed apparent that Shapiro was not the type to change horses in mid-race, certainly not if there’s no reason to believe the new horse is likely to lead you to victory. Neither Wedge’s Indians nor Skinner’s are going to make the postseason.
by FredOx on Jul 6, 2009 11:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Eric Wedge = George McClellan.
"Some days are better than others, but it's a long season."
— The Inestimable Eric Wedge
by emd2k3 on Jul 6, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course, had Lincoln known that the war would end in June 1862, only to begin again from scratch in November, he may not necessarily have relieved McClellan of command in March.
by FredOx on Jul 6, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know, APV was asking for Shapiro to fire Wedge on May 18th. At that point, it was still conceivable that a managerial change could have positively impacted the season and put them in contention for a playoff spot. So I’m surprised that Shapiro is so averse to this sort of change that he’s completely ruled out the possibility of it helping the team at any point. It’s like he thinks Wedge is the most qualified manager for this team that is possible. Which is a HUGE blind spot.
by NickFantana on Jul 8, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes … which is what I wrote 15 paragraphs about a couple weeks ago.
Obviously he didn’t agree on May 18, and that time has now passed. At this point, no manager can help us make the playoffs, so it’s not really worth debating whether he should be fired right now or in October.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with everything you said. I also acknowledge that you said it two weeks ago. Mostly, I’m just coming to grips with the fact that Shapiro’s not the perfect baseball executive.
by NickFantana on Jul 8, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who else would like to see Wedge pull a Charlie Manual and force the issue?
by JK in CBus on Jul 6, 2009 11:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would not want to read the Charlie Manual.
by JulioBernazard on Jul 6, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
you’re on
Proud Fan of the Worst Baseball Team I've Ever Seen
by westbrook on Jul 6, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Insert obligatory The Sound and the Fury joke here:________.
by Seattle Tribe Fan on Jul 7, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This news makes me think the “Ch” in the site header should be changed to “N.”
by JulioBernazard on Jul 6, 2009 3:44 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
a roll
Proud Fan of the Worst Baseball Team I've Ever Seen
by westbrook on Jul 6, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m here all week. Try the veal. Tip you’re waitresses.
(But I think Danvail’s comment is much funnier.)
by JulioBernazard on Jul 7, 2009 8:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree. Margaret Cho is simply not very funny, let alone germane to an Indians website.
by danvail on Jul 6, 2009 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Seems to me Mark is forcing the hand of Dolan. If he wants to get rid of Wedge then he has to get rid of Mark at the same time. A complete upheaval of this organization is necessary but isn’t in the best interest of Dolan to do it in the middle of the season. The candidates to run an effective organization (GM) while be much clearer and available during the off-season. A new manager to run the team would only be a interim or temporary hire so might as well have Wedgie fry in his own mess.
This team needs a major overhaul in the off season and I hope it happens.
by D1g1tal J1m on Jul 6, 2009 5:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
More likely, the Dolans signed off explicitly on not making changes midseason and on making this announcement.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 6, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really didn’t expect this level of boo-hooery. What do you want from the new manager? Five more wins over the course of the season? Wedge more likely than not goes when this all plays out. Shapiro wants the consternated players and coaching staff to stop wringing their hands and stay focused on baseball. The crying references and fuming are just a little juvenile, all things considered. Man up. LGT.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 6, 2009 6:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A chance to get acclimated with the players before starting a new season next year.
by Roger Dorn on Jul 6, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but it’s likely our best other options wouldn’t take the job midseason anyway.
by Roger Dorn on Jul 6, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really didn’t expect this level of boo-hooery.
You didn’t? What fans have you been hanging out with?
What do you want from the new manager? Five more wins over the course of the season?
It isn’t about wanting anything from the new manager. It is about wanting a pound of flesh from the old one.
Wedge more likely than not goes when this all plays out.
But there’s no confidence about this. This announcement creates a sense of dread around the team for many fans, because they want something significant to change about the situation.
Shapiro wants the consternated players and coaching staff to stop wringing their hands and stay focused on baseball
That’s not my read — Shapiro said outright that he doesn’t have much sympathy for the “distraction” excuse. I think this is more about the fans than the team itself. The club decided not to do anything in season, and it was better to announce it, quelling speculation for a bit on the nets and talk radio — than not to.
The crying references and fuming are just a little juvenile, all things considered. Man up.
