Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Heating Up: Miami Evens Series; LeBron, Wade Take Charge

Game 60: Indians 7, Nationals 2

The past, the present, and the future.


Stephen Strasburg's start on Sunday may get more national headlines, but tonight's game is much more important to Indians fans, for it marked the major-league debut of Carlos Santana. Normally a top prospect starts his career towards the bottom of the lineup, but Manny Acta placed Santana in the spot traditionally reserved for the team's best hitter. And you know what? Aside from Shin-Soo Choo and Austin Kearns, Santana may be Cleveland's best hitter even without having played a game. He probably would have been in the majors last year had his status been determined exclusively by his bat; he finished the 2009 AA season with a .290/.413/.530 line, and followed that up with an even better performance in AAA (.316/.447/.597). In his minor-league career, he's drawn more walks (333) than strikeouts (322), and unlike Michael Brantley, he's paired patience with power (.499 slugging percentage).

So why did he stay in the minors until the beginning of June? After all, the Indians weren't going anywhere, and they could have used his bat. The stated reason was that he needed to work on some of his defensive skills, although one unstated reason was service time; if Santana stayed in the minors until June, he wouldn't qualify for "Super 2" arbitration status after the 2012 season. And, like Strasburg, he just happened to make his debut days after that threshold had been reached.

In his first inning in the majors, the Nationals tested Santana's arm. Nyger Morgan reached first base on an infield single, and got a good jump off Jake Westbrook on his way to second base. But Santana made a strong and accurate throw to nab Morgan in a close play. That play proved key, for Washington would get two more doubles in the inning, and Westbrook was struggling to get the ball down early in the game. But thanks to the caught stealing, Jake got out of the first relatively unscathed. He'd get better as the game went on, and pitched into the seventh. Westbrook hasn't had consistent command on his sinker since coming back, but it seems to me that his changeup is light years better than before his surgery. He struck out five tonight, mostly on changeups.

Santana's didn't get a hit in his major-league debut, but he did score a run after reaching base on a fielder's choice in the first. He hit a sharp grounder to second baseman Adam Kennedy, who should have started a double play but bobbled the ball. Kennedy would prolong the inning further by muffing a much easier grounder off the bat of Russell Branyan. The Indians would take advantage of the opportunity, as Austin Kearns didn't miss a hanging curve, hitting the Luis Atilano offering into the left field bleachers for a three-run homer. The Indians would have several opportunities to break the game open off Atilano; in the fourth, after Kearns homered again, Travis Hafner walked, and Jhonny Peralta doubled to place runners on second and third with nobody out. The Indians couldn't get at least Hafner home. But in the sixth, the Indians chased Atilano from the game; Travis Hafner homered, and this time the Indians followed up a leadoff home run with more runs.

The one bad aftertaste to this otherwise satisfying win was another bad appearance by Tony Sipp. He came in to face Adam Dunn after Westbrook left, but walked him. Acta immediately pulled him, and although Chris Perez finished things out tonight, the Indians can't survive with just one good late-inning reliever.

20100611_nationals_indians_0_76_lbig__medium

via www.fangraphs.com

 

Highest WPA Lowest WPA
Austin Kearns .311 Jason Donald -.047
Jake Westbrook .186 Trevor Crowe -.041
Travis Hafner .071 Luis Valbuena -.029

Comment 37 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Let's Go Tribe

Game 41: Marlins 5, Indians 3

May 2012 by Ryan - 77 comments

Game 39: Marlins 3, Indians 2

May 2012 by Ryan - 19 comments

Game 37: Indians 9, Mariners 3

May 2012 by Ryan - 63 comments

Game 35: Indians 5, Twins 4

May 2012 by Ryan - 31 comments

Game 34: Red Sox 12, Indians 1

May 2012 by Ryan - 55 comments

Comments

Display:

You know the old movie cliche where the tough detective/cop/bodyguard/hitman is assigned to watch over the hot girl…and no matter how hard he tries, he always falls in love?

That’s how it is with Kearns. We all know that if he hits, he’s gone. And we shouldn’t get attached, after all, his role here is to get traded.

It’s too late for me.

by dgcambridge on Jun 12, 2010 8:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Sipp = send down and refocus.

by dgcambridge on Jun 12, 2010 8:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Yep. Agree completely.

Also! That is a great caption.

Also Also! The mlb.com recap vid is great.

Armando Galarraga gave up a 420-foot drive to Mark Frickin' Grudzielanik.

by westbrook on Jun 12, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, and great game. Love the caption.

by dgcambridge on Jun 12, 2010 8:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Sipp looked like a guy that had no confidence he could throw a fastball for a quality strike.

by TribeJay on Jun 12, 2010 9:23 AM EDT reply actions  

I thought Westbrook’s slider/slurve was really good, and that’s been a better pitch for him than 2 years ago. But his cutter has never really come back to what it was. Just my opinion, though.

by TribeJay on Jun 12, 2010 9:25 AM EDT reply actions  

I suppose here is as good a place as any to admit this: I was way too worried about Chisenhall’s shoulder. I’m sorry if I got anyone else worked up.

