Transactions: Victor's Gone
Traded C/1B Victor Martinez to the Boston Red Sox for RHP Justin Masterson, LHP Nick Hagadone (A-), and RHP Bryan Price (A+)
Victor Martinez was the unquestioned leader of the Cleveland Indians. Although he didn't have a "C" sewn on his uniform, everyone in the clubhouse knew who was in charge. He grew up in the Indians organization, signing at a very young age. He made a difficult transition from infielder to catcher, then progressed through the minors with clockwork efficiency, arrived in the majors at the age of 23, stuck there at 24, and became the starter at age 25. He was there during the painful rebuild, the division runs, the almost-magical playoff run of 2007, and the valleys in between. With the exception of an injury-plagued 2008 season, he posted at least a 115 OPS+, all while playing the most difficult position on the diamond. Here was a core player by any definition.
The 2009 Indians, despite Martinez and many other very good position players, weren't a good team. The short answer was that their pitching was awful; the long answer will have to wait. The pitching problems were not confined to the major-league level, but through the minors as well. So while the Indians had a good core of both young major-league and minor-league position players, they lacked the pitching to compete both this season and probably in the seasons to come. So, in order to match the pitching talent with the existing everyday core, the Indians traded several valuable players who were eligible for free agency within the next couple seasons. In essence, they attempted to recreate the several years' successful drafts they never had.
Victor Martinez unfortunately was a prime candidate for trade because he was a valuable player with an affordable contract. Martinez is going to make $6.2M this season and, if his option is picked up, $7.5M. For a catcher who can hit like he can, that's a relative bargain. For the Boston Red Sox, who had needs both at catcher and first base and who could also afford to take on Martinez's contract, Victor has been on their radar for what seems like several months. For the Indians, the Red Sox were a great fit, since they had a deep farm system with lots of pitching prospects. For a time, the top prize for the Indians seemed to be Clay Buchholz, a pitcher on the cusp of sticking in a major-league starting rotation, but judging from some of the comments made by Mark Shapiro after the trade, I don't think he was ever seriously part of the negotiations. Even large-market clubs now place high value on prospects ready to step into the majors, especially starting pitchers.
So the trade instead was headlined by Justin Masterson, who has been inducing grounders as a reliever in the Red Sox pen for a couple years now. The Indians will immediately start stretching him out into a starting role, and he should be in the rotation for good next season. The other two prospects are farther away, but both have power arms and therefore have the cherished upside that the Indians were looking for in this trade season. Nick Hagadone is just returning from Tommy John surgery, but is already throwing in the mid-90s. He's seen as a potential starter if he can develop a changeup. Bryan Price was a high draft pick in 2008, and this season he was striking out 9.8 batters per 9 innings in the Carolina League.
From a rational standpoint, the trade makes sense. The Indians get themselves both immediate help in the rotation, along with two high-ceiling pitchers that could help down the road. But as a fan, I hate the trade. Not only is Victor being traded, he's being dealt to the Boston Red Sox, a scale model of the Evil Empire. I hate that the MLB economic landscape is such that medium- and small-market teams cannot make mistakes without dealing players like Victor Martinez to fix them, while teams in larger markets correct their mistakes by indirectly or directly buying replacements. I hate that this trade was made, but I also understand that it had to be made.
4 recs |
173 comments
|
Comments
For me, the reality of never being able to see a lifelong Indian was shattered years ago with Albert Belle. After that I knew that almost every player that did well would one day be on another team. And it really does suck that teams like the Yankees can afford to have their Jeters and Posadas while we are lucky to get 6 years out of a player and luckier still if they decide to not go for the biggest paycheck in free agency and sign an extension. Up until the moment he signed with the Yankees I had hope of seeing Sabathia wearing Wahoo again. Of all the players in the 25 years I’ve followed this team he was one I really wanted to see ride it out. I remember him being interviewed during the game the day he was drafted and remember coming up from school to see his debut against the Orioles. I knew he would get traded, but I still hoped he would come back in the off season. But once the Yankees starting throwing the money at him I knew it was over. And that is the problem with players staying with small teams, because no matter how much they like where they are the moment they hit free agency one of the richer teams is just going to throw cash at them. It also does hurt seeing Vic and Cliff traded to two teams I really dislike. The Crisp trade stung me the same way. In fact I’ll probably avoid any highlights of Vic for a while because I despise the Red Sox so much. But it’s the nature of the beast, and while these players that I’ve come to cheer for have moved on they are still out there for me wish the best for. And now there will be a new crop of players to show the same attitude towards while they hopefully take my Cleveland Indians to a championship. And if they don’t I will always remember the good times I had with them while they were here, and hope the best for them when the day comes that they aren’t.
by The Grimace on Aug 1, 2009 2:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
While driving to Wendy’s to get my dinner I started bawling. I’m not kidding. I don’t even know why. He wasn’t even in my top three of favorites but his departure has broken my heart. I understand why it had to be done and I don’t disagree with it but it doesn’t make it hurt less. And it shouldn’t even hurt this much, I don;t even know him. It’s not like a bad break-up or anything. Gosh I’m messed up.
Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?
by ClemsonGirl on Aug 1, 2009 2:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No, I get it. I really did cry when I got home yesterday and discovered he’d actually been traded. Everybody was a little bit in love with him, even if they didn’t really know it.