I can see that argument, but I also think a little acting out is to be expected and not terribly inappropriate.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 6, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My desire to see Wedge go now is not to exact a pound of flesh – because Eric seems like a pretty decent guy – but I want change, I want hope. I want a reason to want to watch or listen to the remaining 80 games. I feel very little affinity to this club as it stands now.
If you believe it's just a game, you're also probably wondering why Santa keeps skipping your house every year.
by LeftyCatcher on Jul 6, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will say this much, if Wedge returns next year, I will be more skeptical entering the season than I have been since 2005
by Roger Dorn on Jul 6, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto. I’ve been largely indifferent, and probably leaning pro-Wedge, these past few years, but if he’s back next year, I’m going to pretty much assume that most of the “ifs” on next year’s team (and there will be plenty) are going to be quickly answered, “Nope.”
Il faut d'abord durer.
by CU Adam on Jul 7, 2009 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mine is more that I want the guarantee of a new manager for 2010. While in no way do I think such a guarantee will necessarily translate into more wins, I just think this whole team needs a new clubhouse leadership.
by danvail on Jul 6, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh, Shapiro also said this:
“If we feel there’s a way to improve the team in any capacity, we won’t be afraid to make changes,” said Shapiro. “Just as we felt if those changes would impact things now, we’d make them now. But we don’t.”
Which I think is the crux of it. It’s been pretty well documented in the past couple of weeks that the players really want Wedge around (Peralta quote notably absent in those cases). I think the cathartic closure fans would feel isn’t as important as the opposite feeling most players would probably feel. Not for the next couple of months, anyway.
One of the reasons Shapiro made the announcement was to let the players know they could no longer use Wedge’s uncertain future as an excuse. Before they beat Oakland on Friday and Saturday, the Indians had lost 14 of 17 games.
Said Shapiro, “I want people to be accountable.”
“I think this is good for the players,” said left-hander Aaron Laffey. “We’re not coming in every day wondering what’s going on. I think it will lighten up the clubhouse a little bit.”
I think we’re looking at the same quote here and drawing different conclusions from it, which is fine. But I see this as, “No shake-up for the rest of the season, now go out and do your job.”
I can see people taking issue with this. Completely within their right. I just get bitchy when LGT starts turning into cleveland.com, at least a little bit. I respect everyone here, and like I said I think Wedge needs to go. I just can’t see getting so worked up that it’s not RIGHT NOW GDAMN-IT.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 5:24 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, all this. It’s just not about us.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jul 7, 2009 7:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also!
I’m cranky in the morning.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I tend to agree with you, though. I think Wedge has failed to demonstrate he should keep his job, but the desire of the seething hordes for an in-season perp walk is a bit off-putting. I wouldn’t have shed any tears for him had he been canned, but whether Wedge or Skinner manages this team just really doesn’t make much difference. Then again, I’m the only one who doesn’t love Skinner, I guess. My respect for his minor league and interim record is tempered by his performance in his current job.
by FredOx on Jul 7, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um, okay.
</slowly backs away from Scary Nick>
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, I’ve had coffee now.
It’s not LGT until we’re arguing over the most minute details. It’s not “should we fire Wedge,” it’s “Should we fire Wedge now or in October?”
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What the players want is not always best for the team. Case in point: Romeo
by Roger Dorn on Jul 7, 2009 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but in a season that doesn’t matter, keeping the players focused is probably a valid concern. This announcement is less a “keep the players happy” than “knocking off with the distractions.”
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 8, 2009 5:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is beyond damning with faint praise. It is damning with perfunctory, meaningless words.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It isn’t about wanting anything from the new manager. It is about wanting a pound of flesh from the old one.
I’m getting tired of the sentiment that this is unwarranted.
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jul 7, 2009 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we (and I don’t mean you and I) had this debate before, but is there really anyone besides Marte that leads us to believe Wedge lets the youngsters rot? I don’t think we can qualify LaPorta because we saw him for such a short time up here. Wedge’s handling of Marte has sucked resoundingly but I don’t think that treatment applies to everyone else under his tutelage. I think someone said Phillips last time but in reality BP was given almost 400 PAs in 2003.
What I’m getting at is we can’t just assume Wedge will refuse to play the young guys. Marte yes.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
List of young guys. To this, add Cliff Lee (2 appearances in 2002), Victor Martinez (36 PA in 2002), Shin-Soo Choo (33 PA for the Mariners). Wedge has done OK with everyone but Marte, and I’m not diving into those shark-infested waters again.
by FredOx on Jul 7, 2009 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who the crap is Zach Sorensen.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh my god I remember him.
