Our next fearless leaders
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that I don't think Eric Wedge will be our manager next year. I'm going to assume that would make all coaching positions available as well. Who are the people we would want in charge of our Indians for the next 7-10 years?
My first choices are Tony LaRussa as the manager and Leo Mazzone as pitching coach (or Dave Duncan).
Tony's contract expires at the end of this season and I've heard that he and Mozeliak don't really get along. Although, St. Louis might lock up LaRussa simply because he has a really good relationship with Pujols and I've heard that Tony staying would be one of the biggest reasons for Albert to stay in "the loo".
I'm surprised that Mazzone hasn't been picked up by anyone since Baltimore fired him. He did have one of the best starting rotations (debatably) in MLB history, so he had a lot to work with in Atlanta. Baltimore gave him nothing to work with, so I'm not sure how much of that rotation's lack of success was his fault. Either way, I'd like to give him a shot here.
For Dave Duncan. Anyone that can get Kyle Lohse and Joel Piniero to look like quality pitchers is doing something right.
Have at it. Who are your favorites if Wedge is shown the door?
0 recs |
172 comments
Comments
Duncan goes where Tony goes. They are kind of a package deal.
If St. Louis Keeps Tony and the rumors are true that Oquendo is looking for a managing job then I like Jose Oquendo. He’s the man.
Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?
by ClemsonGirl on Aug 17, 2009 1:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
good point. The offer would have to be much more than the Indians would ever offer, for Duncan to ever step out and take a managerial position away from LaRussa. I suppose I’d be okay with Oquendo, but I think I’m leaning more towards Farrell (sp?).
by MooneysRebellion on Aug 17, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think there’s a lot you can say about Carl Willis, but I think there’s a case for firing him, too. The case for firing Shelton doesn’t seem to be as strong, as we’ve seen a few hitters bounce back without being demoted. Of course, Shelton seems to have had more talent to work with than Shelton — in terms of lineup depth, not just one or two stars — but it’s awfully hard to parse.
I too find it amazing that Mazzone isn’t presently employed. I think it would be great to pair him with a young manager, and there are plenty of good candidates there.
I see no evidence that LaRussa is worth anywhere near what he can command. I can’t see sinking 5M or more into a manager when we need to conserve the big dollars for our players. With Mazzone, you can actually make the case based on the numbers for a ROI, but it’s doubtful you could do that with LaRussa.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 17, 2009 1:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Could you imagine being a manager and having to deal with Mazzone’s rocking next to you very day?
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 17, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can get used to a lot of things if I’m winning.
by ASP on Aug 17, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I have to imagine Mazzone doesn’t want a job or doesn’t want the jobs available.
I think there’s a very strong case to be made for Willis, Shelton, Skinner or Lovullo and, reading between the lines, we’re back to the fact that there’s a strong case to be made for just about everyone.
It’s going to be totally dependent on the interview, something we’ll never know anything about.
by afh4 on Aug 17, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Datz_a_fact: MAKIN A STRONG CASE FOR MANAGER BOYZ! ITS MADE OF STEEL NERVES, HARD DATA, AND THE FENDER OF THE BUS IM THROWIN WEDGE UNDER! (2:36 pm)
by fleerdon on Aug 17, 2009 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Datz_a_fact: YALL WANNA SEE THE MATCH-UPS WITH THE COMMANDATZ AT THE HELM??!? CUZ HOT DAMN DO I ROCK THOSE MATCH-UPS!!! CHECK THE DATZ-A-BASE!!! (2:42 pm)
by fleerdon on Aug 17, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
it’s amazing… twitter jokes frustrate me just as much as real twitter verbiage.
by Brick. on Aug 17, 2009 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You went with the “Your dad’s a plumber, and he gave you a swirlie” joke, but you’re frustrated by Twitter gags?
by Chemo on Aug 18, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i can’t read them. i genuinely can’t read twitter language on the first pass, ever.
by Brick. on Aug 18, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is Datz language, not Twitter language.
Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?
by ClemsonGirl on Aug 18, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i reluctantly concede that this is hilarious.
by emil minty on Aug 17, 2009 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I kept my hate-meter high until the Datz-a-Base, which is admittedly awesome.
by Voltaire on Aug 17, 2009 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I was just looking to get some discussion going & didn’t immediately consider the dollars. I rescind my “LaRussa for MGR” push.
I’m going to go with a guy that brough professionalism and intelligence : Orel Hershieser. I haven’t heard his name out there yet, so I’ll be the first? If nothing else, you’ll basically have 2 pitching coaches in the dugout. Cuz pitching wins championships.
