Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Lance Berkman Could Have Torn ACL

H/t to supersizeme. Branyan was 0 for 0 in spring training appearances and took batting practice for the first time this year just yesterday. The brass could still surprise us by giving Marte or Brown the job temporarily, but it seems more likely that LaPorta will start the year at first, with Kearns taking LF or possibly a cameo for the much-unproven Brantley.

about 2 years ago Dosequisman_tiny Jay 116 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Let's Go Tribe

Transactions: Rule 5 Prep

Nov 2011 by Ryan - 23 comments

2010 in Review: Designated Hitter

Nov 2010 by Ryan - 1 comment

2010 in Review: First Base

Oct 2010 by Ryan - 34 comments

Game 136: Indians 4, Mariners 2

Sep 2010 by Ryan - 54 comments

Game 117: Mariners 9, Indians 3

Aug 2010 by Ryan - 8 comments

Comments

Display:

And Carrasco just walked 5 in 3.2 innings. He struck out 7, but if this was the game he needed to convince Acta he deserved the #5 slot, he whiffed.

Huff just needs a non-disaster outing to nail the last rotation spot.

Also Grudz was a late scratch, no word on the reason.

by mcrose on Mar 28, 2010 5:30 PM EDT reply actions  

ewww. You didn’t even mention the worst part. 5 runs; all earned.

... Paul Hoynes is a really great guy ...

by westbrook on Mar 28, 2010 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

What do you expect with five walks? That’s not the worst part; it’s the random/predictable part.

by Jay on Mar 28, 2010 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also! The lineup he faced looks just like one you’d see in the regular season.

... Paul Hoynes is a really great guy ...

by westbrook on Mar 28, 2010 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hamstring tightness, doesn’t appear to be a big deal. “Would have played if it mattered,” etc etc.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 28, 2010 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

How would that be fair? Even with this disastrous start, he still has a better spring training ERA than Huff. In this one start, Carrasco nearly matched Huff’s spring training strikeout total. I don’t think it’s over just yet, regardless of what Huff does.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Mar 28, 2010 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, reading between the lines, the Indians had already given Huff the job, though they haven’t said so in public yet.

by Ryan on Mar 28, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I kind of figured it was that too, but had a thought that the Indians were already losing faith in Masterson as a starter before spring had already ended. Laffey to the pen ended that thought but I thought there might be a “shocker” kind of move where Masterson was sent back to the pen, and Talbot, Huff, and Carrasco all made the rotation.

Still, very unlikely.

by GoTribe028 on Mar 28, 2010 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

They’ll all have ample chances to pitch significant innings this year in the rotation as long as they perform in the bullpen/AAA. Except for Sowers…

by Kenyafan on Mar 29, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yea, I was all excited when I was the 7 K’s…then I kept reading. Meh.

by Oscar_the_Dog on Mar 28, 2010 5:34 PM EDT reply actions  

He’s looked good early (the games is on tape delay on MLB Network) but he must lose it very quickly. Makes me sad.

by GoTribe028 on Mar 28, 2010 5:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Looked like he lost his release on the fastball in the 3rd inning – it started sailing off the plate. But he showed some great offspeed stuff. Its been a very encouraging spring for CC – he turned some heads and showed why he was a top prospect for Philly.

I think it will be a good competitive rotation at Columbus. If some of Rondon’s fastball control rubs off on CC, and some of Carrasco’s offspeed effectiveness makes an impression on Rondon, they could both see time in Cleveland this summer.

by mcrose on Mar 28, 2010 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can’t we just somehow combine all the positives from every pitcher in Columbus and produce some sort of “super prospect”?

by GoTribe028 on Mar 28, 2010 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

nine fingers on ten hands, five on each side of his body thereby offering said super pitcher the ability to decoy release point with four hands. Good luck picking up the rotation on that pitched ball.

by hans on Mar 28, 2010 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I imagine the severed head is up there with Dave Stewart’s low hat brim stare down of the hitter. Very intimidating.

by hans on Mar 28, 2010 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

They seriously need to give the job to Marte. If he proves he can hit, he can go to 3b when Brantley returns and the team can slot Peralta and Asdrubal back to SS and 2B.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Mar 28, 2010 8:28 PM EDT reply actions  

So, like…

Kearns, Grady, Choo
Marte, Jhonny, Droobs, LaPorta

by “when Brantley returns” do you mean Branyan?

... Paul Hoynes is a really great guy ...

by westbrook on Mar 28, 2010 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I read it as Brantley for some odd reason.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Mar 28, 2010 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Speaking of.

