Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Stan Van Gundy Fired As Head Coach Of The Magic

Change Masterson

Justin Masterson is a major league pitcher.  According to Fangraphs data, his 180 innings for Cleveland last year tied him with Fausto as the most valuable contributor (2.7 WAR) on the pitching staff.  Justin handles himself very well against major league right-handed hitters (8.8 K/9, 2.9 BB/9, 2.96 FIP in 2010).  What Justin does not do, and what we all know about him already, is that he does not pitch nearly as effectively against left handed hitters (5.4 K/9, 4.3 BB/9, 4.78 FIP in 2010).  It is difficult to survive as a starter with those kinds of splits, particularly pitching in a division where so many of our opponents top hitters are lefties (e.g. Mauer, Morneau, Dunn, Martinez).  Masterson actually faced more left-handers last season than right-handers, 443 to 359.

Masterson regularly uses three different pitches: a four-seam fastball, two-seam fastball, and a slider.  All of these pitches are, to a varying degree, effective.  But there is a fourth pitch Masterson used last year, a changeup, and it is telling to see how and when he used this pitch. Masterson's first two starts of the 2010 campaign were, by any reasonable standard, very effective; 11 IP, 3 ER, 14K, 2BB.  But with his third start, Masterson began experimenting with his changeup, particularly against left-handers.  In the first 6 starts Masterson used the changeup, he only threw it to a right-handed hitter once.  According to fangraphs pitch f/x data, as a starter throughout the season, Masterson used his changeup 4x as often against lefties than righties (48 vs. 12).  Even facing more lefties than righties in 2010 (55/45), this is a striking difference.  Especially because his changeup did not work.

In addition to not beginning the year throwing the change, Masterson essentially abandoned it by mid-July.  The two stretches he used it most frequently span from April 20-May 24 (0-4, 7.25 ERA) and June 15-July 11 (1-3, 6.38 ERA), and both were horrible.  In his starts outside of those time spans Masterson had a 3.38 ERA.    Masterson's changeup does not have to be an effective out-pitch.  If he is going to use it, though, it has to be able to make his other pitches better.  Right now it very clearly is not doing that.  In 2010, if you saw more than a few changeups from Masterson on the mound, chances are you were watching a bad game.

Slide1_medium

Masterson's poor results with the changeup raises the question of whether he needs the pitch at all.  The problem, again, is that even if you filter out his changeups, Masterson is not effective against lefties.  Masterson's slider, which is a good pitch against right-handers, is not as effective against lefties.  The percentage of swinging strikes Masterson gets on his slider against righties (16.5%, an excellent number) dips considerably against lefties (11.8%) who have a much better view of the pitch coming because of Masterson's delivery. 

Star-divide

Even if Masterson does not improve his changeup, one area of work that could increase his effectiveness is improved control.  Gamescore is a crude metric, but in starts where Masterson threw more than 60% strikes his average gamescore was 51.  In starts where he threw 60% or fewer strikes, his average gamescore was 37.  But again, Masterson's control problems are much more dramatic against lefties (10.4% BB-rate) than righties (7.5%).  Masterson's seeming hesitation with his "stuff" results in an unwillingness to pound the strike zone.  Reflective of Masterson's control issues is his heavy reliance on his fastball with 3 balls (~94%).  With two strikes, in contrast, Masterson increases the usage of his slider (from ~20% overall to more than 30%), working it as an effective out-pitch.  But once again, Masterson hesitates to use it against left-handers.

Slide1_medium

I don't really know what to say about Masterson.  I am still optimistic about his future, but he has to do better against lefties one way or another.  The changeup, while still a possibility for the future, didn't work in 2010.  It seems the Indians and Justin have to decide whether to go ahead and try to sharpen his change, find a different pitch that might disrupt the timing/eye level of left-handers, or abandon the project altogether and accept that Justin is a fastball-slider pitcher, period.  The latter seems to have the highest probability of bringing with it a shift back to the bullpen.

Positive Indicators

  • Work ahead in the count more often (first strike% >55)
  • Either abandon the changeup or make it a positve pitch (usage rate ~0% or pitch value close to 0)
  • Narrower peripheral splits between RHB and LHB (BB <3/9IP, K >6/9IP vs. lefties)
  • More groundballs (>60%)
  • More strikeouts (>20%)

Comment 45 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Will/Could there ever be a point where the Tribe might figure that:

*Masterson still can’t get lefties out consistently
*Despite that, he’s still more valuable as a 150 inning starter (avoiding select teams) than a 75 inning reliever.