I feel so… bereft.
by AngG on Aug 1, 2009 6:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think everyone who didn’t even like V-Mart as their favorite Indian realized yesterday how important he was to the franchise.
by Roger Dorn on Aug 1, 2009 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right, he may not have been your favorite per se, but … it’s just so hard to imagine the franchise without him. Grady is great and all, but he just doesn’t have the personality to lead this team. With Vic gone, it’s not a team, it’s just a bunch of guys.
by mrich on Aug 1, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Am I the only one who didn’t cry yesterday?
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You and Chuck.
Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?
by ClemsonGirl on Aug 1, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes you cut me deep
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t. Too upset to cry.
I propose giving Victor a 2012 World Series ring.
by Gradyforpresident on Aug 1, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no crying in baseball.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 1, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t cry, but I’m plenty bummed.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 1, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hate that this trade was made, but I also understand that it had to be made.
Sums it up perfectly for me. I hate this.
"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay
by Turkmenbashi on Aug 1, 2009 2:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thirded. Great post, Ryan.
--
Force quit and move to trash.
by vbc3 on Aug 1, 2009 3:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, well he’s a member of Red Sawx Nation now. Like I said before, I’ll believe all a this, “I wanna be an Indian for life” cazzata when he signs with the Tribe in 2011 for less money than the Sawx offer.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 1, 2009 2:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Chuck, I’m still not over Vic. Sorry. However, I’m also starting to feel strangely bad about Lee leaving too. I think you’re right about him. You have to admire all he’s been through and that he’s done so without being a disingenuous prick.
"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay
by Turkmenbashi on Aug 1, 2009 2:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s a long time to change his mind. It wouldn’t exactly be a Thome move if he signs elsewhere.
by fwembt on Aug 1, 2009 2:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chuck, you need to go ahead and believe him now.
I don’t mean to rub salt in everyone’s wounds, but a year and a half from now, Victor Martinez and the Cleveland Indians are probably — hopefully, I’m going to reluctantly say — just not going to be a good fit.
Vic is a great player, but the upgrade that 2011-2014 Victor Martinez will provide over 2011-2014 Santana/LaPorta/Wegz/etc — fingers crossed — is probably not going to be worth anywhere near the amount he’ll be due on the open market. In order for the Indians to sign him, and for the deal to make the team more and not less likely to win, he will have to willingly sacrifice double-digit millions of dollars.
Sure, that will be his choice, but… come on. I honestly believe Martinez would be willing to go pretty far out of his way to stay with the Tribe, but I don’t think the team can afford to meet him even halfway, and I don’t think the team should… and I don’t think we should think any differently of him when he signs his next deal somewhere other than Cleveland.
Unless it’s with the effing Yankees or Ped Sox. Eff those guys.
by still ill on Aug 1, 2009 3:41 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
My problem is that I cannot reconcile all the angst over Martinez when there wasn’t all this blubbering when they traded Lee. Both trades were done for the same reason. Both involve one great player – Lee – and one very good player – Martinez. You guys like numbers right? OK how about this:
Lee’s VORP in ’08 76.4
Martinez VORP ’08 4.4
Lee’s VORP ’09 46.0
Martinez VORP ’09 22.4
Who’s the more valuable player? Lee by a long shot. But when Lee left, no tears, no wailing, no gnashing of teeth. But as a loss to the Indians, my guess is that they’ll feel the loss of Lee a lot more than Martinez.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 1, 2009 3:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
though i rarely say anything, i’m going to add my two cents to this.
I beg to differ. I don’t think you see the thread that came when Lee was traded as we did (how many comments again? 300+ at last check). I think that with lee there was more of an attempt to logically come to reason with the process, and to reconcile the reality that this improving, yet seemingly unfair dismantling of a beloved team was occurring.
Sure, the second chipping of a Tribe-child through and through hurts and you’re hearing some good ol’ fashioned whining, but the depth of reasoning elicited when Lee was traded says to me that people are trying to go to the easier response, rather than letting emotions rule – b/c if emotions ruled the full fandom of Tribe land, I’m not quite sure how many fans would have lasted beyond June 1st.
someday, someone I cheer for will win a championship...right?
by themadlibs on Aug 1, 2009 4:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like how you included Victor’s injury-plagued ‘08 season but didn’t include Cliff’s awful ’07 season. Way to cherry-pick your numbers.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To get a more fair look at their stats, here is their VORP from 2005 to 2007 that you didn’t include:
2007: Victor 52.3, Cliff -7.5
2006: Victor 46.2, Cliff 21.5
2005: Victor 52.0, 38.0
So Victor had the clear advantage every year, including a huge advantage in 2007. Cliff was much better in ‘08 when Victor was injured most of the year and has been better this year so far, but that doesn’t make up for the difference their first three seasons. And they’re both 30 years old, so you can’t argue that Cliff is on the upside of his career while Victor is on the downside.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Although I’d bet on Cliff declining more slowly than Victor, who’s a catcher. As a lefty pitcher, Cliff’s got a chance to hang on for quite a while. I think Chuck’s wrong that Lee is a “great” player. Both he and Victor are very good. Victor has been very good for longer. Cliff may catch him if he continues to pitch at a high level in the next few years.
by peter m on Aug 1, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Victor never, ever put up a 76 VORP, hell he hasn’t put up a VORP in the 60s yet.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 1, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Victor also never had a season as bad as Lee’s 2006.