I’m just stoked to see who Orel would bring in as strength and conditioning coach.
by lenred on Aug 17, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I loved Orel on the field, but he’s known in many circles as a presumptuous blowhard, too.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 17, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
kinesthetic sense… loves talking about that because none of the other announcers has a clue what it means
by gorilla_baller on Aug 17, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aren’t there one or two other presumptuous blowhards currently managing in the majors? Gardenhire and LaRussa come to mind.
by lenred on Aug 17, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could deal with a manager that’s a presumptuous blowhard.
"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay
by Turkmenbashi on Aug 18, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could also go for someone with a little life. Maybe a manager like Billy Martin? Or Don Zimmer. We need Don Zimmer.
by lenred on Aug 17, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the problem with a lot of these suggestions is most people are only suggesting coaches they’ve heard of, which has got to be at most 1% of the possible pool that the front office can choose from. All these coaches started somewhere, too.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Aug 17, 2009 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Billy Martin doesn’t have a little life. He’s dead.
by odradek on Aug 18, 2009 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Sal Fasano, We’re not past the ’stache
by Sizemorgasim on Aug 17, 2009 2:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i don’t want some NL manager that bunts even more than wedge.
by Brick. on Aug 17, 2009 2:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i wonder who the new manager will bring in to be the bullpen coach.
by Brick. on Aug 17, 2009 2:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i want the guy who sits in the middle from Shark Tank.
by Brick. on Aug 17, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoever it is, I am prepared to be underwhelmed. It won’t be some splashy name like LaRussa, Valentine or Hargrove. It will more likely be some young(ish), organizational warrior-type that is well-respected in the baseball world. Probably someone that Shap/Antonneti already have a relationship with.
by Toxicadam on Aug 17, 2009 2:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think I would find nearly anyone underwhelming. I mean, what manager would really get people excited?
I know everyone here is wild for John Farrell but I can’t figure out why we should want him or anyone else for that matter. I know zero about these peoples’ personalities, leadership styles, strategic tendencies, etc.
by afh4 on Aug 17, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about your Jack McKeon idea? I liked that one.
by NickFantana on Aug 17, 2009 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn’t there be a real chance of him passing away midseason?
by gorilla_baller on Aug 17, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I think the statue of limitations on McKeon might have passed. I do still support the idea of someone really old that will just sit there.
by afh4 on Aug 17, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I want to be underwhelmed. The sort of splashy managerial hire that anyone would even notice is going to be expensive. Given that I don’t believe the WAR of a manager is all that high, even for guys like LaRussa, I’d rather the club spend the money elsewhere. Or make the beer cheaper.
by FredOx on Aug 17, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Davey Johnson! Splashy, but inexpensive.
by fleerdon on Aug 17, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sounds like a fun guy to take to the local swimmin’ hole.
by Brick. on Aug 17, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Or make the beer cheaper.
I can get behind this.
by hans on Aug 18, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t care what you say, I am still wild for Farrell
by Roger Dorn on Aug 17, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so i see this a lot, but i’m not sure why.
by Brick. on Aug 17, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
With the Indians, Farrell has been instrumental in the development of such pitchers as Fernando Cabrera, Jason Davis, Jeremy Guthrie, Edward Mujica, Rafael Perez, and Jeremy Sowers.
I mean, what else do you need to hear?
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 17, 2009 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Surprised this didn’t get more of a reaction.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 18, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There, feel better?
I agree. You hung a lot of red meat out there and none of us sharks bit…
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 18, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trying to pretend it doesn’t exist
by Roger Dorn on Aug 18, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Okay, I can see that.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 18, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. The best I can hope for is someone that at least looks like a badass.
"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay
by Turkmenbashi on Aug 18, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would rather be underwhelmed than get a shiny name. A shiny name is not only likely too expensive, but being hired to create a buzz.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Aug 17, 2009 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not saying that I want it to happen, not saying that I don’t, because I just don’t know enough about his style. But I could see Travis Fryman as the next manager. In the system already, would seem to fit the Shap/Anton model… Anyone seen the MV Scrappers play over the past few seasons want to comment?
by Wahoo25Ben on Aug 17, 2009 5:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Skinner, Lovullo, Fryman….if we’re just going to promote someone, maybe we should trust the bottom line (440-315, I think) and give the job to Mike Sarbaugh.