I was all for using last year as a “can he get lefties out as a starter” type of year. While there were some encouraging signs, what’s the harm of strategically avoiding the Twins, maybe the Crawford/Ortiz/Gonzalez Red Sox, etc this year?

by cheech99 on Dec 28, 2010 3:39 PM EST reply actions  

It would be incredibly hard to set up the rotation to avoid a couple teams, and you might have to include NY too. Do you just keep Tomlin in the pen and waste the roster spot for 4 days if you realize you can’t adjust the rotation for the Twins series the next week?

by 7foot3 on Dec 28, 2010 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Let’s not kid ourselves, it wouldn’t be “incredibly hard” to set up the rotation that way. While he hasn’t needed to do it every year, Shapiro’s been managing the flex roster thing (send a guy up, wait 10 days, send another guy up) for years now, in effect, showing he can give us an 8 man pen.

by cheech99 on Dec 28, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

What with guys getting nicked up, I think its difficult to plan your rotation a month ahead with 5 legit guys, and the Indians don’t seem to have that even. If Masterson could be the 5th starter I could see shifting him in and out of the rotation, but you may need to adjust the rotation for a couple other guys as well. Your #2 or 3 can’t be your swingman.

by 7foot3 on Dec 28, 2010 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

A couple things:
- the “flex roster thing” isn’t really a skill that a GM has
- it wouldn’t be “incredibly hard” but it would be “incredibly defeatist” and “incredibly inconvenient” if we actually make the playoffs (which is the goal that would have made us try it in the first place)

Moved from swan pool terrace (swan) to fresh restaurant (dolphin).

by westbrook on Dec 29, 2010 1:53 AM EST up reply actions  

You wouldn’t avoid certain teams unless it was really simple—after a day off, or a rain out. Otherwise, you send him out there and let him get boxed around by the Red Sox or Twins or whatever. He’s not going to win every game he starts anyways. Let him take his lumps. Maybe next year (2012) he figures out a way to get some of these lefties out. Or not. He’s still a good starting pitcher.

by odradek on Dec 29, 2010 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

I think he has enough time to try and adjust his approach to lefties, rather than mess with the rhythm of his starts.

by emd2k3 on Dec 29, 2010 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

So if that’s your gameplan to get the most out of Masterson, who do you combine with him in a rotation spot? Are you going to be able to get anything better out of that spot than what he would give you against those teams? And if you do, wouldn’t you be tempted to give that individual a bigger role than just 60-75 innings worth of starts against some of the top teams?

by TKilbane on Dec 28, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know. Maybe Bartolo Colon.

Seriously, yeah, I haven’t thought it through, just find like this might get more out of him. I haven’t really studied it, but it probably would make sense to pick 2 to 4 teams who collectively aren’t also perennial playoff teams. I’d have to see if there are below .500 teams that seriously lilt to the left.

by cheech99 on Dec 28, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he is already there. The only relief season by an Indian in the past 10 years as valuable as Masterson’s 2010 season was Betancourt’s sensational 2007. The fear with Masterson is two-fold. First, that opponents will just get better and better at exploiting his weaknesses and he will quickly become far less valuable. The bigger one is that what the Indians want out of Masterson is something that is actually quite a bit better than what he was in 2010, but he can’t get there without improving against lefties.

by APV on Dec 28, 2010 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

The only relief season by an Indian in the past 10 years as valuable as Masterson’s 2010 season was Betancourt’s sensational 2007.