Cliff never had four good seasons in a row — hell, he’s never had two good seasons in a row.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 3, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, he probably will have by the first week of October. So far, it’s 1.6 seasons.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 3, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
come on….even if he sucks it up the rest of the way for Phlly his season is still going to look pretty good
by APV on Aug 6, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So the ‘07, ’06 and ’05 seasons are more indicative of future performance than the ’08 and ’09 stats, is that what you’re saying?
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 1, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Their more indicative of overall abilities (all of them together, I mean). You can’t honestly use Vic’s ‘08 season when he was injured as a valid comparison tool. Now, if Cliff was 4 or 5 years younger than Victor, then it would be easy to say that Cliff was just reaching his peak and has room for more improvement while Victor is past his peak, but they’re both the same age so you can’t make that conclusion.
I think Cliff will continue to be a very good pitcher for a few more years but won’t put up a performance like his past two seasons, while Victor will continue a slow decline but still be a good-hitting catcher or solid first baseman for a few more years.
I just thought it was very convenient of you to only incluse the past 1.5 seasons where Cliff was out-of-this-world great and not include two years ago when he was awful and Vic was great, as if that doesn’t matter. If someone else did that you’d be ripping them for it.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And let’s not forget that the claim wasn’t that one is better than the other, but since we’re all soulless mechanical number vampires, we should only care about VORP.
by Voltaire on Aug 1, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the past few days have proven that we aren’t all soulless
by Roger Dorn on Aug 1, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, gimme another stat or group of stats that indicates the relative value of the two players. Martinez was a good player true, but we’ve letter better players go before and managed to recover. We’ll recover from this little melodrama too.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 1, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lf you’re referring to that big tub of goo that pitches for the Yankees, you’re wrong.
CC’s best two year ERA+
’07 143
’06 140
Lee’s best two year ERA+
‘08 175
’09 148 and risin’
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 1, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t know we judged players on just two years. Mark Prior for the Hall of Fame!
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Naw, we judge players on handshake inventiveness and gallons of tears.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 1, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uhh, Vic had some nice stats too, you know.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or is it misinterpreted quotes about reading? I can never remember.
by fwembt on Aug 2, 2009 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lee’s body of work cannot compare to C.C.’s at this point.
Lee has had 1.6 stellar seasons. He has never pitched well in a pennant race.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 3, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did Cliff Lee say he wants to be an Indian for life? Did Cliff Lee cry when he was traded? Did Cliff Lee have nothing but good things to say about the team as he talked to the press, holding back tears, despite the fact that they just broke his heart? Did Cliff Lee’s son as if they were still an Indian yesterday morning?
He wanted to be a lifetime Indian. Get it through your skull.
by Voltaire on Aug 1, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
All of this. Lee is a player, Victor was the team.
by fwembt on Aug 1, 2009 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure I was disappointed when Cliff left but I’m upset for s different reason now that Victor’s gone. It’s not about numbers this time it’s 100% about emotions and being emotionally attached to him which is why I am very okay with the logistics of this trade and the numbers side but that isn’t going to stop me from being sad for awhile. You don’t have to have numbers to justify being sad when a player you admit you are only attached to becase of purely emotional reasons is traded.
Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?
by ClemsonGirl on Aug 1, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shapiro is either going to look like an utter genius with these trades (because of the quantity he was able to get by “buying low”) or an utter failure (as their struggles/injuries were indications of things to come). It’s silly to speculate on which, because only time will tell.
I like the versatility that Masterson (and Laffey) give us going forward. They can be starters but if they fail, it’s a safe bet they are going to be pretty decent relievers (with yummy, yummy groundballs). After the last two years, it’s not a bad thing to be “just a reliever”.
==-=-=-=-
As far as Victor is concerned, I have stated in another thread that this day is as sad as any World Series or ALCS loss we have ever had. Not only does it represent the end of an era, it represents the end of a block of time in our own lives.
As I grow older, baseball doesn’t just become entertainment. It becomes a constant summer companion. A thoroughly complex and engrossing novel that plays out over the course of 162 days. With so many ups and downs, elation and heartbreak, heroes and villains.
Victor was the one constant hero I would have every summer. Quiet yet exuberant. Calm yet determined. The slow, steady progression from just another name in the box score into my favorite player of all-time played out over the past 7 years. I was there to witness (or listen) to it all.
Finding a sports hero is often about self-identification. You often gravitate to a player that is your same age, race or background. Victor was a man born on a different continent and spoke a different language. Yet, through his skills, dedication and undying loyalty he transcended all of those built-in biases and became a fan-favorite. Especially to me.
In a way, Shapiro did him a favor. Instead of having to play “the game” that most up coming free agents do. Where they don’t want to upset the fans, yet don’t want to hurt their bottom line. They often error on the side of not wanting to upset the fans and then ultimately break their hearts when economics (and the pressure from family, agents and the union) cause them to leave. Victor was able to leave in such a manner that no Tribe fan will ever forget. He has cemented himself as the most beloved Indian of this decade for years to come.
by Toxicadam on Aug 1, 2009 3:08 AM EDT reply actions 9 recs
Excellent post.
Since the mid-90’s I really have approached my baseball fandom from a detached point of view, in that I root for the uniform more than the players.
Maybe it’s becoming an adult .
Maybe it’s the realization of the economic inequities of the game.
Maybe it’s because I saw first-hand a lot of stuff in the mid-90’s that diminished a lot of these guys in my eyes as “heroes.”
That said, it was hard to be detached about Victor.