My teams win 58% of the time!
by dgcambridge on Aug 17, 2009 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Skinner was 448-333 and made the playoffs five out of six years.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 17, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And by the way, those Skinner-led minor league playoff teams had extremely little major league talent on them … Branyan, Johnny Mac, David Riske … and not much else.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 17, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, maybe he should have developed some. I just checked Lovullo too, his record appears to be 589-515 (sometimes it’s hard to tell), and that includes this years’ mess. This is just more of the same story – young talent up and down the system, worst team in baseball (that tries).
by dgcambridge on Aug 17, 2009 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“maybe he should have developed some” … seems like a harsh judgment. Skinner was coming up as a manager just as the Indians farm system was running dry and being stripmined.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 17, 2009 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, that line was all sarcasm. I don’t know how much importance to place on these records, but I’d rather have these guys winning 55% than 45%.
by dgcambridge on Aug 17, 2009 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I may be in the vast minority here, I don’t know, but I was a big fan of giving Skinner the job full-time after he got the interim tag.
by FallsTribeFan on Aug 17, 2009 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Me too, though now I wonder how much of that was his welcome departure from the ways of Chollie Manuel.
by odradek on Aug 18, 2009 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do we really give people credit for leading minor league teams to the playoffs?
"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay
by Turkmenbashi on Aug 18, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In general, no, but how else to grade someone whose main experience is in the minors?
I do think it’s significant that he had a few teams that seemed to outperform their talent by a significant margin. I don’t think anyone has accused Eric Wedge of that lately.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 18, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay
by Turkmenbashi on Aug 18, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Billy Beane.
OK, just kidding. I’m 99% sure Wedge will return. I don’t think the Indians need a sacrificial lamb, and I’m fine with that. I feel like Wedge does a rotten job of developing young players, but I have no incontrovertible evidence to back up my feelings. I do not like the shuffling of players to and fro from position to position. I am not sure that is Wedge’s fault or a symptom of being a small market team. Again, I feel like the shuffling can cause a lack of focus in other skill areas, but I have no evidence to back it up.
However, if we find out that Jhonny forgot to get his eyes checked this year, I’m going to want everyone fired including the janitor.
proverbial "moron in a hurry"
by 94neverout on Aug 17, 2009 5:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
VALBUENA
You swing the bat the same way? This works?
PERALTA
Sometimes. One time it worked for a whole year. I am trying to “run into one.” That’s what the man shouting all the time wants. For me to “run into one.”
VALBUENA
What man? Wedge? He’s the manager, Jhonny.
PERALTA
He wants me to “run into one.” So I am trying to do that. I do not know who he is.
"It's all part of life's rich pageant, you know?" - Inspector Clouseau
by woodsmeister on Aug 17, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
would willie randolph be both splashy and cheap-ish?
by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 17, 2009 6:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think if we’re going for splashy, we should limit our search to good managers.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Aug 17, 2009 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I remember an MLB.com article talking about how many times he’d interviewed for a position before being hired by the Mets. Apparently it never occurred to the author that the reason he’d never landed a job before was that he was bad.
by Voltaire on Aug 17, 2009 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Randolph, but I didn’t like the fact that — like Hershiser and for that matter Vizquel — he thought he should be a big-league manager despite never having managed at any other level. That, to me, is kind of stupid.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 17, 2009 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i’m not sure it’s clear that willie is not good, is it?
by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 18, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, but how do we know any manager is or isn’t good? How much of his success is the team’s talent, etc etc etc, but I’m not trying to get into that.
I made the comment because I equate “splashy” with “a big name,” one that will get the fan base excited. To the layperson baseball fan, I don’t know how many people would get excited about a manager who hasn’t won anything and was fired for having a great talent pool that constantly fell short. Isn’t that what we already have?
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Aug 18, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dig what you’re saying, but I wouldn’t be afraid to hire a retread either, just because he’s a retread. There’s a learning curve, and it goes without saying that history is full of managers who had more success in their second or third jobs.
Which is not to endorse Willie, necessarily, but hell, maybe he would succeed here. It’s not like any of us actually know.
The once and future
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Aug 18, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just think there are better qualified candidates out there.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 18, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As do I.
The once and future
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Aug 19, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everybody knows you never go full retread
by dgcambridge on Aug 20, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
i hear you…but i actually think that your representation of randolph’s tenure at shea is a bit unfair. 54.4% winning % over 3.5 half years, including a 97 win club that lost in 7 in the NLCS…in my estimation, if the mets don’t collapse in epic fashion in ‘07, willie’s still the manager.
in any event, i don’t mean to come off as a randolph apologist. with his sample, it’s pretty much impossible to judge whether he’s good or not. i mention and harp on him, though, b/c i think it’s a big enough name to make fans say, “really? interesting…”, at the same time as being relatively cheap, on the spectrum of big-ish names.
by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 18, 2009 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But what kind of talent did he have to work with while going .544?
