Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Sob City: Clippers Swept By Spurs

What do Jayson Werth, $126M, and the Nationals have in common? For the next seven years, everything.

He's a year older than Adam Dunn. Although Dunn is a bad outfielder and only an acceptable first baseman, Werth is getting three more years and $70M more than the recently departed Washington first baseman.

This contract is tied with Vernon Wells for the third-largest ever for an OF, behind Manny Ramirez and Alfonso Soriano (h/t to rotoworld).

over 1 year ago 3960034375_6f0a6d7de7_tiny xrickx 57 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Let's Go Tribe

Game 69: Phillies 2, Indians 1

Jun 2010 by Ryan - 8 comments

Comments

Display:

This can’t end well for the Nationals.

Boras is really good at his job.

by ClarkM on Dec 5, 2010 5:57 PM EST reply actions  

He set the stage for this long before Werth was even his client. Boras used the Nats to drive up the price on Teixeira. Teixeira is a HoF caliber player, a whole different beast than Werth. The Nats could have tried to justify that deal — but not this one to Werth

Still, Boras went back to the Nats, I’m sure, to give them access to a “marquee” player. Kudos to him.

This isn’t even the Tigers’ 4 year, $40M deal with Pudge Rodriguez, a WTF deal to give a free agent a reason to come to a losing team. This is more than three times that obligation in terms of dollars, and almost double in terms of years.

by xrickx on Dec 5, 2010 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

i disagree that Teixeira is HOF caliber

by silverbackAXP on Dec 5, 2010 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t think so either, but on the other hand, he does have 275 HR at age 30.

As a first baseman, he needs to get 500 HR or 3000 hits at a bare minimum to have a shot. He has no chance to reach 3000. He’s less than 50/50 to get to 500 HR, per the Bill James estimator.

by Jay on Dec 5, 2010 9:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think he’s a lock, but I think with six seasons left in NY, in that lineup and that stadium, he’ll have the opportunity to build is counting stats with 35HR seasons and 100RBI years. He’ll have a few more top-10 MVP finishes, he’ll add to his four Gold Gloves, and voters will clamor at these accomplishments.

Like Vladi, Manny, Pujols, and Miguel Cabrera, Teixeira has never really had an alarmingly disappointing year.

by xrickx on Dec 5, 2010 11:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Did the Nats really drive up Teixeira’s price? Seems to me the Red Sox bid 160M and the Yankees bid 180M.

by Jay on Dec 5, 2010 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I recalled the Nats made an 8 year, $160M offer, and the Red Sox had to match that. It appeared to be between just the Nats and Sox and Orioles (the whole “Tex goes home” to Baltimore thing), because the Yanks had spent all their time on CC and there was some thought that they’d be happy to live with the already acquired Nick Swisher to play 1B.

by xrickx on Dec 5, 2010 11:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t see this working well. For the Nationals. Shocking.

by APV on Dec 5, 2010 5:59 PM EST reply actions  

Contracts so far this offseason which probably will not end well:

7 years, $126M = Werth
4 years, $56M = Adam Dunn (his last contract was for 2 years, $20M)
4 years, $50M= Victor Martinez (if both are DHs, Dunn > Victor)
3 years, $33M = Ted Lilly (for ages 35-37 seasons)
3 years, $32.5M = De La Rosa (Y3 = player option, Y4 = club option; max 180IP)
3 years, $21M = Juan Uribe (career .300OBP, turns 32 to start year)
3 years, $18M = John Buck (coming off a 1 year, $2M deal)
3 years, $16.5M = Joaquin Benoit (ok then)

by xrickx on Dec 5, 2010 6:07 PM EST reply actions  

I like the JDLR deal.

by afh4 on Dec 5, 2010 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

The thing that bugs me about that deal is the 3rd year is a player option, which really isn’t ever a team-friendly thing.. If he’s doing well, he’s gone. If he’s had a disaster or been mediocre, he stays for $10M.

In the NL, would I like him on a two year, $22M deal? Yeah. It’s not a crippling contract, but the risk is all on the team with that player option.

by xrickx on Dec 5, 2010 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I think they got him at a discount b/c they offered the player option. I mean, he’s getting what Lily got for the first two years and he is a much, much better sign than Lily. In order to get that low annual rate for y1 and y2, they had to do the stupid player option.

