Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

Game 87: Rays 4, Indians 0


Matt Garza struggled his last start (3 IP, 7 H, 4 ER), but didn't show many signs of that tonight, allowing just one hit and 1 walk in six innings. The Indians hit did the ball hard several times off Garza, including a line drive back to the Garza that he caught in self-defense. In the ninth, the Indians would have at least got on the scoreboard if not for a very nice defensive play by Evan Longoria, who turned a likely Andy Marte single into a double play. Austin Kearns followed with a double that would have plated at least one.

But what I really want to spend some time on is Aaron Laffey. Sure, he managed to pitch into the sixth inning this time, just an out away from attaining a modern quality start, but despite the results his stuff was alarmingly bad. The best velocity he could muster was (I believe) 85 mph, and that not only means that his fastball is now well below his normal high-80s velocity, but it makes his high-70s slider that much more hittable since there's not much of a velocity gap between it and his heater. Perhaps he's going through a dead arm period that's in some way related to his recent usage as a reliever, or perhaps there's something wrong with his arm, but either way he's not going to survive in the majors with that kind of stuff. The Aaron Laffey who had success as a starter was a pitcher who threw in the high 80s, got lots of ground balls, hit the corners, and mixed in an occasional slider or changeup to keep hitters off his sinker. This version struggles to hit 85, can't hit his spots, and is often missing high. Yes, he's getting away with it for now, but he's not going to be successful much longer. I'd guess that Carlos Carrasco is in the rotation after the All-Star Break, and Laffey will be on the DL; I just can't believe that that much of a drop in velocity is due to a tired arm.

Travis Hafner left today's game with stiffness in his back. He was scheduled to sit for tomorrow's game anyway (Santana is getting an "off day" and will DH), but back injuries sometimes linger longer than just a couple days.

20100710_indians_rays_0_51_lbig__medium

via www.fangraphs.com


Highest WPA Lowest WPA
Jhonny Peralta .038 Michael Brantley -.089
Frank Herrmann .034 Andy Marte -.087
Carlos Santana .009 Jason Donald -.082

Comment 42 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Let's Go Tribe

Soylent green is people (May 12, 2011)

May 2011 by APV - 10 comments

Game 34: Indians 5, Rays 4

May 2011 by Ryan - 63 comments

Game Seven: Indians 12, Mariners 3

Apr 2011 by Ryan - 22 comments

Comments

Display:

One point the Rays broadcasters made that I thought was fair was that Laffeys location tonight seemed pretty haphazard too, even though he ended up with 56 strikes out 102 pitches thrown.

by MTF on Jul 10, 2010 11:06 PM EDT reply actions  

56 of 102 is an unacceptable ratio.

It’s not only that he’s not throwing strikes. It’s that the strikes he’s throwing are over the middle of the plate.

by xrickx on Jul 10, 2010 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yankees Deem Swisher Worthless Enough to Compete in HR Derby

Must not be here for baseball either. Because that isn't what we're playing.

by westbrook on Jul 11, 2010 12:02 AM EDT reply actions  

With run scoring down, a quality start isn’t worth what it used to be. Mitch Talbot, with his 3.99 ERA, is right at the park-adjusted league average.

by Jay on Jul 11, 2010 1:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Sign me up for at least 2.5 more seasons of that, and we’ll talk when arbitration time comes. That’s gone about as well as it could have, eh?

by xrickx on Jul 11, 2010 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

The park-adjusted league average pitcher is underrated.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Jul 11, 2010 2:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed. I’m thrilled with Talbot. I’m just saying, a QS represents a 4.50 ERA, which usually is right around league average, but not this year.

by Jay on Jul 11, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

At minimum, a QS has a 4.50 ERA.

by YoDaddyWags on Jul 11, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or should I say at maximum?

by YoDaddyWags on Jul 11, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Possibly we should recalibrate the QS threshold each year based on league averages. You keep the same 3 ER requirement, but you add and subtract outs (thirds of an inning).

by Jay on Jul 11, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then you’d have managers’ pulling guys at 6.1 innings to inhibit expensive quality-start liability.

by odradek on Jul 11, 2010 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ha, obviously that would be ridiculous, but then managers do let the Win and Save stat affect their decisions…

by dgcambridge on Jul 11, 2010 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

… which is exactly as ridiculous, not one bit less.

by Jay on Jul 12, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

White is pitching very well in AA. I am excited; he might be our best pitching prospect when the end of the season is over, if he isn’t already.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Jul 11, 2010 2:49 AM EDT reply actions  

His numbers are baffling.

by afh4 on Jul 11, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

His home GB rate is 60% and BABIP is .155. That might cover up a mediocre K rate for awhile (until it doesn’t).

by MTF on Jul 11, 2010 12:08 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Was nice to see him rack up 7 in 6 IP last night.

by stuart dean on Jul 11, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Atkins on White from Lastoria

[Things to focus on are] developing a little bit more swing and miss to his pitches, developing a little more four-seam fastball command, and not relying on the sink of the two-seamer to get the groundballs. We love the groundballs, but if he starts to get the swing-and-miss too then we have something exceptionally special and not just a Major League pitcher.

Link here.

by stuart dean on Jul 11, 2010 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I follow that. It’s just that I’ve got to give him some credit for his run prevention because he is so highly regarded by scouts.

by afh4 on Jul 11, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, but you really can’t give anyone credit for a .155 BABIP.

by Jay on Jul 11, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then why do scouts still love him so much? Because the numbers say he does basically nothing right.

by afh4 on Jul 11, 2010 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Huh, he doesn’t get a ton of groundballs?