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 18, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you mean aside from expensive?
by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 19, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How clear does it need to be?
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 18, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don’t think .544 and an NLCS appearance necessarily establishes anything close to not good.
but, as nick says, it’s pretty hard to judge a manager…especially a manager w/ only 3.5 years under his belt.
by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 19, 2009 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think any list might feature names that the Mariners considered last year.
I believe some of them were …
Joey Cora
The Hale boys (Chip and DeMarlo)
Brad Mills (an interesting name)
Ron Roenicke
In-house candidates would obviously be Lovullo and maybe Fryman (although I hear Fryman really likes working with the younger players.)
And, of course, Farrell will probably be a name near the top of many rumor lists.
by FallsTribeFan on Aug 17, 2009 6:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i thought manny acta would be more popular on this board.
by emil minty on Aug 17, 2009 8:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
When he was fired there was a big push to hire him.
Honestly, I forget who’s even an available manager.
Acta. Sure. Him.
by afh4 on Aug 17, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Acta was my personal preference, but that’s just because I knew his name and liked some of the quotes I saw from him when he ran the Ex-Expos.
If it wasn't for disappointments, I wouldn't have any appointments
by Jackdaw on Aug 18, 2009 1:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still like Acta. I also like Farrell. I might consider applying myself—is that through indians.com?
The once and future
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Aug 18, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Y’know, they actually do let you apply for stadium jobs there.
by Voltaire on Aug 18, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i share your agnosticism (word? who cares) on this. i have no idea what a manager does over the course of a season to pull a team together. i feel fairly certain it has nothing to do with what we read in the paper about what the manager does.
by emil minty on Aug 17, 2009 8:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Albert Belle. I guarantee that watching Indians baseball would be more interesting.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 18, 2009 2:03 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I can get on board with this
"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay
by Turkmenbashi on Aug 18, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I admit that there are moments when I think that Albert Belle actually died, instead of just suffered a career-ending disability. I don’t know why this is. I’ll save you the time and say that I realize some will say the same of me. But lurking is acceptable.
by tabler84 on Aug 18, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
With a gun to my head, my all-time favorite Indian
by APV on Aug 18, 2009 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Albert just the guy to hold it too.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 18, 2009 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Highly, highly likely that Shapiro hires someone he knows or has worked closely with for an extended period of time. That is his modus operandi. He appears to like mind-melding with the manager, and he likes the the partner relationship he has with Wedge. The apparent schism between the front office and Wedge’s management is probably excruciating for him. If he hires an unknown quantity (to him, not the public), he’ll leave himself open to the difficulties he had with Charlie Manuel. He may need some out-of-the-box thinkers added to the organization, but that is not the place he’ll put “new thinking”.
No mention of Marty Brown, now skipper of the Hiroshima Toyo Carp. He managed Buffalo for 3 seasons? Just throwing it out there…
by Bogalusa Bomber on Aug 18, 2009 9:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Closed circuit shot from Wedge’s interview 10/23/02
/2002
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 18, 2009 10:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Can Wedge be Evil Kirk with the mustache and goatee?
by Bogalusa Bomber on Aug 18, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Give me Ryne Sandberg or Travis Fryman.
Case of the beet bandit. Missing beets from all over the farm, no footprints. Inside job. Mose in socks. Boom. Case closed. -Dwight Schrute
by mjschaefer on Aug 18, 2009 10:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t like players who lobby to be major-league managers before managing a game in the minors. Sandberg has a couple of minor-league seasons under his belt now, but he pushed hard to be hired instead of Piniella in 2006. Supposedly he deceived Hendry at the time, who thought Sandberg just wanted to have dinner.
by FredOx on Aug 18, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of all the lousy, dirty … So what? I’m sure Hendry got his dinner, and that’s what counts, right?
Cubs manager is a dream job for him. Can’t fault him for pushing for it, and I do credit him for going to the minors afterward.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 18, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Hendry thing is just kind of stupid, but how is what Sandberg did any better than Hershiser? Besides, no way Sandberg takes a non-Cubs job in 2010.
by FredOx on Aug 18, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It isn’t.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 18, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you forgot “lowdown” and “cotton-pickin.”
-Erik
by drerikbrady on Aug 18, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s funny what perspective can do. Here is one blogger’s thoughts that maybe Duncan is the reason why C. Perez was not successful in St. Louis.
by Toxicadam on Aug 18, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Familiarity. Contempt. All that.
