Indians of the Decade: The Superstars
The is the second entry in a series on the Indians of 2000-2009. The first can be found here.
There's not a lot of argument as to who the Cleveland Indians' superstar position players of the last decade were: Grady Sizemore and Victor Martinez. The first half of the decade was dominated by the last gasps of the 1990s, the final exhale coming with Jim Thome's explosive and, as near as I can tell, rarely mentioned 2002 season. 52 homeruns and nearly as many empty promises later we met 2003 and a lineup that could charitably be described as hilarious. Buried on that team, though, was Victor Martinez. In June of that year, SI described the young prospect in one of those buried sidebars, called "Coming Soon...", assumedly in Scorecard or Inside the MLB:
The top prospect in the well-stocked Indians organization, Martinez, a 24-year-old switch-hitting catcher, was the league batting champ and MVP for Class A Kinston (N.C.) in 2001 and for Double A Akron last year. The 6'2", 185-pound Venezuelan struggled miserably early this season at Triple A Buffalo, hitting .225 in the first 7 weeks, but now that he's learned how to hit off-speed stuff, Martinez is again slicing up opposing pitchers. Last Friday night he hit two home runs, and through Sunday he had seven for the season and had raised his average to .313.
With Cleveland getting little production from starting catcher Josh Bard (.227,16 RBIs through Sunday), Martinez, who hit .281 in a 12-game stint with the Indians last September, will be called up soon. "Victor has been making a lot of progress offensively," says Cleveland manager Eric Wedge. "At some point in time we want to take a look at him. I don't have a specific time frame, but sometime this summer."
Remember that the next time you're itching for a Carlos Santana fix. Do you really believe he's got better bat to ball skills than a 24-year-old El Capitan?
Back in those pre-DSL days, that's all Victor Martinez was to most Indians' fans, even smart ones like yourself. Our hip, young manager Eric Wedge said he was going to be alright and other than that, we'd wait and see. The next season, Vic was named the starter, a title he wouldn't truly surrender until injuries forced him to do so for half of the 2008 season. Four seasons isn't a long time in baseball or in life but it was more than enough time to fall in love with Victor Martinez.
The year that Vic became a full-time starter he was an All-Star, powered into the game by red-hot months of May and June. Months like those, with an OPS over .900, would become staples of Martinez's career in Cleveland. He would often become locked in, hitting everything hard: Martinez spent about 30 months as a full-timer in Cleveland and his monthly OPS topped .900 in eleven of those. Of course, he would also OPS under .700 in seven months. Whether reflective of a reality of his hitting style or just a popular fan perception, Victor always seemed streaky but when he was hot, he scorched.
In the winter of 2006, Ryan astutely pointed out that Victor's two full-time seasons were already two of the top ten seasons by a catcher in Indians' history. Martinez responded by putting up two more seasons in 2006 and 2007 that would've made that list and then bounced back from an injury-plagued 2008 to perform at a level that would've given him five of the top ten seasons in Indians' catcher history had he not been traded to Boston. Victor Martinez is the best catcher in Indians' history, no argument.

Despite his obvious statistical excellence, Victor's impact on the fans of the team went far past the playing field. This doesn't have to be rehashed in depth. Suffice to say that Martinez appeared the clear emotional core of each Indians' team since he arrived.
Fans took to Victor for reasons that made sense: he was very good and he was even better when it mattered. In 2005, the Indians were 15.0 games back on July 22 and Martinez was hitting only .246/.333/.390. The Indians torrid run began the next day and when the dust settled, Victor's line over his final 62 games was .380/.435/.583. His line in the 2007 playoffs was .318/.388/.500, including .353/.421/.588 against the Yankees. How could this guy not be everyone's favorite player?
The answer, of course, is that when Jason Johnson wandered off the mound for a moment, Victor saw Grady Sizemore standing in the outfield. When you're on a team with Grady Sizemore, there's going to be some competition for the hearts of fans.
When Sizemore became the first Indian to appear on the cover of Sports Illustrated since (I believe) Albert Belle in 1996, he immediately became the national posterboy for the Indians in the oughts. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that; Grady is a supremely talented baseball player, ranked by WARP3 as the slam dunk best Tribe player of the decade. His numbers speak for themselves, even with the relative disappointments of the last two seasons. If Grady never reaches the peak that has been forecasted with him, he will more than likely add three more entries to this list before his current contract runs out. That list is all the Indians' CF, since expansion, that have OPS+'ed at least 120. It's a pathetic group, befitting a pathetic era of Indians' baseball but, barring further injuries, Sizemore will come to dominate it.