/goes to shame corner
by Voltaire on Jul 7, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why the shame? It’s the mark of a true fan to remember and even celebrate truly obscure Indians. Alex Cole, Alex Ramirez, Alex Herrera, Alex Cora! We loved them all! For a very short time!
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
/emerges
I just looked up Cole’s career numbers. 91 career OPS+ (WAY higher than I thought). If his D was any good, was actually quasi-valuable?
by Voltaire on Jul 7, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure. Career WARP3 of 9.4, 6.0 of which came in his first two seasons, as an Indian.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s a shame that Sandy Martinez’s legacy is overshadowed by the more reputable Sandy and Martinez at his position.
The most obscure Indian position player has to be Chan Perry. I’m sure that other Tribe hitters have had fewer than 14 pa and 1 hit, but none in recent memory can match the brevity of his Major League career.
Geronimo Berroa is for me one of most memorable of the insignificant Indians I’ve witnessed. He had that tremendous uppercut swing.
Raul Gonzalez had a great ballplayers name, as did Jose Ozoria.
by jhon on Jul 7, 2009 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There have been 10 Tribe position players with zero PAs. Catcher Jim Lawrence stands out, with a career spanning three innings.
by FredOx on Jul 8, 2009 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
…and Hafner with the Rangers in 2002.
I’m with people if they want Wedge fired because a change is overdue, or if you criticize him for being unable to get the bullpen back on track to stay in contention in 3 of the last 4 years. But saying he won’t play kids and derails their careers is pretty puzzling to me when you look at his body of work.
by TribeJay on Jul 8, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wedge’s handling of Marte has sucked resoundingly
Nick, I’m in total agreement with you with the exception of the above statement. That’s only true if you assume Marte would’ve been productive with a full year’s worth of regular plate appearances. That might be true, but there’s also a fair chance he would’ve ended up with a .sub-.700 OPS.
I thought about not venturing into these woods (as Fred says), but I’ll do it with a different argument than I’ve seen here before. Most of the young hitters that have become established major leaguers in the Wedge-era struggled initially, but eventually came into their own. I think it’s possible that Wedge didn’t see signs of Marte becoming a good hitter, at least with what he was doing in parts of three years with the big club. Things like swing plane, plate coverage, how long the bat stays in the zone, etc. Maybe he’s not a hitting instructor, but Wedge was a successful major college player and a major leaguer himself. He managed for several years in the minors and now is in his 7th year in the bigs. It’s fair to say that he looks for certain indicators that he believes are indicators of success, or at least future success, and he has judged Marte to not have these abilities, or Marte has been unable to make necessary adjustments.
It’s possible Wedge made the wrong judgment on Marte in this scenario, but to completely dismiss or ignore this side of the argument irritates me.
The other side of this is that Wedge clearly will allow youngsters to play a lot when they are out of contention, but not so much if the team is expected to contend. I’ll agree that he could use a little more Bobby Cox in him in this regard.
by TribeJay on Jul 8, 2009 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m just sick of Wedge. I’m sick of “grinding” and “run into one.” I’m sick of watching scrappy guys play over more talented guys. I’m sick of Ryan Garko and Ben Francisco. I’m sick of his stupid mustache and his whole stupid face. I’m sick of listening to the most boring man on earth. I’m sick of Wood in for Lee in Kansas City for no good reason.
I’m aware it may make no difference in baseball terms, that it’s possible no one will play any better and that it would only be an interim anyway, but I want them to do it. It’s visceral, not logical. It’s a gut reaction, not a reasoned choice. I admit all of that. I just want him gone.
I become an expert simply by doing something.
by fwembt on Jul 6, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions 11 recs
This is a nice shade of green.
"Some days are better than others, but it's a long season."
— The Inestimable Eric Wedge
by emd2k3 on Jul 6, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Until you mentioned it, I hadn’t realized how boring Wedge is. Have you ever heard him say something interesting, or astute? Or funny?
by odradek on Jul 7, 2009 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not ever.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not only that but he doesn’t even react outwardly during games, even when something really great happens. You can tell he’s making an effort to restrain every emotion, negative or positive. As a result, he shows very little enthusiasm as well.