In a way, you sort of just want the guy who can make smart, defensible decisions and can have the player’s respect. If I’ve cooled on Wedge, it’s only because I’ve started to view more of his decisions as indefensible.
by fleerdon on Aug 18, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think i’ll be happiest with a new manager who is someone I’ve never heard of. Or at least, someone I’ve only heard of because I talk here and so I know who most of our minor league managers are.
by AngG on Aug 18, 2009 2:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bobby Valentine is leaving Japan, i think he is perfect.
by I'd give my legs for Wegz on Aug 18, 2009 3:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Perfect for what? Winning zero division titles in 15 seasons? If we’re going to waste money on a splashy hire, might as well pick one that the clevesters will recognize as good.
by FredOx on Aug 18, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, not sure I follow the logic behind a splashy/flashy/dashy hire. I like Angie’s idea better.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Aug 18, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Either you believe that there is a small subset of managers who are just so good that they’re worth a big chunk of wins all by themselves, or you think hiring a Big Name will get our notoriously fair-weather fans to put butts in seats. Both arguments are BS, in my opinion. We need a metric, Marginal Wins or Wins Above Joel Skinner or something.
by FredOx on Aug 18, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The case for John Farrell:
1.) For a candidate to be worth discussing seriously amongst fans, there should be at least an outside chance for it to be plausible. Farrell is more likely than LaRusa or Bobby Valenine or Willie Randolph or big time names in that he has a relationship with the Indians and Shapiro, as they worked side-by-side for 7 years. And while Farrell and Francona are former teammates and good friends, Farrell has meaningful ties to Cleveland: he lives in Westlake. So he has a reason to like the Indian’s job and Shaprio has a reason to like him.
2.) He knows the a lot of the major league players- their strengths and weaknesses. He was our Director of Player Development from 01-06. He would know Sowers, Laffey, Raffy Perez, J-Lew, Carmona, Sizemore, Marte, Peralta, Hafner. And probably some of our other parts deeper in the system.
3.) Experience. As a major leaguer, a big time college program pitching coach, player development director, and major league pitching coach for one of the best teams over the last 3 seasons, he has worked with young players in a variety of aspects.
4.) By all accounts, he’s good. The Indians system, under Shapiro, Antonetti, Huntington, and Farrell was extremely respected. Winning organization of the year awards and front office awards, during a quick and strong rebuild. The Red Sox love him. A good friend of mine and serious baseball and Red Sox fan has told me several times he is more scared of losing Farrell than just about any other single person on the team. He thinks he is more important to the success of the Red Sox and their clubhouse than Francona.
5.) He’s from out of the organization. Sure, he has a lot of experience in the Shapiro front office, but at the same time, he has been in a different organization for the last three seasons. Luvello and Skinner are fine choices, but one of the reasons I’m not as excited about them is that they are too close to the situation. They would have a similar point of view as anyone else within the organization. Farrell has worked with Francona, Epstein, and the rest of the Boston brain trust. Theoretically, he will have a different voice.
Boston would make it tough to bring him to Cleveland. But, in my mind, he is the best candidate out there that we would have a chance of actually getting.
by Ryan Kelsey on Aug 18, 2009 4:24 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
And probably some of our other parts deeper in the system.
Like our medula oblongata?
by lenred on Aug 18, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Alright, nothing against you DD but just for fun:
1.) For a candidate to be worth discussing seriously amongst fans, there should be at least an outside chance for it to be plausible. Farrell is more likely than LaRusa or Bobby Valenine or Willie Randolph or big time names in that he has a relationship with the Indians and Shapiro, as they worked side-by-side for 7 years. And while Farrell and Francona are former teammates and good friends, Farrell has meaningful ties to Cleveland: he lives in Westlake. So he has a reason to like the Indian’s job and Shaprio has a reason to like him.
I get what you’re saying but there are literally only a handful of guys who are “implausible” and none of them are going to get consideration from Shapiro. I just don’t buy “might actually get hired” as a reason to be excited about a guy.
2.) He knows the a lot of the major league players- their strengths and weaknesses. He was our Director of Player Development from 01-06. He would know Sowers, Laffey, Raffy Perez, J-Lew, Carmona, Sizemore, Marte, Peralta, Hafner. And probably some of our other parts deeper in the system.
As does Wedge. As do many other candidates (Skinner, Lovullo, Fryman, etc). And as did not dozens of managers who were successful with new clubs.
3.) Experience. As a major leaguer, a big time college program pitching coach, player development director, and major league pitching coach for one of the best teams over the last 3 seasons, he has worked with young players in a variety of aspects.
Anyone we hire is going to have significant experience that can be spun as just as valuable as Farrell’s. These guys’ resumes are all going to look pretty similar on paper.