And, lest we forget, there is still considerable upside in Sizemore. He is about to enter his physical peak and has shown a penchant for refining his game throughout his career; this is a player that could easily become one of the five best in baseball if he stays in CF, stays healthy, and improves just a bit. Grady's comparables have always been stunning and the list hasn't changed a great deal since the sterling performances of just a few years ago: he has stopped comparing most similarly to Duke Snider and has moved on to Barry Bonds. Another name on the list that's always sprung to mind for me is Carlos Beltran, a guy who took some big offensive steps forward in his mid-twenties. Point being, Sizemore still has time to turn into some kind of CF playing Scary Monster, even if the more likely outcome might be Jack Clark.
So, how to choose among these two stalwarts? If you're the analytical type, it doesn't seem to be a very hard decision. Sizemore was the superior player by nearly all statistical measures and Martinez, a player whose defensive reputation has suffered considerably since the 2006 season, doesn't make up any ground by donning the tools of ignorance. I'm not prepared to actually evaluate either's defense in a scientific fashion but I do feel comfortable saying that Sizemore was good enough in CF to, at the least, negate the positional value that Martinez offered.
The numbers, though, are not the entire story here. Let me just make it clear that Sizemore has never done anything particularly wrong. It's just that, now nearly three years into being launched into superstardom by the mainstream media, Sizemore leaves something nebulous yet essential to be desired. Grady is, frankly, boring. In sharp contrast to his high-octane style of player on the field, he is a superstar with no personality, not even a fake, unsatisfying one. Try to think of one moment where you connected with Grady Sizemore the person, not Grady Sizemore the athlete. I can't think of a single instance. On the field, he is anything but dull, climbing walls and clubbing mammoth homeruns with aplomb. What does he mean off of it though?
I'd originally intended to pull some part of that big SI article for this piece, something that would help flesh out who Grady Sizemore was, why we loved him so dearly. In doing so, I came to realize: I don't really love him dearly. I'm not sure I love him at all. I love that he plays for my team, that he's so athletically gifted and wears the Cleveland colors. But would I even be interested in talking to him? The quotes I found were astonishingly boring:
"Good luck getting him to talk about himself. He's such a quiet guy who's only interested in playing baseball and doing what he can for the team."
"There is a superstar player on our team, but if you walked into our clubhouse, you'd have no idea who it is. To watch him play day in and day out is a rare treat. All of us, from the front office to the players to the bat boys, are fortunate to see him every day. He is without a doubt one of the greatest players of our generation."
-Mark Shapiro
"He can do it all, but what's so great is he plays the game the right way and he gives your team energy every day. He's a dirtbag. He'll do whatever he can to beat you."
-John Gibbons
"I just want to go out on the field and play. I'm not comfortable in front of the camera. I don't like seeing this mug on TV."
-Grady Sizemore
"I was at the All-Star Game with him last year and I'm telling you, he did not say one word the entire time. Not one word. And it's not because he's a bad guy. He's just that quiet."
It is one thing to be self-effacing or humble. It is another to go to an All-Star Game and not speak to most of your teammates. Perhaps Grady is cripplingly shy or just supernaturally softspoken. Whatever the reason, the end result is that Sizemore does nothing but play baseball extremely well and, in a world where sports is entertainment and quotes and stories are how legend is built, it's questionable as to whether or not that's enough to be the player of the decade for any team. The player of the decade ought to be someone that made me smile for great performance on the field and less obvious, quantifiable reasons. This is a subjective evaluation but, despite claims to the otherwise, sport is not math. Sport is narrative. Prior to this offseason, Grady's performance on the field was as exciting as his performance off the field was lifeless. The best he could offer was a vaguely interesting affection for an old car and old music. And, before December, maybe that would've been enough.
And then, this happened, and, like Lieutenant Aldo Raine, that I cannot abide. The pictures, while harmlessly laughable, are not the sort of thing that legend is made of. If it were more of a runaway, if Grady had not sat out so much of 2009, if Grady's playoff OPS was 1.108 instead of .908 or if his performance in that summer of 2005 had been better than Victor's, if Grady had come out with a clever statement instead of threatening a lawsuit, or, and I know this is unfair, if Grady had been traded instead of Vic and had offered just as powerful an emotional response, then maybe Grady would be the one, great Indian of 2000-2009. But he wasn't and he didn't. He just played good baseball, flashed a great smile, and sat soundlessly at his All-Star Game locker.
On the other side of a ledger we have this:
Victor Martinez sat in front of his locker one last time in the Indians' clubhouse Friday afternoon, with his 4-year-old son, Victor Jose, in his lap.
Martinez sobbed as he explained to his son that he had just been traded to the Red Sox.
"My wife has been talking to him a little bit," Martinez told reporters soon after. "He woke up this morning, and the first thing he said was, 'Daddy, are we still an Indian?'
"I told him, 'So far, yes,' and he started screaming, 'Yes! Yes!'"
<snip>
Plenty of players talk about loving the team and the fans they play for, but Martinez lived it. And that was evident in the wake of the trade, as he spoke to reporters while wearing black sunglasses that hid red eyes.