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Jul 11, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not even 2.0 GO/AO. Not a perfect stat by any measure but it’s all I’ve got.

by afh4 on Jul 12, 2010 3:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

I should point out that all I have to go on is the minor league numbers of our other heavy groundballers-Gardner rocks a 2.71, when Laffey was coming up it was over 2.5, etc.

by afh4 on Jul 12, 2010 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

firstinning.com gives his GB%, which I think is the percentage of balls in play on the ground, a better number. Since his promotion to Akron he’s been getting 58%, which is a pretty big number. It is actually a higher number than Laffey has put up since 2007. Masterson has been in the 60-65% range since coming from Boston. His control has also been exception since joining Akron (6.8 BB%). But the K-rate (14.8% since his promotion) and BABIP (.200) do raise some red flags.

by APV on Jul 12, 2010 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

That seems like a lot of squinting. All I’m saying is that if he’s actually a top 50 prospect, that’s because of some non-statistical factors that, as of yet, I haven’t read a great report on. If he’s actually awesome, I’m sure I’ll understand soon.

My fear, of course, is that his numbers reflect exactly what he is-not that good of a prospect having a nice run.

Gardner plays on my thinking too-I thought White’s numbers, at Kinston at least, would look more like Gardner’s.

by afh4 on Jul 12, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

He’s at 56% GB% at AA. That is an excellent number.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Jul 12, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe the scouts see something that suggests that he’s going to be a good pitcher. The numbers suggest that at the moment, he isn’t one. The fact that the scouts’ opinions may coincide with present-day superficial success may well just be a coincidence; bigger ones happen all the time.

by Jay on Jul 12, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

The superficial stats say he hasn’t been, at least. We know nothing of things like swinging strike percentage, for example. Point is the sample is super small to be making judgments.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Jul 13, 2010 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Tango’s point is a fine one, i.e., that Neyer shouldn’t have used the words “almost every time.”

You will actually lose money about 70% of the time if you bet on one pitcher.

If you bet on a pool of maybe 10 pitchers, you’d lose money almost every time.

by Jay on Jul 13, 2010 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Speaking of Neyer, I read something today from him that said Jimenez starting the All Star game tonight for the NL was a joke because he wasn’t even a top 3 pitcher in the NL (this season.) I get WAR is everyone’s favorite stat, but I found this asinine to complain about. Am I wrong for thinking this?

by Roger Dorn on Jul 13, 2010 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not in my book. This whole thing is ceremonial anyway, so it seems like more of a “joke” to fret over who’s pitching the 1st inning rather than the 4th.

Plus, it’s an odd game with its own odd, strategic considerations. Maybe the decision was influenced by matchups with the AL starting lineup, who largely won’t be in the game later on.

by Jay on Jul 13, 2010 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

It doesn’t matter who pitches what inning, but it’s an honor. I’d be pretty surprised if it was matchups. The reason he’s starting is that he’s 15-1, and he got off to a great start. We’ll probably have to wait at least 20 years until W-L record is further diminished as a stat.

by TribeJay on Jul 13, 2010 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

It has already been diminished somewhat, as evidenced by Greinke’s Cy Young. It’s just tough to diminish it to the point where 15-1 isn’t considered eye-popping. I mean, at that point, it’s being totally ignored.

by Jay on Jul 13, 2010 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ken Schrom.

Blake: Thanks to you, I am damaged beyond repair!!

by emd2k3 on Jul 13, 2010 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

For reference, the only Indians pitching prospects with consecutive seasons with a BABIP below .280 are as follows:

Carrasco, ‘06-’07 (.228-.255)
Espino, ‘09-’10 (.265-.263)

It is actually really hard to find any Indian prospects with a history of BABIP under .300, let alone .280.

by APV on Jul 13, 2010 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

So they’ll just have to find some other way to disappoint us.

by Jay on Jul 13, 2010 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not really that surprising, if you mean the reduced strikeouts.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Jul 11, 2010 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see a guy who doesn’t do anything that well-he walks too many, doesn’t have huge K’s, doesn’t have huge GBs, but yet he’s got this arm that everyone really likes and he prevents runs.

Shrugs. I’d rather have him with lousy peripherals than 2008 David Huff and his great periphs, I guess.

by afh4 on Jul 12, 2010 3:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Except he does have huge GB’s and is young for his level. The strikeouts will come.

LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.

by Joe. on Jul 12, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01731_small
Some quick questions for the locals
Etat_small
Eric's 2012 Cleveland Indians Projections...
Its_alive-fstn_small
Oswalt > Carmona/Heredia
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #24
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian — "Country Peach Passion"
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "Fridge Magnet"
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #23
Small
Seriously Go Get Carlos Peña Now
Avatard_small
Indians by the Numbers — #22
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian: "Fridge Magnet"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

A look back at the last Tribe arbitration hearing
MLB.COM Tribe Top 20
Jared Goedert is Puddin Head Jones
Chisenhall v.  Hannahan
After watching Lindor in the Fall Instructional League, I have very little...
Coming off of an optimistic 80-82 season, is this the Indians window to win?  

See full post on Beyond the Box Score
Praising the Indians offseason
Brooks Baseball Stats
Hello my friends! I hope you guys are ready for Super Bowl Weekend? Make...
Heyman reporting Indians will sign Kotchman

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4