ICBWDSTGFO550K
Ryan Garko isn't worth much, and this proves it. He's probably worth this contract if he's really an upgrade from what Seattle already had. Branyan gone?
about 2 years ago
westbrook
130 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I can’t believe we didn’t sign this guy for only 550K?
fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com
For $550K and as the right-handed side of a 1B/DH platoon, he’s easily worth that contract and all of its incentives.
Sorry man, I never disagreed that he isn’t worth every penny of his miniscule 550k contract. All I said was that he is not good, evidenced by his 1 year deal just above league minimum.
Right. “He is not good” and “he is not worth this contract” are to vastly different statements. Garko isn’t good but he probably deserves to make enough over the league minimum to pad his ego.
550K is a scant 37.5% above league minimum. This is barely better than a minor league deal and not much of an ego boost.
Wonder with the clevesters will think about Garko not being able to get a better contract than this?
by Jay on Feb 1, 2010 7:33 PM EST up reply actions
You sure you really wanna know?
For $500,000 Garko is better than anything we have on the Indians team right now. Are the Dolan’s that cheap that we can’t bring back one of our farm system guys?
Thanks, I guess, but I think I already knew. I predicted all along that the clevesters would treat Garko like some precious jewel that we somehow tragically lost.
by Jay on Feb 2, 2010 8:13 AM EST up reply actions
And just to substantiate my point, the Mariners just guaranteed only $550K to secure a player who, in 485 PA against lefties, has hit .313/.392/.495. For $150K above league minimum, you get that? If I’ve got a left-handed hitting 1B and no clear DH, sign me up.
If it means displacing someone off of the 40 man roster who has some present or future value, no. As for DH, I’d rather use that to give our young players more experience at the plate, if Haf is done.
I don’t think Rick was advocating that the Indians specifically were a fit for him.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 1, 2010 7:54 PM EST up reply actions
Speaking of Branyan, Pluto mentioned that the Indians may bring him to camp. The way he says it, it seems to be a last-resort plan. Meh.
Hell, we ought to be his last resort.
Perennially underrated player/asset.
by Jay on Feb 1, 2010 4:23 PM EST up reply actions
Awesome. Time to dust off my jersey.
by dgcambridge on Feb 1, 2010 4:39 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Rec for having a Branyan jersey.
My brother sang the national anthem at an Aeros game several years ago. We were all pretty drunk, and in front of Grandma no less, but I could swear he hit two doubles and a home run that night.
by Jay on Feb 1, 2010 5:51 PM EST up reply actions
Your brother must be a pretty good hitter to do that when he was drunk.
by odradek on Feb 1, 2010 7:36 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
Ah memories – my first experience with hard alcohol was during junior year in HS. Totally, unexpectedly destroyed, so much that my mom could only laugh when I fell thru the front door that night after my buds rang the bell and ran.
Had my best performance as a baseball player the next day in the afternoon, two doubles and a single and puked on first base. Everybody laughed. Upped my average to .250 tho.
I guess I’m still a little drunk just thinking about it.
My brother was a terrible hitter.
by Jay on Feb 1, 2010 9:41 PM EST up reply actions
Branyan. Ankiel. Gutierrez. My all-time favorite players aren’t the greatest, but rather those with a distinct ability that ranks in the +99th% among all of those who have ever played the game. These guys are legends.
It’s a shame his career was cut short so abruptly. He could have challenged Jim Rice’s record 36 GiDPs. Who knows what might’ve happened next?
You know they pitched the GIDP balls to Rice because they feared him so much.
by Jay on Feb 3, 2010 12:23 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
I Can’t Believe Seattle Acquired Another Cleveland First Baseman.
Sexson, Hargrove, Eduardo, Broussard … who am I forgetting?