This should get repeated a lot.

by Jay on Dec 29, 2010 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t get it. Did he log much time in the pen at all? What am I missing?

by stuart dean on Dec 29, 2010 7:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Poorly written on my part. Masterson’s 2010 season, the vast majority of which came as a starter, was more valuable than every season by an Indians reliever except for Betancourt’s 2007 season. Betancourt’s 2007 was one of the top 10 seasons by a reliever in all of MLB for the decade.

by APV on Dec 29, 2010 8:46 AM EST up reply actions  

So your point was more general – pertaining to the relative value between SP & MRP?

by stuart dean on Dec 30, 2010 9:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly. Even if Masterson was an elite set-up man, it would be hard to squeeze as much value out of him as we got at his talent level last season. If the Indians were a different organization, say Boston, and already had a loaded rotation, that might not matter. But clearly that is not Cleveland’s problem at the moment.

by APV on Dec 30, 2010 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah it’s the alternative that is the problem. As it stands the team maxamizes their performance with him in the rotation vs. him in the bullpen and one of the other “in-house” pitchers in the rotation.

by hans on Dec 31, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t have as much confidence that Fangraph’s WAR answers the question so easily. B-Ref’s WAR has him at -.8 and WARP had him at 1.0.

I don’t know how to explain this, but I think it has a lot to do with how much emphasis each puts on FIP. Masterson’s FIP was .77 lower than his ERA.

by ClarkM on Dec 30, 2010 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

2.7 and -0.8 is a pretty huge disparity. I agree that Fangraphs FIP and xFIP numbers, both under 4, seem like optimistic assessments of his performance last season. I hadn’t looked at the B-Ref numbers prior to this, so I’m not quite sure what to do with this difference.

by APV on Dec 30, 2010 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I think one of the potential strengths of Masterson is that he seems to be another one of these guys with tree-trunk legs who gives the impression that, should he ever figure out how to get lefthanders out, could be a true rotation workhorse. Setting him up to throw fewer starts seems to be missing the purpose.

by APV on Dec 29, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I agree with this in concept — a big part of his value is going to be in building him up to 200+ innings. On the other hand, if you subbed him out for another guy for one game, what’s to keep you from sending him in as a long reliever for 2-3 innings, especially once the opposing lineup is already peppered with righties? I recognize the value in routine in keeping pitchers healthy, but I often think teams could be a lot more creative with how they deploy pitchers, without significantly adding to the risk.

by Jay on Dec 29, 2010 3:57 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think the Indians on-the-field use of players has been one of the more frustrating parts of following the team over the past 5-10 years. Creativity is not, I think, one of their strong points.

by APV on Dec 29, 2010 4:22 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

creative destruction

by APV on Dec 29, 2010 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

sigh of resignation rec

by stuart dean on Dec 29, 2010 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

slam dunk

In the new Geico commercial, Marte sings "Let me be myself" on Wedge's front lawn (with the cavemen).

by V-Mart Shopper on Dec 31, 2010 1:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Fausto had a changeup before his current changeup. If he had abandoned that pitch instead of improving it, he wouldn’t be as effective as he is now. Apparently, at some point in the past, it was determined that having an effective changeup was the straightest line to transforming Masterson into a more valuable pitcher. If we have Masterson abandon this pitch it may lower his ultimate ceiling. And that ceiling may be high once he puts it together.

I wanna go fast

by elsandito on Dec 28, 2010 5:46 PM EST reply actions  

I agree. The same thing can be said about that jackass in NY as well. I don’t, however, know how Masterson’s delivery affects his ability to get a decent changeup. As I said above, Masterson’s changeup, by itself, doesn’t even have to become a good pitch. It just has to be good enough to make his slider and/or fastballs more effective against lefties.

by APV on Dec 28, 2010 6:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Masterson’s motion seems to be “longer” than ideal for a changeup unless it has some serious movement or a big change in pace. So far, neither is the case but he needs to give it one more season before relegation to the bullpen.

Great writeup on his situation. We’ll know by June. He really needs something to change his look to lefties.

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin

by Spidey on Dec 28, 2010 9:22 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

It would be interesting to see how Jered Weaver attacks lefties and compare it to Masterson. Except for their 3/4 arm angles, are Weaver and Masterson different pitchers?

by piersall on Dec 28, 2010 10:52 PM EST reply actions  

Weaver kills lefties. He also uses his changeup much more frequently and has an effective curveball. Masterson is a borderline two-pitch pitcher…fastball (admittedly two kinds) and slider. Weaver is fastball, slider, curve, change…all of them good.

by APV on Dec 28, 2010 10:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Gyroball!

Moved from swan pool terrace (swan) to fresh restaurant (dolphin).

by westbrook on Dec 29, 2010 1:58 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Death ball! Holocene slaughter!