Come on, four billion!

by Joel D on Jun 12, 2010 10:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Are you kidding? I’m still worried! ;)

by TribeJay on Jun 12, 2010 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

The whole slugging-.800 thing isn’t convincing you?

by Jay on Jun 12, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

just joking….giving it to junkballer.

by TribeJay on Jun 12, 2010 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

We have another late inning reliever, the Herrmannator, making two in all. Luxury.

by MTF on Jun 12, 2010 10:38 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Not worth a fanshot, so I’ll just drop it in here: Looks like our favorite Buffalo resident just interviewed for the Orioles job.

Before taking Pro-Acta, please consult your doctor. Do not taunt Pro-Acta.

by Ockus_NYC on Jun 12, 2010 10:57 AM EDT reply actions  

The radio fellas seem to imply every time they see Jake that he has a better change than they’ve seen before. So considering it keeps getting better every start and this years is better than those past, I imagine it is quite good at the moment.

Armando Galarraga gave up a 420-foot drive to Mark Frickin' Grudzielanik.

by westbrook on Jun 12, 2010 12:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Logically, it should be capable of time travel by the end of the season.

Tribe fan trapped in Kansas

by Avindian on Jun 12, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

In the recap picture, the future looks indeed bullish.

by jayme on Jun 12, 2010 12:34 PM EDT reply actions  

I made it to the game, in seats close to the visitor’s dugout. I don’t know if this was picked up on TV, but Acta didn’t look pleased with Sipp at all when he came out to get him.

I would also guess Santana is tired of hearing “Black Magic Woman” for his walk-up music.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Jun 12, 2010 1:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Was this well known? I just heard it on MLB Tonight and thought it was awesome.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Jun 12, 2010 2:01 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

First, it definitely ought to be “Oye Como Va”.

Second, they should save it for exciting situations, maybe close/late or RISP.

Third, anything would be better than “Smooth”.

by Jay on Jun 12, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

It should be the Fleetwood Mac version.

by odradek on Jun 12, 2010 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

First off, “Oye Como Va” is a Tito Puente tune. “Black Magic Woman” is the Fleetwood Mac song written by Peter Green, back in the day when Fleet/Mac was a pretty good band – before the two chicks took over.

Resident LGT results-oriented boob.

by mauichuck on Jun 12, 2010 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Popular songs have many authors. Actually, I should say that popular tracks have many authors, because what most music lovers are obsessed with is specific recordings of songs, not the songs themselves.

So, each track is based on a song. The song has one or more composers. The track, in addition to being based on a song which has one or more composers, also has a recording artist, i.e., the main performer to whom the track is attributed. The composer owns the basic song and must be paid royalties, but the track is owned by the recording artist or his/her record company. The track also has a recording producer, who in some sense can be considered its author, not unlike the way a director authors a film even if he didn’t write it.

Anyway. You say “Oye Como Va” is a Tito Puente tune, but what does that mean?

The “Oye Como Va” which tens of millions instantly recognize is a track by the recording artist Santana of a song composed by Tito Puente. You might as well say that “Man In The Mirror” is a “Siedah Garrett and Glen Ballard tune.” Sure, they wrote it, but of course it’s well known as a Michael Jackson track.

Bet you can’t tell me (without looking it up) the screenwriter for hardly any Eastwood flicks. It sure as hell ain’t Clint.

by Jay on Jun 12, 2010 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Clint Eastwood is a hack.

I am shocked to discover that Tito Puente used to be in Fleetwood Mac.

by odradek on Jun 12, 2010 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m sure this is exactly what Elvis and the Colonel told Lieber, Stoller and Big Mama Thorton.

Resident LGT results-oriented boob.

by mauichuck on Jun 12, 2010 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Songwriters do just fine in the grand scheme of things, as long as they don’t sign away their rights. When the recording artist’s work gets more or less cloned for a commercial or soundtrack, they get nothing, but the songwriter still gets paid.

by Jay on Jun 13, 2010 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

The "Oye Como Va" which tens of millions instantly recognize is a track by the recording artist Santana

This needs a little editing. It should read “tens of millions of Anglos instantly recognize” etc. Just like tens of millions of white people recognize “Shake, Rattle and Roll” as a Bill Haley track and never think of Big Joe Turner or “tens of millions of suburban white boys” recognize “Hard to Handle” as a Black Crows song and never think of Otis Redding.

Still don’t make it right.

Resident LGT results-oriented boob.

by mauichuck on Jun 13, 2010 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh come on, everyone loves that Otis Redding track.

Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile

by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Jun 13, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

More or less negating your entire point:

  • Big Joe Turner didn’t write “Shake Rattle and Roll”.
  • Redding didn’t live to see the release of any version of “Hard to Handle”, but his heirs got the royalties for both of them.
  • Carlos Santana is not a white American.

by Jay on Jun 13, 2010 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

You seem focused on the monetary end here. Like Paulie Walnuts was sayin’ in the up-scale coffee ship, “Those cazzi mericons is rapin’ the culture”.