He seemed to have a genuine joy for the game, losing seemed to gnaw at him more than any other player, he seemed to have a strong family life, he was active in his community, and yeah, he put up the stats we all so desperately cling to.
If I had a favorite Indian of the last 10-15 years, it was probably Victor.
And that’s it will kill me to see him get the standing ovation in Fenway.
Even though he deserves it.
by FallsTribeFan on Aug 1, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Very well said. I agree completely.
"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay
by Turkmenbashi on Aug 1, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure… than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat – Teddy Roosevelt
“Your future’s all used up. Why don’t you go home?” – Marlena Deitrich fortune telling Orson Welles in “A Touch of Evil”
I would much rather be in Shapiro’s shoes this AM than in Ricciardis. While Shapiro knows that he can either soar or burn, Ricciardi has to know that he is locked himself into a limping descent in to a tv booth somewhere…
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 1, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ESPN’s commentator (I think it was Jayson Stark) rated the Indians as the only “seller” team that could be rated a “winner” because they brought in a good haul of prospects. He specifically identified the Jays as losers because they made a ton of noise, then essentially did nothing and solved none of their real problems in the process. Pittsburgh also is rated as a loser in that column.
by peter m on Aug 1, 2009 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Despite our shared penchant for odd statistical anomalies (when Andy went 0-6 last night, he was the first Indian to go 0-6 on the same day that the club traded a player who also had an 0-for-6 night in the same season), Stark is sometimes an idiot. The Pirates were winners, too.
by FredOx on Aug 1, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I tend to agree that Stark is wrong about Pittsburgh. But, I think he’s right about the Jays, idiot or not.
by peter m on Aug 1, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I went back and looked again at the Stark column — he actually DOESN’T rate the Pirates a loser. He calls them a question mark — trading so many guys all at once makes it hard to evaluate what they’ve done. So, not so idiotic, really. My error.
by peter m on Aug 1, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
when Andy went 0-6 last night, he was the first Indian to go 0-6 on the same day that the club traded a player who also had an 0-for-6 night in the same season
You’re like a crazy person.
by Logodaedalus on Aug 1, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like?
"Lotta heart in Cleveland." - Ian Hunter
by Denver Tribe Fan on Aug 1, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Toronto is totally a loser. I scorn them.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 1, 2009 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They did at least manage to dump Rolen on the Reds. But, yeah, they totally lost.
"It's all part of life's rich pageant, you know?" - Inspector Clouseau
by woodsmeister on Aug 1, 2009 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No idea why the Reds wanted Rolen. That was dumb.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I read somewhere that Rolen had asked out of Toronto. Toronto threw in money in the deal too, I think. But, it’s still dumb of the Reds to take him on. Maybe they want Hafner?
by peter m on Aug 2, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
shop is pissed
“I understand [trading] Cliff,” Shoppach said. “Maybe it’s just because of my relationship with Victor, but this one’s tougher for me than [the other moves].”
Shoppach voiced the frustration of many in the Tribe clubhouse when he discussed the trades of Lee and Martinez and the direction this ballclub is taking.
“It’s never good when you trade your best pitcher and your best player,” he said. "It’s definitely frustrating. I know when CC [Sabathia] left, that was huge. But it was CC, and then, a few weeks later, it was Casey [Blake] and then, a few weeks later, it was Byrdie [Paul Byrd]. It didn’t happen all at once.
“All the things we preach about, like competing and being a professional and being a family here, to see what’s happened over the last week is tough. It’s tough to swallow when you hear them say ‘next year.’”
by hyphens on Aug 1, 2009 3:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, he’s pissed, and so is everyone else. I told my family that I won’t talk about Vic with them for a couple of days. But in our disgust lets not forget the obvious: Shop, and everyone else on the team had it in their power to perform on the field better than they turned out to be this year. Every season will bring some new faces to displace old faces, sure, but looking prospectively at the year ahead in April ,Shapiro and the front office were not expecting to have to make the big roster moves they are making now in July. It’s only because the team played horribly that we are where we are today. That straight up truth does not invalidate any Indians message about “family”, or “competing” or being “a professional”. In fact our mutual disgust with the reality we’re in, Shop’s and the fans, underline the messages, or at least in my book they do. None of us like it, but we’ll all have to look forward now. And, looking forward, we have a vast number of close to the majors pitchers and we have freed up salary room for the winter.
by MTF on Aug 1, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Regardless of what words are coming out of his mouth, no doubt Shoppach’s main frustration is the fact that he’s hitting .200, and he knows he played a small part in this disaster.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 1, 2009 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I surely hope that Shoppach doesn’t judge his performance by using idiot stats
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 11:25 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
i don’t care if BA is an idiot stat or not. if you are hitting .200, there is about a 99.9% probability that you are having an awful season.
by Cap'n Snegiryov on Aug 1, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Mmmhmm, sure sure
Except he has a .341 OBP, a .329 wOBA, and an increased walk rate relative to last year. If you rank catchers with a minimum of 200 PA by wOBA Shoppach is 11th out of 26 in the majors.
I wouldn’t qualify that as an awful season.
