Game 120: Cleveland 11, Los Angeles 3
If tonight was a look at the future - and with Justin Masterson on the mound, an outfield of LaPorta, Sizemore and Choo, and Cabrera and Valbuena manning the middle of the infield, it sure looked like it - the future is looking a lot nicer than the present. When the game's final pitch was thrown, an 86 mph slider from Rafael Perez breaking down and in on Robb Quinlan for strike three, the Indians had a solid 11-3 victory.
Justin Masterson was pitching for the first time unencumbered by a pitch or inning count. A Valbuena error and Kelly Shoppach passed ball led to an unearned run in the first, but Masterson settled down solidly after that. A Grady double and Choo single tied it up in the bottom of the first, and before long it started to look like it was a pitcher's duel. Heading into the bottom of the 6th it was still a 1-1 game, with each team only managing 2 hits. Masterson was wild, but effectively so, inducing a lot of groundballs and keeping the ball down.
In the bottom of the 6th the game changed. Not surprisingly, Cabrera and Peralta got on base. But in a rare turn, Hafner came through with an extra-base hit. But the real fun came two batters later, when newly promoted LaPorta hit and 2-run double. That was followed by an RBI hit from Marte, a single from Grady, and a 2-run double from Asdrubal. Seven runs later the game was blown open. An ill-advised decision by Wedge to leave Masterson in after two runners got on in the 7th gave Tony Sipp the opportunity to come in with the bases loaded and one out. A strikeout and flyout later, he left 3 men waiting. For a night, it was good times.
Next up: Huff vs. French, 7:05pm

| Highest | WPA | Lowest | WPA |
| J. Masterson | .247 | A. Cabrera | -.074 |
| T. Hafner | .144 | L. Valbuena | -.039 |
| S. Choo | .092 | K. Shoppach | -.038 |
57 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
She’s too old for you anyway. Or so they say.
Here Lies the Victor Martinez Era:
Sept. 10, 2002 - July 31, 2009
See if I send you anymore Choo bobbleheads.
Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?
by ClemsonGirl on Aug 21, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
I added “so they say” because every time I make this age joke, my little Choo-bobble gives me a dirty look.
Here Lies the Victor Martinez Era:
Sept. 10, 2002 - July 31, 2009
Okay. I guess I could send you some more. Maybe.
Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?
by ClemsonGirl on Aug 21, 2009 4:28 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
See if you get any more homemade chocolate-covered pretzels in the mail.
This is Victor's home. Victor Jose, you too.
Saddest story ever. I left the rest of those at home when I went to school. I miss them.
Who needs affection when you can have blind hatred?
by ClemsonGirl on Aug 21, 2009 4:29 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I always wanted a Charlie Manuel bobblehead. I wondered. however, it could possibly bobble more than the original
Stuart Dean
There is a great need for a sarcasm font
Bah, he uhh, well I uhh I think he, well he threw a uh heckuva ballgame there. I mean, dang, he really buckled down there and threw that ball well. I mean, gee, you see the same ballgame I did? Whoo, I mean, just yeah, woo, heckuva game.
Here Lies the Victor Martinez Era:
Sept. 10, 2002 - July 31, 2009
The nine in the lineup tonight is the way it should remain the rest of the season.
by col323 on Aug 21, 2009 12:06 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I really liked the swing LaPorta put on that double. It wasn’t the pitch location he was looking for but he adjusted very nicely.
Here Lies the Victor Martinez Era:
Sept. 10, 2002 - July 31, 2009
I got a chance to see that AB and you’re right. Nice piece of hitting. I’m also liking Vilbuena more and more. He seems to hit the ball solidly on a fairly consistent basis.
"I once spent a year in Philadelphia, I think it was on a Sunday." (W. C. Fields)
by ChitownTribe on Aug 21, 2009 9:21 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
There are now more home runs being hit in Petco than Progressive.
Progressive is still ahead in runs scored though.
A combination of lack of power by the Tribe and the number of ground ball pitchers we’re throwing out there, I suspect.
"It's all part of life's rich pageant, you know?" - Inspector Clouseau
by woodsmeister on Aug 21, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions
This is why park factors are based on three-year rolling averages, and also on how specific teams hit in different contexts. Obviously the Padres do almost half of all the hitting at Petco, etc.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
yeah and if your park doesn’t yield many homers, [if you’re not an idiot] you’re gonna lean towards designing your team accordingly.
This is Victor's home. Victor Jose, you too.
I suspect that it’s a lot harder to tailor an offense to a ballpark than is generally assumed. I think it’s a little easier to tailor your defense.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
Yeah, my inclusion of “lean towards” is because I see it as kinda over.
Also! GUTZ!
This is Victor's home. Victor Jose, you too.
God I miss him
I propose giving Victor a 2012 World Series ring.
by Gradyforpresident on Aug 21, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I know I’m in the minority, but I don’t miss him that much. I’d rather have one of our lesser defenders who can hit in the OF, and Valbuena at second base.
Yes, it took many analysts (and arguably the Rox FO) a little while to figure that out with respect to Coors Field. Tailoring your lineup based on the offensive effects is down the list, start with talent first.
where on the list is making sure you don’t have any superstars, but a bunch of garrett andersons 1-9?
I thought GA was more of a superstar, but with the exception of four seasons or so, he’s pretty much standard issue. A career OPS+ of 104. Huh.
He was overrated because of his underratedness.
The once and future
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Aug 22, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
This is yet another failure to internalize positional value in player valuation. Garret Anderson, as primarily a LF with a 104 OPS+, has been a below-average major league player over the course of his career.
For two years, 2002-2003, he was nicely above-average with a 127 OPS+. At a skill position, that would make him a real star. In left field, it makes him a star by misconception only.
How did you get “four seasons or so?” I can only guess you were looking at his RBI totals for 2000-2003. Again, for the first two of those years, he had a 104 OPS+, and again, that makes him below-average in those seasons. He was well below-average in six other seasons, including the present one.
Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
I was being generous. For whatever reason, I thought he was better than he, in fact, is. 2002 and 2003 were pretty good (56 doubles!) and 1995 was okay in limited playing time. He had five seasons of 20 or more home runs (not very good for a leftfielder). And it’s not because he kills the Indians: his career OPS against the Tribe is .781.
I’d agree except with regard to true aberrations. You can tailor a team to the Metrodome, or to the billion-dollar little league field in the Bronx. Of course, once you do that, you realize that you play 82 games on the road, and you’ve filled your lineup with bunters or guys that can hit really nice fly balls to RF.
Minnesota Twins
"It's all part of life's rich pageant, you know?" - Inspector Clouseau
by woodsmeister on Aug 21, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I imagine that every night, Padres go out and move their fences in six inches. If they do it slowly enough, nobody will ever notice.
It’s nice to see our future on the field.
I didn’t read the game thread, but nobody’s even mentioned Masterson’s performance in the wrap up thread. He looked good, though I’d like to see him get those walks down.
"Lotta heart in Cleveland." - Ian Hunter
by Denver Tribe Fan on Aug 21, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Tonight’s lineup:
INDIANS (52-68): CF Grady Sizemore, 2B Jamey Carroll, SS Asdrubal Cabrera, RF Shin-Soo Choo, 3B Jhonny Peralta, DH Kelly Shoppach, LF Matt LaPorta, C Wyatt Toregas, 1B Andy Marte. LHP David Huff (7-6, 6.55).

by 