This does ruin my plan for us to sign Garko as a platoon 1B/DH and trade him to Seattle midseason
by APV on Feb 1, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions
No – it’s just a hangover effect from the Grammy’s
by APV on Feb 1, 2010 5:55 PM EST up reply actions
JZ notes garko’s “experience” at DH and catcher
by Brick. on Feb 1, 2010 6:38 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Happens all the time. When you click “post,” it updates your post on your screen immediately. Other people’s posts update on your screen only once you receive it from the server. Thus, real-time messages sometimes live-update on your local screen in the wrong order.
by Jay on Feb 2, 2010 8:38 PM EST up reply actions
Yo, Lyle: You know what else fans could ask? They could ask where the [redacted] does Lyle live because I am going to go over there and beat the ish out of him at Boggle to the tune of 96-67 and then look at him and say “Beginner’s luck.” Then I am going to take Lyle’s car, which he contractually has to give up in a year anyway, and I am going to trade that ish for two more cars, a real fast one and one that’s really powerful, and I am going to tell him he can keep both those cars for the next 7 years. Then I am going to take Lyle’s best friend, that dude with the beard who can’t move left or right with any alacrity, and I am going put him on my private jet to California and when my jet comes back, mother[redacted]ing Santana is going to walk off that ish just rocking on his electric, playing a mash up of Oye Como Va and H to the Izzo. Then I would say “Who do you want to be friends with Lyle? That dude with the beard or Carlos [redacted]ing Santana?”
"I'm a baseball lifer. It's what I do." —Manny Acta
I wonder if they’re serious about giving him some time at catcher. Not to be revisionist or anything, but I always thought, “Take one look at him – he’s a catcher!”
I think its a great deal for them, especially if he proves himself adequate as pinch-backstop.
But he has no place in Cleveland, if only because “Garko in the Outfield” brings up too many bad home movie associations. New era and all.
I have no words.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 2, 2010 6:21 AM EST up reply actions
Please, Damon couldn’t even reach second on one hop. Garko at least can peg it down there when the pitcher rolls his mitt over in between innings.
He actually did throw some runners out as a pro catcher, y’know. I don’t think the online minor league stats go back that far, but I seem to recall his % wasn’t that horrible at Lake County.
that experience as a designated hitter will come in handy.
by ASP on Feb 1, 2010 8:40 PM EST up reply actions
Don’t understand the disrespect for Garko. A bona fide MLer who’s had success. The OF fiasco was Wedge’s fault.
I don’t blame Garko for the OF situation, but we are still talking about a player who might be the worst baserunner in baseball (excluding the Molinas), is far below average defensively at a non-premium position, and is probably best suited for the smaller half of a platoon.
You’re exagerrating. Garko is a far below average baserunner, but not nearly the worst (Thome?). He’s not that bad at first base. I would say serviceable. And he’s not a jerk. I’m saying he doesn’t deserve the disrespect he receives by many on this site who are not MLers. He can still help the right team. He deserves respect for putting together a decent and at times productive ML career, limitations accepted.
Let me get this straight … those of us who are major leaguers are allowed to criticize major leaguers … but otherwise, it’s supposed to be all genuflecting, all the time. Is that it?
Well, he didn’t specify what ML means, so you can also criticize Garko if you work for Merrill Lynch or Midway Airlines, are 960 years old, speak Medieval Latin or hold the British rank of Mountain Leader.
by FredOx on Feb 2, 2010 11:56 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Roger Ebert must also resign for not being an actor/director, and political journalism can now only be practiced by former presidents.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Feb 2, 2010 12:00 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
It’s not that Garko isn’t a major league quality player. It’s that he can’t play defense and can’t hit reliably enough to make up for it. He can hit righties well enough to enjoy occasional playing time. As a pre-arb player he was a fine part to plug in (though not ever a solution to any real problem). As a near league minimum he’s a fine part to plug in (though not ever a solution to any real problem).
by APV on Feb 2, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
I didn’t use the words “revere” or “genuflect”. The reference to Garko not being a jerk was meant to discount him from being worthy of the disrespect displayed here- not as a comment on his value as a player. If you received criticism for your work performance from someone who had a different occupation, would not one of your first thoughts be they don’t know of what they speak? Man, you have to have thick skin around here.