#Indians win, 15-5. Sounds like Andy Marte makes club as backup 1B because Matt LaPorta still not able to play every day.

Hoynsie. I’d say this is “There’s good news and bad news…”

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 28, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the Jhonny-at-Shortstop ship has sailed, and it’s in the next time zone.

If Marte wins the third base job over Peralta, Jhonny’s going to be either on the bench or traded. Probably the latter.

by Ryan on Mar 28, 2010 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Probably, and it’s sad. Jhonny had a much better UZR/150 than Cabrera had last year. Not that I think UZR is the end all defensive metric, but I think Peralta isn’t nearly as bad at SS as most people make it seem, and Cabrera isn’t nearly as good. I still like Cabrera, though. The problem is that I don’t like Valbuena.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Mar 29, 2010 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Isn’t UZR/150 pretty unreliable for sample sizes < 150?

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Mar 29, 2010 6:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

My understanding was even a full 162 isn’t completely reliable.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 29, 2010 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

ZERO chance of that happening….

by TribeJay on Mar 29, 2010 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Angels’ announcers were speculating that Carrasco might be tipping his pitches. That would be a fairly benign interpretation of his tendency to melt down suddenly, as he did today. Benign because it ought to be farily easy to fix, no?

by ken from alexandria on Mar 28, 2010 8:41 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t know if I buy it. How do you strike out 7 guys tipping pitches? I would think the walks are the bigger issue.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 28, 2010 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

And how do you walk five guys tipping pitches?

by Jay on Mar 28, 2010 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was tipping that they were going to be balls by allowing them to evaluate past experiences?

Welcome back, Sandy! ATALECG...

by USSChoo on Mar 29, 2010 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

You’d have to miss the plate pretty badly.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 29, 2010 12:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Woah, look at all those runs we scored.

... Paul Hoynes is a really great guy ...

by westbrook on Mar 28, 2010 8:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Hmm…maybe the statement about Carrasco wasn’t just to put the pressure onto Huff, but also to put the pressure on Carrasco and see how he’d react.

by APV on Mar 28, 2010 9:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Been thinking about this with the way Carmona is going…. I wonder how much the shift from hard ass manager and laid back pitching coach to laid back manager and hard ass pitching coach (granted, Belcher may or may not be that… just kind of reminds me of what he was as a player) is going to ultimately play out.

by cheech99 on Mar 28, 2010 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to hijack the thread or anything, just hadn’t heard anything related to it anywhere… so apparently no long term deal for Asdrubal Cabrera?

by cheech99 on Mar 28, 2010 10:12 PM EDT reply actions  

There’s still a week before Opening Day, so it’s possible. Deadlines have a way of forcing two parties together.

by Ryan on Mar 28, 2010 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really hope they come to terms on a deal. It could be damaging to not have Choo and Asdrubal locked up

by hans on Mar 28, 2010 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Acta says LaPorta will start at first base, while a decision on left field will be made Thursday. Michael Brantley is competing with Trevor Crowe and Austin Kearns for the starting job.

... Paul Hoynes is a really great guy ...

by westbrook on Mar 28, 2010 11:53 PM EDT reply actions  

According to Pluto, it will be two of Brantley, Crowe, and Kearns that make the team. Pluto thinks its Brantley as the starter in LF with Kearns as a right-handed outfielder off the bench. Makes sense in that Crowe sucks and has to be the worst of group right now.

by hans on Mar 29, 2010 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, Brantley can do what Crowe does….only better.

by Ryan on Mar 29, 2010 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I kind of like Kearns as the interim starter in left with Crowe the fourth outfielder until Branyan is ready to play. Brantley is better then Crowe but the arbitration thing means he would have to go down later. As has been stated before it’s not the Indians MO to break camp with a prospect that will be spending time in the minors later. I’m assuming Kearns defense is still good enough to play every day.

by Pa tribefan on Mar 29, 2010 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

As has been mentioned in another thread, how do the Indians make room on the 40-man roster for Kearns, Wright, and Grudz? Making room for all three is tough. With the roster full currently, they could send Hector Ambriz back and drop Sowers, but they still have to put someone on the 60-day DL or trade or waive someone else.

Is Jordan Brown or Wes Hodges or Wyatt Toregas or Anderson Hernandez worth so little?

by Deep South Ken on Mar 29, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

if grudz makes the team, hernandez will have to be designated. he has no options on top of being on the roster.

obviously wright can take ambriz’s spot. seems like rivera will have to wait till closer to his deadline.

kearns is the the one without an obvious foil on the roster. it looks like he has a job, so that’s going to be the tricky one. only obvious choices seem like sowers and brown because of their injuries, suckness and depthchartedness

by Brick. on Mar 29, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I realize that it’s because of the Valbuena Service Time Conundrum, but some people are acting like Grudz has been on a Kearns-like tear. He’s hitting 233/258/333 this spring in 30 ABs.