"This is my house," he said. "I'm leaving my house."
-Castrovince
A player, a moment and an emotion that embodies much of what the last decade's narrative was for Cleveland Indians' fans. The era was defined by a handful of outstanding players, an abundance of character and heart, moments of greatness followed by years of sisyphean toil, and, more than anything, heroes leaving us behind.
Victor embodies or symbolizes all of that. Grady, even for his occasionally Olympian performance, is not nearly as good a representative. Here's to Victor: the Indian of the decade in my eyes. And to Grady: hopefully the Indian of the next.
46 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Consider the 2,000+ words both a peace offering for my lack of content here lately and a byproduct of my lack of content here lately.
It’s excellent. I want to defend Grady, but you’ve got him pegged. You know what Grady could do to vault himself to another level for fans? Sign another long contract here and play well. I don’t expect that, but it would be nice.
And maybe literally step into Victor’s shoes and get moved into the heart of the order, taking on more responsibility as an offensive producer. As leadoff, Grady is gravy, never really counted on to drive in runs. If he’s put in the position to do so, and has success (he certainly has the ability to do so), the fan connection will take care of itself.
That’s my biggest hope for Brantley – that he can be good enuf to bump Grady up the order and into a different level of expectation.
And maybe literally step into Victor’s shoes and get moved into the heart of the order, taking on more responsibility as an offensive producer.
I think you’ve misunderstood the meaning of the word “literally”.
Everybody should get ice cream every day.
by Joel D on Jan 9, 2010 12:41 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Quite the stickler – did you really misunderstand that I was referring to Victor’s position in the lineup?
I’m sure everyone understands it. And had you omitted the word “literally,” you would have actually been saying it correctly.
by Jay on Jan 9, 2010 7:16 PM EST up reply actions
To the actual point, then, don’t you think that Grady would be moved up in the order if we had someone else capable of handling leadoff duties?
Yes, but I think people generally don’t realize what a weak point this is.
There are very few hitters in baseball who are particularly effective in a leadoff role. Most “classic leadoff hitters” are actually terrible hitters with speed and low OBP.
So it seems like you’re saying, “All we need is another one of those leadoff hitter guys, and we can move Grady to another position.”
And what you’re really saying is more like, “If only we had Barry Bonds, then we could move Manny Ramirez down to 4th.”
by Jay on Jan 9, 2010 8:23 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Well I was thinking specifically of Brantley, who seems to be the only guy on the near horizon with the potential tools to take over leadoff duties. He’s certainly going to get the opportunity to claim the LF spot out of ST.
If he does, odds are he’ll be batting 9th to start out. But if he has success there getting on base and running the bases well, we could see Grady batting 3rd at some point next year – at least on a “try it and see” basis.
I don’t know how serious the Indians really are about having him start the year in Cleveland. I don’t think they will have him lead off until they think he’s a strong choice to put up a .360 OBP or better. They won’t install him there just to undercut their own run scoring.
I don’t like seeing this mug on TV.
/Obligatory.
by joeee on Jan 8, 2010 6:01 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
One of my favorite Grady moments was a game in the latter day Wedge era, when Victor came back into the dugout and, presumably to light a fire both under himself and his teammates, kicked a bucket in lieu of trashing the water barrel. He promptly got his foot snagged in the bucket, staggering around with a 5 gallon plastic appendage on his foot.
To me it was a perfect reflection of a team that ostensibly prided itself on grit and fire, even though the actual overall personality of the team was even keeled and undemonstrative. To have this rare show of emotion morph immediately into a Laurel and Hardy trick was pretty funny.
Grady responded in a very pure and human way – he started laughing his ass off right on the bench. I mean, even though Victor maintained the grim look on his face (if only to save face), it was a damn funny sight, and I appreciated Grady’s unfiltered, unrestrained response during a time when Wedgie’s facial tics were verging on hemorrhoidal.
Too lazy to look for examples right now, but I’ve always really appreciated Grady’s dry wit and sense of humor.
"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay
I’m willing to call “Challenge” on this.
This Grady interview indicates…well, something besides funny.
And more excruciatingly boring.
I propose that Grady has been referred to as having a “good sense of humor” over and over because he’s extremely good looking and not a jerk.
More than that, though, it’s not whether Grady is actually funny. For all I know, he’s a riot. It’s what’s his narrative for fans? And as near as I can tell, he hardly has one. And, to me, that matters.
Terrific piece, Andrew. Thanks. (The blockquote at the end is missing the key bit, about how Victor’s son was excited before the trade.)
Great piece, and I think it’ll be a long time before we come across a player with character and heart comparable to Victor’s. Why on Earth would an almost superstar player LOVE playing in a small market and want to stay for the duration of his career? I contend that it’s because he believed so much in what he was trying to do as a part of the team. So atypical of the pro-athlete archetype. I’m not sure we’ll see that again.