If that person watched my every move on TV every time I was at work, had been watching people do the same job for much longer than I had been doing it, and had a better than average knowledge of what it takes to be effective at my job, that would actually not be one of my first thoughts. If my employer had sent me to work for a different company three time zones away, that company had decided not to retain me after three months, and a third company had offered me a job for just more than minimum wage, I’d probably be forced to the assumption that the guy who pointed out I was a very limited worker in my field probably had a point.
Everybody should get ice cream every day.
You two need to stop doing this.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 2, 2010 10:07 PM EST up reply actions
Alls I’m sayin is its very easy to sit back and be critical. This is an excellent site for analysis. Its an analysis site, not a criticism site, right? I think there’s a difference and the criticism of Garko I found to be beyond analysis. A negative tone not warranted for someone who put up a something like a 119 OPS+ on a team that nearly went to the WS.
Alls I’m sayin is its very easy to sit back and be critical.
Yep, it sure is! And so we should… what? Do things the hard way? Only point out the flaws of players in haiku form? Actually I think we’ve tried that before.
Steel Nick
Garko the big-boned,
Summer’s ice cream child astride
Basepaths like a clot.
by YoDaddyWags on Feb 3, 2010 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 4 recs
I do sympathize with this point of view. I’ve written many times about the bizarre anger directed sometimes at role players (like Todd Hollandsworth), who are merely doing the best they can in the role they’re playing, and who should not be expected to be stars.
If you’re sensing some animosity towards Garko, it isn’t directed at him as a player or as a man. It’s directed at the idea that Garko is a guy you would want on your roster. There is a large disconnect between fans who have a sophisticated view of “comprehensive value” and those who put enormous emphasis on RBI.
It’s an unfortunate fact that “the idea of valuing a player like Garko” is often just expressed as “Garko.” I rooted for this guy for years, since the day he was drafted (“Jeremy Guthrie’s personal catcher!”) and up through that awesome 2007 postseason blog he had. It’s sad that, in refuting the RBIdiots, we are sometimes reduced to running down our own players.
by Jay on Feb 3, 2010 10:11 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I will say that there’s no real difference between analysis and criticism. There is no real analysis without unfettered criticism. Having said that, it’s not worth criticizing a player, personally, simply for not being good. If we’re going to criticize Garko, we might say that he perhaps bought into his own idiot stats when his luck was running hot and never really got serious about getting better pitches to hit. It’s no reflection on his character, however, that he’s only worth 550K; it’s just a fact.
I think there’s a difference and the criticism of Garko I found to be beyond analysis.
It’s not that Garko isn’t a major league quality player. It’s that he can’t play defense and can’t hit reliably enough to make up for it. He can hitrightieslefties well enough to enjoy occasional playing time. As a pre-arb player he was a fine part to plug in (though not ever a solution to any real problem). As a near league minimum he’s a fine part to plug in (though not ever a solution to any real problem).
I have no beef with Garko. He is what he is – a marginal major league talent that used effectively on a roster can be a worthwhile component on a team. But his usage is considerably more limited than most major league players at this point, so I am not surprised he signed a near league-minimum contract.
It is interesting how his 2009 was the opposite of his 2008. He was really bad for most of 2008, then he inflated his stats with a strong final month. In 2009, he was pretty solid for four months or so, then totally collapsed in his 40 games with the Giants. His year-end stats ended up in the same place, but he sure took a beating on salary with the 2009 version.
Ryan Garko just isn’t a very good baseball player. He’s a veteran barely making above league minimum, a good indication that we aren’t the only ones who know he isn’t very good. If you want to harp about disrespect you should probably contact the GM’s of the teams who didn’t even think he was worth the paltriest of sums.
You know what happens to guys who aren’t jerks that can’t perform? The same thing that happens to guys that aren’t jerks who can’t perform. They don’t stick around long.
Welcome back, Sandy! ATALECG...
It’s pretty hard to argue against, put this way.
by cleveland teamer on Feb 3, 2010 11:10 AM EST up reply actions
OMG ANOTHER GENIUS MOVE BY ZDURIENCIK!
If you don't respect Aaron Laffey, I will fight you.
by Cap'n Snegiryov on Feb 2, 2010 11:40 AM EST reply actions
