... Paul Hoynes is a really great guy ...

by westbrook on Mar 29, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

what?

either grudz or hernandez is making the team. if it’s grudz, it has to be at the expense of hernandez

by Brick. on Mar 29, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we’re on the same side here.

Hernandez is already on the 40-man. The better one will have the spot next week.

... Paul Hoynes is a really great guy ...

by westbrook on Mar 29, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Isn’t Brown a 60-day DL candidate?

by APV on Mar 29, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hm, seems like it.

by Jay on Mar 29, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

candidate? I think they’re already printing newspaper headlines to the effect.

by hans on Mar 29, 2010 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I would assume that it’s…

1) Return Ambriz (unless they like him enough to stow him on the DL)
2) DFA Wes Hodges (no longer a third baseman, not enough bat for first base)
3) DFA Anderson Hernandez. They’d have to anyways because he’s out of options.

by Ryan on Mar 29, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

seems like there could be a taker for hodges out there after his hot spring. is jim bowden still in baseball?

by Brick. on Mar 29, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think Hodges will have enough bat for first base, but I doubt he get’s DFA’d until we no for sure if he doesn’t develop it.

60 man DL seems to be the way to go (Brown).

by hans on Mar 29, 2010 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Baseball clubs don’t get to know things for sure. They have to play the odds.

Hodges has never had an impressive season. He was decent in 2008, age 23 in Double-A, in a season when he really needed to be breaking out. In 2009, age 24 in Triple-A, he was miserable and probably played hurt after missing two months.

Between his past injuries, his bad defense and his consistent, all-around lack of impressive numbers at the plate, there is little reason to think he will magically become an impressive player at age 25.

As stuart dean implied below, he’s never shown enough bat for 3B, so why should we think he’ll suddenly show enough bat for 1B? This is the kind of prospect that you DFA, or that you fail to roster before Rule 5 if he isn’t already on the 40-man. Maybe you’re not sure he sucks, but maybe you should be.

by Jay on Mar 29, 2010 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

What on earth prompted them to move him to first in the first place?

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Mar 29, 2010 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

His lousiness at 3B.

by Jay on Mar 29, 2010 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d put a DFA of Toregas pretty firmly on this list as the signing of Redmond means that Toregas is the back-up in Columbus all year. The imprudence of keeping a 27-year-old C who has little chance of seeing the parent club this year on the 40-man is I think where the Kearns spot opens.

by The DiaTriber on Mar 29, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

What does this do to our depth, though? Do we then consider Gimenez our third catcher-in-waiting in Triple-A, until we’re ready to promote Santana?

by Jay on Mar 29, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure, I could go with that.
I wouldn’t discount Toregas following the path already traveled by Gimenez this off-season off of the 40-man and right to the Columbus roster.

3rd catcher in waiting in AAA is pretty far off of my radar in trying to figure out who fits where when camp breaks.

by The DiaTriber on Mar 29, 2010 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Toregas is pretty highly regarded in terms of having the requisite skills to be a good backup. I wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t make it through waivers.

by Jay on Mar 29, 2010 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d prefer we not DFA guys who are fighting for a starting role on our team

by APV on Mar 29, 2010 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he’s really being considered, my expectations just sunk a little lower.

by The DiaTriber on Mar 29, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Toregas just seems like an underutilized asset. Excellent defensive rep as a catcher, who has occasionally shown a little bit of pop in his bat. He’s never had any use for us given our catcher depth, and yet we haven’t positioned him to be worth anything.

by APV on Mar 29, 2010 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

If I were the Mets, I would claim Toregas.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 29, 2010 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s true and the time to utilize Toregas was probably if they could have figured out what to do with C/1B and Shoppach/Vic/Garko troika after the 2008 season so Toregas was the back-up catcher.