For the record my response to Jay was mostly sarcasm though
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmm, looking at shoppach’s stats on fangraphs, he actually is putting together an OK season for a catcher despite the abysmal BA. a lot of that OBP has to do with all those HBP, but hey, whatever works—shoppach’s always been a big HBP guy.
my main issue with shoppach this year has actually been what i perceive as his pretty crappy defense. is it just me, or has he really, REALLY regressed in this area?
i still think that 99.9% of the time, a player who is hitting .200 is going to be having a crappy season, because 1) most players don’t get HBP nearly as much as shoppach, who has been rather outstanding in that area this year, and 2) if you are having that much trouble making contact, you probably have other problems in the areas of pitch recognition and hand eye coordination that won’t allow you to compensate by walking or hitting for power.
by Cap'n Snegiryov on Aug 1, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To be fair, Shoppach is having a much better year than I thought too. I admit that I was very surprised when looking at his numbers. With a full season of playing time I think he might actually be worth the $3 million or so he’ll make in salary next year.
I know I keep saying this, but I am so confused with our catcher situation right now.
my main issue with shoppach this year has actually been what i perceive as his pretty crappy defense. is it just me, or has he really, REALLY regressed in this area?
i agree, though I’m not knowledgeable enough to gauge if this is true or not
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In terms to catching runners stealing, he actually regressed pretty significantly last year and just didn’t go back to his 07 numbers this year. His CS% by year:
06: 35% (10/29)
07: 36% (13/36)
08: 21% (10/47)
09: 18% (9/50)
It’s worth noting that these numbers may be slightly different from the percentages you’ll see elsewhere, because I removed SB attempts where the pitcher picked a runner off.
by malexander on Aug 1, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course, CS% is not the be all and end all of catching defense, but when I’ve heard people talk about the decline in Shoppach’s defense, that seems to be mostly what they mean. I’m not assuming that you’re in that boat, but I think this is where the more general perception comes from.
by malexander on Aug 1, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And, while I’m thinking about it, there’s the very significant complicating factor of which pitchers Shoppach has been catching. Just going by game logs, it looks like in 07, he was catching mostly for Paul Byrd. In 08, he was the #1 catcher for a lot of the season, and in 09 up to now, he’s been catching Cliff and Pavano. Someone with a better knowledge of pitching deliveries would need to figure out how much these guys helped or hurt Shoppach’s CS%, but it is definitely important to consider.
by malexander on Aug 1, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But seriously, I think it says a lot about Shoppach that he’s upset about victor leaving considering he has the most to gain
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just don’t have the energy for this. I finally saw the video of him standing in front of his locker with those shades on and it was just draining. He was never my favorite Indian, but he was always right up there.
After Choo and Jhonny both singled in the ninth or tenth, I mentally went through the order and said to myself, “It’s gotta be Vic up next, we’re gonna win this ball game!” I almost turned off the radio when I remembered.
by junkballer on Aug 1, 2009 4:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was following the threads here from just before the trade went through yesterday until about the 7th inning of the game last night, but since I was at work I couldn’t log in and post, though I really wanted to. The weight of two years as sellers, and not just sellers but BIG sellers, finally got to me. I’m still mad, but not at the team and not at the trade partners and not at the players. I’m mad that baseball hasn’t even attempted to achieve a competetitive balance. The “luxury tax” doesn’t even come close to a solution. It’s a complex issue, much more complex than I’m sure I understand. I just know that baseball economics suck. Sports are supposed to be enjoyable, but when fans of small and middle market teams have to accept the tough decisions that have to be made with a smile while watching the big boys mend their wounds with wads of money makes this whole thing a whole lot less fun.
I’m ranting, I’ll stop. But if there’s a reason I’m feeling badly today about Cliff and Victor and Garko, and about CC and Casey and Byrd, it’s that a team with more television revenue wouldn’t have had to make all of those trades.
We got uniforms and everything. It's really great.
by AahWoo on Aug 1, 2009 6:26 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Offered without comment – read this post and then read Livingston.
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 1, 2009 8:50 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Reading Livingston makes one just a little dumber. No thanks.
by FredOx on Aug 1, 2009 8:54 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
that was probably the first non-Pluto Plain Dealer column I’ve read in more than a year. Livingston is a hack.
by APV on Aug 1, 2009 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I got caught up in the comments…..I think I’ll go take a shower now
by Nat on Aug 1, 2009 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I tried, but I couldn’t even finish it. It’s no wonder that Cleveland sports fans act the way they do — they have idiots in the media leading the charge.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m waiting for Terry Pluto to speak up about the Indians. It will be interesting to see what he says. In his book “Dealing”, he regrets the critcisms he wrote immediately after the Colon trade, so I’m guessing he will take a different approach this time. I just want someone in the PD to tell fans what’s really going on and not act like we’re giving up competing for the next decade.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I emailed him that we’re waiting for his welcome voice of reason in this blather-fest.
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 1, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Terry Pluto will not be able to respond to emails until after August 15, 2009
^&%!
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 1, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, crap. Bad time to take a vacation Terry.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or a very good time to take a vacation.
"It's all part of life's rich pageant, you know?" - Inspector Clouseau
by woodsmeister on Aug 1, 2009 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he actually wrote his Saturday piece on faith today. Unless it was recycled or written a long time ago. He’s a smart guy, it appears.
by peter m on Aug 1, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Any chance we could trade Livy to KC and bring Posnanski “home”?
by FallsTribeFan on Aug 1, 2009 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I would be so amazingly happy if this actually played out.
by Ryan Kelsey on Aug 1, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would love to see this scrolling on the bottom of the screen on ESPN: “The Kansas City Star agrees to trade Joe Posnanski to the Cleveland Plain Dealer for Bill Livingston, Bud Shaw, and a columnist to be named later”. But that would be like trading Pujols for Ben Francisco and Carl Pavano.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
“In a side note, local website ‘Lets Go Tribe’” volunteered to raise money to pick up the remaining salary due the departing scribes. Fundraising was apparently soon oversubscribed…"
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 1, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In yet other news ESPN’s Steve Phillips now has a rival for worst ex-gm on the air with Fox’s recent trotting out of Jim Bowden
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 1, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not even Bavasi was THIS stupid.
