Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

Ghosts of the Present

There are alternate realities in which Victor Martinez exists. There is a world where Victor kept to a strict workout regimen and never moved off shortstop, the second coming of Omar Vizquel plus five inches, thirty pounds, and 108 points of slugging. Someone on some planet picked up a newspaper dated October 22, 2007 and read that Victor and the rest of his teammates stood up to the bullies, punched Pedroia in the face when he asked for their lunch money for the third time in four days, spit in the face of Theo Epstein and big markets, and told everyone who would listen that they didn't care about money or money or money: they only cared about each other. And there is an even more fanciful plane of existence that we can all tune into right now over at the Worldwide Leader or in this year's playoffs: in that alternate reality(or at least that's what it feels like to me) Victor Martinez is a member of the Boston Red Sox

Victor Martinez has a multitude of gifts in terms of a baseball diamond. First and foremost of these, Vic has a preternatural gift for simply hitting the baseball. He can hit it down the line, he can hit it the other way, he can hit it out of the park if need be. Victor, simply, can hit. He has also been a stalwart (if at times maligned) backstop throughout his career: he blocks the plate extremely well, when healthy he has kept the running game under control and he is constantly cited as one of the best in the game at helping his pitchers excel. There's little point in reiterating yet again that Victor is one of the best catchers in baseball over the last 6 years. It's self-evident.

Victor-martinez_medium

Star-divide

However, unlike many other players, Victor also has a multitude of gifts not in terms of a baseball diamond. He at least appears to be kind and gracious, a loving father and a friend that we would all be lucky to have. More importantly, he is as charismatic a leader as has ever been seen in a Cleveland uniform. That leadership put him at the core of the Indians' last half decade. When Shapiro was making his Plan, he did not err in placing Martinez directly in the middle of it.

340x_medium

This season, everything tumbled to the ground for Shapiro and his Indians. Yet, even as the gyre got wider and wider, even as things fell apart, the center defied its surroundings and held. Victor held. In a lost season, he stood at the epicenter of a devastating earthquake, one that would claim nearly all of the surviving members of his Indians' generation, and he swung that beautiful bat for us as if the ground weren't shaking. Over his first sixty games this season, as his team collapsed around him like some farce where no deus ex machina would ever emerge, Victor OPSed .955 and emerged as a should've been MVP candidate on a terrible baseball team. Finally, after the season was long since lost, Victor's strength or will or luck or something gave out, just as everyone else's had. His July was among his worst months ever and yet, even with 93 at-bats worth of a .530 OPS, Martinez had done enough to make it possible for Shapiro to turn him into a trio of talented young assets. In the face of what we've lost that's small solace but it seems worth noticing that even on his way out Victor gave back to Cleveland with his performance.

Like us, Victor could not choose in what reality he would exist. He could no more make himself a gigantic version of Omar Vizquel than he could will Fausto Carmona and Rafael Betancourt to succeed in late October of 2007. And, just like us or Mark Shapiro, Victor could not fix the competitive imbalance problem that exists within baseball, the exact problem that has made players of Victor's caliber and contract status a mainstay in Boston and a trading chip in Cleveland. However, in the midst of all this not being allowed to choose, it's worth reflecting on what, if given the option, Victor would've chosen. Through his statements and actions this week it  certainly seems that, unlike a host of other players whom I do not intend to denigrate, Victor would've chosen us.

Victormartinez_seniorandjunior_celebrate_medium

The reality that Victor Martinez was so attached to that he had to wear sunglasses in speaking to the press was not an easy one to love. Since his arrival in Cleveland in 2002, Victor's Indians have been to the playoffs only one time, they have posted a winning record only two times, and they have routinely exploded in the faces of optimistic pundits and a dedicated fanbase and front office. His reality has been the same embarrassing stinking mess that we have all been so frustrated with over the past two seasons. And, in spite of all that, Victor loved it. He loved Cleveland. He loved his teammates. He loved us. He had every right to be glad to finally be rid of the baggage that Cleveland carries, the inbred ability to lose in horrifically innovative ways and, yet, there he was. Glasses on. Wishing he could stay.

 

Anthem_medium


Like it or not, we are a part of the Cleveland Culture to a degree that most players will never be; we have chosen to be here and, barring some disgusting turncoat act of fandom, we will remain here. Players, on the other hand, may leave all of this behind in the blink of an eye when the circumstances align. They may put on pinstripes or Phillies' caps, grinning ear to ear, and it is hard to fault them for that. This week Victor, god bless his soul, didn't want that. He wanted to stay with us in this terrible, horrible season. Even if the siren song of free agency would've eventually pried him away 18 months from now (or even if it would not have) his deeds and words this week reflected how badly he had wanted to be a part of the solution that had never come.

