Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: FSU To Big 12 'Inevitable,' According To Report

Perez will end up getting a healthy raise. Not sure what this is going to mean for Jensen.

over 1 year ago 47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_tiny afh4 35 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Let's Go Tribe

Game 35: Indians 5, Twins 4

May 2012 by Ryan - 31 comments

Game 26: Indians 4, Rangers 2

May 2012 by Ryan - 154 comments

Game 24: Indians 6, Rangers 3

May 2012 by Ryan - 57 comments

Game 23: Indians 7, White Sox 5

May 2012 by Ryan - 50 comments

Comments

Display:

Seems to just make it more likely Lewis won’t be around for long. Kind of sucks about Perez, though.

by APV on Nov 7, 2010 5:59 PM EST reply actions  

Basically, they can’t keep Lewis without paying the elevated super 2 cost, right?

And why would they pay that, so off he goes. He should be a quality NL reliever for a few years.

by afh4 on Nov 7, 2010 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

2 years, 122 days is a lower cutoff point than in previous years. Might be the lowest ever.

Still, at 136 and 133, both of these guys had to be considered likely to be over the line, so it’s clear the Indians made a conscious decision not to worry about their service time — though for opposite reasons.

by Jay on Nov 7, 2010 9:36 PM EST reply actions  

If Pure Rage produces similarly next year as he did this yeas, I imagine the Tribe buying out his arbitration years anyway

by c9kay32 on Nov 7, 2010 10:43 PM EST up reply actions  

So do you, and others, think Jensen Lewis will have any trade value? Should we anticipate he will be either waived to make room for a prospect in the next two weeks, or will the Tribe field offers until the non-tender deadline?

And how much could Lewis command in arbitration anyway? I suppose the key issue is not the money, but that he is out of options.

by Deep South Ken on Nov 8, 2010 5:32 AM EST up reply actions  

On how much — I think $1 M is possible, but probably the ceiling. Could be as little as the 640 K that Brandon League agreed to after 2009.

by dgcambridge on Nov 8, 2010 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, it’s going to be on the low side of that.

I think we should DFA him.

by Jay on Nov 8, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s only going to get lower and lower as more teams try to avoid it. Well, it would if the CBA wasn’t expiring soon.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Nov 8, 2010 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d have thought that woudl have already happened.

I think it’s getting lower as rosters get younger. What we’re seeing this year may in part be a reaction to so many veterans getting the boot starting in 2009.

by Jay on Nov 8, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, with Bobby Cox gone, you can probably add another team to the list.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Nov 8, 2010 11:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously? I’ve thought of the Braves as one of the gutsier teams in terms of putting prospects into key roles in the majors. Maybe you’re thinking of Torre?

by Jay on Nov 9, 2010 12:30 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s what I meant. The Braves rarely seemed to care about a player’s Super Two status, like with Heyward. They were one of the teams keeping the cutoff later.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Nov 9, 2010 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

If an extra $300K or so is what makes us get rid of Jensen, maybe Dolan really is cheap.

Adam Miller is healthier than Stephen Strasburg.

by westbrook on Nov 8, 2010 3:11 PM EST reply actions  

Jensen is replaceable, it’s that simple.

by Jay on Nov 8, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, but that is a different argument—$300K has nothing to do with being replaceable. If the latter is the reason we get rid of him, fine.

Adam Miller is healthier than Stephen Strasburg.

by westbrook on Nov 8, 2010 6:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course 300K has something to do with it. If you think you can grab someone else on a minor league deal, use him in the majors for only three months and pay less money, then obviously that would be a better value. It’s one thing to pay 400K for a guy who’s marginal and out of options, quite another to pay 700K for the same thing.

What if it were $3 million — would that make a difference? Obviously. So it’s really just a question of where the line is for any given player.

by Jay on Nov 8, 2010 10:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I see his point. 300k is a number that is fairly low in this day for any live experienced arm. You could look at this sum as a form of insurance against other worst case scenarios.

by elsandito on Nov 9, 2010 7:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Insurance is a guy you can stash in the minors, and the cost isn’t 300K, it’s the whole 700K.

by Jay on Nov 9, 2010 11:22 AM EST up reply actions  

But, really, how much of an insurance policy is Lewis? Is he any higher than 5th in the bullpen depth chart? And being out of options, it’s not like you can stash him in AAA, just in case.

by 7foot3 on Nov 9, 2010 11:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m responding to both comments here. Yes, I realize it’s 700k. The marginal expense is there because you are dealing with a known quantity. It isn’t a highly valued known quantity. I’m talking about worst case scenarios, which is why one adds insurance. 2 BP guys come out of Arizona on the DL. One guy suddenly cannot find the plate. A starter hurts himself. The chance of all this going wrong at once is small. The options become, do we promote a AAA guy for the minimum or would it be better to have this guy in reserve? Ordinarily, I would say who cares, but we are only considering a difference of 300k. What can you get for 300k these days in additional player value?

by elsandito on Nov 9, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

A known quantity? How is he any more known than 50 other marginal big-league relievers?