Il faut d'abord durer.
by CU Adam on Aug 1, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wanted to quote some of his article and point out how stupid it is, but some people here have made a conscious effort not to read his stuff, so I won’t spoil their hard work.
It’s mindblowingly dumb however.
by JP_Frost on Aug 1, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Livingston sucks, but he did make one good point, which is we have traded away a #1 starter and an All star catcher a good LF ( DeRosa). I agree the revenue sharing or lack of is a major problem, but we also have a major problem with our Sharpo and buds, their FA signings have killed us, drafting pitcher that can’t throw any harder than I did when I was young or just say total poor drafting. But I do have give them their star and that is doing what they have done the last two weeks, the player they have added all have a large upside that I do believe will make us contenders in 2011. The only question I have is would we have had to do what we did? If our FO could do the main 2/3 of their job as well.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know the drafts have been far from perfect (which goes for all 30 teams), but we have drafted some pretty solid arms the last 2 years:
TJ House
Bryce Stowell
Alex White
Zach Putnam
these are just off the top of my head. I know White hasn’t signed yet, and there’s no indication he won’t, but these kids all have a chance to reach the majors. There are more I’m sure, so it’s not so bad.
by JP_Frost on Aug 1, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is the reason why Lee and Martinez were traded – the amateur talent evaluators either didn’t do their job, or the minor-league development guys didn’t do theirs. So you had some nice position players (most of them acquired via trade), with no pitching to match up with, something that Shapiro mentioned at least a couple times yesterday.
by Ryan on Aug 1, 2009 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is what I was trying to say, but what I write and what I think does not alway match.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha, I have the same problem sometimes.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, let’s all hope it’s not the minor-league development not doing their jobs, or we’ve traded major leaguers to have the same problem w/ more minor leaguers, no?
please be talent evaluators, please be talent evaluators***
great.
by themadlibs on Aug 1, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where did all the good sport writers go? We get no inside info anymore, are they all lazy or so dum that the FO looks at talking to them as a waste of time. The only PD writer that really works at his job covers the Cavs (Windhorst).
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Windhorst is great. Too bad he can’t cover the Indians and Browns too.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jobs drying up, industry values volume and VOLUME more than depth.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 1, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Painful to read, all of it. Just have to keep telling me that its part of the process and part of major league baseball. Hopefully more good years will be quickly on the horizon.
Victor, we’ll miss you. Thank you for everything.
by MooneysRebellion on Aug 1, 2009 8:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder how Shapiro feels about all this. He’s a professional and some would even describe him as cold-hearted, but I’m pretty sure he feels absolutely gutted.
by JP_Frost on Aug 1, 2009 9:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He was in the TV booth for the 5th inning yesterday, and he seemed a lot “looser” in his discussions with Underwood and Manning than he usually is. He did talk about how, after all the weeks of working to trade Victor, he finalized a deal that would improve the long-term outlook of the team, patted himself on the back, and then realized what he had done. I’m personally certain he felt like a monster, and I thank him for it. You have to be a cold-hearted bastard to be a good GM.
by Voltaire on Aug 1, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was sort of wondering if it wouldn’t be good for a GM like Shapiro, who, though very calculated, does seem to get very close to the team and some players, to have a high ranking assistant who NEVER interacts with the players and even only watches our team play as much as he does other teams, so that there can be a voice within the FO complete detached from emotion.
Not that Shapiro isn’t doing a fine job of breaking everyone’s heart, but just an idea that came to me last night.
Il faut d'abord durer.
by CU Adam on Aug 1, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
they attempted to recreate the several years’ successful drafts they never had.
Therein lies the true indictment.
On a separate note, I am going to buy me a pair and go tonight….
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 1, 2009 9:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Vichan and I are going to be at tonight’s game as well. Apparently bleacher tickets are selling like crazy. (I don’t know, she bought mine for me because i am just that awesome.)
by AngG on Aug 1, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This just proves that the Indians are a AAAA team for the redsox. Need a CFer as yours just signed for the Yankees? Just call a defensive expert from the tribe for a couple of years (Crisp). Need a starting pitcher to help you get to the playoffs? Just call one up from the tribe for free (Byrd). Need a top shelf catcher as your guy has gotten old? Send the pu-pu pitcher platter to the tribe, and call up Victor.
by oxforddave on Aug 1, 2009 10:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This just proves that about 25 clubs are farm teams for the Yanks and Red Sox.
by Voltaire on Aug 1, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All small to mid market teams are farm systems for big market clubs. That’s the nature of the game unfortunately.
Trading established talent for high ceiling prospects as always been the equalizer. But when the economic market hits a major downturn it causes the double effect of both making high ceiling prospects harder to pry from other teams while also forcing small market teams to cut salary, and encourage them to jettison players like Vic.
It’s a perfect storm of suck.
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 11:35 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Well, at least they’re paying big signing bonuses to their draft picks and then sending them to us on the cheap.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 1, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Am I the only one who didn’t like this trade?