Martinez was shipped away and, within hours, the banners were removed and his picture was painted over. Yet, Victor lingers. He leaves behind a young core that he was instrumental in introducing to the majors and a group of young pitchers that were acquired directly in exchange for him. He leaves behind a countryman, perhaps the actual next Vizquel, who, if you squint and tilt your head just right, can remind you of Victor in ways that seem to matter. Still, the phrase "leaves behind" has an operative word: leaves. Victor leaves. Victor is not an Indian and he's likely not coming back. But you know what?

Victor abides.

Medium_victormartinez_medium


Comment 46 comments  |  15 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Reading this makes me think a return to the playoffs will come soon, very soon…

Yet, Victor lingers. He leaves behind a young core that he was instrumental in introducing to the majors and a group of young pitchers that were acquired directly in exchange for him. He leaves behind a countryman, perhaps the actual next Vizquel, who, if you squint and tilt your head just right, can remind you of Victor in ways that seem to matter. Still, the phrase “leaves behind” has an operative word: leaves. Victor leaves. Victor is not an Indian and he’s likely not coming back. But you know what?

Victor abides.

Great piece!

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin

by Spidey on Aug 2, 2009 5:29 PM EDT reply actions  

This. Yes. And, 5-6 today. That’ll do Vic.

by pdxtribefan on Aug 2, 2009 5:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Thank God for Casey Blake.

by FredOx on Aug 2, 2009 5:43 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Seeing it, now I know what you guys were talking about with that batting stance.

by Joel D on Aug 2, 2009 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

You should see the left-handed version…probably even closer.

by TribeJay on Aug 3, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

if they gave out a Pulizter price for internet writers, you guys make a very good case with these last few articles.

by JP_Frost on Aug 2, 2009 6:11 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

Truly so.

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin

by Spidey on Aug 2, 2009 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

notice how I said Pulizter instead Pulitzer, just to make a distinction between the real one and one for online writers?

Might look like a typo, but man, it’s subtle and crafty brilliance.

by JP_Frost on Aug 2, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’ll get your own Pulizter for online commenting. But you were right, these were beautiful.

Here Lies the Victor Martinez Era:
Sept. 10, 2002 - July 31, 2009

by USSChoo on Aug 2, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why oh why does anyone lock up an aging DH to so much of our payroll/budget back in 2007? Anyone knows that DH is the position you sacrifice on. I think the signing of Hafner ruined the plan to keep core players such as Sabathia or VMart. I know the assumption was that our payroll/budget was going to expand with the local fanbase/economic growth. If we could only have kept one of them instead of a struggling Hafner, would everyone in Tribe-land been so morbid over the last 2 seasons moving out our heart and soul. You keep one of the two and our heart is at least partially intact. Hindsight is 20/20, but the cardinal rule is SP/C over DH.

Baseball fans are junkies, and their heroin is the statistic. - Robert S. Wieder

by jerseywahoo on Aug 2, 2009 7:30 PM EDT reply actions  

There was a lot of discussion back in 2007 about this here. You’ll recall at the time we were looking at extensions for Hafner, Sabathia and Jake Westbrook. If I recall correctly, there was some degree of consensus that getting two out of three of those guys would be a big statement about the team committing to the future and laying out the cash to make it happen, as well as an acknowledgment that Sabathia was likely going to be the hardest to sign. And that is how it played out. In retrospect it looks bad with injury problems to both Hafner and Westbrook and Sabathia’s departure…but had we not signed those two, I am sure there would have been outrage about Cleveland’s unwillingness to pay to keep its players.

by APV on Aug 2, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think at the time, the westbrook extension was completely justifiable. if you look what FA pitchers were getting pre-recession, the money we gave him is reasonable for a guy with westbrook’s age and track record as a workhorse #3 starter.

however, there were serious questions about the prudence of locking up hafner for lots of years and big money. it’s not just hindsight that makes us regret the hafner extension—there were a number of vocal critics at the time of the decision as well. baseball prospectus, i remember, HATED the extension, and predicted (correctly so) that hafner’s contract would become a big albatross limiting our future financial flexibility.

by Cap'n Snegiryov on Aug 2, 2009 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

the comment from Tom Tango (#2) is worth looking at though:

As for Hafner, if your forecast is based on pre-2007, you’ll need to redo your forecast. And, I give a severe penalty that he is a DH-only player (drop him at least 1 win, if not 2 wins).

by APV on Aug 2, 2009 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, absolutely. There’s going to be plenty of projections for DH-only guys in their 30s that aren’t pretty. I just remember reading that article when the contract was first signed, and feeling a lot better.

by 7foot3 on Aug 2, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

That article is atrocious. It’s actually an example of the arrogance of careless analytics.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Aug 3, 2009 1:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think when we signed Hafner anyone asked, “But what about Victor in 2011?”