Player option followed by club option is like an MC Escher painting.

by afh4 on Dec 6, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

I used to have a method for estimating the value of a player option (to the player of course). Maybe I’ll figure it out again later.

by Jay on Dec 6, 2010 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh, I remember … it’s very simple for a one-year thing, actually. You just multiply the value of the player’s PECOTA attrition rate for that season times the option salary, because the assumption is that the player exercises the option after a season where his value has dropped significantly, i.e., attrition. His 2013 attrition rate was set at 44% after 2009 and probably will be a little higher now. I think the player option should be considered a liability of about $6 million.

by Jay on Dec 6, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Depends on the terms of the player option, though. There may be some provision where he can’t exercise the option if he’s on the DL, or if he’s off the 40-man roster by September 1.

by Jay on Dec 6, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m partial to the Dunn deal (no pun intended).

In the new Geico commercial, Marte sings "Let me be myself" on Wedge's front lawn (with the cavemen).

by V-Mart Shopper on Dec 5, 2010 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I don’t think the Dunn deal belongs on this list. It’s only an overpay in the sense that nearly all free agent deals are overpays.

by Jay on Dec 5, 2010 9:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Of all the contracts I listed, it’s the one I’d say is most sensible.

by xrickx on Dec 5, 2010 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Choo is better than Werth. Do we have a better idea now of what his extension will cost?

by jhon on Dec 5, 2010 11:43 PM EST up reply actions  

No,because Choo’s extension will cover his three arbitration seasons. It’s not the same scale. If the Indians are committing guaranteed dollars now and Choo’s production stays the same, something fair is probably $4M, $7M, and $11M over the next three years.

As far as his free agent years, his value is whatever the other teams are willing to pay. It will not be in Cleveland. I can’t stress it enough — that possibility died when he hired Boras.

by xrickx on Dec 5, 2010 11:54 PM EST up reply actions  

The cost of these deals also suggest to me that moving Hafner is not completely out of the question

by APV on Dec 6, 2010 3:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Really carrying that torch, eh?

by Jay on Dec 6, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

If I can just get close enough to the contract with the flame…

by APV on Dec 6, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Flamethrower!

"If Brown is the answer, then you’re asking the wrong question." - Ryan

by woodsmeister on Dec 7, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

And I think this deal puts into perspective just how big the Ramirez deal was. We’re now 10 full seasons since that deal, and it still stands up against and mostly surpasses today’s huge signings.

by xrickx on Dec 5, 2010 6:18 PM EST reply actions  

crawford signs with the redsox in 5…4…3…

by emil minty on Dec 5, 2010 6:21 PM EST reply actions  

Years ago, when Jayson Werth was a catcher in the Orioles’ organization, I saw him hit a home run in Bowie off Akron’s Joe Roa. As Werth started his home-run trot, Roa edged over toward the third base line, and when Werth rounded third, Roa decked him. The dugouts emptied. There was a lot of pushing and wild swinging. Guys were tossed. I never heard anyone explain the bad blood between the two players. Anyway, it makes me wonder if he’s the kind of guy in whom you’d want to invest $126 million. It’s stupifying, even if he’s a prince of a fellow.

by ken from alexandria on Dec 5, 2010 8:39 PM EST reply actions  

Me, I like guys who like to scrap.

Our best players wear suits.

by mauichuck on Dec 5, 2010 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

In boxing, or even hockey or football, sure, there’s value in being physical. Hell, even in basketball and soccer. But willingness to scrap in baseball seems about as valuable as it is in tennis…or ice skating.

by xrickx on Dec 5, 2010 11:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Scrap is a big reason why Nadal won his first couple at Roland Garros.

Is this the whale section?

by sarcasmdave on Dec 6, 2010 1:06 AM EST up reply actions  

That an steroid. Steroid > Scrap.

by gte619n on Dec 7, 2010 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

This.

In the new Geico commercial, Marte sings "Let me be myself" on Wedge's front lawn (with the cavemen).

by V-Mart Shopper on Dec 7, 2010 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I assume you guys are joking, but for those that don’t know, tennis really has a pretty rigid drug testing program. Unless you got cocaine in your system by kissing a girl at a nightclub.

"Have you ever thought about love????"

by Chemo on Dec 7, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s not the fighting itself I’m talking about – like in hockey. It’s the attitude. Maybe it would be better if I’d said, “I like guys who can’t be intimidated”. The polar opposite of the current bunch of Cadavaliers.

Our best players wear suits.

by mauichuck on Dec 7, 2010 12:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Joe Roa wasn’t very effective.

by jhon on Dec 5, 2010 11:49 PM EST up reply actions  

So, when do we see your post advocating that the Indians sign Nick Punto?