4.) By all accounts, he’s good. The Indians system, under Shapiro, Antonetti, Huntington, and Farrell was extremely respected. Winning organization of the year awards and front office awards, during a quick and strong rebuild. The Red Sox love him. A good friend of mine and serious baseball and Red Sox fan has told me several times he is more scared of losing Farrell than just about any other single person on the team. He thinks he is more important to the success of the Red Sox and their clubhouse than Francona.
We only think of him as good because he went to a big market franchise and sat on the bench while he won a bunch of games. Of course the Red Sox love him-they love everyone in their system, as they should, because they do a lot of due dilligence and make good hires. You know who else loves their own? Shapiro. I don’t think your boss’ confidence means a lot, especially when you’re in a perfect situation. I’m the best firefighter in a town where all the buildings are made of cement and there’s no electricity!
And, for the record, your friend’s opinion is based on little more than anyone else’s potential affection for Fryman or Acta or whoever. I mean, really: his pitching coach resume is worse than Willis’. Players have both pitched well and pitched extremely poorly under him (Matsuzaka, Smoltz). I just caution against heaping a bunch of praise on the pitching coach of Beckett and Papelbon. I mean, Willis gets credit for turning Cliff Lee from a totally nothing asset to the best pitcher in baseball. That’s much more than Farrell’s ever done.
5.) He’s from out of the organization. Sure, he has a lot of experience in the Shapiro front office, but at the same time, he has been in a different organization for the last three seasons. Luvello and Skinner are fine choices, but one of the reasons I’m not as excited about them is that they are too close to the situation. They would have a similar point of view as anyone else within the organization. Farrell has worked with Francona, Epstein, and the rest of the Boston brain trust. Theoretically, he will have a different voice.
Yeah, theoretically. Or maybe everyone in Boston and Cleveland has the same robot speak approach to everything except when they say it in Boston money falls out of their mouths.
by afh4 on Aug 18, 2009 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No offense taken.
It seems like you actually agree with #1, but you just don’t get excited about it. That was more for those in this thread advocating the implausible candidates out there like Randolph and LaRusa.
Sure, his familiarity with our team (#2) and his experience (#3) might be difficult to distinguish, but the fact is, he has both. I’d say he has a better resume than Lovullo. And he knows the team better than, say, Manny Acta. Skinner might match his combination, but its not like there are 100 guys that have both attributes.
Personally, I think you are giving Willis way to much credit for Lee. And let’s not pretend Beckett and Papelbon are the only thing the Red Sox pitching staff has had going for it the last three years. Lester has thrived, and I think exceeded expectations. And with the Tribe’s newly acquired wealth of arms, Farrell wouldn’t be without talent on this team.
I’d really hope Farrell would look at things slightly differently than the Shapiro way from his time in a different and successful organization.
by Ryan Kelsey on Aug 18, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we want a guy that both 2) knows these guys and 5) is from a different organization, we aren’t going to have a lot to pick from.
I'm not really into Song of Hiawatha.
by sarcasmdave on Aug 20, 2009 3:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, and obviously those are not preconditions. Still, there are obvious advantages to getting both of those qualities, and maybe that’s the best case for Farrell.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 20, 2009 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is #5 just a question of being outside the organization, or being in a good organization? In other words, is Farrell better than Lovullo because he left Cleveland or because he went to Boston? I think it’s the latter, because otherwise why not talk about Brad Komminsk? Going to the Orioles organization probably makes you a worse candidate. Plus Komminsk is a jerk.
by FredOx on Aug 20, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s good to be in a good organization, which presumably has better people from whom you can learn. Having said that, people learn all kinds of things in all kinds of places.
A better point might be that Komminsk is the kind of guy who can get hired to be a minor league manager by the Orioles, while Farrell is the kind of guy who can get hired to be a major league pitching coach by the Red Sox. Not really the same thing at all, is it.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 20, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brad Komminsk is not a jerk. He is one of the nicest guys I had the pleasure of knowing when I was in a related field. I could not understand why he did not go to Buffalo when Wedge went to Cleveland but it was explained to me AA was as far the cranial horsepower could take him.
Stuart Dean, shrubber
by stuart dean on Aug 20, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In case you missed it, this is all in reference to this, which I maintain is pretty ridiculous. However, that’s probably more on LaStoria than on Komminsk giving what he thought would be innocuous quotes.
by afh4 on Aug 20, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you mean this?