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Aug 2, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

This.

We had a shot, took a chance, and spent the money on what now looks to be the wrong dudes (we might end up thinking differently next year, but maybe not; who knows?). When you’re the Yankees or the Red Sox, you can get decisions like that wrong. When you’re the Indians, this is what happens when you roll the dice and lose. The decision seems wrong now, but I can’t find fault in what we did at the time. It happens, especially when you’re the Tribe.

by Joel D on Aug 2, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stop making me cry.

I still believe in Carl Pavano.

by salome on Aug 2, 2009 7:38 PM EDT reply actions  

It’s like they are all taking a turn.

by Brad D on Aug 2, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep. hate it.

"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay

by Turkmenbashi on Aug 3, 2009 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

hug

Here Lies the Victor Martinez Era:
Sept. 10, 2002 - July 31, 2009

by USSChoo on Aug 2, 2009 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have no problem with signing Westbrook. My argument is locking up a DH only to a large percentage of your payroll. Its a lesson I have learned in about 200 seasons played as Cleveland in OOTP.

Baseball fans are junkies, and their heroin is the statistic. - Robert S. Wieder

by jerseywahoo on Aug 2, 2009 7:42 PM EDT reply actions  

It’s not a bad contract if he doesn’t get hurt and can’t you say that about any position? Hafner was one of, if not the best, hitters in the league when we resigned him. You spend that money on him whether he is a DH or a RF or whatever. If he comes back next year and hits as well as he has this year, but with the additional playing time he is projected to get, no one is complaining about the contract.

by Brad D on Aug 2, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

i don’t know if i agree with this. you really have to hit to be worth that kind of money as a DH. i mean, you REALLY, REALLY have to hit to be worth that kind of money as a DH. i don’t think a DH who OPSes in the .900 range is even worth that kind of money, and i don’t even know whether a .950 OPS DH is worth it—in 2006, the median full-time DH was OPSing .920-926.

and yes, hafner from 2004-2006 probably was worth that kind of money. but there are like 1-2 other players in all of baseball who have produced at that level over a sustained time—pujols and steroidy bonds. i’m not trying to condemn the FO here, but you would have to have an awful lot of confidence in hafner going forward to think he was worth that contract over the long haul. . . especially given his level of performance in 2007 immediately preceding the deal.

by Cap'n Snegiryov on Aug 2, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

if it wasn’t clear from my post, i cited the 2006 DH numbers to give a quick look at what sort of information our FO would have used to evaluate hafner’s value relative to other DHs. . . of course OPS isn’t the only number they would have used, but you get the idea.

by Cap'n Snegiryov on Aug 2, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

SHOOT it just occurred to me that those sortable stats i listed are guys who are currently DHing, not guys who were DHs back in 2006. that’s weird, ESPN. fangraphs actually lists the guys who were DHs in 2006, and clearly a .900 OPS DH was much rarer than i thought. take it for what you will. . .

by Cap'n Snegiryov on Aug 2, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

And even then, you were referring to the top 10 guys in PA. We need a WAR or VORP type number to complete the picture. Sure, half the AL can put out a guy we think hits enough to make up for having zero defensive value, but we need the appropriate context as well.

by 7foot3 on Aug 2, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

7foot3, i’ve always been curious. . . is that you dressed up as quail man in your avatar photo?

by Cap'n Snegiryov on Aug 2, 2009 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good save.

Another good question is, how much do the 900+ guys tend to get paid? Just because there are quite a few doesn’t mean you can just go grab one off the waiver wire. Great hitters get paid, and great hitters often have the luxury of settling into a DH role. Ortiz can play first base, he’s not terrible, but he’s been permitted to just be a DH.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Aug 3, 2009 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you, Andrew. Absolutely great post.

--
Force quit and move to trash.

by vbc3 on Aug 2, 2009 7:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Automatic rec for Yeats reference.