However, I fear that Toregas’ ship has sailed as an Indian as his usefulness on the 40-man just isn’t as obvious as nearly everyone else on there. Maybe the 60-day DL stash is coming for Sowers or Brown, but if there’s a squeeze, Toregas runs neck and neck with Hodges as a redundancy on the 40-man to me.

by The DiaTriber on Mar 29, 2010 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

As I said on your site a long time ago, Shoppach should have been dealt after 2008.

by APV on Mar 29, 2010 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then something has to give as 4 catchers on a 40-man roster doesn’t make too much sense in a year in which there’s going to be a lot of movement on the 40-man.

by The DiaTriber on Mar 29, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gimenez seems to be the guy to move off the roster then. Given the options we are considering, Gimenez offers no value right now.

by APV on Mar 29, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

already off for that reason

by Brick. on Mar 29, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh…that’s right. Hmm….

by APV on Mar 29, 2010 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I generally agree, but I think it’s just a function of having two highly rated prospects at that position.

by Jay on Mar 29, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think laffey’s a good enough athlete to catch

by Brick. on Mar 29, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

he was a left-handed infielder in HS.

... Paul Hoynes is a really great guy ...

by westbrook on Mar 29, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

specifically, a shortstop.

Laffey went 6-2 as a junior, with an ERA under 2.00, and he also hit .500 from the plate. He played in the outfield and at shortstop when not pitching.

... Paul Hoynes is a really great guy ...

by westbrook on Mar 29, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

This guy is still under contract.

by YoDaddyWags on Mar 29, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

And he’s in shape!

by YoDaddyWags on Mar 29, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think there needs to be some kind of standardized tattoo artist Hippocratic Oath.

by Toxicadam on Mar 31, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Would kill business.

by Jay on Mar 31, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

2) DFA Wes Hodges (no longer a third baseman, not enough bat for first or third base)

by stuart dean on Mar 29, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ll be at the game Monday night. Just finishing up my annual trip to Arizona to visit my son Colin (aka Logo) and his sister in Tucson. Unfortunately Logo won’t be making the trip to Phoenix, but I’d be happy to say hello if any other LGT members will be there.

by Pa tribefan on Mar 29, 2010 12:47 AM EDT reply actions  

I watched some of the game last night and I’m not sure how much of a disaster that start really was. If you had seen the first couple of innings, you wouldn’t have felt that way. Carrasco was really good early. But he was really wild on his arm side in the last couple of innings, which tells me he was flying open with that left shoulder. From what I’ve read, that’s the number one issue with him. I believe it was Roger who posted something late last year about Pujols telling him that he was really flying open in a spring training game…I don’t have time to search for it now. That would also make it easier for the batter to see the pitch out of his hand, which maybe explains the tipping pitches story.

I also think this mechanical issue may explain Carrasco’s tendency to blow up all of a sudden. Perhaps it’s more mechanical than mental. Anyways, he’s made a positive impression, and if he’s sent down it’s not the worst thing in the world. If he does well in AAA, he’ll be up soon due to injury/ineffectiveness at the big league club.

by TribeJay on Mar 29, 2010 8:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Yea, I did post a link about Pujols telling Carrasco this in spring training last year. I’ll give it a little search a bit later. Interesting observation if he is doing something similar again.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 29, 2010 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks. I remember now, it was the Tigers announcers.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 29, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it’s a common problem for almost all pitchers. You’ll often see catchers point to their other shoulder to tell pitchers they’re flying open. Perhaps it affects Carrasco more than your average pitcher. I don’t know. But it appears to be a big deal for him (with limited observation).

by TribeJay on Mar 29, 2010 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

From my limited observation he has a tendency to lose some control with men on base. Perhaps that’s due to pitching from the stretch? I don’t know, but it was also notable yesterday that he tried numerous pickoffs (one successful) to both first and second base, “as if” he was thinking about it a little too much.

One can be a mechanical issue, the other simply a loss of concentration and focus.

He’s also a pretty deliberate pitcher that doesn’t establish a real rhythm between pitches. He walks off the mound frequently during almost every at bat.

by mcrose on Mar 29, 2010 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

And if you’re concerned about the running game, you might have a tendency to rush towards home plate and open up your left shoulder. Interesting observation.

by TribeJay on Mar 29, 2010 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the info.

I’ve always felt it was more a mechanical issue rather than mental. Let’s hope he can fix it in AAA.

One thing that’s pretty amazing imo — he has just turned 23. He’s been on the prospect lists for so long you kind of forget how young he still is.

by JP_Frost on Mar 29, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Isn’t Brown’s injury severe enough that he’s not actually in this discussion?

by afh4 on Mar 29, 2010 1:21 PM EDT reply actions  

i think so. i figured he meant hodges.

by Brick. on Mar 29, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stuck indefinitely in Terminal C of Hopkins. If anyone is around, I’ve got my Tribe hat on and a red plaid(ish) shirt.

by APV on Mar 29, 2010 3:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Plaidish sounds like a good name for a hoppy scottish red ale

by Brick. on Mar 29, 2010 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I had two Edmund Fitzergalds. Great Lakes in the airport is a life saver.

by APV on Mar 29, 2010 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

6 Cabrera, 8 G Size, 7 Brantley, DH Pronk, 5 Peralta, 3 LaPorta, 4 Valbuena, 2 Toregas, 9 Crowe. RHP Masterson.

k

by Brick. on Mar 29, 2010 4:59 PM EDT reply actions  

I say Kearns makes the team, either as a starter or 4th OFer, depending on which of the other two make it.