by Jay on Nov 9, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

He is known as one of 50 marginal relievers.

by elsandito on Nov 9, 2010 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I suspect we’ll keep him, by the way. I’m just saying, if we don’t, it won’t be because of “cheapness.” It’ll be because we think we can — and will — spend the money elsewhere more effectively.

by Jay on Nov 9, 2010 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t buy the cheapness reason either. I have no real position on keeping him. I’m not a big fan of JL. I’d like to give some of the other young arms a chance to blossom. But, if the FO has some concerns about injury or eating some innings, 300k is not a lot of extra money to pay in these times. Last year there was discussion over signing some FA for $1M and some folks here became quite animated over the signing. I say if it doesn’t represent a significant percentage of the payroll, it’s probably not worth a lot of hand wringing.

by elsandito on Nov 9, 2010 7:02 PM EST up reply actions  

A good reference point here is Aaron Fultz. Shapiro picked up his club option prior to the 2008 season at a price of $1.5 million. Then, when Breslow became available on a waiver claim, they DFA’ed Fultz, seemingly with little thought to eating the $1.5 million.

Essentially, they spent 400K upgrading from Fultz to Breslow, which had to be seen as a pretty marginal upgrade in the grand scheme of things. (Although, then again, Fultz never made it back to the majors after that.) And then, not satisfied with eating that meal, they dumped Breslow, too.

Keep in mind, this was part of an effort to contend, and it was also in a soft but not yet restructured economy. Still, it was also twice as much cash, and four times as much marginal cash, as in the present example.

by Jay on Nov 9, 2010 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess an important criteria for me is that I don’t think Lewis really presents additional value over the guys we expect to push into the majors over the next two years. I think Lewis at 400k is still a pretty likely DFA candidate. If you’re playing to contend (like the Fultz example) then keep him for now. I think today’s insurance policy should be a guy you are more likely to use down the road, who has a chance to be more than the 5-6th guy in your pen.

by 7foot3 on Nov 10, 2010 9:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I know this all makes sense, but one question: If players of equivalent value and talent are readily available, why were the Indians pens so bad?

by odradek on Nov 10, 2010 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

This gets back to the “Fire Everyone!” series. It seems to come down to evaluation and coaching. There really is nowhere else to point the finger, because other teams really have done more with less, particularly if you go back to our brief flirtation with spending more than $5 million each year on free agent relievers.

by Jay on Nov 10, 2010 10:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with that, but I sense there is also an underlying truth here: a bird in the hand. A reliever who kind of sucks is better than an unknown reliever who might really, historically, hundred-year-Oldberto suck. I don’t know if he’s $300,000 better, but maybe better than rolling the dice, unless—as you say—you’re adept at rolling the dice.

by odradek on Nov 11, 2010 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Again, I don’t really buy that Jensen is more “known” than some other guy on some other team. It’s not like each team plays in a bunker, invisible from all the others. We have miles of tape and reams of stats and scouting reports on all these guys. Certainly the Shapiro-Wedge combo seemed to find ways to turn personal familiarity into a competitive disadvantage.

by Jay on Nov 11, 2010 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Certainly the Shapiro-Wedge combo seemed to find ways to turn personal familiarity into a competitive disadvantage.

Amen to that.

by odradek on Nov 11, 2010 1:55 AM EST up reply actions  

He has fungibility!

by emd2k3 on Nov 8, 2010 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s that there are better arms for the pen with options remaining. Why spend an extra 300k now for a guy who may not make your roster anyway?

by 7foot3 on Nov 8, 2010 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Lots of better options. By the start of 2012 we should see a pretty sizable turnover in the bullpen, much of that occurring this coming season.

by APV on Nov 8, 2010 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Aside from that playoff run, Lewis has been pretty bad for us. Maybe he’ll end up ok. Let’s let some NL team experiment with it and figure it out, and let’s give someone else a chance. We have young arms in the system’s bullpen, so rather than hope and pray for mediocrity out of lewis for arbitration prices, let’s slot in one of the younger arms and see if he can be a great reliever.

In the new Geico commercial, Marte sings "Let me be myself" on Wedge's front lawn (with the cavemen).

by V-Mart Shopper on Nov 9, 2010 3:08 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Indians70sicon_small
Youkilis for Pure Rage
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #36
Topps1978-332f_small
Historical Timeline
427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small
Pick 6 Discussion
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #35
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #34
Small
Indians 2012 Player At Bat Music
Etat_small
Tribe Observations - 15 games In
Draft_lens6670022module54040272photo_1251768414louissockalexisicon4b_small
LGT, in the belly of the beast.
Tribe_cap_small
LGT Safeco Field Meet Up?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

2012 MLB Power Rankings - May 21st
Kerry Wood hangs 'em up
I did not like Cleveland Municipal Stadium. Like it? How could anyone like...
Garko gets another shot
Broadcaster Rankings (Radio): 30-21
Indians at Fenway don't drink beer; they watch TV.
Michael Brantley: A Studious 4-for-5 Night
Damon Makes His Case for HOF
Casey Blake to Retire
To longtoss, or not to longtoss

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4