"It's all part of life's rich pageant, you know?" - Inspector Clouseau

by woodsmeister on Aug 2, 2009 8:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks Andrew. Didn’t feel fitting to see Vic go without a tribute from you.

by tabler84 on Aug 2, 2009 10:11 PM EDT reply actions  

I had to throw away my Vic t-shirt back in 2004, because it was broken (spiritually, not physically). Time to order a new one. Thanks Andrew. And thanks for your piece too Jay.

I know a lot of people are made at the system, and probably rightfully so, but I’m still mad that we suck this year. If we didn’t suck, Vic would still be here, and next year too.

Here’s a thought though – if we were competitive this year and next (or maybe if we didn’t get Santana), the Vic situation could have been ugly. We all like to think that he would have been happily generous and given us a huge hometown discount, and everybody would hold hands and sing songs. But if he didn’t….then there were two other options – he would have left for big money elsewhere, or we would have given him a deal that we shouldn’t have.

This way, we can blame the system, or the economy, or the soulless Red Sox, or the owner, or the GM, or the assistant GM, or the Wood/Raffy/Raffy/Carmona/Sowers/Huff/PronkShoulder/JakeElbow/Frisco/Lewis/Lewis/Peralta/Masa/Shoppach/Defense suck combo that made 2009.

by dgcambridge on Aug 2, 2009 10:55 PM EDT reply actions  

The real problem with Victor is that even with the hometown discount, keeping him at any significant cost was probably the right move. So I agree that it was likely to end ugly, unless he got hurt before becoming a free agent.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by Jay on Aug 2, 2009 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Must you all insist on making cry every day?
Great job. Very touching.

Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?

by ClemsonGirl on Aug 2, 2009 10:58 PM EDT reply actions  

It’ll end eventually. Like.. maybe next month?

Here Lies the Victor Martinez Era:
Sept. 10, 2002 - July 31, 2009

by USSChoo on Aug 3, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I figure when I can get through the Victor playlist I made without tearing up I have made it past the depression stage. Not there yet.

Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?

by ClemsonGirl on Aug 3, 2009 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just wanted to let you know that the piece was wonderfully written and bittersweet at the same time. Thanks.

Baseball fans are junkies, and their heroin is the statistic. - Robert S. Wieder

by jerseywahoo on Aug 2, 2009 11:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Nice piece, Andrew. Thanks.

Has anyone else noticed that there is an obnoxious increase on the big online sport site’s (ESPN, Sportsline, whatever) calling Vic “V-Mart”? As if this wasn’t frustrating enough, they’re trying to A-Rod Victor.

Il faut d'abord durer.

by CU Adam on Aug 2, 2009 11:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks, everyone.

It’s been a tough week. I’m rolling out a mothballed humor piece in the next couple of days to lighten the mood.

by afh4 on Aug 3, 2009 12:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Well done, Andrew.

"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay

by Turkmenbashi on Aug 3, 2009 12:33 PM EDT reply actions  

How fitting is it that when I get to reading this post, there were already 41 comments…

"It’s tough," Martinez said. "This is my house. This is my home."
We'll miss you, Vic

by BLAZER_FAN_199 on Aug 3, 2009 12:54 PM EDT reply actions  

yeah well you ruined that for me….thanks a lot JERK

by Nat on Aug 3, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I bought a Victor Martinez bobblehead on Ebay

by Roger Dorn on Aug 3, 2009 8:36 PM EDT reply actions  

I’m trying to decide how I feel about that.

I guess the best I can do is keep you posted.

by Joel D on Aug 4, 2009 12:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01731_small
Some quick questions for the locals
Etat_small
Eric's 2012 Cleveland Indians Projections...
Its_alive-fstn_small
Oswalt > Carmona/Heredia
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #24
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian — "Country Peach Passion"
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "Fridge Magnet"
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #23
Small
Seriously Go Get Carlos Peña Now
Avatard_small
Indians by the Numbers — #22
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian: "Fridge Magnet"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

A look back at the last Tribe arbitration hearing
MLB.COM Tribe Top 20
Jared Goedert is Puddin Head Jones
Chisenhall v.  Hannahan
After watching Lindor in the Fall Instructional League, I have very little...
Coming off of an optimistic 80-82 season, is this the Indians window to win?  

See full post on Beyond the Box Score
Praising the Indians offseason
Brooks Baseball Stats
Hello my friends! I hope you guys are ready for Super Bowl Weekend? Make...
Heyman reporting Indians will sign Kotchman

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4