And I’m concerned that in spite of the strong arguments for the trade, the team’s failure to sign him may have sent a message that the Indians value the human element in the same degree as everyone else—not more. To me this represents a possible missed opportunity: if they had signed Victor, loyalty to our stars might have been a selling point—those guys actually take people’s lives and commitment into account. Instead we’re just like all the other clubs, and what might have been a competitive advantage in recruiting FA talent, int’l guys and young draftees to come to Cle—and in spite of Shapiro’s talk about a clubhouse comprised of upstanding citizens—now we’re just another small market team. We’ll have to keep on trying to outflank the big boys at the high stakes table, while the big guns will keep on exercising their no-trade clauses.
This problem also seems significant with regard to the younger players. What’s Choo supposed to think—that the Indians will actually try to sign him in a few years? Of course not— he knows he’s outta here. Same goes for Santana and also for Grady.
Sure, there’s downside to signing an aging star to a deal. But is there more downside than in the signing of a lumbering, unathletic (if strong) DH to a 35-year contract?
On another note, good point also about the substantial personality of the 2000’s Indians in general. I was always amazed by Vizquel and Alomar and Belle. And it’s the closest we ever got to dynastic. But Victor and Blake and Hafner in ‘07 and in ’05 outperformed everyone’s expectations because they brought their A-game when it mattered—they just wanted it so badly. That’s an endearing way of getting it done, willing yourself to victory.
Sorry about the tirade, wanted to speak to a crowd that I thought might understand why this piece of considerable quality got me so bummed…
The only message our fans want to hear is that we’re winning. We can’t afford to extend people at or above market value just as a goodwill gesture, because then we don’t have as solid a chance to win and people don’t come to the games anyway.
Choo, Grady, Santana, and their respective agents all know that the Tribe will try to extend your contract if 1) you’re playing well and project to continue to do so and 2) your value equals or exceeds the cost. They also know that if they fulfill number one, they have a good shot at breaking the bank on the FA market. I’m not sure what your point here is.
And yes, we did well in ’05 and ’07 simply because that team wanted it more than this group of heartless wusses.
Everybody should get ice cream every day.
We can’t afford to extend people at or above market value just as a goodwill gesture, because then we don’t have as solid a chance to win and people don’t come to the games anyway.
This cannot be overstated. We locked up Victor and Hafner long-term after 2004, then Grady and Jhonny and Cliff after 2005. After 2006, we extended Westbrook’s contract through the end of 2010, and mid-2007 we extended Hafner through 2012. As 2007 rolled into 2008, we had lots of stars locked up long-term, and the only one in doubt was Sabathia, and we had just come off a season with the best record in baseball and a strong showing in the postseason.
And you know what? Season ticket sales were lousy anyway.
So let that be a lesson to all of us. Locking up the popular players doesn’t necessarily mean squat in terms of keeping the fans happy and boosting revenues.
by Jay on Jan 9, 2010 2:54 PM EST up reply actions
When Sizemore became the first Indian to appear on the cover of Sports Illustrated since (I believe) Albert Belle in 1996,
Well, #&*@ Jay.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jan 8, 2010 11:24 PM EST up reply actions
For the record
The Indians’ other male model-caliber player made the cover back in ’05:

And thanks, Andrew. I’ve spent the offseason trying to forget Victor Martinez ever existed.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jan 8, 2010 11:24 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
Must have appeared right before the 9 game losing streak (and rec for making me spit out my coffee all over my keyboard).
by kennesawmountainwahoo on Jan 9, 2010 8:54 AM EST up reply actions
I think you mean the 1-5 final week, and yes—I believe it was immediately prior.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jan 9, 2010 8:59 AM EST up reply actions
Oops – I was thinking 2004. BTW, Belliard was one of my favorite players on that team, and I never could figure out why.
by kennesawmountainwahoo on Jan 9, 2010 9:03 AM EST up reply actions
It was immediately prior to the final weekend, referencing the two relevant series: Indians-White Sox and Yankees-Red Sox.
The caption says “4 teams, 3 spots,” but of course Chicago had already clinched.
by Jay on Jan 9, 2010 2:57 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, but SI had terrible lag time—Thursday’s issue usually was only up-to-date as to the last Sunday.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jan 9, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions
Proof that Belliard can get both feet off the ground is right up there with a yeti sighting…
I need a new avatar...
by stuart dean on Jan 9, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
I know Sizemore wins the statistical battle, but for me the ’00s are Victor #1, CC #2. In ways largely independent of their statistical performances, they each seem to represent the success and ultimate disappointment of the decade.
I put Sizemore ahead of CC. I actually spent a good deal of my baseball time in the 00s trying not to actively dislike CC.

by 


