Welcome back, Sandy! ATALECG...

by USSChoo on Mar 29, 2010 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

new idea – Indians are “showcasing” Toregas to see if we can get something for him rather than just DFA him and lose him

by APV on Mar 29, 2010 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

This.

I just wanted to believe.

by mjmarble on Mar 30, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

http://twitter.com/hoynsie/status/11329327663

#Indians 1B Russell Branyan, headed for the DL, went 2-for-3 in a minor league game. He homered in his last at-bat.

by Brick. on Mar 30, 2010 5:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Well, dang.

Welcome back, Sandy! ATALECG...

by USSChoo on Mar 30, 2010 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe it was inside-the-park. Collision at the plate.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Mar 30, 2010 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

What I want to know is – did Branyan re-injure his back walking out of the doctor’s office after the physical? Or perhaps later that night, when he was out on the town?

Sorry, but I find this, and the Knapp thing, pretty annoying. It’s one thing to take a chance on a guy who previously had a back or shoulder injury, and another to acquire a guy who has yet to recover. We’re not talking about NRIs; these are guys that we spent real assets on.

by dgcambridge on Mar 31, 2010 1:48 PM EDT reply actions  

but i think that’s part of how we’re getting them at the price we’re getting them. perhaps a fully healthy knapp is off-limits, a recovered branyan is 4M, etc.

by Brick. on Mar 31, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m sure that’s right, and perhaps its only in mind that the Indians believed that these guys were even momentarily healthy. With that though, should we even be investing this way?

by dgcambridge on Mar 31, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

There’s significant upside. $2 million is less than the average MLB salary.

by Jay on Mar 31, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s inflated by the Yankees, though. What’s the average, say, AL Central salary?

Figured it out myself. Average salary for someone on a 2009 opening day 25-man roster in the AL Central was $3,428,411.28

Is this the whale section?

by sarcasmdave on Mar 31, 2010 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay, then.

Branyan’s deal for 2.0M is 58.3% of the average MLB salary. And it’s a one-year deal.

For context, last season’s salaries included:

Carrolll – 2.5M, club option buying out first year of free agency, following a two-year deal
Masa at 3.0M, final guaranteed season of a two-year deal.
Dellucci at 4.0M, final season of a three-year deal.

Not only is Branyan’s salary lower, his overall deal is smaller in scope, too. It really should be viewed as just slightly north of insignificance.

by Jay on Mar 31, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s some perspective.

Russel Branyan hit the market with the second-most home runs of any free agent. He started out asking for a 3-year deal between $20-30 million.

We signed him for $5k less than what Jamey Carroll made in 2009.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Apr 1, 2010 1:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

500K less, you mean.

by Jay on Apr 1, 2010 8:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dammit, yes.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Apr 1, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ok, I’m convinced now. I just have to get used to the fact the we are not just gambling on injury-prone players, but actual injured players. It’s a significant difference, but the numbers reflect that.

by dgcambridge on Apr 1, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, Branyan’s deal is very similar to Pavano’s, as opposed to Millwood’s deal, which had $7-8 million guaranteed. So, there’s that.

by Jay on Apr 1, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

A recovered Branyan gets a two-year deal.

by Jay on Mar 31, 2010 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Indians70sicon_small
Youkilis for Pure Rage
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #36
Topps1978-332f_small
Historical Timeline
427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small
Pick 6 Discussion
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #35
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #34
Small
Indians 2012 Player At Bat Music
Etat_small
Tribe Observations - 15 games In
Draft_lens6670022module54040272photo_1251768414louissockalexisicon4b_small
LGT, in the belly of the beast.
Tribe_cap_small
LGT Safeco Field Meet Up?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

2012 MLB Power Rankings - May 21st
Kerry Wood hangs 'em up
I did not like Cleveland Municipal Stadium. Like it? How could anyone like...
Garko gets another shot
Broadcaster Rankings (Radio): 30-21
Indians at Fenway don't drink beer; they watch TV.
Michael Brantley: A Studious 4-for-5 Night
Damon Makes His Case for HOF
Casey Blake to Retire
To longtoss, or not to longtoss

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4