So you don’t think that every Bobby-Soxer in 1959 didn’t think that Bill Haley wrote, arranged and performed “Shake, Rattle and Roll”? And that all those pimply-faced suburban kids thought that “Too Hard To Handle” was a Chris Robinson creation? and that just because he isn’t white Carlos Santana can’t exploit a fellow Latino?

Not everythings about money.

Resident LGT results-oriented boob.

by mauichuck on Jun 14, 2010 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, not everything is about money.

Culture is a constantly evolving thing. Bill Haley didn’t “rape” Big Joe Turner any more than Big Joe Turner “raped” the guys who actually wrote the song. And unless I vastly misunderstood The Sopranos, Paulie Walnuts was an idiot.

You suggested that it’s only gringos who think Carlos Santana originated “Oye Como Va”. I’m no expert on this, but I’m willing to bet that Santana is much more famous in the Latino world than Puente, as is Santana’s version of “Oye Como Va”.

It’s not nothing to do with race or rape, and everything to do with who created the version that is compelling enough to make a permanent imprint on pop culture. You probably know that Otis Redding wrote “Respect”, but that hardly makes Aretha Franklin some kind of also-ran — let alone a “rapist.”

by Jay on Jun 14, 2010 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

So to be exploited in the Chuck world-view, do you have to be the original artist or the songwriter? And what do we do with people like Neil Diamond, who wrote several of the songs popularized by the Monkees, only to see their “cover” versions released before he could release the originals? Who’s the exploiter there?

Of course, to people like my kids, the entire idea of ownership of culture is an outdated concept. Everything is recorded, cut, remixed, recorded again. There’s no expectation whatsoever that the person you are hearing has any claim over what they are performing, just a claim over the performance.

Also! When I think of Hard to Handle, I think of the Dead.

by FredOx on Jun 14, 2010 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand the decline of primacy, but the problem is—whenever I discover the original —I almost always prefer it to the subsequent versions. Chris Robinson (or Pigpen) over Otis? Big Mama Thornton over Elvis? Santana over Fleetwood Mac? Monkees over Neil Diamond? It would be easier to list versions that surpassed the originals, like Hendrix’s version of “All Along the Watch Tower” or James Carr’s “At the Dark End of the Street.”

by odradek on Jun 15, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

personally, I typically prefer the version I heard first, whether it be the original or the remake. For example, I prefer the Roger Daltrey version of Don’t Let the Sun Go Down On Me rather than Elton John’s version because I heard it first from the Lost Boys soundtrack. I may have heard the earlier version from Elton John when I was younger, but the version I recall best is this Daltrey version.

Tainited Love by Soft Cell and Always Something There to remind Me by Naked Eyes are two other remakes from 60s Motown that I like better than the originals.

by talonk on Jun 16, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I vote for “Soul Sacrifice” – you know with RISP.

Resident LGT results-oriented boob.

by mauichuck on Jun 12, 2010 3:10 PM EDT reply actions  

In case you forgot what a strong tune this is here’s a clip. This was actually written by Carlos unlike the other three tunes mentioned above.

Resident LGT results-oriented boob.

by mauichuck on Jun 12, 2010 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plus, that might cause Woodstock flashbacks among the old-timers.

by FredOx on Jun 12, 2010 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

This from songfacts:

Carlos Santana later said he was on acid during his Woodstock performance, and the reason he looks a little harrassed is that his guitar kept turning into a snake, and he would have to change it back so he could go on playing. It’s not certain whether he took the brown acid (which was initially given out free to musicians at the show) but perhaps this is one of the experiences that led announcers to warn people that the brown acid wasn’t too good.

So, flashbacks, yeah, right.

Resident LGT results-oriented boob.

by mauichuck on Jun 12, 2010 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

That is fantastic stuff. I always wondered why he looks so angry in the documentary.

by NickFantana on Jun 12, 2010 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Indians70sicon_small
Youkilis for Pure Rage
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #36
Topps1978-332f_small
Historical Timeline
427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small
Pick 6 Discussion
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #35
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #34
Small
Indians 2012 Player At Bat Music
Etat_small
Tribe Observations - 15 games In
Draft_lens6670022module54040272photo_1251768414louissockalexisicon4b_small
LGT, in the belly of the beast.
Tribe_cap_small
LGT Safeco Field Meet Up?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

2012 MLB Power Rankings - May 21st
Kerry Wood hangs 'em up
I did not like Cleveland Municipal Stadium. Like it? How could anyone like...
Garko gets another shot
Broadcaster Rankings (Radio): 30-21
Indians at Fenway don't drink beer; they watch TV.
Michael Brantley: A Studious 4-for-5 Night
Damon Makes His Case for HOF
Casey Blake to Retire
To longtoss, or not to longtoss

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4