I think Farrell would be a great choice – immersed in the philosophy of the organization, but with significant exposure outside of it and with a different clubhouse and dugout atmosphere. I’d hope some of Terry Francona would’ve rubbed off on him, a manager that has the intensity and authority Wedge does, but reacts to the game along with his players and actually seems to be enjoying himself.
by mcrose on Jul 7, 2009 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He hung his head a tiny little bit after Skinz held Lofton at 3B during ALCS Game 7.
by JulioBernazard on Jul 7, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude, I am ALL ABOUT John Farrell.
by NickFantana on Jul 8, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you’re missing the point. First let me establish that I support the firing of Wedge. No argument from me. What I don’t give a crap about is when it happens before the start of winter.
His being boring is not a reason to be fired. Nor is his sense of humor. He’s not here to entertain you.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 5:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope the next manager is the opposite of Wedge, so in a few years, we can all complain about how his ranting and screaming was intimidating to the players, and how he isn’t connecting to the young talent. In the end, the only managerial quality that matters is winning.
You know who was good with a sound bite? Charlie Manuel.
You know who was excitable in the dugout? Mike Hargrove.
by FredOx on Jul 7, 2009 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes. I wish Wedge was more of a showman, but I’ve almost come to defend his personality when I have no cause to just to combat the vitriol against it. Most of the “robot” hate is because he’s losing. If this team went 162-0 it would be because he’s so stoic. It’s one of the things he got kudos for in 2007.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His being boring is not a reason to be fired. Nor is his sense of humor. He’s not here to entertain you.
I know all of that. Like I said, I just want him gone. It has nothing to do with baseball. It’s a purely emotional reaction to the stimulus of a bad season. I’m normally a rational, stat-based, objective measures only, intelligent baseball fan. Allow me this spasm of cleveland.comness.
I become an expert simply by doing something.
by fwembt on Jul 7, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who am I to tell a Clevelander not to get pissed?
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His being boring is not a reason to be fired. Nor is his sense of humor. He’s not here to entertain you.
He’s here to win ballgames.
by woodsmeister on Jul 7, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, and he hasn’t done much of that the last 2 seasons, so go ahead and fire him for it. But if 2008 and 2009 had been like 2007, would anybody care that he was a robot?
by FredOx on Jul 7, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, or maybe, but what really is your point in mentioning this?
People are sick of the guy, that’s all.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There’s plenty to criticize about his performance. Do we really need to attack him as a person, too?
by FredOx on Jul 7, 2009 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure! The guy looks like a homeless bum, too.
I’d tolerate a lot more from him if he had a few human qualities: a sense of humor, perhaps, a streak of philosophical wisdom.
by odradek on Jul 7, 2009 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right! And not doing so is a great reason to fire him. I’m not sure where the personality comes in.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We should be careful not to conflate public persona with his real personality. What we’re discussing here is the way he comes across on TV. In real life, he comes across much differently — everybody does — and it’s his real-life personality that does matter a great deal in his work.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, this is true. Granted. There are however plenty of people that point to his public persona as one of many items on a list proposing dismissal, which I think is a fallacy.
As for his personality, I don’t know. A) Do the players take issue with it? The little glimpse we have seems to suggest not, and that most even prefer it. B) Is it affecting what he does negatively? Maybe this is the debate.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want to assert right here that you can’t take what the players say seriously. If the players aren’t giving out quotes supportive of their manager, he should have been fired months ago. The fact that they are giving out those quotes doesn’t mean he hasn’t lost other parts of the roster.
Put another way, there’s nothing a veteran can say about Wedge to change the fact that he hasn’t done jack to turn around Peralta, Perez, Lewis, Carmona, etc.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh I’m sure he’s lost other parts. If Jhonny doesn’t dislike him he really is too lazy to care.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or Shoppach, Sowers, Sizemore, Francisco, Garko, Barfield.
by odradek on Jul 7, 2009 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s a bit early to be dumping on him for Sizemore, no? He hasn’t been down long enough to have or need a comeback nursed by the staff.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 7, 2009 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look at Grady’s numbers. If his performance, or lack thereof, is attributable to injury, somebody, preferably an adult, is supposed to get him out of the lineup.
If Grady’s nosedive isn’t attributable to his bum elbow, then the staff should have addressed his propensity to try and yank everything to right field.
Again, the numbers indicate that Sizemore is struggling (to put it kindly).
by odradek on Jul 8, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Get him out of the lineup?
Do the words “track record” and “defense” mean anything to you?