Stuart Dean, shrubber
by stuart dean on Aug 20, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I meant our discussion on it. I think that’s why somebody called him an idiot.
by afh4 on Aug 20, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I called him a jerk actually, and yeah that’s why. I thought his comments were a bit out of line and gallingly self-aggrandizing (he was good when I coached him, but then they kicked me out and look at him now). I would hope that if we hired Farrell, he wouldn’t respond by trashing Lester in a couple of years.
by FredOx on Aug 21, 2009 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then again he could be right, kinda like Tyson with Rooney.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 21, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like Jay said, that’s the best case for Farrell. He has the somewhat unique background of both knowing our guys and learning from a different (and successful) organization.
by Ryan Kelsey on Aug 20, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I used to want to hire Cito Gaston, but he’s obviously taken now.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 18, 2009 10:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think I was in this camp, too. I never understood how he vanished after ’97.
by APV on Aug 18, 2009 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we talked about this here once, but the story I remember is that he came in to interview for the job that Charlie Manual eventually got. Walked in flashing his WS rings, sat down, and told everyone how they would be helping him run his team. Without regard to how right he may have been, it didn’t go over well in the job interview.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Aug 19, 2009 5:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man, if you thought Wedge sat youngsters. Cito was the absolute master. A young Shawn Green grew mold on the bench while Cito kept trotting Ruben Sierra out there. I think he was slow to play Olerud as well..
Stuart Dean
by stuart dean on Aug 19, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure what that has to do with a guy who won back-to-back World Series.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 19, 2009 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll admit I was never that big of a Cito fan. I think he’s too old-school for my tastes. But I was particularly thinking of what Gene Tenace said this year:
“Gene came in and just said, ‘Hey, don’t think. Swing the bat,’” Toronto center fielder Vernon Wells said. "He knew we had some problems, obviously, throughout the season, and he just kind of tried to simplify everything. “He said, ‘If you get a pitch, take a hack at it. Whatever happens after that, happens.’”
by odradek on Aug 19, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And here we thought Wedge was bad for Marte’s development.
The once and future
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Aug 19, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LaRussa too has an aggressive hitting philosophy, from what I hear. Besides the money, this is another reason that I don’t want to hire him. At least Wedge understands patience and working the count.
Baseball isn't boring. YOU ARE.
by Matt Y. on Aug 20, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i can’t tell if this is serious…
I reserve the right to complain about Gimenez at 1B and Carroll in the OF, no matter the facts. - FredOx
by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 21, 2009 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i was way into hiring cito before he went and took another job (dick)
by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 19, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is the thing I’m most looking forward to this offseason — seeing what will happen with Wedge and whoever replaces him (my money’s still on Lovullo).
It’s pretty sad that shopping for a new manager is the highlight amongst possible trades and free agent signings.
by JP_Frost on Aug 20, 2009 9:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the FA signings are gonna be pretty dull for Tribe fans this winter.
Look, it’s mid-August and we’re talking about winter trades! This really takes me back to old time Indians baseball.
Resident LGT results-oriented boob.
by mauichuck on Aug 21, 2009 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s going to be a cold winter, again.
by odradek on Aug 22, 2009 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It actually was a pretty hot winter. We signed Wood, then traded Gootz for Valbeuna and Smith, then acquired DeRosa for some minor league relievers, and finally tacked on Pavano at the end.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 22, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
CHAMPIONSHIP!
"You just gotta roll with the ounches." - Clemson58YearOldMan
by emd2k3 on Aug 22, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Seriously. Remember how annoyed we were after 2006, when all we did was sign Dellucci and Nixon?
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 22, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you are forgetting about Oldberto, Fultz and Foulke. Really bolstered the pen.
by Roger Dorn on Aug 22, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also Borowski.
Baseball isn't boring. YOU ARE.
by Matt Y. on Aug 23, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
http://www.cleveland.com/tribe/index.ssf/2009/07/now_that_it_looks_like.html
The actual Sunday paper had a longer list, but I don’t have that in front of me. I know in addition to what they have on cleveland.com, they had something on Hargrove, the Angels’ bench coach, and the White Sox AAA coach. Maybe a few other names.
by Ryan Kelsey on Aug 23, 2009 10:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yikes, Buddy Bell? Exactly .399 win pct for both the Tigers and Royals. Tough sell.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 23, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Buddy didn’t exactly look too bright when he was in Kansas City.
by odradek on Aug 24, 2009 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here’s the full piece you mentioned.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 23, 2009 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mattingly? That seems to be a name Hoynes just pulled out of a hat.
Also!
The Indians, some believe, have become a victim of their own ability to sway the national media into believing they’re better than they really are.