"If Brown is the answer, then you’re asking the wrong question." - Ryan

by woodsmeister on Dec 7, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Jayson Werth was a catcher in the Orioles’ organization

For the 2nd time in 5 minutes…

WHAT!?

I hold back at least 3 Ambriz jokes a week.

by westbrook on Dec 5, 2010 11:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Top rated Catching prospect in Orioles and Blue Jays system…I remember Baseball Weekly had an article years ago extolling the greatness of the Jays two catching prospects Werth and Josh Phelps

by The Grimace on Dec 6, 2010 12:08 AM EST up reply actions  

This deal kind of reminds me of the JD Drew deal. Not good, but not awful.

It’s only awful if you are dreaming of us extending Choo.

by Toxicadam on Dec 5, 2010 10:40 PM EST reply actions  

It’s just a surprising investment given the state of the franchise.

I suppose the Nats are willing to pay for the next three or four seasons of Werth, at the risk of throwing away the final three or four years of the deal (and $70M), to make whatever statement the franchise wants to make. Drew was a year younger but more injury prone, yet his deal was only for five years and $70M.

Oh, and the Red Sox have the luxury of a DH for a middle-30s player on the decline. If Werth’s defensive stats last year are the start of his decline, it’s scary.

by xrickx on Dec 5, 2010 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

The Nats risk throwing away all 7 years of the 31 year old Werth. 3 or 4 seasons of Werth vastly underperforming relative to his pay grade seems likely to me.

by jhon on Dec 5, 2010 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

1B wouldn’t totally be out of the question for Werth eventually, but the contract still sucks

by The Grimace on Dec 6, 2010 12:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Werth is 32, has an extensive injury history and received a 7 year deal. It’s pretty bad.

by Roger Dorn on Dec 6, 2010 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

The 6th and 7th years are bad, no defending them. But it seems that is the price Washington has to pay to get an above-average player to sign with their franchise.

by Toxicadam on Dec 6, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Other than Adam Dunn, you mean.

by Jay on Dec 6, 2010 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Just saw this and WOAH!

I hold back at least 3 Ambriz jokes a week.

by westbrook on Dec 5, 2010 11:45 PM EST reply actions  

On twitter, Joe Sheehan brought up a sort of bizarre point. What if, instead of giving out this contract, the Nats put it back into discounts and give-aways every game? That’s over 200K a game. Wouldn’t they become the most popular team in baseball?

Where’s the big problem here? Integrity?

by afh4 on Dec 6, 2010 11:33 AM EST reply actions  

Wouldn’t they become the most popular team in baseball?

Not a chance. Free giveaways work now and then to promote a product. But if you begin to just shift the value of the product, in this case a baseball ticket, towards $0, people will eventually start valuing it that way. Which is not what you want.

by APV on Dec 6, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Over 200k a game. For 7 years, giving away ten cars every game.

by afh4 on Dec 6, 2010 2:29 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Which people like me will say “Oh, I’ll never win.”

I hold back at least 3 Ambriz jokes a week.

by westbrook on Dec 6, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d have to sell the car to pay the gift tax.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Dec 6, 2010 3:15 PM EST up reply actions  

You must be in a pretty high tax bracket.

Our best players wear suits.

by mauichuck on Dec 7, 2010 12:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Or he has received a ton of gifts in his lifetime.

by matt7 on Dec 7, 2010 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Winning (or at least the perception you are trying to do so) > Coupons.

by emd2k3 on Dec 7, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Indians70sicon_small
Youkilis for Pure Rage
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #36
Topps1978-332f_small
Historical Timeline
427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small
Pick 6 Discussion
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #35
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #34
Small
Indians 2012 Player At Bat Music
Etat_small
Tribe Observations - 15 games In
Draft_lens6670022module54040272photo_1251768414louissockalexisicon4b_small
LGT, in the belly of the beast.
Tribe_cap_small
LGT Safeco Field Meet Up?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

2012 MLB Power Rankings - May 21st
Kerry Wood hangs 'em up
I did not like Cleveland Municipal Stadium. Like it? How could anyone like...
Garko gets another shot
Broadcaster Rankings (Radio): 30-21
Indians at Fenway don't drink beer; they watch TV.
Michael Brantley: A Studious 4-for-5 Night
Damon Makes His Case for HOF
Casey Blake to Retire
To longtoss, or not to longtoss

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4