"If Brown is the answer, then you’re asking the wrong question." - Ryan

by woodsmeister on Dec 29, 2010 8:32 AM EST reply actions  

Sub-boreal or merely sub-atlantic?

by stuart dean on Dec 29, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s got talent, but I just wasn’t satisfied with him last year. He gets really nerveous when under pressure, and it shows.

http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/?p=451

by Heavysoviet on Dec 29, 2010 11:42 PM EST reply actions  

That is what I am wondering. In 2010 Masterson did better with men in scoring position than in other contexts. He performed almost identically with runners on compared to his total season line. He did better in tie game situations or when the game was within 2 runs than his season line as a whole. One of his best games of the season was against his former team (home vs. Boston on June 9th). His first start of the season was good. I just don’t see evidence of him struggling under pressure.

by APV on Dec 30, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s just how I saw him.

http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/?p=451

by Heavysoviet on Dec 30, 2010 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought you maybe somehow got an EKG on him or something and was about to post some readouts…

by hans on Dec 31, 2010 12:17 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

He was slightly better in low-leverage situations and slightly worse in high-leverage situations. Check the WPA splits on B-Ref. It’s not really BIP-driven, either, although I must stress that the difference is pretty marginal.

Not every baserunner situation is high-leverage.

by Jay on Dec 31, 2010 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Is there a standard deviation on the deviation from OPS allowed (I’m assuming you were using this) in low leverage situations to high leverage situations? Or better said, is it normal to have a higher OPS against in higher leverage situations, and if so what is the average difference? His K/BB ratio is better in high leverage situations by the way.

by hans on Jan 1, 2011 3:56 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s kind of what I’m getting at. Over a small number of PA, 50 points of OPS is just not a lot of variance, and given the better K/BB, it’s likely his FIP is countering the OPS trend. (On the other hand, it’s reasonable that hitters might tend to swing away more in high-leverage and low-leverage situations than they do with “ordinary” leverage.)

The median OPS among qualified batters was 767 last season (Adam Jones, 75th out of 149). There were 23 players who hit within 50 points over that, and 36 players who hit within 50 points under that, meaning that 60 out of 149 qualified batters were within 50 points of the median.

Perhaps a better way of putting it is that in any given month, a 750 OPS type of hitter might have a 650 OPS or an 850 OPS — and it would be a mistake to make too much out of that one month result. Masterson’s high-leverage splits are based on 158 PA, which is about six weeks of PA for an everyday player. 39 points is nothing much over that stretch.

by Jay on Jan 1, 2011 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Masterson’s high-leverage splits are based on 158 PA, which is about six weeks of PA for an everyday player. 39 points is nothing much over that stretch.

Yeah using this guide from THT about when stats become meaningful, 158 batters faced isn’t going to tell you anything other than K%, GB%, and LD%, deriving a meaningful OPS number is going to take far more batters faced to be significant. All of this supports your point. And all of this including Heavysoviet’s single man’s perspective are pretty meaningless if trying to draw that conclusion about Masterson.

His career ML OPS against stats for the leverage situations from B-Ref, ranked from High Leverage, Medium Leverage, Low Leverage (with total batters faced in parentheses for each) are as follows: .722 (312) /.724 (771) /.730 (650). Pretty damn consistent across the board actually, despite the leverage of the situation, though the 312 batters faced for high leverage is still too low to be significant.

by hans on Jan 1, 2011 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Good analysis, thanks for the write up.

by millionairesrow on Dec 30, 2010 11:48 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Indians70sicon_small
Youkilis for Pure Rage
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #36
Topps1978-332f_small
Historical Timeline
427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small
Pick 6 Discussion
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #35
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #34
Small
Indians 2012 Player At Bat Music
Etat_small
Tribe Observations - 15 games In
Draft_lens6670022module54040272photo_1251768414louissockalexisicon4b_small
LGT, in the belly of the beast.
Tribe_cap_small
LGT Safeco Field Meet Up?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

2012 MLB Power Rankings - May 21st
Kerry Wood hangs 'em up
I did not like Cleveland Municipal Stadium. Like it? How could anyone like...
Garko gets another shot
Broadcaster Rankings (Radio): 30-21
Indians at Fenway don't drink beer; they watch TV.
Michael Brantley: A Studious 4-for-5 Night
Damon Makes His Case for HOF
Casey Blake to Retire
To longtoss, or not to longtoss

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4