I pulled a muscle rolling my eyes at this. Even though I think this is complete crap, and at most had an effect at the very very tiny margins, I’ll admit that its a juicy storyline. So I can’t kill Hoynes et al for it. Slick Shapiro, and his team of well-dressed sauve geniuses, charming the national media.
by dgcambridge on Aug 24, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is a juicy storyline, but my sense is that the Indians have fooled themselves as much as they’ve fooled everyone else.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
by Jay on Aug 24, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fearless Leaders
The perfesser said: “there’s not much to being a ballplayer, IF you’re a ball player.” So many good comments in this thread, lotsa good choices, but does Shapiro want to win? I don’t think so. I tend to think that Mr Pluto’s “why strive for excellence when you can settle for mediocrity?” ideas of a “profitable, sustaining baseball corporation” come into play in the selection of a new whipping boy. We learned nothing from Viet Nam. Balancing the books is more important than winning, and until those priorities are reversed, Let’s bring Hargrove back……
by Casey37 on Aug 29, 2009 9:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
1/rec?
There is a great need for a sarcasm font
by stuart dean on Aug 29, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Is there a team that is winning consistently without balancing the books?
I don’t think there is. Indians fans are often confused by this. Other owners are not willing to lose money, either, they’re just making more money off the team in a big city than Dolan is in Cleveland.
It will be interesting to see if you come back and show any interest in these facts.
by Jay on Aug 29, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
don’t the yankees consistently lose money on baseball operations? although, i guess it’s all academic, since their various other interests (e.g. ownership in YES network) more than make up for the team’s operating losses (-$25mm in ‘06, -$4mm in ’08).
I reserve the right to complain about Gimenez at 1B and Carroll in the OF, no matter the facts. - FredOx
by DontCallMeJoey on Sep 1, 2009 1:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WTF are you tryng to say?
There is a great need for a sarcasm font
by stuart dean on Aug 29, 2009 12:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I assume this was meant for Casey37. I can’t figure it out either.
Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?
by ClemsonGirl on Aug 29, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Com’in back to take a beating –
Balancing books IS important……I remember an Arthur Anderson representative testifying under oath during the ENRON hearing stating that important fact.
If we are gonna compare the (corporate) Cleveland Indians to other ball clubs, why stop there? Let’s compare ‘em to all business corporations. Are we getting a well manufactured product? We are definetly paying a premium price. How about return to the shareholders? Sorry for feeling this way, but unless you are 68 or 69 years old, you can’t remember the Tribe bringing home the big prize. Winning is important to me. I was only 4 years old when Mr. Mays caught Mr. Wertz’ can of corn, so I don’t remember them beating the Boston Braves in ’48. SOMETIME THIS LIFETIME, PLEASE………
by Casey37 on Aug 29, 2009 11:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We actually aren’t paying a premium price when compared to other corporations in this field. So that doesn’t wash. What do you want us to do? How would spending more money have helped in 2005 or 2007?
by fwembt on Aug 31, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Dolan Beer Subsidy idea would work in any season, but other than that, I got nothin’.
As for what we pay, according to the 2009 Team Marketing Report Fan Cost Index, the Indians were 16th in average ticket price and 15th in Fan Cost Index, which includes “the prices of two (2) adult average-price tickets, two (2) child average-price tickets, two (2) small draft beers, four (4) small soft drinks, four (4) regular-size hot dogs, parking for one (1) car, two (2) game programs and two (2) least expensive, adult-size adjustable caps.” A Tribe family buying all that stuff would have paid only 44% of that paid by a family attending a Yankees game, not including the therapy required to recover from the trauma associated with attending a Yankees game.
by FredOx on Aug 31, 2009 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But is the Cleveland fan earning 44% of what the Yankee fan is earning? I doubt it’s that big of a discrepancy in income, but we might have to look at those factors, too.
"You just gotta roll with the ounches." - Clemson58YearOldMan
by emd2k3 on Aug 31, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is the hypothetical Yankee fan from NYC (Cleveland is 52% cheaper than NYC) or Newark (25% cheaper)? But that wasn’t really the original point, which was a claim that we are paying a premium price and receiving an inferior product for that price.
by FredOx on Aug 31, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is still no point here with yet more thoroughly irrelevant referencing. Arthur Anderson? Viet Nam(sic)?! If you don’t want to “take a beating”, have a supportable point and keep any tangents remotely apropos.
There is a great need for a sarcasm font
by stuart dean on Aug 30, 2009 9:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And use the reply button for crying out loud.
by fwembt on Aug 31, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously. Newbie.
The once and future
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Sep 1, 2009 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