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Track record is a racing term, so sure. Grady has a history of significant performance. And he’s now the best centerfielder the team has, defensively. But I’m not getting into another pissing contest about Sizemore. I will try to refrain from mentioning him in a critical fashion.
But you tell me if his performance this year—both on the field and at the plate—correspond to his “track record”?
by odradek on Jul 8, 2009 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just in case you haven’t looked recently (I hadn’t): Grady has a .319 OBP and is slugging .423, for a robust .742 OPS.
by odradek on Jul 8, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t have to look.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And just in case you didn’t look closely enough, it’s 1.051 since he returned from the DL. SSS? Of course it is (52 PA). But so, frankly, is the 250 PA that preceded it.
by FredOx on Jul 8, 2009 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is what I am talking about, Fred. To say Grady’s start to the season was small sample size strikes me as odd. Watch the guy swing and you could tell he didn’t look well.
I know you don’t believe that the way he looked before going on the DL was something he would just play his way out of. If 250 PAs was SSS, what would we need to determine something was wrong? 650?
He looks better since he’s returned, but I’m not confident he is close to 100%. I view him like Hafner: impaired, but able to contribute if handled judiciously.
by odradek on Jul 8, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, of course not. But he’s been injured, and you don’t look at two months of track record, you look at his entire career.
A player’s ability is not defined by his most recent three or six months of play. This is the classic fallacy of bad GM’s and fantasy players. There is no good GM, manager, fantasy player or projection system — none — that says Grady should be removed from the lineup, as long as he’s presently healthy.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, but I think he was permitted to play while injured—when it was clearly impairing his performance—even during spring training. It would take a bold manager to sit him down, but maybe it would have been for the best to have his elbow scoped right away.
by odradek on Jul 8, 2009 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And we said the same regarding Victor and Hafner last season. Maybe it’s a real management problem, or maybe there was no real upside to having him benched. For whatever it’s worth, Will Carroll has opined that there’s no reason to think Sizemore will aggravate his injury by playing for three months before having surgery.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A player’s ability is not defined by his most recent three or six months of play. This is the classic fallacy of bad GM’s and fantasy players.
I think there’s another side to this, which is to look at the history to the exclusion of what can be observed plainly. He looks bad, but he has a solid history of doing good, so we’ll just deny what we’re seeing. I know you’re not arguing for such singlemindedness, but there comes a time when history has to be questioned.
by odradek on Jul 8, 2009 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Certainly.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As you said elsewhere re Jhonny: His value has been significantly altered this season. Whatever his past performances, he is no longer young, no longer a serviceable shortstop, and no longer. The Jhonny story has changed.
by odradek on Jul 8, 2009 1:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t say no-longer-serviceable exactly, but I basically agree.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most of hitting is mental approach. I am concerned that his state of mind had been altered since entering the home run hitting contest. If his new self image is to remake himself into a corner outfielder by expanding on his power, he might be trying to jerk the ball over the fence more often than he used to.
by elsandito on Jul 8, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Grady’s nosedive isn’t attributable to his bum elbow, then the staff should have addressed his propensity to try and yank everything to right field.
If you’re watching him the past couple of weeks, I think it’s pretty clear the elbow affected him. He’s had much better swings immediately after he came back.
In the end, the “pull everything” issue is something I’d like him to change, but he did the same thing the first half of last year and it seemed to work pretty well for him. Not sure that’s as big of a deal as people make it out to be.
by TribeJay on Jul 8, 2009 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It can’t possibly be as big of a deal as people make it out to be.
It’s turned into one of those diagnoses that people harp on for lack of any other understanding of anything at all.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see it as a “lack of doubles” issue. But I agree: he can pull the ball all he wants when he hits 30 homeruns.
by odradek on Jul 8, 2009 12:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And, of course, if you wish to remove Grady from the list, there are still nine players that Wedge has been unable to restore.
by odradek on Jul 8, 2009 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I won’t argue the other nine, I just wasn’t gonna let you slip Grady in there.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why should the two personas be THAT different?
"Some days are better than others, but it's a long season."
— The Inestimable Eric Wedge
by emd2k3 on Jul 8, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They just are. The personality is the same, but what comes across on TV is often very different than how you would perceive a person in a private conversation. It’s a basic fact of media.