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 11:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure that anyone liked the trade, I like the player we got, would I have love to have gotten more, yes.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think that whether you see masterson as a starter or reliever is pretty much dispositive with regard to whether you like this trade.
and of course, that turns on whether you think masterson can start getting lefties out.
i am a glass half full guy with masterson . . . i guess i’ve always seen the lowe comps and read the glowing scouting reports. plus, i’m a velocity/tools whore when it comes to most young pitchers (with the notable exception of laffey). masterson is a big, durable dude who throws hard and gets a lot of grounders and strikeouts. he’s also got that funky arm angle and needs to develop his third pitch, the circle change, if he’s going to be more than a marginal starter. i hope that the development of that changeup plus his natural physical development (which, i suppose, is near finished) will help him maintain his velocity as a starter and be effective enough against lefties.
by Cap'n Snegiryov on Aug 1, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He’ll always give up hits to lefties, just like Carmona will. The key will be to limit the walks and XBH. If he can develop his changeup and accomplish that, he’ll be good.
by TribeJay on Aug 1, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I don’t think he’s going to grow up to be Derek Lowe. I see his upside as a durable yet mediocre starter. And no, mediocre does not equal bad. I think the idea is to get a couple decent starters now (Masterson and Carrasco), and hope that a couple of the high-ceiling guys turn out in two years.
by Ryan on Aug 1, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Next years rotation: Westbrook, Carmona, Masterson, Laffey (probably) one from Huff/Sowers/Carrasco/Rondon/Lewis. You can see what Shapiro’s thinking is — we’re back to 8+ starters and, except for Westbrook, they’re all inexpensive and have the potential to get better. If 2 of the young guys actually do, you’ve got the makings of a rotation for 2011.
by peter m on Aug 1, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My guess is that that the order for the 5th spot goes Sowers/Huff/Lewis/Carrasco/Rondon
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Basically agree. Sowers/Huff is hard to call — they’ve got the rest of the season to see if one of them actually has the edge.
by peter m on Aug 1, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Sowers gets the nod since he’s out of options, had multiple opportunities, and Huff could use some extra time in AAA
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I honestly don’t want to see Sowers in the rotation next year unless he shows something great over the last two months. I’d like to see us try making him a reliever and see how that goes.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. Though for me to want Sowers in the rotation next year he’ll have to go something like 8-0 with a 1.00 ERA and .50 WHIP over the next two months. Not to mention he’d need to up his k-rate to above 5.5 k/9.
by Ryan Kelsey on Aug 1, 2009 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In fairness, Sowers’ 4.97 ERA would be 43rd in the AL. Not that that’s great, but with 14 teams, that makes him solidly a #4 starter.
He also started the season with two be trainwrecks. After that, he had a five-inning relief appearance — scoreless — and has made ten starts since then. Dating back to that May 25 relief gig, he has a 3.94 ERA over 62 IP. It is possible that he’s turning a corner.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 3, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really? What about Huff’s performance so far makes you think he needs additional time in AAA?
"It's all part of life's rich pageant, you know?" - Inspector Clouseau
by woodsmeister on Aug 1, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t really think he’s likely to be sent down any time soon. But his OBP against is basically the same as Sowers’, who is generally reviled around here as a starter, anyway.
by peter m on Aug 1, 2009 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, and how much more major league time does Sowers have than Huff? C’mon guys, David Huff has made 14 major league starts. Sowers has made 60.
"It's all part of life's rich pageant, you know?" - Inspector Clouseau
by woodsmeister on Aug 1, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huff hasn’t been sharp all year going back to his time in AAA. His periphs have dropped almost universally across the board (k rate, BB%,FIP,etc.) Considering our roster depth, I think Huff starts out in AAA so he can regain work through some of his issues.
it’s not a knock on Huff per se, just a prediction based on the context of our situation
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think one of the Sowers/Huff/Lewis/Laffey will be packaged in a trades this winter, I think we have more holes than most think. 1st baseman, LF, utility infielder, starting pitcher. yes we hope to fill these hole from our minors, and we will, some but not all.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think any of those positions are holes
LaPorta- LF
Donald/Valbuna- utility
Starting pitcher- well…there’s a lot
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Laporta, yes I think he will be our starting LF, and Valbuna our 2nd baseman, but to be honest I have not seen Donald play, is he ready or does he spend most of next year at AAA. Watched the last two nights of Marte at bats over and over tried to compared it to last year and the only thing I see different is he more selective, hope this is enough.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Donald was expected to be in the bigs this year if it hadn’t been for the knee injury
by APV on Aug 1, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that is good to hear, and when he comes up in Sept we will get to see what we got.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I asked this elsewhere, but is Sowers really going to get another chance next year to be in the rotation?? I mean, above guys like Huff, Lewis Carrasco, Rondon: all who haven’t established crappiness and have better stuff and ceilings, and all who will have more than a half season above AA?
by Ryan Kelsey on Aug 1, 2009 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have no idea what they are going to do with Sowers. I imagine they won’t want to lose him, but I don’t know where they think he’ll begin next season.