Mike Schmidt was often considered aloof, because that’s how he came across on TV. Anyone who knew him knew that he was the furthest thing from aloof. What we perceive on TV has little if anything to do with what Wedge’s real personality is.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As far as bile inducing Wedgisms, you forgot the prerequisite to grinding – “bow your neck”.
by mcrose on Jul 7, 2009 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“Trust the process” when the Tribe is teetering on the edge of elimination in May gets me every time.
by JulioBernazard on Jul 7, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It may be tougher this year for a second half surge. There seem to be fewer teams abandoning hopes of contending. The races are closer. So, there will be fewer teams promoting AAA pitching for us to face.
Nevertheless, I hope Shapriro and staff use this time to fully explore all options with regard to manager and other coaches.
Are we allowed to converse with coaches on other teams informally during their season? Is this considered tampering?
by elsandito on Jul 6, 2009 7:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No doubt little conversations will be had here and there, hints dropped, etc. John Farrell doesn’t need anyone to say anything to know that they’d at least call as a courtesy. But they aren’t allowed to interview coaches without permission from their current clubs. This occasionally happens during the postseason, even with a coach of a team still in the hunt, but not all that often.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 6, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The grass is always greener. I really would hate it if the Tribe degenerated into a knee-jerk organization. If I’m the Dolans, allowing the plan and the management structure to play out through what is already 1/3 of rebuild #2 is more appealing than flailing, which is what piecemeal moves are. A managerial change without a front office change must make sense, and unless there is a candidate that everybody agrees will work well inside the plan, then you’re just crossing your fingers and jumping.
I think this is Shapiro manning up behind something he believes in – his plan, process, and staff. The first rebuild got to the ALCS and developed cost/value talent depth, even if it is currently over-weighted towards position players. Moving Lee and Victor over the next 14 months will net substantial complementary talent. Shap’s FO and Wedge are all first-timers. To jettison anybody now would be to jettison collective experience and lessons learned, in complete disregard to expected outcomes.
If it takes three years to get another group to come together at the same time and make it to the ALCS, I can live with that. To be more consistent than that is going to take a either a much larger budget (no guarantees when you sign that check, mind you), or LUCK (see bullpens and injuries, ala 2007), not a new manager.
That said, one part of the plan that may not have been considered in 2001 that may be coming up more frequently now: Shapiro and Antonetti may acknowledge either a) that the FO is having a hard time putting together talent that meshes with Wedge’s need for set roles, or, b) that Wedge can’t maximize rosters that don’t present a salient identity immediately. If they do make a move after the year, I think they’ll look at those two factors in selecting their next manager. But, as I said above, that won’t make much of a difference in the W-L columns.
by pdxtribefan on Jul 6, 2009 7:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I personally find it too depressing to parse.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2009 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shapiro and Antonetti may acknowledge either a) that the FO is having a hard time putting together talent that meshes with Wedge’s need for set roles, or, b) that Wedge can’t maximize rosters that don’t present a salient identity immediately.
Good points.
by odradek on Jul 6, 2009 8:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow, Wedge has been manager for 7 years. That’s a long time in sports.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Jul 7, 2009 5:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Did you know you can comment on Let’s Go Tribe! from your phone or PDA? SB Nation has launched mobile commenting. Check it out next time you’re at the game or bar and have something to say.
by Brick. on Jul 7, 2009 10:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Somehow posting from a phone at 2AM as the bar is closing down doesn’t seem like a wise idea after 8 pints of GLBC.
by talonk on Jul 7, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, i can’t get it to work on mine. can’t even log in – from the top of the main page or the bottom of a thread. all the O’s in Choo! for the site header really wack out the page. and what might be the advertisements, or perhaps just the format make the “running scripts” process take forever.
by Brick. on Jul 7, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is this on the mobile.letsgotribe.com site? I’m posting this via iPhone, so it obviously Works For Me, as they say.
by FredOx on Jul 7, 2009 11:45 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
For me, at this point, the questions aren’t about Wedge. He is what he is. The real questions are about Shapiro and what he needs to change or improve to make this team competitive for more than one year in a row. I’m certainly more doubtful now of Shapiro’s ability to accomplish that goal than at any time since he started.
by NickFantana on Jul 8, 2009 2:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he needs to light a fire under antonetti.
by Brick. on Jul 8, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m coming around to this point of view. What had apparently been Wedge’s problem now seems to include Shapiro. If he had acted swiftly and decisively, he might not have got himself implicated in all this.
by odradek on Jul 9, 2009 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

