by APV on Aug 1, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wince every time I read his name here, especially in the format of “better guy/Sowers/better guy/better guy”
by dgcambridge on Aug 2, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i mostly agree, although i think i see more upside in masterson. i’m not saying he’s going to be derek lowe, by any means—that would be pretty unreasonable—but i do think the comp is justifiable. lowe had a weird development path that i wouldn’t expect anyone to follow—didn’t even become a starter until he was 29 years old. i dunno. . . i’m not trying to do any hardcore analysis here obviously, but i see a lot of similarities in both pitchers’ physical attributes and approach.
that said, if you define a “mediocre starter” as someone like the early 2000s versions of jake westbrook and gil meche—a #3-#4 hoss who eats up a lot of innings and keeps you in the ballgame—i definitely see masterson following that kind of path. he needs to cut down on the walks (as many young starters do) but i do see him down the road as a pitcher whose value is mostly tied up in being an average starter with lots of durability.
by Cap'n Snegiryov on Aug 1, 2009 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess part of the reason I dislike this trade is based on my belief that Victor can still play quality defense at catcher. Obviously his value goes up if he’s catcher
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i can see that. i think he’s decent defensive C who makes up for some of his deficiencies (throwing out runners mainly) by performing well in other areas—blocking balls, managing a pitching staff, etc. of course, the perception around the league seems to be that vic is a poor defensive catcher who can’t play behind the plate everyday, and that is really what matters as far as trade value goes.
by Cap'n Snegiryov on Aug 1, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think there’s a difference between perception around the league and the perception amongst fans and media types. But that said i agree with everything else you said.
Also, am i the only person who thinks throwing out runners is a bad measure for the defensive skills of a catcher? I’m not saying it isn’t important, but there seems to be a lot of other aspects to the catcher’s position
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know with all the talent we have in the minors I wouldn’t be surprised if we packaged some of it in a trade for an impact player.
One thing I do like about all these trades is that it sets us up nicely to make a big splash during the offseason or, god forbid, next year’s trade deadline. With the market being the way it is our money and prospects could go far
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 12:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
trades of prospecst for major leaguers is not something that we are good at, but it would be fun to talk about.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like Mark DeRosa?
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure, we don’t do that very often. At least not under Shapiro. I think you’re remembering the Giles/Burnitz/Sexson trades but those were under Hart.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah DeRosa and Lofton are the two I can think of. They both worked pretty well.
by Ryan Kelsey on Aug 1, 2009 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope that we will need to do that. But that will only come once we’re contending. 2011.
by dgcambridge on Aug 2, 2009 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Guys. Guys. Next time remind me about hangovers.
by AngG on Aug 1, 2009 1:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This maybe a bad time to say this, but Sharpo has just completed what he great at. Maybe at the end of the year it is time to find a new FO (I’m not just including Sharpo) one that can pickup the pieces he has provided and move forward.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 2:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Even when it works out, I’ll never support giving Torii Hunter five years, $90M. I"ll keep the thoughtful, reasonable, objective GM.
by xrickx on Aug 1, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know that we could never do that, and what I was talking about is the draft and make the correct FA at much small level.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
make the correct FA at much small level
But it’s much harder to pick the right free agents at the lower level because they’re inherently more flawed players. It’s very easy to spend big money on a guy like CC or Teixeira but harder to choose from the Delluccis of the world.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 1, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And then when it comes time to make trades should we fire that GM and rehire Shapiro?
Also, who are these horrible free agent signings? Off the top of my head Dellucci was the worse free agent signing Shapiro’s made and even that wasn’t all that bad.
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The bullpen FA signings have, in general, been very poor
by Roger Dorn on Aug 1, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As bullpen FA signings tend to be. Filling a bullpen in the free agent market is a recipe for overspending.
by FredOx on Aug 1, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like Fred said below, bullpen signings are hit or miss no matter who you are. I think this goes double for a small market team looking for bottom of the barrel pitchers. Between Byrd, Pavano, Millwood, Blake, and Perez I think he’s done pretty decent for his limited resources.
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wasn’t critical of his FA signings. I said his bullpen signings have all been poor. Some teams succeed in signing relievers. We have not yet that I can think of
by Roger Dorn on Aug 2, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We really don’t have a massive FA bust outside of, maybe, Kerry Wood. The draft just got overhauled this year with new people in charge. I think we should give them more than one draft to get things going.
by fwembt on Aug 1, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s too early to call Wood a bust, particularly considering the way he’s been used.
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Aug 1, 2009 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree. I threw that out there for the sake of argument as the only one that was even a possibility.
by fwembt on Aug 2, 2009 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is “Sharpo” intended to be an insult that I am just too obtuse to understand, or just a consistent misspelling?
by FredOx on Aug 1, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marx Brothers GM.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 1, 2009 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now I feel a little less dumb. Wait, no I don’t. Sharpo is only slightly wittier than Cheapiro.
by FredOx on Aug 1, 2009 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sharpo is the forgotten Marx Brother.
"It's all part of life's rich pageant, you know?" - Inspector Clouseau
by woodsmeister on Aug 1, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have dyslexia since childhood and screw up words, I will put Shapiro in my word checker , and I would never try to insult someone. sorry for my error.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
was looking up our FA sigings and ran into this
http://www.theclevelandfan.com/article_detail.php?id=219
Dolan does spend when it is with reason.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 3:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just want to say that this is the best site I’ve ever been on, and it is great to spend time with such knowledgable posters, I know we do not alway agree with each other but the knowlede tranfer is great.
Fan in Texas
by fanintexas on Aug 1, 2009 3:22 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs

by 






















